User talk:Memphisto

Archives

Archived Contents Image issues

Hey, articles on wikipedia that cover albums generally do not use quotes. Fopkins | Talk 07:31, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how to respond to this. Do you mean quotes around the song titles? In which case it seems quite normal especially when other information is included i.e. - songwriter - length of track.

• Sorry for the confusion. The titles of album articles do not usually include quotations. Fopkins | Talk 23:22, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean I mistakenly created a article/page for an album with the name of the album in quotes?

Yes, I tagged it for deletion, and it was deleted. I was just letting you know why it was deleted. Fopkins | Talk 15:59, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. I am a bit of a newbie here.

Image:Alp george promo.jpg

Hi Memphisto. I've restored this image and added a {{promotional}} tag. You'll still need to add a fair use rationale, or it can be deleted in 7 days. Also, {{promotional}} probably doesn't apply, since it is repeatable. Let me know if you have questions. --Fang Aili ^talk 15:46, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ex-Tea Sea chronological discography

Please note my entries on discussion pages for the articles I modified. I agree the XTC catalog need be updated. I believe their comps and outtakes are of importance in and of themselves and should be included in the chronology. If they are merely cash-ins (Hmm... the Who, Rolling Stones, Elvis Costello ...) can see an argument against including them. I do not believe this is the case with XTC. Their comps and odds-and-sods are Notable, and should be included in their discography. Let me know what you think.--Fantailfan 23:15, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Joepane

Thanks for bringing that to my attention. I've raised the Joepane issue to the folks at Wikipedia:WikiProject Automobiles many times, but they just don't want to hear it. Why don't you post on the WikiProject's discussion page? Maybe they will listen for a change. I have listed the image you mentioned, along with all of Joepane's other images, for deletion. They should all be deleted shortly. Jagvar 02:30, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Musik

I'm attonished that the song Churches was unknown in UK. It had successes in several other countries.What does it change that the song Churches was only a success in some western countries?

Van Rijn. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.67.12.72 (talk) 20:45, 11 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Red Box (band)

Hi Memphisto

Thanks for the message. I wanted to help give RB as much of a presence on Wikipedia as possible, gathering together all available info. on the band (ain't much) in one place for anyone wondering why the albums are still unavailable, and for those able to facilitate their re-release (should they come looking). Every little helps. I've re-edited the discography sub-headings to keep the bottom end of the page from becoming too cluttered, but your additions (and the album entries) look superb.

Once again, thanks for the message, it's much appreciated.

GoldfishNation 12:47, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Blancmange (band)

Oops, sorry about that. Thanks for fixing my errors. (ESkog)^(Talk) 16:02, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

driven (TV series)

I noticed you added the fact that there were 80 episodes - can I ask where you found that out? AlexJ (talk) 00:54, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Motive (album)

An editor has nominated Motive (album), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Motive (album) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:08, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sperm Warfare

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sperm Warfare, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

WP:NALBUMS : All articles on albums, singles or songs must meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.

General notability guideline : "Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail, and no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than trivial but may be less than exclusive.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Soundvisions1 (talk) 13:49, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use Bot Hit

Sorry about that. I obviously didn't catch that. I'll look to see if there is a tool to check for link dependencies and will use it in the future. Again, sorry about that. Dinjiin (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 16:36, 7 February 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Greetings

Hello, I noticed you had done some editing on the XTC article. I was the person who secured the first band photo, but I feel it is probably not accurate, a mixture of band members and fans. However, another professional photographer took lots of group and individual photos of the members of the band. Would you be able to identify the particular members? If so, I can upload free images to be used in the band article and also for the band members' pages. Please let me know. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 21:45, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! Maybe I can help you? Or you, me!

Hi M- I wrote you some time ago, about XTC. I came here to see if you can identify photos from a batch on Flickr, and if you can, --there's maybe 8 photos in the bunch, I can ask the photographer for release under the Creative Commons CC-BY-SA license to Wikimedia Commons, making them useable for any of the articles we have here. After arriving here, I noticed you're having "issues" with the "Powers that Be" here (to speak politely)!! I went through a lot of frustration trying to see deserving biographies of musicians here get photos- took me over a year (or two), but I have the "free image" concept down mostly from Flickr to Commons. I only started keeping track of my uploads, all of which I place some months ago; see the vast list of names in my userpage. Another editor, and friend, Suede67 is good with the non-free uploads. Feel free to check my talk page to find his posts and thus, contact him. Ask him for help with those uploads- he's a good teacher, and quite methodical. I can help you find the free images and show you how to get them to Commons, even if they're copyright protected for now. Speak up, and help is here, if you want it. Cheers!--Leahtwosaints (talk) 23:47, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Whitecoat.JPG

Regarding File:Whitecoat.JPG, I had to decline the speedy deletion of that file because I couldn't verify the copyright violation since there was no source provided. Could you please provide that source and renominate? I've also tagged it for no evidence of permission, so you could also take no further action and that would be acceptable as well, and just wait a few days for it to be deleted that way. SchuminWeb (Talk) 11:02, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Need your expert-ease

