User talk:Oleg Alexandrov

Write a new message. I will reply on this page, under your post.

---

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

---

Mathbot down

Hi Oleg. Just a heads-up that Mathbot hasn't run in over 24 hours. I'm guessing that this is related to wikitech:News/Toolforge Grid Engine deprecation, for what it's worth. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:31, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He is inactive for a long time, with fewer than 50 edits last year. Just a random Wikipedian^(talk) 03:20, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will take a look tomorrow. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:35, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I migrated the bot to the new way of doing things. Thank you for your note. I will keep an eye on it for a while. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 20:52, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Integration with other techniques" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Integration with other techniques has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 31 § Integration with other techniques until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:04, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment on De Moivre Talk Page

On the De Moivre Talk page you say:

By De Moivre's formula:

${\displaystyle (-1)^{1/2}=\left(\cos \pi +i\sin \pi \right)^{1/2}=\cos {\frac {\pi }{2}}+i\sin {\frac {\pi }{2}}=i\,}$

but also

${\displaystyle (-1)^{1/2}=\left(\cos 3\pi +i\sin 3\pi \right)^{1/2}=\cos {\frac {3\pi }{2}}+i\sin {\frac {3\pi }{2}}=-i\,}$

so you get two different answers which is not good.

Why do you think it is not good that there are two square roots. Is it also 'not good' that, for example, 3 has two square roots? Can you please explain why it's not good?37.228.204.111 (talk) 18:01, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christmas in the Park (San Jose) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christmas in the Park (San Jose) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christmas in the Park (San Jose) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

User:Namiba 15:23, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Hilbert Spaces and Fourier analysis" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Hilbert Spaces and Fourier analysis has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 28 § Hilbert Spaces and Fourier analysis until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:32, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hardy-Littlewood constant

Hello, Oleg Alexandrov. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hardy-Littlewood constant, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:07, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wiped that page and reinstated the redirect from Hardy-Littlewood constant to what was there before. This was somebody's abandoned scratch work. They can request getting it back if need be. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:58, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Simple zero" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Simple zero has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 7 § Simple zero until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:20, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]