|
User talk:Miked1992
WTCPlease do not change the times noted in the article - there are differing times depending on sourcing, and the present times are based on a later and more thorough documentation. I believe there's a discussion of the time issue in the archives of September 11 attacks. Acroterion (talk) 15:46, 26 August 2013 (UTC) January 2014
Hudson River edit warringHere's the deal. You insist on using non-authoritative "sources" such as map sites and blogs. We've reverted you over and over. If you don't want to be considered for banning, I suggest you get on the Talk page and make your case. - Denimadept (talk) 18:11, 14 July 2014 (UTC) I have made my case on the talk page, authoritative sources are a good idea, but it does not mean that they are always right. This topic is very much up to debate as to where it truly begins. I just tend to go by Henderson Lake as the source because there is a dam on the outlet usually meaning a river, and the maps which I told you before. I am not doing this out of sheer spite, I just truly believe this. If you disagree be my guest, just do not threaten to block me because of it all that is just uncalled for. I do not mean any harm Miked1992(talk} 18:46, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Are you a page administrator? 22:00 14 July 2014 (UTC) Miked1992 {talk}
I am not completely inexperienced, but I still could learn a little more. I am from New Jersey and the Hudson River flows only about an hour from where I live. I have never been too deep in the Adirondack Park so I am not 100 percent sure as to exactly where it begins. I would say since it is not quite lake Tear of the Clouds contrary to popular belief, Either the outlet of Henderson Lake or close to the outlet at the confluence of those two streams. I live next to a lake in Northwest Jersey Lake Hopatcong which is the source and start of a major but largely unspoken river the Musconetcong. I have always enjoyed Cartography and looking at maps as a pastime. I personally would feel that an admin knows best in these situations. Although I have done more editing this year I still just need to learn a little more. Miked1992 {talk}
I have now both points of view both Us Geo Survey and Google Maps as references and I have contrasted them apart. I have stated that the Us. Geo Survey shows one source while Google Maps and Mapquest show another. Miked1992 (talk)
Now that I know that the US GEO survey is a true government source and is not all erratic, I finally believe all of you. I am sorry if it took too much convincing. - Miked1992 (talk) July 2014
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:18, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:20, 22 July 2014 (UTC) Hi, August 2016
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this: Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes) I noticed your recent edit to Linkin Park does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history. Edit summary content is visible in: Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Mlpearc (open channel) 21:39, 20 August 2016 (UTC) September 2016
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! Hello, Miked1992. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Sylar (Band)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Sylar (Band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 23:20, 11 December 2016 (UTC) Just letting you know that I've fixed the timeline table that you were trying to add. I removed the '06/01/2017' date for now because the table can't read dates that are past today's, otherwise it'll break. I'll remember to add it back in when the time comes. Minima© (talk) 16:42, 4 January 2017 (UTC) ArbCom 2017 election voter messageHello, Miked1992. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) Hi Miked1992, Greetings. Pls note that your creation of Fire from the gods has been moved to Draft:Fire from the gods. Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs inline citation from independent/third party r reliable source (in any language) for verification to gauge nobility criteria is met. Pls see reliable source - WP:RS, verification - WP:V, and notability WP:N. For webcite - see here WP:CITEWEB and its template Template: cite web. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:25, 3 March 2018 (UTC) March 2018
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 23:02, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:4TheWynne, you may be blocked from editing. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 01:10, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 3Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sylar (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beartooth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 3 April 2018 (UTC) April 2018 You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Amp71 (talk) 03:47, 28 April 2018 (UTC) Why Cannibal Corpse members does not sang backing vocals on their studio albums/live shows? Joseph Saleem (talk) 08:07, 28 April 2018 (UTC) September 2018
ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Miked1992. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Fire from the godsHello, Miked1992. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fire from the gods". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 17:24, 9 March 2019 (UTC) ArbCom 2019 election voter message
November 2019
December 2019 This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in the September 11 attacks. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. --MONGO (talk) 15:51, 22 December 2019 (UTC) Please stick with one account. Re-adding challenged material by using multiple accounts can get the blocked fron editing.--MONGO (talk) 15:59, 22 December 2019 (UTC)  Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--MONGO (talk) 18:55, 22 December 2019 (UTC) Hello Mongo, Since we both share a mutual agreement to avoid a personal edit war. I was just wondering how I could properly form a new consensus on the WTC Crash and Collapse times. Should I (A. Write a Paragraph), (B. Find and Share New Sources in a Talk Page Forum), as just a couple of ideas. I Hope to hear back from you or Arcoterian on this matter soon thanks. Miked1992 (talk) 14:40, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
I personally believe that the general consensus for the WTC 2 crash time in the 2010s as stated by the 9/11 Memorial Webiste, (the most authoratative source) is 9:03 A.M. I will be writing my argument on the talk pages soon, thanks. Miked1992 (talk) 14:24, 31 December 2019 (UTC) Multiple accountsI can’t help but notice the similarities between your account and Mikeis1996, right down to the name and tendency to edit war over genre. Unless/until you can explain this incredible coincidence, your account is blocked. Sergecross73 msg me 15:16, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
I am Not Mikeis1996, that is a totally different account and I am telling the truth. Sorry for the confustion. Miked1992 01:05, 28 January 2020 (UTC) March 2020
April 2020 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent you from persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:33, 1 April 2020 (UTC)Unreliable sourcesHi Miked1992, Thank you very much for providing inline references for your contributions. This is a good first step. However, there has been a new complaint about your addition of poorly sourced content, such as "lead guitar" vs. "guitar" in Special:Diff/948989121. If I see correctly, you have used a self-published personal fan website as the source for such information. Wikipedia requires reliable sources, and fan websites are not reliable sources. Please be more careful in your choice of sources, and ask at the Teahouse for assistance if you are unsure about the reliability of a source. Best regards, Thanks ~ ToBeFree (talk), I am not the most experienced Wiki User, I still have much to learn. Hopefully I can find better sources for my editsMiked1992 (talk) 02:48, 4 April 2020 (UTC)Miked1992Miked1992 (talk) 02:48, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Avoiding an unintentional edit warHi again Miked1992, First of all, thank you very much! But then again, I'll need to voice a concern – the situation at Darkest Hour (band) is quickly getting close to an edit war. Unintentionally of course, but dangerously. Whenever you would like to restore something that another user has reverted, please click "Talk" above the article, then "New Section". Propose your changes there instead of making them directly, and wait at least one week to see if someone raises a concern. Thank you very much and best regards, Thank You, ~ ToBeFree (talk I will leave a new section in the Darkest Hour Talk Page to explain my viewpoint on guitar roles. I am a fan of the band "Convalescense" is probably my favorite song by them.