Hi Memphisto- Would you please take a look at this stub someone began, and I feel, ran with it, and when I say that, I mean, like spilled tomato juice, all over the table, and down the chair, and... you get my point? I don't know if I did the "don't eat the newcomer" ot what-have-you. But you'll see the page and my comment on the talk page, please? I despise confrontation but I think whomever is working on this article hasn't a clear idea of where they are planning to go with it: Guitarist. My comments are on the talk page. Can you answer me on my talk page? --Leahtwosaints (talk) 00:52, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

80.2.15.1

Since he hasn't edited in two weeks, there's really nothing I think I could do. But if he resumes this activity, let me know as soon as you can. Daniel Case (talk) 15:52, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Turn It On Again

This page had recently been moved to the correct capitalisation, which is "Turn It On Again". "Turn On" is a phrasal verb, so both parts are capitalised. Can you move the page back please, thanks. Bretonbanquet (talk) 12:00, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've done it myself, cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 12:31, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Listing files for deletion

When you list files for deletion, you are still required to add template:ffd with a link to the log page on the file, even for orphaned pages. Can you please add that to the ones you listed here? I already deleted File:JohnGeorgeDodson.jpg under CSD F8. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 04:00, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

listing files for deletion created by Rodolpho

Hi. It would seem that for some time you have been listing files uploaded by Rodolpho for deletion. Some of these seem to have been on invalid grounds, and others for technical violations whereas the actual images are valid provided the licencing was listed correctly. I must ask exactly what is going on here? Deleting valid files, or working to have them deleted, when some other editor is attempting to create legitimate articles containing legitimate images is not good faith editing and is not appropriate on wikipedia. Sandpiper (talk) 21:51, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, perhaps you might consider altering your user page to say something about yourself, rather than redirecting to this page? Sandpiper (talk)

I see you have been back to wiki and done some editing, but it is unfortunate you did not have time to drop me a reply. Sandpiper (talk) 21:33, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Memphisto. I've been discussing with Sandpiper at User_talk:Fastily/Archive_4#deletion of FingaskMural Lofty Buchannan. Perhaps you might like to comment on the allegations made against you? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:25, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About Derek Murawski

Hi Memphisto,
The long version would go: per WP:SOMEPOLICY and WP:SOMEOTHERPOLICY, please see the difs here, here, here, here and here... and it may be possible that, in some circumstances...
The short version: Yep, I was wrong, I made a mistake.
--Shirt58 (talk) 16:48, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your John Clark edits

So you think it's fine to edit my page and edit my talk page? We're dealing with fan factors here, my friend. Are you on a mission? So edit away! Have fun! And when you're through, I shall remove your edits, most of them anyway. JohnClarknew (talk) 18:12, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so you are now in an editing war. I suggest before you take any further action, you do what is plainly stated as Wikipedia policy, that is, to discuss on the talk page. If you look there, you will see that Will Beback has comments, yet has not edited the page. He is an administrator. You are not. Your edits suggest to me that you are in the Lynn Redgrave camp, and if you are, then you are editing from your POV. 3 Lynn Redgrave obits, where I am spoken of disparagingly, on the John Clark page? Delete the mention that my son married the mother of this child to get her a green card? This fact was filed in court. The press continues to push that this was a true marriage, which makes me look like a berk, and I will not allow that impression to continue unchallenged. I'm also doing this for the kid's sake. He deserves better treatment.

Why don't you come out of hiding, and reveal your true identity? JohnClarknew (talk) 16:52, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moving a page

Please read: Help:Moving a page.   Will Beback  talk  23:49, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please use talk/discussion page before editing

It is policy that before editing a page, discussion of the proposed edits take place on the talk page. Why don't you do this at John Clark (actor/director)? For example, it is plain that Redgrave filed for divorce from Clark. You delete this, and substitute that the marriage was dissolved. Your editing lacks NPOV, as essential when editing, as it is when writing an article. Why run the risk of being blocked? JohnClarknew (talk) 17:23, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

John Clark (actor/director)

Regarding your last edit; per BLP policy (at least as I read it) sources by the subject can be considered authoritative about factual things on themselves. The last ref you removed supported only factual stuff - what do you think? --Errant Tmorton166^(Talk) 14:35, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(good work otherwise btw :) it's slowly taking shape) --Errant Tmorton166^(Talk) 14:36, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Please remember to be respectful of notable individuals. Just think - maybe someday you might be in the same position! Cheers,   Will Beback  talk  14:28, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NPA

I know WillBeback has commented above (and that you know these rules) but; please keep calm and avoid this sort of commentary directed at individual editors. I'm warning you in the interests of fairness. I appreciate you removed the comment at a later stage before any other edits occurred - and as a good faith courtesy gesture I reverted John's attempt to bring it back to the page. But please avoid such comments in the future --Errant Tmorton166^(Talk) 15:53, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have opened an ANI thread which may concern you --Errant Tmorton166^(Talk) 17:50, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GET OFF MY BACK, MEMPHISTO

