User talk:Michael Goodyear
Personal and Contact InformationMichael Goodyear, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada mgoodyear@dal.ca
Outcrossing and allogamyHi, I saw your linking together of the outcrossing and allogamy pages. Those terms are certainly synonyms, but the outcrossing page is almost exclusively about a particular technique. I don't know what page title would be considered appropriate, perhaps it wouldn't change, but rather than merging the pages, I think it would be good to disambiguate that sense of the term. Perhaps it could start with a hatnote that says something like "This page is about a technique used in animal and plant breeding. For naturally occurring outcrossing see allogamy". Sminthopsis84 (talk) 14:06, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
So I've made some changes at Outcrossing, to reduce the overlap with Allogamy. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 14:39, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
APG IVGlobe-trotting over? I've done some work on updating to the APG IV system, including using "Asphodelaceae" rather than "Xanthorrhoeaceae" (hooray!) as APG IV does, in anticipation of its conservation in 2017. I haven't properly dealt with articles like Asparagales, so do please have a look when you have time. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:07, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participateHi Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal. We welcome you to have a look the journal. Feel free to participate. You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:
The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reachwikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason. DiptanshuTalk 14:22, 11 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.
William T. Stearn scheduled for TFAThis is to let you know that the William T. Stearn article has been scheduled as today's featured article for April 16, 2018. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 16, 2018, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:40, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Clarification of wording of Barbara's topic banSandstein has closed the User:Barbara (WVS) ANI discussion with a topic ban worded "is topic-banned (WP:TBAN) from medical articles". Following discussion with Sandstein regarding the scope of that topic ban (User_talk:Sandstein#What_the_topic_ban_covers), it is felt that further wording is required. Therefore it is proposed that the wording of the topic ban is amended to read: "By consensus of the community, Barbara (WVS) (talk · contribs), also editing as Bfpage (talk · contribs), is topic-banned (WP:TBAN) from health and medical topics, including anatomy and sexuality, broadly construed, and is also banned from interacting with Flyer22 (talk · contribs) (WP:IBAN)." As you took place in the discussion, please visit Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Proposal_for_clarification_of_scope_of_topic_ban to give your views. SilkTork (talk) 08:38, 26 March 2018 (UTC) April 2018 at Women in Red
I want to thank you for the work you did on Woolf's page. It pained me to see how disorganized it was, but every time I tried something, there were always issue. Is Woolf your only interested? also Vita Sackville-West needs work according to me. --Elisa.rolle (talk) 08:33, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!
Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation May 2018 at Women in Red
Wiki Loves FoodHello! After the successful pilot program by Wikimedia India in 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is happening again in 2018 and this year, it's going International. To make this event a grand success, your direction is key. Please sign up here as a volunteer to bring all the world's food to Wikimedia. Danidamiobi (talk) 22:09, 6 May 2018 (UTC) Women in Red June Editathons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging Invitation to participate in studyHello, I am E. Whittaker, an intern at Wikimedia with the Scoring Team to create a labeled dataset, and potentially a tool, to help editors deal with incivility when they encounter it on talk pages. A full write-up of the study can be found here: m:Research:Civil_Behavior_Interviews. We are currently recruiting editors to be interviewed about their experiences with incivility on talk pages. Would you be interested in being interviewed? I am contacting you because of your involvement in Wikipedia’s Women in Red project. The interviews should take ~1 hour, and will be conducted over BlueJeans (which does allow interviews to be recorded). If, so, please email me at ewhit@umich.edu in order to schedule an interview. Thank you Ewitch51 (talk) 21:31, 18 June 2018 (UTC) July 2018 at Women in Red
File:Pye Beaulieu 1910.jpeg listed for discussionA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pye Beaulieu 1910.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:10, 9 July 2018 (UTC) August 2018 at Women in Red
Eichmann in Jerusalem article video link same as on Hannah ArendtBefore:
Update (User:Alexf decided he did not want me to fix linkrot, and reverted this):
from Hannah Arendt:
69.181.23.220 (talk) 22:44, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Hannah ArendtHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hannah Arendt you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 17:01, 23 August 2018 (UTC) September 2018 at Women in Red
Orphaned non-free image File:Hannah Arendt.pngThanks for uploading File:Hannah Arendt.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 27 August 2018 (UTC) October 2018 at Women in Red
Get ready for November with Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging Better source request for File:Honora Sneyd by Flaxman.jpgThanks for your upload to Wikipedia: You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:08, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
