User talk:SharonmoncyCS1 error on Mrz thoppiHello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Mrz thoppi, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:46, 16 November 2023 (UTC) Mrz thoppiYou are edit warring and if you persist I will report you. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 08:03, 16 November 2023 (UTC) Mrz thoppi moved to draftspaceThanks for your contributions to Mrz thoppi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jamiebuba (talk) 08:59, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Mrz thoppi (November 16) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ratnahastin was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Deletion discussion about St Thomas Church, NalukodyHello Sharonmoncy, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, St Thomas Church, Nalukody, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St Thomas Church, Nalukody. Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top. If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) Grahaml35 (talk) 14:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: St Mary's Church, Parel (November 23) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
The Hope (2023) moved to draftspaceThanks for your contributions to The Hope (2023). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mekomo (talk) 15:15, 1 December 2024 (UTC) |