User talk:Pur 0 0

Welcome

Hello, Pur 0 0, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Victor Schmidt (talk) 14:07, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Footnotes

For How to create footnotes, please see Help:Referencing for beginners. basically, you write your footnote text inside <ref></ref>. Example: [1]. The software behind Wikipedia will then do the rest for you. Victor Schmidt (talk) 14:13, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ This is an example footnote

Sri Lanka

I undid your edit per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking. Regards--Chanaka L (talk) 09:31, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And your edit was undone long back by someone else, and it has stayed ever since. I guess I was right this whole time haha. Pur 0 0 (talk) 19:19, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IAST Punjabi

Can you check Amrita Pritam's name transliteration is correct or not. Bairagi Ram (talk) 21:11, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no transliteration given on the page. Though if there was one, it should be Amṛtā Prītama. Pur 0 0 (talk) 19:12, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[Əੰm੍ɾਿt̪ਾ p੍ɾੀt̪m
I am talking about this one Bairagi Ram (talk) 13:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is called IPA. I'm sorry, but I don't know how to transliterate that. Especially not this one, since I don't know Punjabi alphabet. Pur 0 0 (talk) 13:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No problem....! Thanks Bairagi Ram (talk) 10:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indic Script

Hi, it is regarding recent changes/additions like this. Per WP:NOINDICSCRIPT, we are not supposed to add Indian scripts in article leads and infoboxes. We can have IPA or IAST instead. Please do the needful changes. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

From WP:NOINDICSCRIPT,
This avoidance of Indic scripts only applies to articles that are predominantly India-related and is excluded from, among others, articles about Hinduism, Buddhism, or any of India's neighbouring countries.
One reason Indian scripts are avoided is that there often are too many languages with their own native script, each of which can be original names for a topic. Additionally, there are too often problems with verifiability of the accuracy of the non-English spelling. A third reason is frequent disagreements over which native scripts to include; this led to a resolution to avoid all of them.
Basically IAST/IPA/ISO 15919 are all used when the article is regarding something relevant to India, not Hindi. Punjab Kesari is relevant to Hindi rather than India, as it is a Hindi newspaper. The fact that it happens to be Indian is irrelevant, since it is a company, so it can be used anywhere around the world. Pur 0 0 (talk) 11:41, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The same logic can be used for film articles, since those can be watched anywhere in the world. But, the film articles are one of the main reasons why this policy was enforced. I believe the native scripts should be removed, transliterations can suffice. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:10, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I concur with Fylindfotberserk, the newspaper/magazine articles that you've inserted Indic scripts into, are Indian and circulated in India,it makes them predominantly india related as the policy states, you would need to seek consensus from the community if you would like newspaper/magazine articles to be an exception to the rule. Thanks. Ratnahastin (talk) 13:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't know film articles were the reason why it was done. I thought it was done because of names of places and government related articles. Because I would have used the same logic to believe they should have indic scripts as well. Pur 0 0 (talk) 17:37, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of governors of Uttar Pradesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United Provinces. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 21:36, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Delhi Technological University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ahom rebellion has been accepted

Ahom rebellion, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 15:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Thanks for the article. I am still confused about the geographic location of the events: the article mentions the rebellion taking place in Rangpur, Bangladesh, but at the same time talks about "British rule in Assam" and Rangpur, Assam was the capital of the Ahom kingdom, and appears to be much closer to the Naga hills. Would it be possible to clarify this point? Thanks a lot! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 15:48, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi.
You're correct. It was in Rangpur, Assam. When I was linking the article, the Rangpur of Assam was not coming in the link, so I thought Rangpur is only in Bangladesh. I have corrected it. Pur 0 0 (talk) 11:04, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ISO

Where does WP policy state that the very confusing ISO transliteration that you have added en masse to many articles is required? If you want to make these changes, start an RfC at WT:INDIA and attempt to achieve a consensus, but before doing so, please undo your edits. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 15:35, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By the policy that textboxes have a field to be filled, and for because of that one rule I myself hate we have to use ISO 15919 instead of indic scripts. Below it says to use IPA. If you find ISO very confusing, I don't think you'll be able to handle IPA.
But anyway, it's not a hill I will die on. I just saw the message and was about to undo them, but you've already done it for me. Thanks for that. Pur 0 0 (talk) 03:17, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flags in Infoboxes

Please read MOS:INFOBOXFLAG and undo your edits. If you keep doing this, you are looking at penalties. Best regards Fowler&fowler«Talk» 15:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Saiman Says

Hello Pur 0 0, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Saiman Says, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saiman Says.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|GrabUp}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

GrabUp - Talk 15:34, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]