|
User talk:Necessary EvilWelcome! Hello, Necessary Evil, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place Barnstar Hi Necessary Evil
Best regards and happy editing
Tycho BraheThanks for your edits, but I have now updated the article HEAT1X-TYCHO BRAHE so it has no content which has not been paraphrased.--Confusedmiked (talk) 17:52, 25 August 2010 (UTC) Shuttle-Mir Program da:Rumfærge-Mir-programmetHi there, take this :-)
RollbackYour request has been granted. Please be sure that you never use the rollback functionality in content disputes, and be open to discussion about your edits. ffm 19:49, 24 September 2008 (UTC) Your PostHey. It's common practice to not evaluate users and each of their contributions prior contributing to the articles they created/edited. User:Slikkidrajs may be a scumbag, but you should take a more mild approach to posting to talk pages of non-scumbags, as they would essentially be "on your side" in a dispute such as this. If he is flooding Wikipedia with new articles with misspellings of Rajasaurus, you should have put a warning on his page. DRosenbach (Talk | Contribs) 17:13, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
List of International Space Station visitorsI noticed an error in this list. I think stuff goes wrong here. the US trip count goes from 151->158 (should be 157). Also, the double stays the same, even though Nowak was on her 2nd visit. If I correct the US trip count, and the double omission error. I'm once again on matching numbers in the current list. So this is what I have done. --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 01:32, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Hej!Jeg kan se at du er aktiv på den engelske Wikipedia, og at du er fra Danmark. I skrivende stund, diskuterer vi på landsbybrønden et nyt forslag, om at starte en national afdeling, der vil blive kaldet Wikimedia Danmark. Hvis du er interesseret i at bidrage med noget tid til at få startet afdelingen, kan du skrive dit navn på denne side hos meta. Tak for din tid! Mike H. Fierce! 08:03, 20 January 2009 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (File:Valhalla14.jpg)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 5 February 2009 (UTC) Fair use rationale for File:Multi-Purpose Logistics Module Logo.pngThanks for uploading or contributing to File:Multi-Purpose Logistics Module Logo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -MBK004 22:04, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
CanberrasBritain's small wars is generally pretty reliable, learn something new every day. I thought the deployment of PR.9 was an urban legend. Guess I might have to make a FoI request. Justin talk 23:25, 16 March 2009 (UTC) Zodiac "observations"Before you revert my edit again, I'd like you to think carefully about what's going on here. At any given moment you can ask what the Sun's location is. Everyone agrees where it is. Then you can ask "Which 30-degree interval is it in relative to the Spring Equinox?" The answer to that is the tropical zodiac sign. You can ask "Which 30-degree interval is it in relative to the Fagan-Bradley reference point?" The answer to that is the sidereal zodiac sign. You can ask "Which IAU constellation is it in?" The answer to that is the astronomical constellation. All three of these are observations. All three of these are arbitrary human-chosen "agreements" or "votings" (your words). All three are objectively defined and repeatable. None of them have anything to do with anybody thinking that the Sun goes around the Earth. None of them is in any meaningful way subjective or a matter of opinion; at most there can be said to be some dispute over which one is a more useful question to ask. Do you have any idea why someone might see calling one an "observation" and the others not as an implicit value judgment? Do you think implicit value judgments are appropriate under Wikipedia's NPOV policy? Find the citation if you think there's a legitimate argument about whether astrological zodiacs are or are not "observed." There's also a grammatical issue here - signs and constellations are the same type of thing (namely, arbitrarily defined regions of the sky) whereas an "observation" is what you do to decide which sign or constellation the Sun appears in. It doesn't make sense to refer to the type of thing in one column header and what you do to find the thing in the third header. I think that's less important, though. 69.63.60.29 (talk) 23:48, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Argentine Naval ForcesHi, It would be a good idea to check the Talk Page, as Jor70 and I had already discussed this and had agreed to put in the Spanish names already. Is "Task Group" Spanish? It simply was ridiculous to have half the headers in Spanish and the rest in English. A bit of good faith goes a long way you know. Justin talk 10:15, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
