User talk:Pek

Welcome!

Hi Pek! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Kj cheetham (talk) 08:18, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I'm actually not new. I just switched accounts. I used to have to login, then logout, whenever I jumped between Finnish Wikipedia and English Wikipedia, so I decided to just use my Finnish account on both sites. --Pek (talk) 08:32, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Roof collapse moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Roof collapse, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

The topic appears unimportant, is possibly not worth the effort of fixing, and likely won't survive AFD. References are none, as the only reference is going to an obvious company that specializes in roof repairs. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:49, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ghost website moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ghost website, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Singularity42 (talk) 19:21, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Currently those are the only sources I was able to find. Only others were with duplicate information, so I didn't include them. No point in transferring the article to draft space, when there is nothing else that can be done to the article. Just seems very silly. --Pek (talk) 19:23, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ghost website (August 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcmatter was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ghost website and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 03:00, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pek! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter ^(talk)/(contrib) 03:00, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Pek. Thank you for creating Egoyomi. User:LowLevel73, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice contribution to the encyclopedia. Thank you!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|LowLevel73}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

► LowLevel73 ^(talk) 04:40, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Trackside telephone for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trackside telephone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trackside telephone until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:08, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thematic tournament moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Thematic tournament, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^TT me 11:45, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pureed diet moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pureed diet, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:41, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dye transfer inhibitor moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dye transfer inhibitor, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:03, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roof collapse (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asparagusus was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roof collapse and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Asparagusus (interaction) 03:12, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Intercourse denial moved to draftspace

There MAY be a valid article here, but this isn't it - functionally unsourced, the two sources given are risible tabloid items, and the content on incels is simply misleading. Please don't put this into mainspace without substantial improvements. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:10, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Intercourse denial (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Compusolus was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Intercourse denial and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Compusolus (talk) 03:36, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pineapple boat moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pineapple boat, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^TT me 11:36, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ghost website

Hello, Pek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ghost website, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nanodegree moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nanodegree, is not suitable as written to remain published. First, this is little more than a dictionary definition (see WP:DICDEF. Second, it would need more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^TT me 14:34, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ghost website

Hello, Pek. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ghost website".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 04:11, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Thematic tournament

Hello, Pek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Thematic tournament, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pureed diet

Hello, Pek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pureed diet, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dye transfer inhibitor

Hello, Pek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dye transfer inhibitor, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Roof collapse

Hello, Pek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Roof collapse, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pureed diet

Hello, Pek. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pureed diet".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 17:03, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dye transfer inhibitor

Hello, Pek. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dye transfer inhibitor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 06:03, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Roof collapse

Hello, Pek. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Roof collapse".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 03:25, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Intercourse denial

Hello, Pek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Intercourse denial, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:55, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pineapple boat

Hello, Pek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pineapple boat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:04, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Intercourse denial

Hello, Pek. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Intercourse denial".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 03:36, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Study partner

Hello, Pek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Study partner, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nanodegree

Hello, Pek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nanodegree, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Murder weapon

The article Murder weapon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dictionary definition.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 14:10, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Transmaxxing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Transmaxxing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transmaxxing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 16:29, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Pek, looking at Transmaxxing and Height dysphoria (as well as the inactivity-deleted Draft:Intercourse_denial), I have a feeling you're trolling. Please note that the repeated creation of pages with verifiability, neutrality or notability issues may lead to a block from editing or a topic ban from the area described in the blue box above, possibly without further warning. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:37, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like you haven't checked my profile page. And what exactly does contentious even mean? You mean controversial topics? Whats the issue with that? There are many controversial topics in Wikipedia. Also, how exactly is height dysphoria controversial? That's like the least controversial thing I'v ever written about. I'm really confused by your post. Please check people's profile pages and the articles they have created or edited, before commenting something as ridiculous as this, even calling me names. --Pek (talk) 16:47, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Transmaxxing is up for deletion, if you don't find it notable enough, feel free to point your own opininion. Why make a personal attack against me? --Pek (talk) 16:51, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pek, I would strongly recommend you slow down and learn a little more about Wikipedia's reliable sourcing requirements before creating more articles. Your recent creations are well below what is required for sourcing on Wikipedia, particularly when it comes to articles on medical topics (see the explanatory template I added below). I'd really recommend you try out WP:AfC for any future articles, or for articles that you continue to develop in draftspace, so you can get a second opinion on whether the article you've written is ready for the mainspace, since it seems you don't yet have a strong grasp of what that entails. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 17:01, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Medical references

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them.) WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here.