File source problem with File:RHSAGM.pngThank you for uploading File:RHSAGM.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:46, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Michael Goodyear. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) December 2018 at Women in Red
January 2019 at Women in Red
2019--Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:12, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:12, 7 January 2019 (UTC) Please check out "Happy" once more, for a smile, and sharing (a Nobel Peace Prize), and resolutions. I wanted that for 1 January, but then wasn't sad about having our music pictured instead. Not too late for resolutions, New Year or not. DYK that he probably kept me on Wikipedia, back in 2012? By the line (which brought him to my attention, and earned the first precious in br'erly style) that I added to my editnotice, in fond memory? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:33, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
--Michael Goodyear ✐ ✉ 00:46, 13 January 2019 (UTC) February 2019 at Women in Red
March 2019 at Women in Red
Your GA nomination of Hannah ArendtThe article Hannah Arendt you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Hannah Arendt for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 01:20, 9 March 2019 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Hannah ArendtThe article Hannah Arendt you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hannah Arendt for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 19:21, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
That's excellent, thank you so much for all you put in. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:24, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
April editathons at Women in RedApril 2019
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging (Please excuse this post if it is a duplicate!) May you join this month's editathons from WiR!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging June events with WIR
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging Perotin contributionsThank you so much for improving the article and adding so much depth! -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 14:47, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Brynhild OlivierHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Brynhild Olivier you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caeciliusinhorto -- Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 17:21, 24 June 2019 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Brynhild OlivierThe article Brynhild Olivier you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Brynhild Olivier for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caeciliusinhorto -- Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 20:21, 24 June 2019 (UTC) July events from Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:40, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging Your GA nomination of Brynhild OlivierThe article Brynhild Olivier you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Brynhild Olivier for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caeciliusinhorto -- Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 21:21, 1 July 2019 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Ornithogalum umbellatumHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ornithogalum umbellatum you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 22:00, 4 July 2019 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Ornithogalum umbellatumThe article Ornithogalum umbellatum you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ornithogalum umbellatum for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 17:41, 11 July 2019 (UTC) August 2019 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 06:45, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging Habsburg Empire/Habsburg MonarchyWe have a HUGE problem on the page Habsburg Monarchy. It seems to be a page about Habsburg control of Hungary and Croatia. As far as I know Austria was Habsburg Monarchy since 1282, way before Hungary and Croatia. But worst of all, Habsburg Empire redirects to that page. So the empire of Charles V and Austria-Hungary do not currently count as Habsburg Empires, when literally all books and encyclopedias define such empires as Habsburg empire. Barjimoa (talk) 00:01, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
NevermindIt seems that I solved the issue above with another user. Barjimoa (talk) 10:31, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
TelephieaeHello Thanks for your input on WS and WP regarding Crassulaceae and I somewhat agree with your approach. I am trying to match it with WS, but this taxonomy and classification largely. I have a major query regarding the tribal classification of Sempervivoideae. Telephieae is circumscribed in Caryophyllaceae, by Rabeler & Bittrich 1993. Suprageneric nomenclature in the Caryophyllaceae. PDF, as Telephieae DC., Prodr. 3: 366. (1828) with the type genus Telephium L. (1753). It is therefore unavailable for use in Crassulaceae, as a tribe in Sempervivoideae, as cited by yourself as Telephiae 't Hart, Ohba and Thied ed ined. I have a few ideas where this error may have come from, but can not read Russian and Plants of the World is very odd. I assume it is a clade based upon Sedum telephium Hope you can help. Andyboorman (talk) 20:29, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
I have made an attempt to follow Kubitzky on WS. All will be fine until I get to Telephieae and as WS is primarily a taxonomic database we hit a problem with ined. I will edit Sedeae to more or less follow Kubitzky and those that have followed. I will omit the clades, but add a note explaining they are being worked on - it looks like the outcome could be an eventual single Sedum s.l. for this tribe. I will use his definition of Umbiliceae Meisn. and get rid of Umbilicinae and Sedinae as subtribes on WS. To be consistent Telephieae ('t Hart) Ohba and Thiede ined. will then have to be added as a tribe with a note that taxonomically this definition is provisional only. That is the best I can do and hope fellow WS editors are not too annoyed. Seem OK with you? Andyboorman (talk) 08:48, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
