Welcome to Wikipedia, Onepebble! Thank you for your contributions. I am Dthomsen8 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wales. Your edits may appear to constitute vandalism. They have been reverted.
If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
Hi, Onepebble. I'm sorry if the previous message that Gareth left you was a little confusing. Don't worry - we don't think you're trying to mess anything up, it's just that part of your edit, where you moved some images, apparently caused some formatting issues where there was too much blank space in some areas. If you're curious about the specifics, check with FruitMonkey, the user who undid your change, I just wanted to follow up because I understand those template messages can be off-putting and wanted to reassure you that your work is not considered vandalism and is appreciated. ST47 (talk) 17:31, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Onepebble, Just a line to thank you for the incredible amount of good editing since you began on May 1. With regard to my note above, what I meant to write was, " ... at Wales. Your edits here may, to others, appear to constitute ... They have been reverted by another editor." Kind regards, -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 23:41, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That's alright Griff-J.
I's be knowing Wales is your hood and all that, so dem fingers be ON the trigger!
Please refrain from changing multiple articles by merely adding paragraph breaks, particularly where the breaks are inappropriate and make the article choppy. Change for the sake of change is not constructive editing. Oldtaxguy (talk) 22:11, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Onepebble, and welcome to Wikipedia!
I hope you wasn't offended by my revert at the Six-Day War article.
Making smaller changes as you did here and here makes it soo much easier to spot any mistakes (and we all make mistakes, of course). Well done! --Frederico1234 (talk) 10:02, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Having reviewed the edits, I agree that those were good edits. I particularly like the added sub-section headers in the West Bank section, as that section probably leaves most readers gasping for air. --Frederico1234 (talk) 21:08, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Skin cancer is 50 to 250 times more common among transplant patients than the general population - 20 years after a transplant between 60% and 90% of patients are affected.[3]
Azathioprine causes the accumulation of 6-thioguanine (6-TG) in patients' DNA.[4] This can trigger cancer when the patient is later exposed to ultraviolet light.[5] Patients taking azathioprine were found to be abnormally sensitive to UVA light.[6]
That sounds fine. BUT, this one time, when the popo hit me wit like 14 rounds, hollow point, and just a bottle of tussin (regular) done cure - peer review didn't be predicting that, nomesayin? Onepebble (talk) 15:21, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
