User talk:Politsi

Hi. I'm not sure exactly how this works but I was reading the page on Taylor Swift and in her relationships part it doesn't include Taylor Lautner (or whatever). I realize thus makes me sound kind of nutty, but it should be fixed. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmosRoast (talk • contribs) 05:07, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello Politsi, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Politsi, good luck, and have fun. --Aboutmovies (talk) 07:18, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Your accusations

I actually really take offense to stupid accusations like that. First of all, there is no denying Madonna as a huge power star, and her influence in pop culture. Secondly, I'm not 14, I don't break rules and change shit for "Diva Wars". If you actually paid attention, I didn't even open that discussion, someone else did. Mariah IMO has more talent in her finger than Madonna, and done far more for music, so I don't feel the need to act in immature ways like some of you noobs suggest we do.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 16:16, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I can honestly say I don't have the slightest fucking idea what you just wrote to me. You're talking to me about Green Day? I thought you were up Madonna's alley. Music preference has absolutely nothing to do with gender/sexual orientation. In fact, I find it more gay to be uber-fans of some punk/glam boy band than a beautiful and talented woman.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 22:43, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Politsi, you are invited to the Teahouse

Teahouse logo

Hi Politsi! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit requests

Hi

May I ask if the IP user adding and removing comments from Talk:List of best-selling albums is in fact you, logged out. The reason I ask is that the IP deleted one of your comments: [1], and I don't want to revert if it is in fact you. Begoon talk 07:57, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Politsi. You have new messages at Begoon's talk page.
Message added 08:56, 1 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Begoon talk 08:56, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a question of Done or No

I transferred the following part of your discussion posted within Ozzy Ozbourne's section onto here because I feel it needs to be discussed separately. Beside, listen harout. You don't have to put some anger when i ask you if i have found some new sales figures of those artist in this list which looks like so inflated. Just answer NO or DONE. You could analyze my question, i've been saying this over and over again. I put my respect on you that's why i will asking you about the contain in this list. I hope you will understand on that. (beside, I've been success to update the figures of Eminem, Garth Brooks, Eagles, and others in this list)

It is actually a little bit upsetting when you come back and ask the same question over and over again the answers to which I have given to you numerous times. And when you do that, my answer can't be a simple No, because by asking me repeatedly if we should update sales claims with further inflated figures when you and I have already come to an agreement, it's as if you never read what I took my time to wright for you. And this has nothing to do whether you have come up with those sources that there was need for. In the future, this kind of discussions should be posted in separate discussion threads, perhaps on my talk-page.--Harout72 (talk) 16:43, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then. Like i said, i'm so excited every time i see a new claim figures from a very reliable source, and thanks for leaving me a message Politsi (talk) 06:01, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of best-selling music artists

Don't delete any of the discussions whether you were involved in them or not. All discussions do get automatically archived at Talk:List of best-selling music artists in 10 days. In this edit, you're asking me about The Ventures again. If you had not deleted my reply to you about The Ventures previously in October 2012, you could have simply searched for our old discussion about The Ventures by simply entering The Ventures in the Search Archives at the top of Talk:List of best-selling music artists, and the search database would bring up all discussions about The Ventures, but now it doesn't because you've deleted it. It brings up another discussion from 2011. So don't delete any of the discussions.--Harout72 (talk) 18:27, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, i thought it might be help to make the talk page more effective for all of us. Alright then, thanks for leaving me a message. Politsi (talk) 09:44, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

When you are adding one source that says 100 million Records, you don't add another source that says 100 million Albums. We should use the sources that claim Albums ONLY if the said sales figure is available with the term Albums. It's in the lead of the list. You haven't seen it? I also removed your recently added source for Pink Floyd which said 200 million albums. We already have one source that claims 200 million Records.--Harout72 (talk) 15:26, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

oh god, finally you response my edit...hehehe. Well, i just trying to add that figures and wait your response and i like it. seriously. but i will fix it. thanks Politsi (talk) 05:17, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

I noticed the message you recently left for HarrySwed. Please remember not to bite the newcomers. If you see someone make a common mistake, try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. Thank you. Your behaviour at Talk:List of best-selling music artists is unacceptable. Please assume good faith. ukexpat (talk) 13:26, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Why we should deleted the 100m-claim of ABBA ?

