User talk:SahabAliwadia

Archives

Update this page

Nomination of Zara Noor Abbas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zara Noor Abbas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zara Noor Abbas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 17:56, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User warnings

I don't see Roman Empire 29 (talk · contribs) posting any defamatory or libellous material on Alif Allah Aur Insaan (TV series). I think you need to stop giving people invalid warnings. --Saqib (talk) 18:01, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib: It is only because you have your big eyes on me and forget to look after other users. Well first see then ask. And if you don't find, I am telling you. He wrote "Hamiz burki as uncle" and something like that in the cast of Alif Allah which is libellous because it is not real. Don't do this mistake again. Thanks 😡 SahabAli^говорити 11:39, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RfA's

You have nominated at least two users for adminship without checking with them if they are willing to become admins. Both users withdraw their nominations as a result. I strongly suggest you to check with the user you want to nominate for adminship before you make their entry or otherwise it would be considered disruptive editing. --Saqib (talk) 20:38, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib: Blah Blah Blah! What you want me to do? SahabAli^говорити 11:41, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Any more of that and you'll lose access to this talk page. You still have access solely so you can show, at some point in the future, that you should be unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 12:22, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeating the same behavior as soon as you were unblocked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Vanjagenije (talk) 21:27, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, as soon as your previous block expired, you contained the very same behavior that I outlined here. Here, you gave an IP editor an "only warning" for "vandalism". His only edit to the article is not a vandalism. I told you to familiarize yourself with WP:VANDALISM, but you failed to do so. Also, here you accused an editor for making "defamatory or libellous" edits, althout there is nothing of that kind in their edits. I also noted that you nominated two other editors for administrators without reading WP:RfA (it clearly says If you wish to nominate someone else, check with them before making the nomination page). Here you nominated for deletion an the same article that you already nominated a month ago, claiming that other editors were "mistaken", and then you closed the same discussion as "keep" less than 24 hour later. All this (and more) shows that you are not willing nor able to stop your disruptive behavior of for which you were already blocked. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:45, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Might I add to this behavioural trend – for the benefit of Vanjagenije and Yunshui – this Afd, which you renominated within one month of the previous Afd having been closed as a keep. I was thankful that you chose to heed my advice and withdrew the nomination. Your editing, as listed above, has been quite disruptive. I really don't know how you'll respond, but a good start would be to voluntarily stick to areas where you might make few, critical mistakes. If you make it past this indef, feel free to ask me about how to traverse this world without making too many mistakes. Warmly. Lourdes 17:31, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Catherine Hettinger has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Catherine Hettinger. Thanks! JSFarman (talk) 20:16, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@JSFarman: I've been blocked for some another reason but like if you improve this article and take help of others SahabAli^говорити 11:35, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aiman Khan (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ProgrammingGeek was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aiman Khan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ProgrammingGeek^talktome 17:19, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! SahabAliwadia, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ProgrammingGeek^talktome 17:19, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muneeb Butt (November 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muneeb Butt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:57, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Your signature is also causing Tidy bug affecting font tags wrapping links.

You are encouraged to change

<span>[[User:SahabAliwadia|<span style="color:#3D7D0C;">'''SahabAli'''</span>]][[User talk:SahabAliwadia|<sup style="color:#045315;">'''говорити'''</sup>]]</span> → SahabAli^говорити

to

[[User:SahabAliwadia|<span style="color: #3D7D0C">'''SahabAli'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:SahabAliwadia|<span style="color: #045315">'''говорити'''</span>]]</sup> → SahabAli^говорити

Respectfully, Anomalocaris (talk) 18:35, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Philipp Budeikin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philipp Budeikin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philipp Budeikin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 8==8 Boneso (talk) 23:10, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Catherine Hettinger concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Catherine Hettinger, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Catherine Hettinger

