Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cutie Honey the Live logo.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Cutie Honey the Live logo.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 13:48, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:PKMNmovie12teaser.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
May I suggest that, instead of having an edit war over the title of by renaming and moving the article, you discuss the changes here first? At least a rational discussion will prevent any double redirects. MelicansMatkin (talk) 21:46, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Edit War warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Chōkoku no Jikū he. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. The object of opening up a discussion is to discuss any potential changes before making them, not stating your point and then making the changes anyways. MelicansMatkin (talk) 23:50, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I would like to make you aware that marking "a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette, especially if the change involves the deletion of some text". Also, please provide edit summaries, for controversial edits in particular. More specifically, the 130,000 characters of text you repeatedly removed from List of Death Note episodes are being discussed at Talk:List of Death Note episodes#over concise non-encyclopedic Episode descriptions. Please engage in civil discussion with your fellow editors instead of trying to force the issue by edit warring. Regards, -- Goodraise (talk) 22:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Stop removing the official link to the site and stop trying to unhide episodes that have not aired yet. Just pointing to the Sunrise site does not mean anything. They have not aired yet, so they are not confirmed, and the Sunrise site does NOT list airdates for any of the episodes. Quit edit warring, and quit ignoring warnings and just copy/pasting them back to my talk page. If you disagree with the current practice, discuss it on the talk page, do not just keep stubbornly reasserting your preferences without any comment or reasoning. -- -- Collectonian (talk·contribs) 23:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You were already blocked for this crap before. How many more times are you just going to continue to try to do it? Stop unhiding episodes with no air dates available. The titles are already there for when dates are available. Stop Removing the warning about the English title. And stop trying to get around 3RR by hiding behind an IP - because its obvious and against policy. -- Collectonian (talk·contribs) 02:05, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I was not vandalizing,I am helping out the page, Why does Collectonian constantly removing me helpful edits, as claiming its vandalism? I am not vandalizing.
Decline reason:
You are not blocked for vandalism, but for edit-warring. Your request seems to imply that, if unblocked, you would continue edit-warring, which means that the block is still necessary to avoid disruption of the encyclopedia. It might help you to familiarize yourself with both WP:EW and WP:DISPUTE before your block expires, so that you can participate more usefully in the future. FisherQueen (talk · contribs)02:26, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I did not revert as vandalism. You have already been asked then warned repeatedly not to keep unhiding episodes for which we have no sourced airdates, but you continue to do so. You were invited to bring it up for discussion, but instead you just keep edit warring. You refuse to discuss, ignore all attempts to reason with you, and just continue going against the current consensus for how episode lists should work - only those with verifiable airdates are listed (and as Syobi does NOT have titles on those episodes, you cannot claim that as a source for those episodes airing; that is why they have a different background - they are unconfirmed; you must wait until they themselves have verified/confirmed the airdate). You were blocked for continuing to be disruptive and edit warring, including using an IP, after having been blocked for doing the exact same thing multiple times before. -- Collectonian (talk·contribs) 02:23, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
So, why haven't you discussed it at Talk:List of InuYasha: The Final Act episodes? That's where the guidelines to follow would be. This isn't about procedure and guidelines and what the page should look like, it's about edit warring.
This is what I was asking for all along. An RS for the next titles and keeping the note about not using anything other than the English titles. Much appreciated. Though I would recommend unchecking "mark edits minor by default" if you have that on. As Tedder noted above, if you are using that, it is causing you to misused the Minor edit mark. From the title of ep 26, looks like the predictions on it being 26 are dead on. -- Collectonian (talk·contribs) 02:00, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I have been blocked for three months for continuing to mark all edits as minor, what where does it say i can't mark my edits as minor. What is so disruptive about that? Have I gotten a warning about not doing that? No, I haven't. I administrator has not given me a warning about the reason he blocked me for. I want to be unblocked.
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
There was never an "official" warning, though it looks like you've been told about this three times: 1, 2, 3. Do you indeed have "mark all edits as minor" unchecked in Special:Preferences now? If that's the case, I'll be glad to unblock. JamieS93❤17:33, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Of course, I'm sure you have read WP:MINOR, right? This is an escalation of previous disruption - on its own, it's not usually a huge deal. However, after being asked 3 times - plus the additional disruption - it became an escalation. (talk→BWilkins←track) 19:31, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This edit was still marked as minor- I'd encourage you to use this talk page as a sandbox to make sure you've fixed it. Do you need help on how to do it? tedder (talk) 02:25, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
){kind=link}