Your attacks on me have to stop, sir. You think it ok to edit talk pages as you see fit. That should be done with great care. Talk pages are somewhat sacrosanct. So stop acting, not like a Wiki policeman, but a Wiki Gestapo. Towards me, that is. JohnClarknew (talk) 14:15, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And me. You are NOT in a position to bar me from making supported verifiable additions to Wikipedia pages you happen to closely monitor. I correctly reference and carefully construct these additions and strongly object to your deletion of these posts and accompanying toothless threats. DominicJones (talk) 01:56, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disengagement

I think it would be helpful if you disengaged from the conflict over Talk:Shakespeare for My Father. That isn't a judgment of your behavior, just of the overall situation.   Will Beback  talk  07:09, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Email

If you register an email account in your preferences I'll send you a note.   Will Beback  talk  10:54, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then something's not confirmed or active, 'cause it don't work. Or send me an email and I can respond.   Will Beback  talk  11:01, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate cover→Alternative cover per WP:VNE

Are you aware of this bug in the bot? It also changed the filename of the album cover from 'alternate' to 'alternative', with the obvious consequences. [1] memphisto 10:47, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear. Thanks for catching that. I did in fact make some changes to my bot on Monday evening to prevent it from ever editing the cover parameter in those templates, so it shouldn't happen again. Before the changes I kept an eye out for those kinds of change, but obviously that one slipped through. Sorry! CmdrObot (talk) 23:33, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moving Delirious? songs based on some naming convention

What convention is that? I was just in discussion with them about something that would break this supposed naming convention and no one said anything against it. Could you please point-out this convention? --Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:48, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see it. You moved several things that were correctly disambiguated to things where they didn't need to be.

When necessary, disambiguation should be done using "(band)", "(album)", or "(song)" (such as Anthrax (band) or Off the Wall (album)). Use further disambiguation only when needed (for example X (American band), X (Australian band)). Unless multiple albums of the same name exist (such as Down to Earth), they do not need to be disambiguated any further.

Nowhere does it say that the song or album must contain the band's name. Only that if necessary you make disambiguation.

For instance, you moved Deeper (song) to Deeper (Delirious? song). There are not multiple songs named Deeper so there is no need to disambiguate the song from others. Please change it all back. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:30, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are multiple songs called "Deeper" - Deeper (Delirious? song) and Deeper (Boss song). This is also why I have made Deeper (song) a disambiguation page. memphisto 18:39, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The disambiguation page wasn't in place when I first checked. Thanks for making that change. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:07, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RED

It may say that over at WP:RED, but I disagree completely. Templates are meant for links. Red links are meant to encourage people to build articles. (I even went through the process of disambiguating each of my links as needed! Thanks a lot, man!) So, you've basically rendered my templates useless. Counterproductive, as I've said. Who do I talk to to change this ridiculous policy? Wikkitywack (talk) 20:43, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lemon Jelly dab

I'm not quite sure why you think it's a "hoax", Google returns nearly a quarter of a million hits for "lemon jelly" recipe (see?) so if all of them are in on it too then fair enough. I will remove the prod. Thanks for the notification. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:03, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Live in Concert Denmark 1976

Hi Memphisto, Nothing to do with your editing - I am just curious to know if you own this album yourself? If yes, can you recommend it? You can answer here, I am watching your talk page. Cheers. – IbLeo^(talk) 14:37, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

promotional vandalism?

hello, i think im doing this right, could you explain what "promtional vandalism" means? You allow fan site links, record label site links, but not the official street team sites? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caeos (talk • contribs) 02:46, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

you link pointing me to a page without being specific doesnt help me or future "fails". what actual rule or guideline has been broken? does a letter from the actual band or record label need to be sent? --Caeos (talk) 14:15, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

so a Bands Official Street Team website cant have a link, but 2 fan sites can? the info was all on the street team website, i will try and get you a copyright free pic, or even a streaming version of their latest single, all available on the street team website. --Caeos (talk) 21:47, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

overturn of rev. 408725653

Why was this changed? The name "Fuzzy Warbles" is plainly lifted from "A Clockwork Orange". Revise the wording if you like, but why completely delete a bit of info that's true? Why not do the homework? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.56.237.11 (talk) 13:05, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 11:54, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Daily mail

Please explain why you consider the daily mail to be a reliable source.©Geni 17:03, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I asked why you considered the daily mail reliable. Articles should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. The daily mail kinda fails that last bit no?©Geni 17:07, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In making your edits you are asseting that the daily mail is a reliable source. Please justify this.©Geni 19:36, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

see eyes passim. and Daily_mail#Libel_lawsuits of course.©Geni 00:18, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I have. I'm just having a hard time dealing with the idea that someone is defending using a source while being aparently unaware of it's nature. Do you want to take this to Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard ?©Geni 00:41, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links in books

