User talk:Pixel Lupus

Welcome!

Hi Pixel Lupus! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (talk page) (Contribs) Remember to notify me after replying off my talk page. 14:38, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Songshan National Park

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Songshan National Park requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://tourwild.in/bandipur/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 15:14, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Ytpks896 (talk) 15:12, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alternates blocked

To make your life easier I have blocked both User:XxPixel WarriorxX and User:Tylertoney Dude perfect as one is lost and you aren't using the other. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:17, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some advice

You are evidently quite keen and enthusiastic about contributing to the encyclopaedia, but you keep hitting problems of various kinds, the most recent one leading to your other accounts being blocked by CambridgeBayWeather. As you know, I have defended you against blocks more than once. However, the way you are going it is likely you will soon be blocked indefinitely, and this time stay blocked. I will give you a few pointers to try to help you avoid that happening.

  • A lot of what you write is very confusing and difficult to follow, for several reasons. You write long wandering texts that don't make it clear what you are getting at. You often seem to assume other people will realise what you have in mind without actually saying what it is. You jump into conversations under a new user name, without explaining that you are the same person who has already taken part in the same conversation under another name, and you seem to expect that people will realise who you are. (To give just one example, it took me quite a bit of searching around and wasting time before I figured out that the person who pinged me at User talk:Ytpks896 was a person I already knew under a different name.) Your recent comments at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your use of different accounts confused more than one editor there, including me. I think I eventually worked out what you were saying, but it took me quite a bit of head scratching before I got there.
  • I can't even begin to understand what the issues are which you have quarreled about at User talk:Ytpks896, because neither you nor Ytpks896 seem able to express yourselves in ways that make any sense to an outsider. Maybe if I spent a long time searching through the editing histories of your accounts and Ytpks896's account I might be able to figure it out, but I'm not going to do that. I have already, more than once, spent far more time searching through the histories of your accounts than most people would be willing to do, to try to help you by sorting things out for you. Even I have a limit for how much time I am prepared to put into such work, and I am pretty well at that limit now.
  • You jump in to involve yourself in matters where you don't need to be involved, and where you seem either not to understand what is going on, or not to understand the relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines, or both, so that your attempts to help really aren't helpful. This happened at User talk:ABHIMAN 19. (I am sure you were honestly trying to help, but I'm afraid you weren't managing to.)
  • You sometimes take an aggressive and belligerent attitude to other editors you disagree with. User talk:Ytpks896 is an example.

Here are some pieces of advice:

  • If for some reason you wish to use different accounts on different phones, give them user names which make it clear they are the same person. Dennis Brown has suggested "Pixel Lupus (alt)". However, why do you even want to do that? Why not use one account for both phones? I use one account on my phone, my laptop computer, and my desktop computer, and I don't find any problem with doing that.
  • Even if you do have related user names for different accounts, it is better not to use them both in the same discussion, even if that means that you have to wait a while until you are on your other phone before answering a point.
  • It is absolutely not enough to rely on the fact that theoretically other editors could look at the user pages of every account they come across just in case two of them happen to be the same person. People are not going to do that.
  • Stick to making small improvements to articles. Don't try to get involved in other aspects of Wikipedia until you have far more experience of how things work here.
  • If you disagree with another editor, don't get into arguments about who is right or wrong. Be willing to just walk away and do something else instead.

My guess is that you are quite young. You don't have to tell us whether that's true or not, but if it is, then the things I have said about sticking to making small improvements and not getting more involved apply even more than they would otherwise. Most Wikipedia editors deal with other editors on the assumption that they are adults, even though quite a lot of editors aren't, and they don't necessarily express themselves in ways which are helpful to younger people. In years to come you may find it easier to get more involved, or you may by then decide you don't want to, but for now keep it simple.

I am totally sure you really want to contribute well to Wikipedia, and you are enthusiastic about doing so. However, no matter how good your intentions are, if you keep behaving in ways which other editors find unhelpful, confusing, and time-wasting, sooner or later one of two things will happen. Either you get blocked from editing and this time stay blocked, or you don't get blocked, but get so sick of always hitting problems and being warned and told off that you give up and go away of your own accord. I hope that won't happen, and it's to try to help you make sure it doesn't that I have taken the time and trouble to write this. I hope it will help. JBW (talk) 21:58, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]