We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note, or post to the talk page of the Wikipedia WikiProject Medicine GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 16:52, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fever dream (sleep physiology) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Fever dream (sleep physiology), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 16:53, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aim trainer moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Aim trainer, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 17:03, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Transmaxxer

Hello, Pek

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username C1K98V, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Transmaxxer, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|C1K98V}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

C1K98V ^(💬 ✒️ 📂) 03:53, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Most effective tactics available for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Most effective tactics available is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Most effective tactics available until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 23:35, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Most effective tactics available, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:15, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How exactly is META an inappropriate article? Maybe better that you don't write ridiculous comments to other users pages, when you are high on mushroom juice. Just a useful tip. --Pek (talk) 08:07, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Though I think it's funny, please be aware that insinuating editors are "high" is an WP:ADHOMINEM insult. In any event, you did not do any sort of due diligence to check if there was an existing page for the term, which there is (meta is short for metagame, which has been there since 2005). The article is also misleading in that "meta" does not stand for "most effective tactics available" - it is a backronym. A simple Google search would see evidence of that. You must take more effort to check to see whether an article is standalone notable and can be properly sourced, and has the content to justify its existence, which seems to be an ongoing issue with other articles. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dream Character Page

Hello Pek, while I understand that oneirology is a scientific field that studies dreams, my concern lies with the significance and notability of dream characters as a separate topic deserving their own page. I believe that the information about dream characters could be merged into the existing dreams page, or perhaps the lucid dreams page, as they might not have enough broader relevance to justify a standalone article. This would help maintain the integrity of the content while adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines. Please check WP:N and WP:STUB 2600:4040:A4B9:E000:CD4E:F439:6A11:EFF1 (talk) 03:15, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voluntary page creation restriction?

Pek, would you consider voluntarily agreeing to stop creating new pages for a period of time (perhaps six months?) Looking back up through your talk page, there is a sea of deletion notices and requests from editors that you stop creating pages that are wholly inappropriate for Wikipedia, and yet the behavior seems to be continuing. It doesn't seem that you've yet been able to grasp what is appropriate for a standalone page, and what adequate sourcing looks like, so perhaps a voluntary break from creating new pages might be in order? There is certainly no shortage of existing pages that could use expansion and improvement, and it might help you get the hang of things to read more pages that are suitable for inclusion. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 16:33, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can't be serious... 6 months? Are you out of your mind? I have exactly 2 activities that fulfill my life, first of them is playing video games and second one is reading/editing Wikipedia. There is no way I'm going on voluntary restriction. I have done many successful entries to Wikipedia, yet you ignore all of them. You are only focusing on my unsuccessful entries. About 50% of my articles has been allowed to exist, and you can check the list for yourself on my user page. There is no way in million years that I'm going to leave the activity that is so importantly part of my life and existence. Pek (talk) 06:18, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not asking you to stop reading or editing Wikipedia, I'm just asking if you would stop creating brand new pages. I have looked at some of the recent pages you've created that still remain, and they too have serious issues. Most effective tactics available is at AfD, trending towards delete. Several have WP:MEDRS issues (electrophobia, for example), and others are likely not sufficiently notable/fleshed-out for a standalone article (height dysphoria, tongue posture, etc.) GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 16:52, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Pek repeatedly creating poor quality stubs. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 16:08, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• I have closed the ANI discussion with the note that you have voluntarily agreed to stop creating new articles for six months. For more details, visit here. Thank you for your understanding. Lourdes 11:02, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Height dysphoria

The article Height dysphoria has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insufficient WP:MEDRS for an arguably nonexistent condition. No evidence of WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. IceBergYYC (talk) 02:02, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Okichitaw (martial arts)