September 2019 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging Your GA nomination of FritillariaHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fritillaria you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:40, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of FritillariaThe article Fritillaria you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fritillaria for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:42, 9 September 2019 (UTC) October Events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging November 2019 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:58, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging ArbCom 2019 election voter messageFern classificationThe Schuettpelz et al. (2018) Taxon article doi:10.12705/673.1 and the subsequent reply by Christenhusz & Chase (2018) doi:10.12705/673.2 make entertaining reading for those enjoying academic spats, but leave us with a problem here. Instinctively, I would prefer to follow Christenhusz & Chase's "lumped" system for article titles and taxoboxes, since it causes least changes to article titles based on early systems of classification. However, the only taxonomic database that has a fully consistent system down to the level of species, which is necessary here to make the species names and articles consistent, is the Checklist of Ferns and Lycophytes of the World which uses PPG I. Plants of the World Online currently doesn't use any consistent system, and as of 22 November 2019, has errors like listing Sphenomeris as an accepted genus but then placing all its species in Odontosoria. It's definitely the case that fern classification is a total mess! I regret starting on trying to sort out our articles, because I just keep finding more problems. Peter coxhead (talk) 11:13, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
It does seem important to refer to both the PPG I and the Christenhusz & Chase systems in articles. If it's of any use to you, I've drawn up a comparison table for my own use at User:Peter coxhead/Work/PPG#Comparison. The √ marks in the end column show the (few) articles I've checked/changed so far. Thyrsopteris is an example of the minimum I think is needed in a stub article. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:01, 25 November 2019 (UTC) December events with WIR
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:43, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging January 2020 at Women in Red
Your GA nomination of SaxifragalesHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Saxifragales you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Starsandwhales -- Starsandwhales (talk) 02:20, 7 January 2020 (UTC) Your GA nomination of SaxifragalesThe article Saxifragales you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Saxifragales for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Starsandwhales -- Starsandwhales (talk) 02:41, 10 January 2020 (UTC) February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging March 2020 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging Hi Michael, I'm Dan. I'm quite impressed by your list of botanical GAs. Your Coronariae is up at GAN, and I'll be happy to review it, if we can find another reviewer to spotcheck the Latin sources (I can spotcheck the German ones), and if you're amenable to adding some text to the article. Some reviewers would look at this article and say that it's too list-y for GAN ... I don't agree, I think the most impressive thing about the article is the sourcing, and a GA is perfectly acceptable scaffolding for that sourcing. OTOH, there's not a lot of text below the lead that isn't list-y. It's not a fatal flaw, but it's a concern, for me anyway. There are several options for what to add ... what do you think of adding some images and text descriptions that will help the general reader get up to speed on what species we're talking about here? I think most readers will need some help understanding what Liliales covers. - Dank (push to talk) 23:16, 11 March 2020 (UTC) Thanks. I look forward to working with you. Michael Goodyear ✐ ✉ 23:30, 11 March 2020 (UTC) Your GA nomination of CoronariaeHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Coronariae you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dank -- Dank (talk) 04:01, 12 March 2020 (UTC) Your GA nomination of CoronariaeThe article Coronariae you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Coronariae for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dank -- Dank (talk) 20:42, 12 March 2020 (UTC) Nomination for merging of Template:Late Anatolian Roman provincesTemplate:Late Anatolian Roman provinces has been nominated for merging with Template:Late Roman provinces. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 18:24, 22 March 2020 (UTC) Nomination for merging of Template:Provinces of Roman AnatoliaTemplate:Provinces of Roman Anatolia has been nominated for merging with Template:Roman provinces AD 117. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 19:11, 22 March 2020 (UTC) April 2020 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging May 2020 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging June 2020 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging July 2020 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging August 2020 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging September Women in Red edithons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging Books to buyHi Michael, I'm looking for recommendations on books to buy as sources for stub- and start-class articles. I see you've been citing The Flowering Plants Handbook (Byng) and Plants of the World (Christenhusz et al.) in some of your genus articles. Can you recommend those (with the caveat that the first one is pre-APG IV)? What do you think of the latest two volumes (14 and 15) of The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants (Kubitzki)? - Dank (push to talk) 17:59, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