You didn't see my brief explanation in the edit summary? Both sources claim that ABBA have sold 100 million records before disbanding in 1982, I had never paid attention. Also, please don't be rude to other editors on the Talk:List of best-selling music artists, avoid calling editors such names as a kid or so on.--Harout72 (talk) 04:08, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That sources speaks of albums only. I don't think we'll prove that ABBA's overall sales is 100 million by adding that source because what difference does it make between the 200 million records which is for albums, singles, videos and the 100 million albums? It's up to you, if you want you can add it. We have the same for others like Led Zeppelin.--Harout72 (talk) 06:00, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
100 million albums is not the closest to the available certified sales, 100 million records (albums, singles, videos) would be closest. The Billboard source that claims 100 million is only speaking of albums, it leaves out ABBA's singles and videos. We already have sources for ABBA which claim 200 million records, that includes singles, albums, videos. If you find another source that claims 100 million records, then yes, that will be the closest to ABBA's available certified sales.--Harout72 (talk) 15:33, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, The Sydney Morning Herald is ok to put up there next to the 200 million records. But I still can't remove the 200 million claims unless we have newer and multiple sources that claim 100 million records, this one is from 2010. The other source is not so good, avoid using that. Put it up there next the 200 million records, if it gets removed by that the same user, I will personally revert his edit. Will get to the Osmonds, but I don't think they have enough certified sales.--Harout72 (talk) 02:09, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Pink Floyd

This one by Mail Online claims 250 million records in the beginning and then 250 million album in the middle of the content. That is useless for that very reason. The article by Santa Ynes Valley News is not one of highly reliable news agencies. For now, I think, we are ok with our current sources even though they're from 2007. But keep looking, if you find 250 million records by another news service. Replace them.--Harout72 (talk) 02:17, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ABBA at Talk:List of best-selling music artists

I removed your recent comments in which you called the user HarrySwed such names as gayman. That is completely unacceptable and you have violated WP:Personal attacks. Please make sure this doesn't happen again or I will never reply your questions again. We are to keep our discussions at wikipedia civil regardless of how much we disagree with what other editors claim about their favorite artists.--Harout72 (talk) 15:15, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Stevie Wonder

Jakarta Globe seems to be a relatively new Newspaper. But Reuters is a very old and very reliable news service. I think we should leave Reuters in place for now. But if a similarly reliable news agency publishes the 100 million in the near future, it's worth updating our source as it's from 2008.--Harout72 (talk) 15:18, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:The Journal (student newspaper)

Yeah it an independent newspaper put together by a group of students. Avoid using that.--Harout72 (talk) 15:12, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:ABBA Another 100m-records claim

The key sentences in that source are where it says: Nevertheless, Abba mounted its first international tour in 1977 and appeared in the U.S. two years later. Longtime live-in lovers Benny and Anni-Frid (who both have children from teenage marriages) were wed in 1978; they divorced in 1981. Two years earlier, Bjorn and Agnetha's marriage of six years had also ended in divorce. Abba's public image, however, remained harmonious. By then the group had sold an estimated 100 million records worldwide. That 100 million records are for up to early 1980a, no later. It's pretty much what we had before.--Harout72 (talk) 05:25, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please, use edit summaries

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to (all over the place) does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! - DVdm (talk) 07:39, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Need sources

Hey, see if you can find a source for Ayumi Hamasaki stating some 75 million records, she has over 60 million in Japanese certified sales.--Harout72 (talk) 00:43, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of best-selling music artists

Please take care when updating claimed sales of artists and moving them upwards. You accidentally have deleted Eminem in one of your recent edits.--Harout72 (talk) 03:18, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Clapton

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to Eric Clapton, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 05:18, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just came across your deleted post

You should never post anything like this. It was reverted by another editor which I agreed with. The lead of the list itself is informative enough, we also have detailed information on the talk-page as to how the list is operated. That should be enough. The rest can be explained to editors calmly and in a friendly manner on the talk-page.--Harout72 (talk) 02:43, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:List of best-selling music artists, you may be blocked from editing. - DVdm (talk) 06:27, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I thought you had made this edit, whereas you actually made this edit. My mistake—and my apologies. - DVdm (talk) 06:45, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
He indeed made that disruptive edit. I'm the one who reverted it.--PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 16:41, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that was reverted by you. I thought he made the edit again, so I accidentally reverted an acceptable edit and gave another warning, for which my apologies. Politsi was already warned for it by Harout72, so please do not swap the striking. - DVdm (talk) 17:20, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I would also like to add Politsi that when you start calling people as "fat" and "skinny" etc you are causing WP:BLP violations. Either tone down the way you talk, else make it very sure that I will report you and get you banned from posting at the List of best selling artist talk page completely. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 05:00, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To indianBio, i hope you would understand I'm not doing any personal attack between editor,

and what rules that i have break out regarding with word skinny and fat! because i'm telling that to the artist! Not personal attack between editor.