BTW, I noticed that you customized the appearance of certain articles for Book:Arthur Loves Plastic. As a rule of thumb, external links should not be excluded from printed material. If a link is relevant to the article, then it is relevant to the book, so I reverted your recent edits. Sections concerning "audio previews" should also probably be entirely removed per WP:DIRECTORY, although I don't know what exactly is the consensus on this. I'll ask at WP:ALBUMS. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 11:19, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Free Fall

Hello. I moved Free Fall (Golding) back as requested at WP:RM, but two points: 1. You can move a page yourself over a redirect as long as there is no more than one edit there. 2. Are you sure that wasn't a good move? It looks like that is the recommended way to dismbiguate novels at WP:NCB. I have no strong opinion which is better myself - the current title is shorter but the other tells you what it is. Station1 (talk) 22:59, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy-deletion of templates

You have recently tagged a number of templates for deletion under speedy-deletion criterion T2, generally with the edit summary that With only [two] articles to navigate too - this Navbox musical artist serves no useful function. I have declined those speedy-nominations for two reasons.

1. CSD#T2 is restricted to those templates which make false representations about Wikipedia policy. The templates you were tagging made no representation about policy at all. T2 does not apply.
2. The assessment that a template "serves no useful function" is a subjective opinion. And while that may be a valid reason to eventually delete a page from Wikipedia, it is far too subjective a criterion to use for speedy-deletion. Questions of usefulness must be evaluated by multiple editors to confirm that there is consensus to delete the page.

If you still feel those pages should be deleted, I recommend that you compose a nomination at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion. Thanks for your cooperation. Rossami (talk) 16:06, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Thanks for moving them to TfD. Rossami (talk)

A win

I know things get heated around here, but to have two editors like you and Steelbeard1 is a plus. We're all working towards the same goal, no? :) --andreasegde (talk) 19:00, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Past Masters

Can you answer this question. Can you get a new copy of Past Masters or any subsequent Beatle album as a new LP right now? This includes Live at the BBC, the Anthology series, Let it Be...Naked or Love. Steelbeard1 (talk) 14:39, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

re:A suggestion

Thanks for the olive branch. Frankly, I've been a bit too upset/depressed by your actions to speak to you directly (or stand up for myself, apparently). Could I call for a sort of "cease & discuss" before you modify any more of my templates? I think I can convince you otherwise. Not to mention you're on pretty shaky ground citing WP:NAV ("This guidance essay contains comments and advice of one or more Wikipedia contributors. It is not a Wikipedia policy or guideline...") and you appear to have changed your opinion concerning plain text in templates... Anyway, there is much to discuss. Thanks for reaching out, Wikkitywack (talk) 21:29, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mega Mix and Ptbotgourou

I think you doesn't understood that User:Ptbotgourou is a bot and couldn't answer to you. For the article Mega Mix, as long as the french article contain a link to the english article, all interwiki bot (as mine) will add a link to the french article in its english counterpart. So the only method is to remove the interwiki link in the french article (I've done it).

For your own information, if there was more than one interwiki link, all other counterpart article in any language should be corrected to prevent bots to not repeat the same error. --GdGourou - °o° - Talk to me 08:33, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Memphisto. You have new messages at JamesBWatson's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

JamesBWatson (talk) 15:48, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

...and again. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:54, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alan Parsons - A Valid Path (DualDisc).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alan Parsons - A Valid Path (DualDisc).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

WikiProject Albums and redirects

Sure I've personally added over 1,000 entries to Category:Redirect-Class Album articles. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 11:48, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also That article was just moved to a new title within the time that I made my AWB queue. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 12:01, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Blanc Burn

List-defined references are not a common practice in music articles, while the referencing system I applied is unarguably universal and much clearer. Plus, <ref> tags should be added directly beside the word, with no space in between, like you're doing. SnapSnap 18:52, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Arthur Loves Plastic remix EPs

Category:Arthur Loves Plastic remix EPs, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:53, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Arthur Loves Plastic remix compilation albums

Category:Arthur Loves Plastic remix compilation albums, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:56, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Arthur Loves Plastic

Category:Arthur Loves Plastic, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:58, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frederica von Stade - Mahler Songs - Album Cover.jpg