It is not necessarily a good and up to date taxonomic source (scholarly articles are) but one of the most comprehensive sources in almost every other aspect of taxa. Michael Goodyear ✐ ✉ 13:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC) October editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging Nomination for deletion of Template:Valentinian dynastyTemplate:Valentinian dynasty has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Avis11 (talk) 17:09, 17 October 2020 (UTC) November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging Edit conflictI'm sorry, I think I wiped out all your edits in the past half hour or so with an edit conflict on Valentinianic dynasty. GPinkerton (talk) 22:29, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter messageDecember with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging A New Year With Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging Featured article plans?Michael, you are certainly an exceptionally prolific and admirable editor. I wonder if you have ever considered putting an article through the WP:FAC process? I recently did so with Portrait of a Musician, and found a plethora of feedback, resulting in the gold star – which felt like an almost "seal of approval" – and eligibility for the article to be featured on the main page. WP:PR has recently become more active so I'm sure you could find much ideas for FAC preparation there, especially if you put it in the Template:FA sidebar. Just some ideas and (hopefully) words of encouragement. Regards, Aza24 (talk) 03:56, 5 January 2021 (UTC) See William T. Stearn Michael Goodyear ✐ ✉ 13:00, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Precious anniversary 6
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:46, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
February 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging March 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging Invitation to comment on Julia Margaret Cameron articleAs someone who has contributed substantially to this article, I invite your input on an RfC asking: Should the infobox use the original photograph of Cameron or a version modified by a Wikipedia editor? Thanks in advance for your input. Qono (talk) 22:19, 17 March 2021 (UTC) April editathons from Women in Red
May 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging June 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging July 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging Validity of A. piscivorus piscivorus photoThe validity of the species identification for File:Agkistrodon piscivorus piscivorus dark.JPG has been questioned. Please see the comments in the edit history of Agkistrodon piscivorus piscivorus and in the edit history of Commons:File:Agkistrodon piscivorus piscivorus dark.JPG. It is suggested that the photo is actually a specimen of Nerodia erythrogaster (or at least some Nerodia – perhaps Nerodia fasciata or Nerodia sipedon). Those species are frequently confused. See, for example, File:Watersnake.jpg. The head of the snake is unfortunately obscured in your photo. The identification of the snake would be easier if the head was more visible. — BarrelProof (talk) 23:30, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
Gentian flower ?Hi Mr. Goodyear, i need some help to find specimen of this flower. So far Google said it is Gentian. Diameter of flower in focus is around 8-9 mm (milimeters), that is fully grown. It is almost all blue, just leafs at corner got some part of red-violet. But that middle is nice white middle-which i can find of Google Gentians. regards, --Petar Milošević (talk) 20:04, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
It is under question mark, till i find specimen. After i change name. Found in Ljubljana, Europe in June. Gentiana is "google choice" but i dont seem that middle (white) is similar to them. Will try whith that links. Thanx. --Petar Milošević (talk) 11:03, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
I have done some other photos from distance, if any help. Also aksed at botanic garden. --Petar Milošević (talk) 13:41, 20 July 2021 (UTC) Commelina is similar, leafs, but stigma not. They grow on grass, beside train station, sunny spot. 1st photo is pictures end of May, and other today. --Petar Milošević (talk) 14:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC) We found it, probably is Anchusa. Anchusa officinalis maybe ? --Petar Milošević (talk) 18:42, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Proposed Women in Green EditathonHello Michael -- With the goal of helping to progress the WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) women’s rights-themed GA nomination goal for 2021, I’m proposing that WiG hold a special editathon event in the fall (maybe October/November?). I can assist with logistics, but I need to know how much interest/support there might be from WiG participants first. Please let me know what you think in the talk page conversation! All the best, Alanna the Brave (talk) 02:11, 20 July 2021 (UTC) August Editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:26, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging September 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging October 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:36, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging Dictionary of Botanical EpithetsMichael, I'd love to have one or two more etymological sources for species epithets that I can pull from. One of the most popular among plant editors (with 40 hits) is Chuck Griffith's Dictionary of Botanical Epithets. But I'm not sure if I could get it through WP:GAN or WP:FLC ... do you know if that, or anything Griffith has written, has ever been vetted by any publisher? If not, do you have any recommendations? - Dank (push to talk) 04:56, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
