User talk:NapoliRoma

I'm a big fan of keeping an entire discussion in one place, so unless otherwise requested or noted, I'll reply here to anything started here. Similarly, if a discussion was started elsewhere, I'd prefer to continue it there, but if that's something you're rabidly against, I'm easy.

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Politrukki (talk) 00:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Office of the Former President moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Office of the Former President, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. This page needs correct sourcing, expanded text and just generally a lot of work before it is ready for the mainspace. Please develop this article more and get some help before you submit it to the mainspace again. Nightenbelle (talk) 18:44, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Nightenbelle: -- this is an article I created that got (correctly, IMHO) turned into a redirect, but then got co-opted by another editor who added entirely new content. You've probably noticed that it's already been recreated by another editor (and deleted again, and recreated, if I'm reading the history correctly) and the war is back on... .
In any event, the content that's currently in draftspace is not mine, nor do I think it needs to be preserved (although it would probably be appropriate to restore the edit history to the original article).
If the edit history can't be salvaged, I think the draftspace version should be deleted. Are either of these something you can do, or guide me on doing myself? Thanks, NapoliRoma (talk) 23:47, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Office of the Former President for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Office of the Former President is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Office of the Former President until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

– Muboshgu (talk) 00:48, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Patent (disambiguation) cleanup

Thanks! Turns out one of the detailed statements wasn't even correct (the botany glossary says the term means 45–50°, not 90°). DMacks (talk) 21:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ernest Granville Booth moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ernest Granville Booth, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creepTalk 13:03, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ernest Granville Booth has been accepted

Ernest Granville Booth, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– robertsky (talk) 01:01, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict...please fill out my survey?

Hello :) I am writing my MA dissertation on Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and I noticed that you have contributed to those pages. My dissertation will look at the process of collaborative knowledge production on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and the effect it has on bias in the articles. This will involve understanding the profiles and motivations of editors, contention/controversy and dispute resolution in the talk pages, and bias in the final article.

For more information, you can check out my meta-wiki research page or my user page, where I will be posting my findings when I am done.

I would greatly appreciate if you could take 5 minutes to fill out this quick survey before 8 August 2021.

Participation in this survey is entirely voluntary and anonymous. There are no foreseeable risks nor benefits to you associated with this project.

Thanks so much,

Sarah Sanbar

Sarabnas I'm researching Wikipedia Questions? 20:49, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of ships damaged by kamikaze attack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of ships damaged by kamikaze attack, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ships damaged by kamikaze attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American convicts who became writers has been nominated for deletion

Category:American convicts who became writers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:50, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

grunts and groans

In context, grunts are ordinary soldiers; groans is a play on the ambiguity. —Tamfang (talk) 04:31, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ahmed Naji, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Egyptian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]