Hello, Pek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Okichitaw (martial arts), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:05, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Your recent editing history at Lebanon shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Skitash (talk) 16:57, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Spice rack

Hello, Pek,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Bastun and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Spice rack, for deletion, because [consensus decision] previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bastun}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bastun^Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 11:32, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the article doesn't qualify for Speedy Deletion, so that has been withdrawn. It is very borderline whether or not it should be included in WP, though - please see WP:NOTDICTIONARY. Bastun^Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 11:58, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Spice rack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spice rack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spice rack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ldm1954 (talk) 05:38, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New articles and sourcing

Hey there, Pek. I've seen the new articles you've been making and I'm concerned that you have not addressed the problems that led to your 6 month voluntary restriction. During that time, you were asked to get more experience in editing, but I don't think you meaningfully did this. You made only 34 mainspace edits and then went right back to creating articles. Spice rack, Store credit (currency), Belly rub and Esports betting all have major problems. One is at AfD and the others should probably be draftified at a minimum.

Maybe I can help you to improve. One major problem with your articles is the sources. Dictionary defintiions, blogs and promotional sources are not particularly helpful, especially when it comes to establishing notability. Indeed, many of the blogs you cite should not be used as Wikipedia sourcing at all.

For example, this source used on your store credit article is essentially an ad. It's there to sell the website's "easy solution to managing (store credit)" as you can see from the call to action at the end. I'm using this as an example but you use many similar sources.

I urge you to get more general editing experience and learn more about appropriate sources before continuing article creation. Consider adding sections to existing articles rather than creating whole new ones. The best sources for the articles you create will likely be found in newspapers and magazines. Consider using articles like this or this for your Esports betting page and steer well clear of blogs.

Feel free to ask for advice if I can help. MarchOfTheGreyhounds 09:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Fever dream (sleep) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Fever dream (sleep). Thanks! Drmies (talk) 01:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Pek. Thank you for your work on Reciprocity bias. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for adding this new content, framing Reciprocity (social psychology) as a bias. However, it is very short and better contextualized within that existing article, with which is overlaps heavily. Any differences can be discussed on that page.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 07:48, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creating new articles

Please heed the advice of other editors at ANI, AfC, AfD, and on your talk page, and focus on adding quality sources to existing articles, rather than creating poorly-sourced stubs. For information about finding reliable sources, see WP:RS and WP:RSP (and, for some cases, WP:MEDRS). If you remain confused about article creation requirements, perhaps consider sending all articles to WP:AFC.

I write this message because I have blanked-and-redirected several articles you have created. If you disagree with any one of these actions, feel free to reinstate content with proper sourcing and demonstration of notability, or to start a discussion on the relevant talk page.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks, Wracking ^talk! 04:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I usually spend a lot of time searching for good sources, but nothing ever seems to be good enough. Also, the reason I create stubs, is because I don't have the expertise on the subject I'm writing about. I'm creating stubs in the hope, that someone who actually knows about the subject would add more content to the article in future. Recently I made draft article about fever dreams, and to me, the sources are good, but still people disagree with me. I don't know what to do. This is the only hobby I have and I don't want to get voluntary restriction again. --Pek (talk) 05:08, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pek, why not edit existing articles? Add content to stuff that's already out there. I see you've been doing that a little bit and your edits there seem more productive than your new articles. You need more experience in editing before tackling article creation, something that's widely acknowledged to be one of the toughest things to do on Wikipedia.

Because when I create new article, it gets more attraction that way, and the stub is going to be more likely edited than non-stub. --Pek (talk) 08:32, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it's a little bit disappointing or worrying that you say that "nothing ever seems to be good enough" about sources. In the section above I gave you some good advice about better sources for your articles. Others have done so in the past too. MarchOfTheGreyhounds 07:33, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just don't get it. Why is Wikipedia so strict about sources? Like this for example. It's an article written by company that sells beds, pillows, etc. But the article itself is really in-depth, and it even says that it is medically reviewed by a professional. But according to Wikipedia, it is "commercial", so it's not a valid source. That's just silly. --Pek (talk) 08:32, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, isn't it better to have some sources, even if they aren't perfect, than having no sources at all? --Pek (talk) 08:47, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've already linked WP:MEDRS, which explains the very good reasons that articles to do with medical subjects need to have particularly high quality sources. Especially when it comes to medicine, an article with bad sourcing can absolutely be worse than no article at all. As for the suggestion that when I create new article, it gets more attraction that way, and the stub is going to be more likely edited than non-stub, I don't think this is true at all. You could also edit any of the many existing stubs that need more attention.