November 2021 at Women in Red
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging ArbCom 2021 Elections voter messageDecember 2021 at Women in Red
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging Invitation to take part in a survey about medical topics on WikipediaDear fellow editor, I am Piotr Konieczny, a sociologist of new media at Hanyang University (and User:Piotrus on Wikipedia). I would like to better understand Wikipedia's volunteers who edit medical topics, many associated with the WikiProject Medicine, and known to create some of the highest quality content on Wikipedia. I hope that the lessons I can learn from you that I will present to the academic audience will benefit both the WikiProject Medicine (improving your understanding of yourself and helping to promote it and attract new volunteers) and the wider world of medical volunteering and academia. Open access copy of the resulting research will be made available at WikiProject's Medicine upon the completion of the project. All questions are optional. The survey is divided into 4 parts: 1 - Brief description of yourself; 2 - Questions about your volunteering; 3 - Questions about WikiProject Medicine and 4 - Questions about Wikipedia's coverage of medical topics. Please note that by filling out this questionnaire, you consent to participate in this research. The survey is anonymous and all personal details relevant to your experience will be kept private and will not be transferred to any third party. I appreciate your support of this research and thank you in advance for taking the time to participate and share your experiences! If you have any questions at all, please feel free to contact me at my Wikipedia user page or through my email listed on the survey page (or by Wikipedia email this user function). The survey is accessible through the LINK HERE. Piotr Konieczny January 2022 with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging in friendship
Happy new year! - Today I show yesterday's snow (if you click on "songs") and today's music in memory of Jerome Kohl, a friend --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:19, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:18, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
my joy - more on my talk --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:57, 7 February 2022 (UTC) Valentine's Day edition, with spring flowers and plenty of music --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:56, 14 February 2022 (UTC) stand and sing --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:24, 25 February 2022 (UTC) I took the pic in 2009, and it was on the German MP yesterday, with the song from 1885, in English Prayer for Ukraine. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:49, 6 March 2022 (UTC) February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging "Desirability" listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Desirability and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 19#Desirability until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 06:35, 19 February 2022 (UTC) March editathons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging April Editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging HippeastreaeHi, in 2016 you developed the articles Hippeastreae and Hippeastrinae. They've become rather out-of-date since then; according to APweb, only 6 genera remain in Hippeastreae (see Hippeastreae#Genera), although two more are retained by PoWO – somewhat oddly perhaps, since Sprekelia is given only one species Sprekelia formosissima, and Rhodolirium only two. I've done a bit of work on the article, but it needs more to make it clear that much of the taxonomy is now historical. So if you have any time, you might like to look at it. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:06, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
"Sexually receptive" listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sexually receptive and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 7#Sexually receptive until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:54, 7 April 2022 (UTC) May Women in Red events
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging June events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Green - July GA EditathonHello Michael Goodyear: WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Editathon event in July 2022! We hope to see you there! Alanna the Brave (talk) 13:27, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Women in Red in July 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red August 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red in September 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging WikiProject Women in Green October 2022 Good Article EditathonHello Michael Goodyear: WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Editathon event in October 2022! We hope to see you there! Alanna the Brave (talk) & Goldsztajn (talk) 23 September 2022 You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:35, 25 September 2022 (UTC) Women in Red October 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging Here's a heads-up on this work-in-progress on the alismatid monocots, in case you want to set me on the right path! As is often the case with lists, the idea is to condense and illustrate the material, to make it less overwhelming for, say, younger readers. I've been relying heavily on Plants of the World so far, and comparing that with our existing articles on monocot families. Any thoughts would be appreciated. - Dank (push to talk) 12:54, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red in December 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:55, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging ArbCom 2022 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Women in Red January 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red in February 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Good article reassessment for Hannah ArendtHannah Arendt has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. - car chasm (talk) 02:55, 19 February 2023 (UTC) Women in Red March 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Splitting discussion for ClitorisAn article that you have edited or that may interest you, (Clitoris), has content that I have proposed to be removed and moved to another article, (Human clitoris). If you are interested, please visit the discussion. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 05:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC) Women in Red April 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red May 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging WikiProject Women in Green June 2023 Good Article Editathon notificationHello Michael Goodyear: WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Editathon event in June 2023! We hope to see you there! You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here. Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC) Women in Red - June 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Nomination for deletion of Template:TetrarchyTemplate:Tetrarchy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 02:12, 18 June 2023 (UTC) Women in Red July 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red 8th Anniversary
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red August 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging September 2023 at Women in Red
--Victuallers (talk) 16:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Green GA Editathon October 2023 - Around the World in 31 DaysHello Michael Goodyear: WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023! We hope to see you there! Alanna the Brave (talk) 00:53, 22 September 2023 (UTC) You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here. Women in Red October 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red - November 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red December 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging ArbCom 2023 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Women in Red January 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging 2024Like 2019, see above -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:47, 1 January 2024 (UTC) On the Main page: the person who made the pictured festival possible --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC) Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:20, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Today a friend's birthday, with related music and new vacation pics --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:00, 30 January 2024 (UTC) Women in Red February 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging TFA re-run for William T. StearnHi Michael. William T. Stearn has been at WP:Today's featured article before, but all FAs are eligible to run twice (after 5 years or more), and I'd like to get this up at TFA again, this time on April 16, if that's okay with you. The article appears to be in good shape, as always. - Dank (push to talk) 00:34, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red March 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red April 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red May 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Green GA Editathon June 2024 - Going Back in TimeHello Michael Goodyear: WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in June 2024! We hope to see you there! You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC) Women in Red June 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Orphaned non-free image File:Aloysandmarieliechstenstein.jpgThanks for uploading File:Aloysandmarieliechstenstein.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:05, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red August 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red August 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging September 2024 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:00, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Green's "Around the World in 31 Days" GA Editathon – October 2024Hello Michael Goodyear: WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2024! We hope to see you there! Grnrchst (talk) & Alanna the Brave (talk) You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:21, 11 September 2024 (UTC) Women in Red October 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red November 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging ArbCom 2024 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Women in Red December 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 18:46, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red January 2025
--Lajmmoore (talk 17:50, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging 2025 Update from Women in GreenHello Michael Goodyear: 2024 has wrapped up, and what a full year it was for WikiProject Women in Green! Over the past year, we hosted two edit-a-thons, one themed around women's history and another on women around the world. We also managed to achieve most of our 2024 annual goals, nominating 75 articles for GA, reviewing 64 GA nominations, nominating 8 articles for FAC, peer reviewing 3 articles and reviewing 10 FAC nominations. Excellent work, and thank you to everyone involved! For 2025 we have a new set of goals for nominations and reviews. In particular, we would like to see more articles on our Hot 100 list being improved and nominated for GA this year. If you take a look at the list and see an article you are interested in contributing to, feel free to add it and yourself to our Hot 100 project discussion. You might even find someone interested in collaborating with you! This year, as with every year, we hope you will join us in helping improve our coverage of women and women's works on this encyclopedia. Every contribution helps. We'll see you around! You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |