|
User talk:Rex the firstFor anyone who has something to say, please go ahead! Welcome Wikipedia:Bootcamp teaches you the basics quickly, The following links might also come in handy: freetekI think that's a good idea (re: wikiproject on freetekno) it seems that Free parties are an aspect of the larger free tekno movement, but that could just be semantics. A merger sounds like a good idea, I suggest we use the name freeteknoas it is more specific than the somewhat ambiguous 'free parties'. Someone could think "oh, free party, that means I don't pay" but freetekno always implies some sort of culture or intention, at least in my mind. youmight also want to check out the canadian freetek scene's mb at freetekno.toronto.on.ca comm-uni-cat-ion;)
I would for the template to have a name change but I can't think of anything better. As all types of parties are predominantly illegal (or at least have large illegal elements) I used Template:Illegalparty. If you can think of another feature that unites all the articles then please tell us! Rex the first talk | contribs 18:50, 12 May 2006 (UTC) Free PartiesHi Rex, I've finally signed up to wikipedia but was me who requested the NPOV on the above article. Have been to a fair few free parties in my time in the UK and Europe so will be adding anything I can think of to improve them. I disagee with the guy above that the two should be merged as the UK and European scene have enough differences that at least the English Wiki should have seperate sections. Would be happy to discuss any way of improving the articles with you. Raerth 06:19, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
more on free partieshi guys, i am also interested to sort out the tekno pages a bit ... i have been updating the teknival, freetekno, spiral tribe pages and would also like to look at the czechtek and free tekno pages. suburbass has a page which is very subjective and compared to other artists not listed here (eg crystal distortion) he is minor figure, but then hey, we can only move forward in slow steps!! for the record i agree with making free party and squat party the same page and leaving freetekno for canada, then i would add that free tekno needs developing as a musical genre page. i may do soemthing towards that, because other genre pages eg gabba and breakcore are much much better. but agin, i dont have so much time at my disposal... Mujinga 00:38, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
hoi rex, im back online after a bit and have unleashed my latest idea... im not sure if its really necessary or not, but it could be useful. feel free to add more english sisdems if you feel so inclined, at the mo' the list is very london-biased cheers! Mujinga 20:52, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
dstormhi rex, nice one for the dstorm story on teknival, i also remembered it and found a ref. on undercurrents Mujinga 04:52, 10 March 2006 (UTC) GabbaYou could change it back but in all honesty those links will just have to be changed manually. It happens all the time. I think it should remain as a disambiguation page. I don't think most Aussies would have a clue what Gabba music is! Dankru 07:21, 9 April 2006 (UTC) Hyde ParkRe changes to the bits about the Hyde Park Social - don't have a problem with it, but I think there's a bit more than just the Techno Scene involved and it seems a bit reductionist to keep it surrounding that. When I get time I'm going to get a bit more into the Hyde Park pages. I'll also have a look at some of the free party stuff - that may be towards the summer now when essays are out of the way. Are there any bits you particularly would like tinkered with? Acidsaturation 10:47, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
I wasn't sure if they were just taking the piss or not! Well, I pointed them to WP:Style and told them to get an account! Rex the first talk | contribs 19:56, 12 May 2006 (UTC) My edit to List of noteworthy ravesWhile we agreed the 2000 as a cutoff point... I think we need to use some common sense and be a bit more flexible. I readded the entry for full moon festival, yes it started in 2001, but its already run for longer than several others like Tunnel Rave, Biology, Energy, etc... perhaps we should make an exception for any series thats run for more than say 5 years as well? That would definately establish them as far as noteworthiness goes... I'm open for a discussion if you have an objection to this. ALKIVAR™
Eulerian/Lagrangian reference frameWould you mind if I merged them? I think they are needed but would be better in one article. Rex the first talk | contribs 20:37, 25 May 2006 (UTC) That's a great idea... It would be nice if the title was changed to reflect both (Lagrangian and Eulerian Coordinates), but I can't figure out how to do that once an article is created.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mooseo (talk • contribs) . In the top panel next to watch you can click on Move to chnage the page title. Also in you type ~~~~ at the end of you comments on talkpages it puts you name and datestamps it. Have a look at Help:Contents if you need any more help, or ask me at my talk page.Rex the first talk | contribs 12:21, 26 May 2006 (UTC) Sandbox categoryHello Rex the first. I noticed that in your scratchpad / draft / alternative article User:Rex the first/sandbox you have the categories still activated, so it's showing up in Category:Citation templates and in several others. Could I suggest that you deactivate the category links (by putting a colon before 'Category' in the link) until such time as the article is in the mainspace rather than the userspace? (As per WP:CG, "If you copy an article to your user namespace (for example, as a temporary draft or in response to an edit war) you should decategorize it".) Cheers! - Henge 21:00, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