remember that and keep in your mind, i believe my contribution to the list of best-selling artits is VERY HIGH!.

and if you want to report me! go a head. It's your right but it's my right also to asking why?. thanks Politsi (talk) 15:56, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions are worthless and your approach is nothing to be proud of. Learn to have respect for others and the artists they admire. Instead, you try and belittle them. I think being fat is far better than being a talent-less, old whore.--PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 01:47, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HAHAHA....worthless? and nothing to be proud of?.... i dont have to tell you my contribution to the that list, ask yourself Nathan. And please be fair, do NOT erase my comment in your page eventhough that's make you so shame. Politsi (talk) 03:40, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Don't edit my comments in any way shape or form. Edit your own poorly written ones. Anyways, I'm done having this fruitless conversation with you child. PS. I will only remove your messages that have negative comments that I disapprove of. Keep it mature and between you and me and we'll be fine.--PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 04:29, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ayumi Hamasaki claim sales records

If you update data on a page, you need to use a reliable source! You can't use someone's Deviant Art page. Deviant Art users make no claim on being experts or authorities on Japanese music sales. You'll need to use a source such as Oricon, RIAJ or Music Station. --Prosperosity (talk) 02:37, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying my message. You don't have to tell me about a reliable source, I know it well... But the point is, until now there's no reliable source who claim that new sales for Hamasaki (80m-more), and she's still stuck with 53m-sales. Which is completely wrong!, and I use the source from Devian Art just to try encourage the media to find out more for Hamasaki's sales. Believe me, Hamasaki sales is not 53,000,000 but its already more than 80m-records. Politsi (talk) 02:51, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sure you could use Oricon or RIAJ as good sources for these purposes, they have a lot of data on her sales (especially RIAJ's digital certifications, which aren't compiled in Oricon sources) --Prosperosity (talk) 10:01, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Information icon Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 01:11, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:59, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Information icon Your recent edit to University of Bologna appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Thomas.W talk 09:14, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for remind me. Politsi (talk) 09:16, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Best Selling artists of all time

I am a statician Who Specialises in the music industry. There is an error on the page best selling arists of all time. You have said that the well known singer Rihanna has sold over 200 million records. You have also said that beyonce has sold 75 million albums. The issue with this is that for most singers on the list (like Beyoncé) you have put the number of hard copies of records sold (actually bought from a shop). For Rihanna you have added her digital records to it as well! As a statition, I can confirm to you the fact that Rihanna (my source is my own calculations as well as roc nation.com. She has in fact only sold 50 million hard copies worldwide and should therefore be removed from the list. The figure for beyonce (78 million) was correct back in 2011, however she has now sold 118 million as a solo artist. She has also sold 60 million records with destiny's child. In the world of statistics, the 60 million would be added on to her total as she was the lead singer of the group. Beyonce has therefore sold a total of 178 million hard records and Rihanna 50 million hard records. The error here was that digital albums and hard copies were mixed on rihannas figure and beyonce's figure was both outdated and incorrect. i just wanted to ask you (or one of your colleagues) to change this. If you give me access to edit this page, I will make sure that all the figures have been measured using the same criteria and are up to date. Thank you. Statistics123 (talk) 16:57, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Editing summary

Politsi, can I request you to use short edit summaries for all your edits? Please note using WP:ES is considered valuable and something every editor should follow. —IB [ Poke ] 10:23, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IndianBio. Actually I don't know the edit summaries work exactly since I'm not very active and only handling the best-selling artists page. I was editing some image artists on the list and then as usual, asking Harout for permission. If the edit summaries is mandatory for every editor, I will learn to do that. Thanks. Politsi (talk) 10:29, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It is not about it being mandatory, it is about being informative. A short summary like "changing Shania Twain's image to a clearer one" will make editors understand why you changed it and accept it. Similar to the sales reference changes that you do or the Beyonce move that you just did. Simply add a edit summary like "As per discussion in talk page"... —IB [ Poke ] 10:31, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I understand that, I never put any attention in the section of edit summaries. And yes, it will be good and informative if my change in page is very meaningful from my perspective. Politsi (talk) 10:42, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Information icon Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Maria Sharapova, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 02:34, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Information icon Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Maria Sharapova, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 07:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Politsi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion

Hi, Politsi. I know that you're an user involved in sales records. I know that you're very neutral with any artist. So, I don't pretend be a spammer, but because we don't have too much participation, can you give your opinion in the talk page of David Bowie about his sales records, please?. If not, don't worry :). Chrishonduras (Diskussion) 05:02, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

The Music Barnstar
Politsi, you deserve this barnstar for helping me to find all the reliable sources for the List of best-selling music artists that you have.

