User talk:Orasis

List of ethnic slurs

Your recent addition of Peckerwood needs a reference to support it. If you need help with this,leave me a message here, I will be watching for it. μηδείς (talk) 03:39, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Limor Schreibman-Sharir

Dear Orasis, I don't understand why you put notability line above the entry. Whar criterion From the 5 notability criterions doesn't exist in this entry ? Tzahy (talk) 09:08, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alliance Global Group for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alliance Global Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alliance Global Group (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:51, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:Royal Rife‎, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Hertz1888 (talk) 09:58, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ralph Bunche, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lehi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lehi (group)

Please don't make up your own Commons categories, as you did with your recent edit to Lehi (group). Also, if an editor adds the {{NPOV}} template to an article, they should start a discussion on the article's talk page specifying the article's POV problems. Since you failed to do so, I removed the template. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 10:59, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ARBPIA notice

The arbitration committee has decided that editors with less than 500 edits, such as yourself, may not edit any article which is broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict , including Talk pages of such articles. You were probably not aware of this restriction when you edited Lehi (group) , so I am making you aware of it now. Please to not continue to edit there until you have accumulated 500 or more edits in other areas of the encyclopedia. Read more about the case here WP:ARBPIA3. Epson Salts (talk) 01:49, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to edit articles where you are restricted from editing per WP:ARBPIA3, I will have an administrator enforce this via a block. Epson Salts (talk) 23:13, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 3, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:47, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration Enforcement

Please see WP:AE#Orasis. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:24, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 04:34, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban

Per WP:AE#Orasis, you are banned from the WP:ARBPIA topic area, broadly construed, for 6 months. I would also suggest that continuing on in the same manner after the ban expires will rapidly lead to an indefinite ban from the topic and most likely an indefinite block as well. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 22:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page

For abusive misuse of this talk page, I have blocked you for one month and have revoked your ability to edit this page for the duration of the block. If you continue in the same way once the block expires, you should expect an indefinite block. If you wish to appeal, please see WP:UTRS. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:30, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, having looked more closely at your recent edits, I see there was deliberate flaunting of your topic ban with the same kind of disruptive editing as before (together with misuse of another user's talk page that made it clear you are not going to heed your warnings and ban). As a result of that, I have increased your block to indefinite, as you were warned above, with talk page access disabled. See WP:UTRS if you wish to make an appeal. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:38, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:F-khufu.jpg

The file File:F-khufu.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]