OK no worries. Justin talk 22:22, 6 May 2009 (UTC) Thanks, I understand what you mean now with regards to Tailhook and I agree with you on re-reading the section. RP459 (talk) 14:53, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Friendly fire vs Blue on blueHello, you have shown an interest in whether the term "friendly fire" or "blue on blue" should be used in the 1982 British Army Gazelle friendly fire incident article. I have now raised the matter in the article's A-class review, if you are interested. Ryan4314 (talk) 13:01, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
RfC for War of the PacificHi User:Necessary Evil, I started a RfC in the Talk Page in order to improve War of the Pacific. I would appreciate your opinion and advice to the theme. Please, feel free to improve the grammer, style or spelling of the text. --Keysanger (talk) 17:32, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Fighter Command R/Ts 1940Yes I see the problem; there is also an unsourced statement: "The TR9 HF radio used by RAF fighters was limited in range, and even with a network of relay stations the squadrons could not roam more than one or two sectors from their airfields." which makes things even more confusing. Ramsay's point is the effective range of the TR9 was limited because of distortion and interference from other HF stations; the further away the fighter was from the transmitter the more distorted the signal became. The transmission range was shorter because the power of the set was lower than that of the TR1143. I will rewrite this. As it is there are other statements in this section which need a source: "Finally, the system for tracking RAF fighters, known as HF/DF or "Huff-Duff", restricted sectors to a maximum of four squadrons in the air. The addition of IFF, "Pipsqueak", while a welcome help in identifying RAF aircraft, took up another radio channel." Not very useful because there is nothing to confirm any of this. I'm also removing this speculative statement "This is, in part, a reflection of the novelty of the type of combat, as well as the control system. Sector Control could have been assigned one frequency for all fighters to "listen out" on (or "guard", in modern parlance), with "roving" intercept guidance, rather than the close positive control used, which limited controllers' ability to handle large numbers of interceptors.[1] " Cheers Minorhistorian (talk) 23:41, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (File:Blue Zone - On Fire single cover.jpg) Thanks for uploading File:Blue Zone - On Fire single cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 07:39, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Chronostrat siteRegarding the use of Late instead of Upper, there must be a cite to some international body that uses such terminology? I can't get the currently sourced paper on T. rex biomechanics but somehow I doubt this explicitly lays out a system of chronologic nomenclature in its conclusions. Dinoguy2 (talk) 23:33, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
AR magsHi, a quick google search : [1] (we are winning) [2] (we are still winning) (obviously touched) --Jor70 (talk) 23:30, 16 February 2010 (UTC) Find more: [3] [4] [5] [6] (!!) [7] (THis is one would be excellent for Pablo Carballo article!!) --Jor70 (talk) 23:42, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Tal Cual and ThatcherI have found this: [[8]], the images are towards the bottom. I'll let you decide what do with the images, the pirate one is in the background of the 'La Dama de la Muerte' image, and is quite difficult to see. I hope this helps. Regards, Rtdixon86 (talk) 23:56, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 The article Cabinet of Lars Løkke Rasmussen II has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ==Merge discussion for Luftwaffe North (Ostland) detachment (Luftflotte 1, Baltic Area)
Perseus71 (talk) 02:09, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Blue Zone - On Fire single cover.jpg Thank you for uploading File:Blue Zone - On Fire single cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 00:01, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
File:Blue Zone - On Fire single cover.jpg listed for deletionA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Blue Zone - On Fire single cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 23:29, 2 March 2010 (UTC) Aspects (talk) 23:29, 2 March 2010 (UTC) File:100kroner2009-sketch.jpgJust so you know, I've closed the move request you filed for this article. Files cannot be moved like articles can, you have to upload another file under the new name and have the old deleted (of course replacing all instances of the old file with the new one). Just wanted to drop you a line on your talk page informing why I closed it. Regards, Parsecboy (talk) 10:33, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Squadron (cavalry), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://plumbot.com/Squadron. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:21, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Talkback Message added 20:57, 9 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Hi, now that Squadron is a disambiguation page, per WP:FIXDABLINKS could you help fix the links that now point to a disambig? Thanks, --JaGatalk 12:19, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Satellite ImageryThe US didn't provide satellite imagery during the Falklands War. A request was made but the USG refused to retask satellites that were spying on the USSR. Its a myth not reality, so I support your removal of that material. Justin talk 21:01, 23 August 2010 (UTC) Milhist A-class and Peer Reviews Jul-Dec 2009