You removed the image File:Frederica von Stade - Mahler Songs - Album Cover.jpg from the article Frederica von Stade. The article contains the following sentence: "Her LP album of Mahler songs was praised as "cherishable" by Peter G. Davis of The New York Times." Does this not constitute critical commentary of the album in question? --Robert.Allen (talk) 07:10, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you are referring to criterion 3a which reads: "Minimal usage. Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information." I interpreted this to mean (perhaps incorrectly) that an additional image of the album, such as, an image of an insert or an image of the back of the album, should not added to the Wikipedia, if the image of the front of the album is sufficient, and does not say that the same image cannot be used on more than one page, if it meets the other criteria. This interpretation is consistent with the wording of criterion 8: "One-article minimum. Non-free content is used in at least one article." In this case, the additional usage meets criterion 8 (contextual significance), since the image enhances understanding not only of the critical commentary about this specific album, but also the fact that Frederica von Stade, who is the topic of the page, is a critically successful recording artist. In my view, the fact that there is no image of the singer on the page does not appear to be relevant. The addition of an image of the singer would not preclude the use of the album image on the page, and the absence of an image of the singer shouldn't either. --Robert.Allen (talk) 18:05, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is also criterion 10c: "The name of each article (a link to each article is also recommended) in which fair use is claimed for the item, and a separate, specific non-free use rationale for each use of the item, as explained at Wikipedia: Non-free use rationale guideline. The rationale is presented in clear, plain language and is relevant to each use." This seems to allow for using the item on more than one page. Perhaps I did not write the justification for the second usage in the second rationale clearly enough. I get the impression that you consider any second usage to have more stringent criteria. I'm not sure when any second usage would be allowed under your interpretation. --Robert.Allen (talk) 18:13, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Röyksopp - The Drug.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Röyksopp - The Drug.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:40, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Röyksopp - Forsaken Cowboy.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Röyksopp - Forsaken Cowboy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:48, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Editing talk page entries

Please refrain from editing talk page entries or reverting talk pages . before consensus is established. 180.148.124.237 (talk) 07:27, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your deletion from Talk:Short Stack#Reasons for DB-band as it did not appear to comply with WP:TPO. If you disagree, please discuss it here or over there. Please note that your deletion is also being discussed at Wikipedia:Notability/Noticeboard#Short Stack Article - Request for speedy deletion marked as Vandalism, although the main thrust of that discussion is the notability of the article and its nomination for speedy deletion. HairyWombat 19:06, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Short Stack

You wrote on my Talk page:
Hi HairyWombat, User:180.148.124.237's addition of a speedy delete to the Short Stack article was an obvious case of vandalism, as were the user's nonsensical statements on the talk page. If you feel the need to revert this, then fine. I'm just glad this article has now been semi-protected for a while. memphisto 21:57, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read Talk:Short Stack#Reasons for DB-band where I wrote, "The nomination of the article for speedy deletion was therefore inappropriate.", or Wikipedia:Notability/Noticeboard#Short Stack Article - Request for speedy deletion marked as Vandalism where I wrote, "Your [User:180.148.124.237's] nomination of the article for speedy deletion was clear vandalism. Please desist."? As for removing stuff from Talk pages, the guidelines for this are very clear and can be found at WP:TPO. (If you wish to respond, please do so here.) HairyWombat 02:52, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote on your Talk page:

Yes, of course I had read it all and I understand Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. My first thoughts (which I still stand by) were that this IP is a troll, and that was why I also deleted their nonsensical statements on the talk page. memphisto 09:21, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

With regard to the article being marked for speedy deletion, we are agreed that that was clear vandalism. With regard to deteting stuff from the Talk page you wrote above, "If you feel the need to revert this, then fine." It would seem this matter is closed. HairyWombat 16:11, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Memphisto! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Love Fungus

Please stop adding Facebook links to Love Fungus, I've removed it a couple of times. There is already a link to their official website in the info box. Adding links to Facebook (which itself isn't a reliable source) is spam in this context. Dennis Brown (talk) 16:40, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Blind Devotion for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blind Devotion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blind Devotion until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dennis Brown (talk) 17:58, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Love Fungus - Blind Devotion.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Love Fungus - Blind Devotion.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:42, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Solar Enemy - Proceed to Beyond.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Solar Enemy - Proceed to Beyond.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:30, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tegan and Sara

Please be very careful about re-adding something just because the previous edit was tagged, "references removed". That information was sourced to a blog, which is never a reliable source per WP:BLP. Furthermore, the claims were extremely negative, and thus must be extremely well sourced or removed on the spot, per WP:BLP. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:12, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Memphisto. You have new messages at Yworo's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Service award

This editor is a Veteran Editor and is entitled to display this Iron Editor Star.

In recognition of your over 9,000 edits, I hereby award you this service award.

Other forms of this award can be found here. Yworo (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Web-presence links

Hi. I'm not sure if you are watch-listing a page where the debate (on an issue you became involved with yesterday) is progressing—so I'll provide the link here: Talk:Britney_Spears#External_links. No doubt there will have to be some sort of middle-ground approach, but I feel that the editors who are pushing for the removal of all web-presence links have moved too far to one end of the scale, and are using the "rules" in too literal a manner. Anyhow, I've had my $0.02 worth there. Cheers. GFHandel ♬  22:15, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

John Lewis

The main reason I reverted the edits was due to the lack of citation. When I put unbelievable it was with regard to the type of fact added. If it had been something along the lines of "John Lewis plans to open a new store", it would be more believable to the casual reader. However, the relatively obscure nature of the edit would lead most to believe that the edit was untrue, especially in conjunction with the absence of references or citations. Regards DrMotley (talk) 20:11, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shaun Diviney

Please don't remove WikiProject Biography from talk pages of bands. Band articles usually talk about the band members and their lives. If a person is not notable outside the band, the only place to talk about a band member is the band's article.

