Hello, I'm Travelbird. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Phillyblog have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Travelbird (talk) 12:26, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello, this is my first day ever editing and I am new to this. I am not really sure if you are a person or a bot, though I guess you probably are a human user. However, I have been reading for years and this edit was actually years overdue and restored what was originally present years ago and which correctly is directly related to and exactly matches and corresponds to the subject matter itself, which someone else had replaced with spam. The external link added was the correct one which had originally appeared years ago and which matched the article subject itself before someone replaced it with their unrelated spam. Pub Int Law (talk) 13:11, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The problem arises when you simply remove parts of an article without explaining that either on the talk page or in the edit summary. removing an info box is not "spam removal". removing individual links is generally fine and will not cause any issues, unless you are removing references and are not replacing them. Travelbird (talk) 03:53, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
Please do not remove references, even if the link is dead, unless you can provide an equal link or reference. Travelbird (talk) 12:39, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
