en User talk:Nightingale8283

Welcome

Hello, Nightingale8283 and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students. Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, if your class doesn't already have one.

Go through our online training for students.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Helpme}} before the question.

Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.

It is highly recommended that you place this text: {{Educational assignment}} on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and should be treated accordingly.

We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! GabeIglesia (talk) 02:17, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia -- It looks like you've successfully followed the directions in the assignment and made a few edits! I'll be giving out Wikipedia assignment #3 to the class on Monday! -- Sethant (talk) 00:04, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment #3

Looks like you've completed assignment #3 successfully! Awesome! -- Sethant (talk) 05:48, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Review for assignment #5

Howdy! For your first review for Wikipedia assignment #5, check out the proposed edits made at User:Michael.weeks/sandbox and leave a comment about something you like and something you think they could improve further! - Sethant (talk) 06:23, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Your changes help make things more easy to understand and simple for those who may not know much about chemistry. I like that you defined all the terms and included specifics and units with some. One thing you could maybe include is the definition for ΔE°. You explain ΔG, ΔG°, and ΔE. So maybe just mention ΔE°, that way people are not confused. (Dsports1 (talk) 01:53, 21 May 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Second review for assignment #5

Howdy! For your second review for Wikipedia assignment #5, check out the proposed edits made at User talk:Pitts0608/sandbox and leave a comment about something you like and something you think they could improve further! - Sethant (talk) 05:58, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Review for your proposed edits - Drew P. Branch

Hi! I looked over your proposed edits for the Gibbs free energy page. I only see a few really minor changes. Could you expand your descriptions or elaborate on all the relationships to work available, cell potential, or the Nernst equation? Just a thought. Also, you've written that Q is equal to 1 for G⁰. While that is true, you may also want to point out the concentrations are equal to 1M or standard state.

You're a great writer, and have so much to contribute. I hope you just let it all go a bit to show your stuff. I see also you included links to other pages in your edits which is a good thing, and something I forgot. Good job!

Kirwan, aka Drew.P.Branch (talk) 03:57, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CHE260 assignment 6

Looks like you successfully completed assignment 6 and took your edits live! Awesome! -- Sethant (talk) 23:18, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]