The commandersNice! [9] one step closer to finish :-) --Jor70 (talk) 14:27, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
UNINDENT The Black Buck raids were commanded from London, so it had a fairly long command chain. Air Commander Sir John Curtiss Air Vice-Marshall George Chesworth in Ascension & Mike Knight in the UK Air Chief-Marshall Sir Michael Beetham in the UK Gp Captain Price in Acension - Gp Captain Laycock wasn't in the command chain during the raid. Sqn Ldr John Reeve Laycock commanded the training element in the UK. On the Top Malo thing, we already have the precadence of Skirmish at Many Branch Point. What do you think? Justin talk 20:29, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
TrollYes I know ;-), but I cannot delete someone else talk --Jor70 (talk) 13:23, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
neologismHi Necessary Evil, There is an interesting discussion in Talk:Falklands_War#Malvinist? and I would like to know your opinion about. --Keysanger 20:12, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
I've started a discussion on the talk page, your input would be appreciated. J Milburn (talk) 17:42, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Subscripted 7 in 2010 TK7?Please respond at Talk:2010 TK7#Subscripted 7 ? Mitch Ames (talk) 02:41, 30 July 2011 (UTC) Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Port Stanley Airport - Google Earth.JPG Thank you for uploading File:Port Stanley Airport - Google Earth.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Veggy (talk) 15:00, 2 September 2011 (UTC) Replaceable fair use File:Port Stanley Airport - Google Earth.JPG Thanks for uploading File:Port Stanley Airport - Google Earth.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Veggy (talk) 15:48, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Steen Andersen BilleHej! Could you please look at the new section Steen Andersen Bille on my talk page. You may be able to help me! Viking1808 (talk) 16:13, 2 December 2011 (UTC) TalkbackMessage added 17:48, 20 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. W. D. Graham (previously GW) 17:48, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Battle of denmarkHello Necessary Evil. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Battle of denmark, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: no valid reason to delete - see WP:R#KEEP. The speedy criteria for redirects, R2 and R3 are deliberately limited, because there is not often any point to deleting redirects - it doesn't save any space. When you move the target, there is a bot which should sort out the resulting double redirect within a day or so, though it's tidy to make sure by doing it yourself - I've done this one. JohnCD (talk) 15:32, 9 May 2012 (UTC) Help translate ekvipagemesterhi NE - could you have a look at Jens Schou Fabricius which is newly expanded from a stub by using Topsøe-Jensens book (in Danish) and the Norwegian wiki-article. I am stuck for a good translation of ekvipasjemeister or ekvipagemester. Neither carriage master nor master of horse really seems to fit! Translation now improved. What do you think? Viking1808 (talk) 17:03, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Talk:List of active United States military aircraftThank you for signing my comment, i really didn't notice i hadn't! Gavbadger (talk) 18:00, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
AF447Hello, I'm discussing your latest edit to the AF447 air disaster here: Talk:Air_France_Flight_447#Post_report_findings. While I believe that your edit is totally inline with the cited source, I still think the source itself is quite misleading. See you there to know your opinion on the matter. Cochonfou (talk) 13:42, 20 March 2013 (UTC) Chicago's FireHello. I think you misunderstood. I have been learning Danish for eight years, and I can translate from Danish to English with accuracy. I will admit, I need practice regarding grammar, since I haven't written anything in Danish for two years. However, the standards you refer to are more flexible than you think. No one asked the rest of wikipedia to correct my commas, but assuming good faith, you should assume I will continue to work on the article. What I am a little worried about is the treat of deletion, especially when my poor translation makes for a better article than what was available before. As for google, I did not use a computer to translate the text at any point. CAT programs split the text into segments, and the user translates each segment manually. This is to assist multiple language translations within the same file. That is the main function of CAT programs, so I fail to see the relevance of google in all of this. My suggestion is, over time, improve what I have translated. I will keep working on it, but it isn't something that can happen overnight. But if I need to argue against deletion or reverting it back to a previous version, I wont be able to translate the whole article or correct the grammar of what I already have written. --OO(talk)(useless text here) 15:25, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