Also, adding "music-group=yes" in the biography banner puts the article into WikiProject Musicians, where "... a project to better organize information in articles related to Musicians and Musical ensembles/Bands." This is the only way to add an article to WikiProject Musicians. Bgwhite (talk) 07:36, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If the redirect has a talk page, the put class=redirect in the banner, not remove the banner. Bgwhite (talk) 07:39, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Please don't remove WikiProject Biography from talk pages of bands." I removed it from a redirect.

And you might want to undo you recent edit to the Short Stack article - Category:Living people! memphisto 07:45, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's Wiki etiquette to keep the conversation in one spot.

Did you not read above. There is a reason class=redirect exists. It is for this very reason. Most times, the talk page can also be redirect to the other articles talk page. But since there is a AfD message, it can't. So you add class=redirect. Bgwhite (talk) 07:52, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I. Again, I didn't remove the Biography category from an article - I removed it from a redirect.

II. Category:Living people should never appear in an article about a band.

III. This may be your idea of "wiki etiquette", mine would be not making ridiculous edits and then posting nonsensical comments on other peoples talk pages. memphisto 09:47, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I. Please stop removing WP Biography on the redirect. I have never said an article, only you have. As I have said above, on a redirect, IF there is a talk page, use class=redirect inside the biography banner. Again, there is a reason why class=redirect exists. I have shown you there is a class=redirect. It is also listed on Template:Grading scheme Now, if you have proof, then show it. Otherwise leave it alone.

II. Nowhere above is "Living people should never appear in an article about a band." mentioned. This discussion is about the redirects. Please keep a discussion listed in the same spot per WP:MULTI.

III. Try not to demean or ridicule another editor... please keep things civil. Bgwhite (talk) 21:55, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Memphisto asked for advice on my talk page; I'll reply here. As far as I can see, the talk page of the redirect cannot redirect because of the AfD notice. Thus, the WikiProject banner on that page seems reasonable. ItsZippy ^(talk • contributions) 20:16, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Anticon

Your recent editing history at Template:Anticon shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. 114.164.142.128 (talk) 22:18, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anticon

Might be time for WP:ANI on this? Kaini (talk) 11:42, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i'd add the other IPs to it as well, and let WP:CHECKUSER do its magic :) Kaini (talk) 11:47, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Template:Anticon

Hello, Memphisto. You have new messages at J04n's talk page.
Message added 12:33, 2 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stop wikihounding me.

Recently, you are wikihouding me on the pages such as Anticon navbox, Anticon, Sole and the Skyrider Band and Genghis Tron. I want you to stop reverting my edits and calling my edits "vandalism" without any comments on the talk pages. 122.21.243.146 (talk) 16:32, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian again, as you did at Sole and the Skyrider Band, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 122.21.243.146 (talk) 16:43, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) For someone who claims to be new to Wikipedia you seem to know quite a lot about wiki terms, and I must say I am also finding it very hard to keep WP:AGF. Anyway, please read WP:HOUND. Memphisto has an interest in the articles, not in you. He will revert edits you make against consensus, not every edit you make. And he is not alone, you have by now gone against something like six different editors, are they all hounding you? Get real. --Muhandes (talk) 17:00, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Solar Enemy - Techno Divinity.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Solar Enemy - Techno Divinity.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:37, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Solar Enemy - Dirty vs Universe.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Solar Enemy - Dirty vs Universe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:36, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Röyksopp - The Drug.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Röyksopp - The Drug.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:35, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Röyksopp - Forsaken Cowboy.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Röyksopp - Forsaken Cowboy.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:37, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Time Machine (2002 film)

Hello, Memphisto. You recently made an edit to The Time Machine (2002 film), with the edit summary, "revert vandalism to box office take." I'm not sure which edit you consider the "vandalism", but if it was this edit by me, the edit wasn't "vandalism", it was a mistake on my part, and that's all. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 20:14, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Inspector Montalbano

Hello. I was 86.178.74.237 the other day. Thanks for fixing my mistake on the Inspector Montalbano article. Cheers. 86.156.144.125 (talk) 18:23, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reply (RJB talk)

"I generally find the more boring an article is, the more COI issues it has!"
Yeah! Editors who are there because they're interested in the subject will be looking at articles to cite and so are more likely to find the angles that most readers are interested in. COI editors have the wrong motivations & can't see the forest for the trees. Twang (talk) 09:28, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick note ...

