en User talk:Minutes to Rise

USER TALK

If you want to have those genres listed

You need relible sources to back them up. I have told you this many times before but you never seem to listen. You can't just make a claim and not back it up. On the same note you can't delete genres that are sourced, which I noticed you've done on various pages. If you want to be a positive contributor here you have to STOP switching back edits of yours, when people deem them unproductive.Hoponpop69 07:54, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is English your second language?Hoponpop69 08:27, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why lastfm is not a valid source

Last fm is user edited just like wikipedia, meaning anyone can change the information on it. Because of this it is not considered a reliable source.Hoponpop69 09:02, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tokio Hotel

What on earth are you trying to do with this page? Sala Skan 11:17, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Post-Hardcore

You don't own the Post-Hardcore article, neither do I nor anyone who edits it- Wikipedia owns it. If you feel so strongly about it, discuss why you think Heavy Metal should be a stylistic influence on Post-Hardcore on its talk page. TheLetterM 16:34, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Minutes to Rise for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. TheLetterM 17:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

You and your sock IP User:87.167.226.119 have just violated WP:3RR, and consequently, I am reporting you. TheLetterM 17:34, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting

You've been reported to both 3RR and Suspected Sockpuppets. Suffice it to say I warned you. TheLetterM 17:45, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sala Skan 17:53, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another 3RR warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tokio Hotel. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Sala Skan 18:00, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please

May I ask that you discontinue attacking other editors and create disruption. We're trying to do something good here so please contribute carefully and constructively. Thanks a lot, GDonato (talk) 20:23, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Further to GDonato, please use the article talkpages to voice your concerns. Discuss matters with other editors, and be prepared to accept the consensus even if you disagree. Please do not use the CAPS LOCK when posting, as this is considered Uncivil. You will find that your views will be more carefully considered and responded to if you raise them in a more appropriate manner. LessHeard vanU 20:36, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tokio Hotel

I recommend that you read up on policies like Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Reliable sources. I think they're a rock band, you think they're a pop band. Solution: we both go look for some sources, and cite them in the article. This makes the article more reliable as well. Please stop blatantly reverting me, and try to discuss the matter on the talk page (politely) instead. Also, please be more careful when you revert, this time you also removed some categories. Sala Skan 10:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Wikipedia has a neutral point of view policy; we try to keep every viewpoint and opinion balanced. Edits like this one are clearly POV (point of view), because this is a subjective matter and there likely won't be many people agreeing with you. Please refrain from making such edits, Wikipedia isn't meant to promote a particular viewpoint. Also, if you want to include such a claim, please cite a reliable source. Sala Skan 10:14, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, comments like these are considered uncivil. Sala Skan 11:50, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR Block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule on Post-hardcore. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 13:05, 14 July 2007 (UTC)}}[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of AFI-PUNK (talk • contribs • block log • creation log). As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 23:13, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Minutes to Rise for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Angel Of Sadness ^T/C 20:55, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]