User talk:OneTrueKingLives

Welcome to my Talk Page, all! Please assume good faith. All editors who assume good faith are welcome in my talk page.

Welcome!

Hello, OneTrueKingLives!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.


The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.


The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Welcome again

Welcome again. It's unclear to me why you've made a third Wikipedia account but you're entitled to do so. Anyway, many of your edits on this account have been reverted. Please don't add random words just for the sake of it. Some of the information you added doesn't appear to be sourced and adding "currently" to organisations unlikely to change their nature is pointless. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me or at the Teahouse. Thanks! MarchOfTheGreyhounds 19:02, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @MarchOfTheGreyhounds,
Thank you for your kind and thoughtful welcome. I will not put any random words in articles. OneTrueKingLives (talk) 21:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hello OneTrueKingLives! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Have a citation, using it on Malay page, but it’s from Wikipedia, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 04:12, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Harris J

Hello OneTrueKingLives,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Harris J for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

CoconutOctopus talk 08:51, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. OneTrueKingLives (talk) 08:53, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on TharProductionPak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CycloneYoris talk! 08:24, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Although many people not see your contributions on Wikipedia, I do. Mirah221 (talk) 22:28, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
100 edits is quite a lot! Keep up the good work Yaa114 (talk) 22:09, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Ponyobons mots 23:27, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wait; you mean those barnstars are fake??? Wow, who woulda thunk it? --Floquenbeam (talk) 23:46, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tireless, but not so original as it turns out.-- Ponyobons mots 23:48, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]