Regarding I don't know what to do. This is the only hobby I have and I don't want to get voluntary restriction again. What you need to do is take a step back and learn about the sourcing requirements, as multiple people have already explained to you. If you can abide by sourcing requirements, and stop compromising source quality just for the sake of creating a new article, you shouldn't have any trouble continuing to edit. Continuing to edit as you have been, however, is likely to be a problem. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 17:22, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pek— thanks for your quick response. I am going to try to outline some of the issues with your editing, and how they might be resolved.

As Drmies mentioned in the AfC review, WP:MEDRS likely applies for Draft:Fever dream (sleep). Because it does not intersect with my interests, and because biomedical content has more stringent sourcing guidelines, I generally steer clear of these topics myself. Because you have demonstrated a lack of understanding of Wikipedia's sourcing guidelines, I recommend you avoid any content that could be related to biomedical topics.

Instead, I can offer some more specific feedback on Cardinal slice, for which I found none of the supplied sources were reliable:

• Blog; not reliable. (WP:SPS) [1]
• User-generated content; not reliable (WP:UGC) [2]
• Mostly user-generated, unclear editorial process; likely not reliable (WP:UGC) [3]
• Blog; not reliable (WP:SPS) [4]

I easily found some reliable sources for Cardinal slice, though they were not in English: [1][2][3][4]

Really, though, you should have started by editing Austrian cuisine, not by creating a new article. Most of the articles I found are about a one-time media frenzy about dessert's ties to fascism, so there is not demonstrated sustained notability. Other articles are not independent, due to being provided by bakeries or interviews with them. You can use these sources with discretion, but they do not count towards notability.

You say you have trouble finding sources. If you can't find reliable sources on a subject, it's probably not notable, and should not have an article. Here are some resources for finding sources:

Note that none of these are guaranteed to provide reliable sources, but they can be a great start

• The Wikipedia Library – access to databases of journal articles, newspaper articles
• The Internet Archive Library – access to lots of nonfiction books
• This template: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

If you do not understand notability and sourcing guidelines at Wikipedia, you should not create new articles. Wracking ^talk! 18:24, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

1. "Austrian Cardinal Slice". culinarytalks.com. 2016-06-05. Retrieved 2024-05-07.
2. "Kardinalschnitte". wien.gv.at. Retrieved 2024-05-07. (in German)
3. "Kardinalschnitte". tasteatlas.com. AtlasMedia Ltd. Retrieved 2024-05-07.
4. "L. Heiner Konditorei". visitingvienna.com. Retrieved 2024-05-07.

Incomplete AFD nominations

Hi, I see you recently added WP:AFD tags (switching from a WP:PROD?) to a number of articles. But it seems you have not finished the nominations steps by creating the AFD entry and add that to the daily index. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#How to nominate a single page for deletion for the steps needed, I think you may have completed step I but need to do steps II and III. If this isn't done soon, as there's zero rationale at all provided, the AFD tags will likely be reverted to either the PROD or nothing. Thanks and let me know if you have any questions. Skynxnex (talk) 13:54, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note that many of these could probably just be tagged with {{db-author}}, since they have no substantive edits besides yours. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 17:19, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Inflatable bathtub for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inflatable bathtub is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inflatable bathtub until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Triptothecottage (talk) 02:02, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Centre of Expertise on Euthanasia moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Centre of Expertise on Euthanasia. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 12:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Pek. Thank you for your work on Sissy hypno. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you creating this article on a form of pornography that has seen an increase in academic focus in the gender studies field in recent years. It's concise, appropriately referenced and expandable (reasonably tagged as a stub by another editor). A solid base from which to build.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 10:24, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bahnhofsmission moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Bahnhofsmission. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ... discospinster _talk 16:34, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Pre-Cataclysm" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Pre-Cataclysm has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 28 § Pre-Cataclysm until a consensus is reached. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:20, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Snoonet