Alright, Ive managed to voice my opinion on the bands talk page, and I hope for the best --Miked1992 (talk) 03:06, 4 April 2020 (UTC)Miked1992--Miked1992 (talk) 03:06, 4 April 2020 (UTC) Please do not edit about band members and their roles anymoreHi Miked1992, in response to your question at User talk:ToBeFree/Archive 11#Editing Bands and avoiding Edit Wars, I'll copy my answer here, as it is sadly important. Thanks for asking, and for starting these discussions. Sadly, the answers to your other, similar requests, have been negative. The concerns voiced by other users at Talk:Lamb_of_God_(band) and Talk:As_I_Lay_Dying_(band) show clearly, with many references, that your proposed type of editing is being objected to. While there has been no response to Talk:Darkest_Hour_(band)#Guitar_Roles, I believe that the reactions on the other talk pages should be reason enough to stop making similar proposals in the future. Please find different topics to contribute about, instead of making these changes about bands. Best regards,
Sounds good, I will cut back quite a bit on editing band roles. However if I feel I could contribute I will post my views on the talk page first. I am not trying to spitefully get back at other users for a dispute, I do not feel that admins however should exert their power over people who are less advanced in Wikipedia editing by reverting their edits like a bully just because they feel that they are right, thanks. --Miked1992 (talk) 21:21, 23 April 2020 (UTC)Miked1992--Miked1992 (talk) 21:21, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
April 2020
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 03:02, 20 April 2020 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for May 8Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Melissa Doi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Tower (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:36, 8 May 2020 (UTC) July 2020
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
February 2021
Jack Owen was not a rhythm guitaristHello, please stop changing Jack Owen's "title" on Cannibal Corpse as rhythm guitar. He did just as many guitar solos as Bob Rusay on those first two albums. He did more solos than pat O'Brien on live cannibalism. so stop labeling it as lead or rhythm and just say guitar. it makes people think differently when you say rhythm guitar for jack. or at least just put both lead and rhythm for jack July 2021
September 2021
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add December 2022
January 2023
I'm not entirely sure if this is my place to respond, but I messaged Miked about this again ten days ago[1] and received no response back. They instead reverted yet another attempt of mine to reinstate that edit without offering an explanation as to why.[2] There is only a second’s difference, but both the NIST[3]: 80 and the 9/11 Commission[4]: 322 state that the collapse of the South Tower began at 9:58:59, not 9:59, and plenty of articles on the subject of 9/11 give the precise times down to the second. Off the top of my head, I can think of Flight 11, which lists the crash time at 8:46:40;[5] or Flight 77, listing the moment it struck the Pentagon at 9:37:46.[6] In a similar vein, one of Mohamed Atta's accidental transmissions to ATC is listed as occurring at 8:33:59,[7] even though going by this logic of changing "9:58:59" to "9:59," it should be listed as 8:34. Hmm1994 (talk) 16:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC) References
South TowerNIST and the Commission, who both investigated the World Trade Center disaster thoroughly, clearly state that the collapse of WTC 2 began just before 9:59.[1]: 80 [2]: 322 I'm not sure why you keep changing it back to the common consensus of 9:59; that's literally just people rounding up to avoid having to type a mouthful of a number like "9:58:59." This was also pointed out to you in these two diffs[3][4] as well as here.[5] Hmm1994 (talk) 18:55, 6 January 2023 (UTC) References
ANI Discussion
Thanks for being polite and responsive on WP:ANIHi, I just wanted to say, thank you for being polite and responsive to the concerns raised at ANI. We rarely see that. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 07:44, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Plush (band) (July 5)
Erra (band)Hello, so I just read the article you use as a source and there isn't any single direct mention about who is playing which guitar. Furthermore, there isn't even a mention that it occurred on all their releases, so I suggest you to find something more direct or at least specify it more in the article because I could miss it. Thanks. --Tobi999tomas (talk) 07:35, 28 August 2023 (UTC) ArbCom 2023 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add February 2024
March 2024The amount of warnings (and a block) over unsourced editing is extremely concerning. You're blocked for 1 month. When it expires, I hope you'll finally take Wikipedia's sourcing standards seriously. Sergecross73 msg me 20:20, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
