This user may have left Wikipedia. GDonato has not edited Wikipedia since 23 December 2012. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.
Please continue any conversation where it was started.
If I have left a message on your talk page please DO NOT post a reply here.
I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.
If I have forgot to watch your page and haven't replied then please post a reminder here or send an e-mail.
User:GDonato has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as GDonato's day!
For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,
enjoy being the Star of the day, dear GDonato!
Razzinator socking and also violating block evasion
Razzinator (talk·contribs), socking with IP to avoid block and violate block evasion during block you gave the user. I blocked the IP User:68.118.199.90 and tagged, but perhaps you could take a look, and extend the block on the main account Razzinator for block evasion and socking? Cirt (talk) 22:04, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies. I get this problem when I try to warn a particularly bad edit for the last time, Unfortunately, you had reverted the edits before I could warn the vandal, and so you got it instead... Sorry... Rkr1991(Wanna chat?)04:42, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, unfortunately your "quick laugh" is not appropriate for the site. In addition as the content appeared to be derogatory and/or offensive you were issued with a warning, if you are genuinely interested in creating an article see WP:FIRST but continuing to recreate that page will lead to loss of editing privileges. Best regards, GDonato (talk) 00:00, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
RE: Vandalism
Um I didn't vandalize anything. If anything got deleted then it must have been a mistake. Let me know what page that was on but I did not vandalize anything. Thank you. (Rwhollywoodfan (talk) 17:16, 1 April 2010 (UTC))[reply]
I think there might be a misunderstanding; I haven't accused you of anything, as far as I can tell you've done nothing wrong at all! :) GDonato (talk) 19:44, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The article on Tennessee State Senator Mae Beavers may have a problem. The last line of the article, copied below, may present libel problems and should be reviewed.The line reads:
"Fake conservative and crazy person Susan Lynn filed to run against Beavers in the 2010 Republican primary."
I am not sure what it means to be a fake conservative or if it is appropriate to term someone "crazy".
19:11, 25 April 2010 (UTC) Michael Freeman
Not sure why you've picked me to raise this with but I've gone ahead and removed the sentence in question while I try to work it out. Thanks. GDonato (talk) 23:21, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:34, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Invitation to particpate in the December 2010 Wikification Drive
Hi there! I thought you might be interested in the December 2010 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We're currently recruiting help to clear a massive backlog (22,000+ articles), and we need your help! Participants in the drive will receive barnstars for their contributions! If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!
You are currently listed as a member of WikiProject Wikify. As agreed upon by the project, all members will be required to confirm their membership by February 1, 2010. If you are still interested in assisting with the project, please add yourself to the list at this page—this will renew your membership of WikiProject Wikify.
I live in Binghamstown in Co Mayo. I noticed that there was an error (Binghamstown used to be called Ballymacsheeran, not whatever is written in Wiki - I'll check with my husband who is a local historian and a Bingham). I noticed that Molag Bal (?? don't have name in front of me) was banned. I was interested in learning why. You seem to have been involved in the decision. I have no idea how these things work.
Best,
Lucy —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.251.255.13 (talk) 12:40, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:08, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:07, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WJBscribe(talk)16:37, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanztalk00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"Cardillac" is Correct; No, It's not Cadillac Flubbed. Nor everybody's Old Friend Cadilac.
Somebody has posted a query-box on your reference to the Cardillac syndrome in your fine Madeleine de Scudéry article.
I've googled it, with some difficulty since the machinery at Google really really wants to tell me about Cadillacs, and when I minus them out they have a fallback position of wanting to tell me about some guy Cadilac.
Most of the references to it seem to be in German or French, and the best English one may be:
Motherless Children, Fatherless Waifs: Fictional Protagonists and the Artistʼs Search for the Real Self
Issue 12 of I.O. Evans studies in the philosophy & criticism of literature
Volume 12 of Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden
My problem is, I don't know how to insert a footnote 7 in the middle of the list, but somebody ought to do it. My, how I hate those prissy, intrusive, little "you don't have enough XYZ. Nyah-nyah" boxes...
But if Hoffman is the only person who ever suffered from it, does it qualify as a syndrome? But nobody could ever by that prissy. Shurely.
I’m posting here (and on the talk page for M. Sweeten)… I don’t get why there is only one brother listed, when she had 2 - and with whom she played the children of Raymond on the TV show “Everyone Loves Raymond”. Really, both brothers should have pages… but that is far beyond my skills.
Thoughts?
Jd.varner44 (talk) 04:47, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