Hello Pek, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Snoonet, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snoonet.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sohom Datta}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sohom (talk) 16:18, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Fever dream (sleep)

Hello, Pek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fever dream (sleep), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:05, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warrior of Mogente moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Warrior of Mogente. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:17, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Modelling light moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Modelling light. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Sources are not reliable, and unclear this article meets WP:GNG. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CoconutOctopus talk 17:44, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Pek continuing to mass create poor-quality stubs after ban expiry. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 21:26, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pek,

Please participate in the discussion on ANI as sanctions against your editing are being discussed. You should have an opportunity to respond to the complaints about your article creations. Liz ^Read! Talk! 01:28, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban on article creation

As per the WP:ANI discussion, you are now indefinitely banned from article creation, broadly construed. This includes but is not limited to the Draft process. This is appealable no sooner than six months from now, and once per year thereafter. --Yamla (talk) 13:08, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stumm AG moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Stumm AG. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:36, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Linkomanija

The article Linkomanija has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Invite only non notable file sharing website. No secondary sourcing. the claims to popularity based on hits and visits are an old game but don't show notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 11:46, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lakka (operating system)

The article Lakka (operating system) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable Linux distro. There are many of these. An entry in distrowatch does not demonstrate notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 11:47, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bizatch

The article Bizatch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable compute virus. The "most destructive of all time" link is a blog. Not reliable. There are millions of viruses, and this is one of them. No independent reliable secondary sourcing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 11:50, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban violation

I see you moved Draft:Modelling light to Modelling light, violating the WP:TOPICBAN imposed on you by the community. Please indicate you clearly understand and will not repeat this topic ban violation. Failure to do so will result in a block for violating your topic ban, executed 24 hours from now. --Yamla (talk) 13:11, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm allowed to publish draft articles, I'm only banned for creating NEW ARTICLES, not old ones. --Pek (talk) 13:13, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, you most certainly are not. "You are now indefinitely banned from article creation, broadly construed. This includes but is not limited to the Draft process." You most certainly may not publish draft articles. Please indicate you now clearly understand this topic ban and will not repeat it. --Yamla (talk) 13:15, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay then, I guess I'm not allowed to do anything anymore... Well, thanks for clarifying this. I will not repeat this behavior. Sorry. --Pek (talk) 13:17, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are allowed to edit existing articles (but not drafts). Thank you for acknowledging your violation and committing to refraining from further violations. --Yamla (talk) 13:19, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Am I allowed to ask other editors in community hub for creating new articles, so I can edit them later? Or does that also violate WP:TOPICBAN? --Pek (talk) 13:28, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. You are to stay away from all aspects of article creation. All aspects. --Yamla (talk) 13:39, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thanks for clarifying. --Pek (talk) 14:18, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

I reverted your change to Decontamination. https://www.carlosarboles.com definitely does not meet WP:RS. It is absolutely critical that you demonstrate a thorough understanding of reliable sources, if you ever wish to have your topic ban lifted. --Yamla (talk) 18:35, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What's wrong with that source? Carlos Arboles S.A., is a company that manufactures emergency showers and eyewashes, I'm pretty sure that they know what they are talking about. It's a decent source in my opinion. --Pek (talk) 10:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion does not match WP:RS. Please read and thoroughly understand WP:RS, and please make no edits until you have done so. --Yamla (talk) 10:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What about this one? Would this be an acceptable source? --Pek (talk) 11:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not particularly. It's an internal memo targeting University of Wisconsin-Madison faculty and students. What part of WP:RS made you think such a source was appropriate? Please do not ask about any other sources until you have read and thoroughly understood WP:RS and until you can clearly explain how the source fits the criteria in the guideline. --Yamla (talk) 11:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]