May 2013
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:08, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
It is unhelpful and unfriendly not to explain reversion at Gulf War (disambiguation)You reverted my edits at Gulf War (disambiguation) with the completely opaque and unhelpful comment "Don’t throw the baby out with the bath water." What baby? What bath water? What you reverted back to is a complete mess. It is repetitive and confusing. Your choice to revert and not edit is, further, unfriendly; against the spirit of cooperation, inclusion and consensus that undergirds Wikipedia; lazy; arrogant; and even bullying. Please explain on the talk page your insulting action -- your disregard of my work -- with an understandable explanation and not some flippant cliched metaphor. You owe my edits at least that much respect. --Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 11:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 10Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Unafraid of the Dark, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heliopause (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 10 June 2014 (UTC) Sarah BrightmanI think your comment on your revert is superfluous. At the time I made this edit Sarah Brightman was part of the crew of Soyuz TMA-18M, so no I was not joking. Hektor (talk) 11:15, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Category:Aircraft with four ejection seatsCategory:Aircraft with four ejection seats, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger One ping only 11:31, 5 January 2016 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for August 4Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Islamic State. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 4 August 2016 (UTC) ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! Hello, Necessary Evil. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Flyvevåbnet.png Thanks for uploading File:Flyvevåbnet.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 24 April 2017 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Hjemmeværnet.pngThanks for uploading File:Hjemmeværnet.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 9 August 2017 (UTC) ArbCom 2017 election voter messageHello, Necessary Evil. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Hæren.pngThanks for uploading File:Hæren.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 11 February 2018 (UTC) Elephanten (1773) - interpretation needed.Hi Necessary Evil - Some years ago you translated a couple of ship articles into Danish for Danish Wikipedia for me. I wonder if now you can give me the benefit of a true Dane in interpreting the following . . . It appears against the entry for the Danish ship-of-the-line Elephanten which was decommissioned in 1801, but appears (if my reading is correct) to have become a powder store and/or a blockship in the four years following.
Orphaned non-free image File:1000kroner.jpgThanks for uploading File:1000kroner.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ★ Bigr Tex 02:45, 30 August 2019 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:200kroner.jpgThanks for uploading File:200kroner.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ★ Bigr Tex 02:45, 30 August 2019 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:100kroner.jpgThanks for uploading File:100kroner.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ★ Bigr Tex 02:45, 30 August 2019 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:50kroner.jpgThanks for uploading File:50kroner.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ★ Bigr Tex 02:45, 30 August 2019 (UTC) I have sent you a note about a page you startedThanks for creating 1000 DKK (1997). User:Onel5969 while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. Onel5969 TT me 02:06, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Orphaned non-free image File:Forsvarets Auditoerkorps.jpgThanks for uploading File:Forsvarets Auditoerkorps.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 13 May 2020 (UTC) |
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
![[1]](http://www.todohistorietas.com.ar/gentemayo1982.jpg){kind=link}
![[2]](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_AYtnXc5wPBg/Sdt_p4GxcNI/AAAAAAAAfZ8/VHioDizgqmI/s400/genteseguimos.jpg){kind=link}
![[3]](http://i42.tinypic.com/2s5z7mf.jpg){kind=link}
![[4]](http://i40.servimg.com/u/f40/11/80/95/58/escane19.jpg){kind=link}
![[5]](http://i29.tinypic.com/6gygq8.jpg){kind=link}
![[6]](http://s1.subirimagenes.com/otros/276981elporteno01.jpg){kind=link}
![[7]](http://s1.subirimagenes.com/otros/276947gente20051982.jpg){kind=link}