When you give people vandalism warnings, particularly if it's the {{only warning}}, it's helpful to an admin reviewing the ensuing AIV report that you sign it. Daniel Case (talk) 15:44, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Sorry about the testy attitude. Yeah, I forgot some of the vandalism-warning templates automatically include a signature. Daniel Case (talk) 16:11, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:AASHTO logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:AASHTO logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:27, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:PastMastersLP1and2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:PastMastersLP1and2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:04, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Filthy White Guy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Filthy White Guy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filthy White Guy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Puffin ^Let's talk! 21:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Special When Lit (album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Special When Lit (album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Special When Lit (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Monty₈₄₅ 21:52, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Special When Lit (album). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot  t • c »  04:01, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. duffbeerforme (talk) 09:29, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Strings (Arthur Loves Plastic album), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:37, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Arthur Loves Plastic - DCremixes.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - DCremixes.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 08:15, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Remixes 2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Remixes 2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 08:16, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Remixes 3.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Remixes 3.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 08:16, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Remixes 4.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Remixes 4.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 08:17, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage newer editors. Please read Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:28, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Professor Fate (album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Professor Fate (album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Professor Fate (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:09, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Love Is All Around (Tapegerm Remixes).jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Love Is All Around (Tapegerm Remixes).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 11:19, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Touch.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Touch.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 11:21, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Interludes.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Interludes.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 13:24, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Teflon Diva!.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Teflon Diva!.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 13:58, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Arthur Loves Plastic - The Zero State.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - The Zero State.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 13:59, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Arthur Loves Plastic - The Tapegerm Mixes.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - The Tapegerm Mixes.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 13:59, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Plastic

Have you tried to discuss the notability of these articles with the IP? I've seen Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Special When Lit (album), but haven't come across anything else yet.  —SMALLJIM  16:22, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Smalljim, Just to let you know that the blanking of these articles is not limited to just the IP 114.145.146.143, the related IPs 114.145.24.94, 114.145.174.2, 114.164.216.48, 114.164.64.248, 114.150.82.38 have been involved too. memphisto 16:24, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know. Would you please try to discuss the matter with him at the current IP's talk page. Thanks.  —SMALLJIM  16:27, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I should also point you towards Strings (Arthur Loves Plastic album), which is another article blanked by the anonymous ip range before being nominated for deletion. memphisto 16:40, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really interested in how we got here. What matters is that editors shouldn't edit war - we discuss problems. Please try to initiate a discussion on the above IP talk page. If there's no response to your approach, well, that will say something about the other editor.  —SMALLJIM  16:51, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In fact he's added something there now. It's up to you to respond, I think. You do need to show that these albums are notable; it doesn't seem to me to be very clear that they are, but I'm not going to get involved in that aspect.  —SMALLJIM  16:56, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for trying to engage the IP in discussion. Hopefully he will respond to you in due course. Although I don't condone his method of raising issues with the articles, he has expressed valid concerns about their notability. Are there actually any independent reliable sources that show that these album articles have sufficient notability of their own?  —SMALLJIM  22:40, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Remixes (Arthur Loves Plastic album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Remixes (Arthur Loves Plastic album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remixes (Arthur Loves Plastic album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 01:53, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Included in the afd are Queen of the World, Downtempo Diva, Mega Mix (album), Remixes 4, Remixes 3, Remixes 2, DCremixes. duffbeerforme (talk) 02:14, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Love Is All Around (EP) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Love Is All Around (EP) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Is All Around (EP) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:17, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also in this afd is Touch (EP), Interludes, Who Do You Trust? (EP). duffbeerforme (talk) 08:19, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sperm Warfare for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sperm Warfare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sperm Warfare until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:25, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Professor Fate (Original).jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Professor Fate (Original).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 20:04, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arthur Loves Plastic (album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arthur Loves Plastic (album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Loves Plastic (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:34, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Tapegerm Mixes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Tapegerm Mixes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Tapegerm Mixes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:34, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Nebulae - Arthur Loves Plasticulae.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Nebulae - Arthur Loves Plasticulae.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 13:25, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Teflon Diva!.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Teflon Diva!.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:20, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Teflon Diva! (Original).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Teflon Diva! (Original).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:04, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Arthur Loves Plastic - DCremixes.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - DCremixes.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 20:04, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Downtempo Diva.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Downtempo Diva.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 20:04, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Mega Mix.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Mega Mix.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 20:04, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Queen of the World.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Queen of the World.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 20:05, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Remixes 2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Remixes 2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 20:05, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Remixes 3.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Remixes 3.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 20:05, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Remixes 4.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Remixes 4.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 20:06, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Remixes.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Remixes.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 20:06, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Arthur Loves Plastic - The Tapegerm Mixes.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - The Tapegerm Mixes.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:09, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Blue Room (soundtrack) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Blue Room (soundtrack) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Blue Room (soundtrack) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:34, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Love Is All Around (EP) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Love Is All Around (EP) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Is All Around (EP) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:34, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alan Parsons - A Valid Path (DualDisc).jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alan Parsons - A Valid Path (DualDisc).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 09:41, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Global account