By the way, Linkin Park are now on the list as the RIAA has just updated lot of their singles' certifications.--Harout72 (talk) 02:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.... Politsi (talk) 05:47, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Politsi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to the Neil Diamond article (worldwide sales)

Hi,

I can't find anything that I'd consider absolutely official - no worldwide charts, no hard numbers in Billboard or MBI, etc -- but the daily paper in La Crosse, Michigan (the La Crosse Tribune) is less reliable than The Daily Telegraph. More than 100 million may well be correct, but it's a significant edit, and we should have a more substantial source. JSFarman (talk) 02:36, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've asked for a consensus on Neil Diamond sales on the Talk page for the article. I will respect the consensus, as I'm sure you will as well. JSFarman (talk) 16:48, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Use of File:Tupac Amaru Shakur2.jpg

In this edit, you introduced File:Tupac Amaru Shakur2.jpg into the article List of best-selling music artists without providing a valid rationale for doing. Please be aware that per WP:NFCC #10c, we require a separate, specific rationale for every use of a non-free file on the project. However, also be aware that per WP:NFLISTS, the use of this image on that article would not be permitted anyway. Please undo your edit. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 16:54, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I still don't understand. I just took that picture from Shakur's Wikibio. Thanks Politsi (talk) 10:27, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Timberlake

Hi, I have the following doubt. From the claim that he has sold 88 million records, what % should be represented in his certified units for him to be in the article List of best-selling music artists? Cornerstonepicker (talk) 23:54, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be both edit-warring and dodging the basic questions

Does List of best-selling music artists have a field for "claimed sales". Yes or no?

Have I provided high-quality sources—that do not cite the record company—for that field for a particular artist. Yes or no?

Just answer those two questions honestly, and we can move on in a productive fashion. — DCGeist (talk) 08:08, 22 January 2018 (U

No need to leave me a private message. Just leave it at the talk page of the topic Politsi (talk) 08:14, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No, Politsi, you made this personal. You declared that you WP:OWN the article in edit summary: "do not touch this list." Are you going to apologize for that now? If you do, we can keep this on the article Talk page. But if you think you're an OWN-er, than you're going to hear a lot from me, right here, buddy. — DCGeist (talk) 08:22, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@DCGeist, I ask you to not touch the list because we should wait some consensus regarding with your issue. Why should I apologize? who are you? Are your the owner of Wikipedia?. You should behave yourself before you want to do some discussion. Politsi (talk) 08:29, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

I don't know if you've already seen it but just wanted to let you know that both accounts User:DCGeist and User:DocKino were being run by the same person. Both accounts are now blocked indefinitely for Sock puppetry. I opened up an investigation, and surely enough they turned out to be the same person, pretending to be two different persons. I would revert the 1 billion sources, but I have already reverted three times in the same 24 hour. You can go ahead and revert it if you want. I'll have to wait for another six hours to revert without breaking any rules.--Harout72 (talk) 02:21, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I don't know that account is come from a same person. We need your help to prevent the same vandalism happen in the list, it was wasting our time and energy. Thanks @Harout72, Please revert that inflated claim if you already able to get into it, I'm afraid forgot and breaking any rules. Thanks Politsi (talk) 02:47, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Drake

Hey bro, sorry if I'm bothering you, please I was wondering if you could update about Drake, according to his wiki page, he's sold 12 million albums and 74 million singles, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drake_(musician) please if you could update the list and update me, it'd be nice, I jus joined Wikipedia too :) thanks. Jay el rey (talk) 20:36, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Brown

Eight months apart of the other source, this source is now used to support the 100 million records. Now, the source says "nearly 100". How is that my opinion? I think this is more about showing a misleading statement so other minor websites can copy and validate it, rather than staying truthful to a reliable source. Same happens with Ed Sheeran 126 million records, using a tabloid, because you thought the singles were already over 100 million. This may be crossing the line already.. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 03:38, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cornerstonepicker, So what's your effort? do you have a better reliable source for Brown and Sheeran? for your record The Courier-Mail is a former Broadsheet newspaper and not fully a tabloid journalism. You keep silent when I use some unreliable source for Timberlake's 56m singles claim because he is your favorite artists. And now you act like you are concern about truthful, you are confusing. Politsi (talk) 03:47, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's been a tabloid for over 10 years now. You have used two or three accussations already in two different talk pages. Basically, you want me to step back so you continue this bad practice.
There is no reliable source claiming Ed Sheeran sold 100 million singles, and you putting that there is blatant original research; The Hollywood Reporter is a reliable source, and that article was posted less than one month ago.Cornerstonepicker (talk) 18:23, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cornerstonepicker, I answer your question in your talk page. And do you think that The Hollywood Reporter is the original source who first announced Ed Sheeran's 76m claim?. Read that edit history carefully in Sheeran's profile page regarding Sheeran's 76m claim. Politsi (talk) 01:30, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Metallica, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 02:09, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rihanna

You should update Rihanna sales. She has 196m certified sales in the USA Niperman (talk) 15:27, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Politsi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PAGE

can you move a draft to a regular page? Mm08jimmy (talk) 19:49, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? Politsi (talk) 11:51, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Let's agree on something

You should have read my discussion on the removal of the 175 million before you removed it. You shouldn't have ignored my discussion and/or decision. Make sure we are both in complete agreement before any claim is changed on the list.--Harout72 (talk) 00:53, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bon Jovi

Have you ever come across an article for Bon Jovi that puts their records sales at 110 million records? I'm considering to update their claimed figure but can't find anything for 110 million.--Harout72 (talk) 18:12, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. There's only 120-130 million. Politsi (talk) 23:31, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Best Selling Artists - Oasis

75 million, meets the criteria from what I can tell? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.150.143.157 (talk) 21:39, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alicia Keys

Have you come across a source for Alicia Keys stating 75 million records? Because RIAA has issued lots of certifications for her and she can now be listed with 75 million. I can't find any sources.--Harout72 (talk) 16:51, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to find it. Politsi (talk) 11:49, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Coldplay. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 03:34, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Record Sales

@Politsi: You commented "100m sales is inflated. They only have 28m in certified sales." when you edited the Depeche Mode page. You changed "100 million" to "75 million". If 28m is certified, then wouldn't the correct statement be "they have sold more than 28 million records worldwide"? Anything else seems like a guess. How is 100m or 75m figured from 28m? Assuming 28 million in sales is verified. They both look inflated to me. Liberty5651 (talk) 10:52, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ABBA

I am not an editor, so would appreciate it if can you please amend your edit (and edits from others) relating to ABBA sales figure on the ABBA page. The link you added from Sydney Herald states 150m sales for their 8 Studio Albums. It does not state all global albums. The previous edit by another Editor (decreasing to 150 million) states this was due to reference to "List of Best Selling Artists". They cannot use wiki as the source, only the sources from external references. Therefore the two previous links stand as being correct in the range of sales estimated. 122.60.192.248 (talk) 00:58, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Read the source carefully. It was stated clearly. Politsi (talk) 03:02, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hotel California

Hi, Politsi. The ref citation you added at Hotel California (Eagles album) to support the sales claim of 42 million for the album doesn't go to anything about the Eagles. Was the page you were looking at deleted or renamed? Did you get the URL wrong? Do you maybe have another source (or corrected cite)? — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 09:13, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JohnFromPinckney Please look at List of best-selling albums for information regarding with Eagles's Hotel California 42m claim. The source is clear and there is nothing wrong with it. Thanks Politsi (talk) 13:00, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ha, ha, well, looking at List of best-selling albums as a fallback source to your edits at HC is a bit silly, when you are the editor who added the same 42 million claim with the same source at that page, too. But it's all okay, now. My problem was that following your citation to https://www.tuscaloosanews.com/news/20181027/black-jacket-symphony-to-re-create-eagles-hotel-california sent me to https://eu.tuscaloosanews.com/, presumably because the Tuscaloosa News is one of those companies who are afraid Europeans will steal their content, or something. What I get is a dull, standard entry page with about 20 story teasers (and nothing about the Eagles or Black Jacket).
I have now reverted my reversion at Hotel California; sorry for the uproar. — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 06:29, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Best Selling Music Artistes

I think it is already due time, for Post Malone,Green Day,Barry White,Robbie Williams,Imagine Dragons and Carrie Underwood to be added up to the list. Their Inclusion is Necessary. Don't you think that it equals if not higher their all round Certified units to their Record Claims. 41.190.12.141 (talk) 08:34, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]