Hello, SahabAliwadia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Catherine Hettinger".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:02, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Asim Azhar concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Asim Azhar, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SahabAliwadia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm extremely sorry for what I did 3 years ago here for which I was blocked; it was totally my fault I should not have done it, it was totally bad of me that I was engaged in disruptive editing, sockpuppetry and bad behaviour but instead of accepting my mistake I used to become angry on administrators although they wanted to keep all things right...I used to think they had personal grudge for me but they were all doing it for betterment of Wikipedia and their actions were justifiable... I can't believe in myself anymore but will try my best to be better than before....Having watched my block log and my repeated behaviour each time, I don't deserve to be unblocked but I assure that I will not disappoint anyone this time and you can block me again if you catch me doing it all again.....Thanks! SahabAli^говорити 18:13, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your block log suggests that you've already had several second chances over five years. I see no reason to accept this request. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:18, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The exact text of my decline message at UTRS is as follows: "As you still have access to your talk page, and as there is no private information associated with your appeal, please post your unblock request to your user talk page for administrator review. You can follow the guide at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks." --Yamla (talk) 18:38, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this :) SahabAli^говорити 19:06, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vanjagenije It's been 12 days since my unblock request :( please have a look... Sorry for mentioning actually some years ago administrators used to quickly respond to unblock requests... But now almost 2 weeks have passed and no response..what has happened.... :( SahabAli^говорити 18:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sir Yamla what is happening here... :( Almost 2 weeks since my request...can you do anything please... SahabAli^говорити 05:18, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is happening is that no administrator is willing to accept your request. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:13, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vanjagenije but they haven't even declined it... What can be the possible reason behind this :( I guess no administrator has hovered over this request otherwise they would respond....I am ready to wait SahabAli^говорити 10:32, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Please help me admins...I don't know why my unblock request is not getting any attention from 2 weeks :( Please respond to my unblock request or else please procedurely decline my request so that I can request unblock again...Thanks --SahabAli^говорити 07:12, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Admins are volunteers like most other editors, and do what they can when they can. You may use the time you are waiting to attempt to make your request more persuasive instead of just creating a new one. 331dot (talk) 08:59, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

331dot So means my request is not persuasive? :( hmm ok I will try...SahabAli^говорити 11:08, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rosguill You are absolutely right I have been given several chances before I myself was surprised by my block log because I was unavailable onto it from 3 years...Everything has changed in these 3 years I also have tried my best to change myself and will now edit constructively once given chance... I know I don't deserve to be forgiven but I assure that you will never receive any complain from me now... Thankyou SahabAli^говорити 10:32, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SahabAliwadia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand that I'm unforgivable with respect to my block log where I've always repeated same behaviour again and again.. 3 years have passed into it and I have tried to change myself alot during these years and I assure that if I'm given a last chance you will not have any complain from me.... I admit that before 3 years it was my own fault that had me blocked and administrators always tried to correct me for those things in a most pleasant way but I dissuaded them instead of correcting myself, it is shame for me :( But now I will now do constructive edits and not have disruptive behaviour anymore once given a chance...please grant me last chance...thanks SahabAli^говорити 06:58, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There's not much that can be offered in this situation, but perhaps this is a last way out: Please have a look at the "Core free-knowledge projects" list at meta:Complete_list_of_Wikimedia_projects. This might be Wikipedia in another language, this might be the Wiktionary; it could be any project. Or multiple. In no less than six months, preferably a year or two, please add another unblock request here, pointing to your constructive contributions at Special:CentralAuth/SahabAliwadia. Please ping me in your request ({{u|ToBeFree}} ~~~~) and ask for the reviewing administrator to notify me on my talk page. I promise to have a detailed look at your contributions, and I am very likely to unblock you if your edits have not led to recent warnings or blocks elsewhere. If you accept this offer, please stop making any edits on the English Wikipedia until you're ready for the request. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:04, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Admins please help I have throughly seen and checked my unblock request and corrected it wherever necessary...It's been more than 2 weeks, can I know the reason behind no response from admins? :( Please? SahabAli^говорити 16:08, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your request is open and visible; help requests are unnecessary. 331dot (talk) 16:30, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

331bot oh sorry for disturbing... I am actually confused why it isn't getting any attention; not even procedurely declined, so that I can request again...Thanks for your assistance I wish you could review my unblock request too... SahabAli^говорити 16:34, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]