Hi Memphisto! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 17:01, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Special When Lit.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Special When Lit.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 23:22, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Well Kept Secrets for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Well Kept Secrets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Well Kept Secrets until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Blackbombchu (talk) 04:22, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Recoil - 1 + 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Recoil - 1 + 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:25, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Deeper.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Deeper.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Arthur Loves Plastic - King Shag.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - King Shag.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Klondyke 5.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Klondyke 5.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Slice (Original).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Slice (Original).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Slice.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Slice.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Strings.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Strings.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Arthur Loves Plastic - The Zero State (Original).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - The Zero State (Original).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Arthur Loves Plastic - The Zero State.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - The Zero State.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Troubled.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Troubled.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lisa Moscatiello and Rosie Shipley - Well Kept Secrets.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lisa Moscatiello and Rosie Shipley - Well Kept Secrets.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:39, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Second Avenue (album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Second Avenue (album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second Avenue (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Blackbombchu (talk) 22:56, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of What Happens After Love for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article What Happens After Love is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What Happens After Love until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Blackbombchu (talk) 22:58, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Trouble from the Start for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trouble from the Start is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trouble from the Start until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Blackbombchu (talk) 22:59, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lisa Moscatiello - Innocent When You Dream.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lisa Moscatiello - Innocent When You Dream.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lisa Moscatiello and Fred Lieder - What Happens After Love.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lisa Moscatiello and Fred Lieder - What Happens After Love.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lisa Moscatiello - Trouble from the Start.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lisa Moscatiello - Trouble from the Start.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:29, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lisa Moscatiello

Template:Lisa Moscatiello has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Blackbombchu (talk) 01:27, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ladytron - Light and Magic (Original Cover).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ladytron - Light and Magic (Original Cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ladytron - 604.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ladytron - 604.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:44, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Dukes Of Stratosphear - Chips From The Chocolate Fireball (negative version).jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Dukes Of Stratosphear - Chips From The Chocolate Fireball (negative version).jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Nadir.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Nadir.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Memphisto. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SPA - SPA.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SPA - SPA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AASHTO logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AASHTO logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Memphisto. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Bright Lights, Big City (Soundtrack).jpg

The file File:Bright Lights, Big City (Soundtrack).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in Bright Lights, Big City (film)#Soundtrack. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:59, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Memphisto. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:XTC - Instruvenus.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:XTC - Instruvenus.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Roger Joseph Manning Jr - Solid State Warrior (Booklet Cover).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Roger Joseph Manning Jr - Solid State Warrior (Booklet Cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Music for Pleasure - Disconnection.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Music for Pleasure - Disconnection.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Music for Pleasure - Dark Crash.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Music for Pleasure - Dark Crash.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Martin Newell bibliography for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Martin Newell bibliography is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Newell bibliography until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Pontificalibus 11:52, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pork Pies

Not sure what to make of this pork pie serving business. I reverted you at Pork Pie then self-reverted shortly after when coming across this source which says "room temperature". To my knowledge that is just a recommendation for taste quality rather than a direction. I for one admit to liking them fresh out of the fridge and I thought everyone else did. Given pies are refrigerated food, I would have thought one has the choice here and so there is no need to tell in the opening line how one should eat it. --Rice not spice (talk) 02:33, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Beatles - Mono Masters.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Beatles - Mono Masters.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ta for the Blancmange album ad

In re-reading it afterwards, I realized the new album count is actually 8 when you include the Happy Families remake, so as I was rewording and fixing that I ended up rewriting most of the front section. I also made mention of the Fader and Near Future albums (which were/are down in the article also.) Maybe we could add those into the grid as well, with "as (group name)" in them? Just a thought, not of vital importance - but since you succeeded where I failed with that...lol. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.224.73.221 (talk) 14:44, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Music for Pleasure - Chrome Hit Corrosion.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Music for Pleasure - Chrome Hit Corrosion.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Suzanne Vega - Songs in Red and Gray.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Suzanne Vega - Songs in Red and Gray.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Human Factor (song)

The article The Human Factor (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not satisfy WP:NSONG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – DarkGlow • 23:23, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Music for Pleasure - The Human Factor.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Music for Pleasure - The Human Factor.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Beatles - Past Masters - Volume One.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Beatles - Past Masters - Volume One.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Beatles - Past Masters - Volume Two.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Beatles - Past Masters - Volume Two.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Landscape - Einstein A Go-Go excerpt.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Landscape - Einstein A Go-Go excerpt.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Landscape - Norman Bates excerpt.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Landscape - Norman Bates excerpt.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Music for Pleasure - Blacklands.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Music for Pleasure - Blacklands.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monsoon - Ever So Lonely.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Monsoon - Ever So Lonely.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 03:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Second Avenue Detour.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Second Avenue Detour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Second Avenue Detour (Original).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Loves Plastic - Second Avenue Detour (Original).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]