illegal party templateHi Rex, got yr message after a few days without inet .. to me it seems a bit dumb to label 'illegal party' as NPOV, but maybe 'rave' or 'free party' would be better. i like 'free party' meself, but maybe thats also NPOV. er, 'underground party'? I would like the template to stay as i think it performs a useful function. Seeya later! Mujinga 13:04, 2 June 2006 (UTC) [1] Template:IllegalpartyHope you don't mind if I ask a few questions here as I seem to have written loads on the template page! I wrote most of the Free party#Law and Police section and have done research into this and I am confused as to the problem with the label 'illegal'. I agree that what is illegal in the UK is not illegal in Czech so maybe that adds a POV but there is no doubt that in many countries these parties are illegal, not just slightly but there are whole laws [2] [3] [4] against them so. I could find no law against them in Canada but there seems to be enough legal basis (I don't have any training in law but from what I can understand) in calling them illegal. Hope you don't mind me asking but nobody else seemed willing to defened their delete vote so if I can understand why then I'll try to make the template less POV. Rex the first talk | contribs 18:15, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, I think that makes sense. I would argue that most CzechTek's have been illigeal but then in Italy they aren't so it puts a UK/US bias. I have changed the name from Illegalparty to DIY Parties, hope this means it won't be deleted! Rex the first talk | contribs 09:02, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Cheers! Rex the first talk | contribs 09:11, 10 June 2006 (UTC) Yes I know, there are no #Morning and #Night sections in the article; I was planning to write the diffrences between morning psytrance (full on) and night psytrance (dark) today. Psychomelodic (people think User:Psychomelodic/me edit) 00:32, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
#$%^& psytrance,freetekno (hardtek/jungle) rule the nationAS spiral tribe put it best "the message is n the music" ..although psytrance deos have a seemingly nice message, the apparent scene that has formed from that message has been nothing but a cal to peacfull but conformist gatherings, overpriced and very self indulged parties, even the ones in goa, India, as can be scene in the soundconspiracy video touring to Goa, India. There is a psytrance scene heere in NYC, and they want nothing to do with freetekno, as similiar as the styles may be, the crowds are yuppified, hedonistic druggies ranging in ages from 21-50... now age is nothing but a number, but to be so close minded as to not accept the combining of fretekno soundsystem forces with psytrance forces, because of the need to "keep psyrance at its purest form" is very biased. This deos not go on just in NYC, this is a world wide phenomenom, its literally as if the alien gods have put psytrance and freetekno on earth to be at war with eatchother, we just cant get along the way an average freeparty person would expect. Not sure if its psytrance inability to veiw music as "free" since they spend so much money of expensive synths and parties. But there must be a reason, if you put modern hardtek and psytrance side by side, production skills are very similiar, but hardtek experiments with allot more drum patterns, while both styles can be monotonous, in psytrance you can always expect a melodic synth line to bring into another tune, whils't in hardtek the mixes just flow indoubetebly "freely" I noticed that in canada someone is throwing a "teknival" with no freetekno crews and just psytrance, someone better put this person in his place. Anyhow, i wanted Rex to not forget about us here in the U.states , there are countless soundsystems nowadays, main ones include.. renegadevirus.org, havocsound, pirateaudio23, Blackkat, Spaz, 5lowershop ,bassbot theese are all active travelling soundsystem collectives, and there are many more.. i will link eventually, you might find them on our site at renegadevirus.org just wanted to let you guys know what was up before psytrance sucks in your soul..hehehe peace and love--the sound the sound the sound========== foodstampz.aka wizdem I —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.38.250.127 (talk • contribs) . AtomThanks for cleaning up my mistake in atom, I reworded something that didn't make sense and then realised that the whole sentence was wrong but I was too tried! I was wondering what was wrong with the anti matter section, I thought that the change I made had not made it off topic and was a better summary of the main article, could you explain your concerns? Rex the first talk | contribs 19:27, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Fair, I added content on the section to as Titoxd suggested. Rex the first talk | contribs 06:14, 23 June 2006 (UTC) Hoi Rex, The List of free party sound systems is a candidate for deletion. It's a bit annoying since we already discussed it once on the talk page, and to me it is clearly notable, verifiable, useful etc etc. Anyway, your contribution to the debate is of course welcome. Here is the link. Mujinga 00:27, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Hi Rex, thanks for your note, yes its nice the list is not up for deletion now, but we are still discussing how best to do it over at Talk:List of free party sound systems if you feel like making any suggestions. Cheers! Mujinga 00:05, 19 July 2006 (UTC) For some reason I ended up at this page and saw that there seems to be no Conservatives and lots of Unionist MPs, was this a temporary name change or is something amiss? (I forgot to sign) Rex the first talk | contribs 23:21, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Cheers, I know nothing about it but saw that in both elections either side (1929 and 1923) there was no Unionist. Thanks for your reply! Rex the first talk | contribs 09:37, 20 July 2006 (UTC) You're using too many capitals in section headings. I did some downcasing. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style. Michael Hardy 22:59, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Add an external link for streamlinesWould you consider it as helpful for readers if we added an external link to existing software adressing streamline placement: http://www.cgal.org/Manual/3.2/doc_html/cgal_manual/Stream_lines_2/Chapter_main.html List of countries' endonyms (belated response)You're quite welcome. I had to dig in the archives to re-read your question and it was only half answered. It would be nice to also have a list of endonyms for the each nation's citizens. Cheers!---Sluzzelin 06:38, 27 September 2006 (UTC) Re: Template:Battlestar_Galactica_regularsI was wondering what was the problem with the comment about interwiki links on Template:Tnavbar? What did this do to Template:Battlestar_Galactica_regulars? Hope you don't mind me asking I just enjoyed playing with the template a while ago and wondered what the problem is now. Rex the first talk | contribs 12:45, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Tnavbar thanksGreetings Rex the first, now that a bit of time has passed I just wanted to drop you a note and express my appreciation to you for having improved Template:Tnavbar. Your code has made Tnavbar quite a bit more universal and easier to use in general. Cheers for that. (→Netscott) 03:47, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
vandalUser_talk:84.53.80.194 is at his vandalism again. Scoutersig 14:02, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
You must have User:Oblivious's talk page watchlisted or been tracking my edits... you didn't hesitate to jump on Template:V. LOL! Very nice... :-))) (→Netscott) 02:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk Rave
I re-removed the comment! No problems, I figured it was harmless as it was his own and un-addressed. After re-reading m:Right to vanish, I'd probably leave it alone next time. Thanks for all your help on this and other articles .. I hope to continue seeing you around ;). See you someday in the woods by the bassbins. ∴ here…♠ 01:07, 19 December 2006 (UTC) External link in PlymouthHello, I have a question, if you could please tell me why a Plymouth web directory (external address: http://plymouth.towndir.co.uk), which is absolutely free, isn't worth adding to the external links section in the Wiki description of Plymouth. the link was here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Plymouth&oldid=94475813 but after your modifications here, it dissapeared: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Plymouth&oldid=96647966 thank you for your help: Dominik Sipowicz admin@sipnet.krakow.pl —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.29.254.71 (talk) 19:11, 9 January 2007 (UTC).
Invite Bristol wikiproject Hello, this is an invitation to join WikiProject Bristol.Thank you for editing the article St Pauls, Bristol. You may be interested in joining WikiProject Bristol. This WikiProject aims to improve the standard of all articles relating to Bristol, which includes all subdivisions of the city, major buildings, roads and other related articles. You can help by:
For more information, see the project page, and if you have any questions you can leave them at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bristol and someone will get back to you. — Addbot (talk) 20:58, 23 February 2009 (UTC) — Rod talk 21:02, 5 March 2007 (UTC) UK ReligionsYour edit here removed a source about Imans on the Times. Was there a reason as you lef the ref tag in but put no link? Sorry this is a while ago but I just noticed the change! Rex the first talk | contribs 21:40, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
No worries! Though I should check if it was some sort of reminder for later. Rex the first talk | contribs 06:52, 13 March 2007 (UTC) Advection and advection equation mergeWhat in the devil are you doing?? If these are to be merged, it should be under advection, not advection equation. What you've done is like merging redirecting energy to an article called energy equation. That's backwards. The general topic comes first, the math later. Put the math in a subset of the main article, where everybody expects to find it. As is done for all physics topics where there is only one article. Are you trying to make a joke, here? SBHarris 23:50, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Crownest has expressed interest in reviving this. Since you were a member of the FD project (now converted into a taskforce), I'm wondering if you'd be a part of the Taskforce. The taskforce is undergoing a significant overhaul at the moment, and by the end of it, it should be fairly easy to get around and there should be a nifty compendium of useful tools for people interested in FD. Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 10:54, 26 February 2009 (UTC) Jimmy Wales event in Bristol.Hi, I thought that you might be interested in WT:WikiProject Bristol#Free Event: Jimmy Wales, Founder of Wikipedia, Talks in Bristol. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:00, 27 November 2010 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Tangram Housing Co-operative
A tag has been placed on Tangram Housing Co-operative requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. noq (talk) 19:23, 23 December 2011 (UTC) ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! Hello, Rex the first. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:Physics/ParticleDistributions
Please seehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Chickenpox#Text Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:02, 15 November 2018 (UTC) |
