User talk:LunaEclipse

The Signpost: 12 December 2024

Welcome ...

story · music · places

... to WP:QAI. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:43, 16 December 2024 (UTC) Today, a 10-years-old DYK and new pics - look for red birds --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:41, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for improving article quality in December! - Today is a woman poet's centenary. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:28, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pretendo Network

Information icon Hello, LunaEclipse. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pretendo Network, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nuzlocke

Thank you for making the cool image mockup on Nuzlocke! I wanted to ask you a few things related to the image, so I'd figure I'd run them by you here.

  1. Would the Nuzlocke image be better in the article body? I feel it may be worth taking up more body space since you can barely read the text in the lead, and frankly, Terry O'Quinn is less important in the context of this article than the mockup.
  2. How did you go about reusing the Paroot image for the diagram? I was considering doing something similar for a recent creation of mine, Shiny Pokémon, by recoloring the Paroot image and including both to visualize how the mechanic worked, but I am admittedly uncertain on the process. Do you have any advice on how this should be accomplished?

Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 01:57, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 December 2024

Women in Red January 2025

Women in Red | January 2025, Vol 11, Issue 1, Nos 324, 326, 327, 328, 329


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Celebrate WiR's 20% achievement by adding {{User:ForsythiaJo/20%Userbox}} to your user page.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 17:48, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Welcome to the 2025 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2025 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor, we hope the WikiCup will give you a chance to improve your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page.

For the 2025 WikiCup, we've implemented several changes to the scoring system. The highest-ranking contestants will now receive tournament points at the end of each round, and final rankings are decided by the number of tournament points each contestant has. If you're busy and can't sign up in January, don't worry: Signups are now open throughout the year. To make things fairer for latecomers, the lowest-scoring contestants will no longer be eliminated at the end of each round.

The first round will end on 26 February. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), Frostly (talk · contribs · email), Guerillero (talk · contribs · email) and Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse

Please do not compare human editors to dogs. Please do not archive Teahouse threads prematurely. Cullen328 (talk) 01:16, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cullen328,
1. My intention was not to compare OP to a dog and I apologize if it came off as insulting. I was trying to say there was no point in arguing with them as they were dragging out the discussion.
2. 100% understood. I will not do that again. — 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) 01:20, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I deeply apologize to anyone I have offended. — 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) 01:38, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi. Also, there's a bot that sends notification to OP that their Teahouse thread has been archived. It happens only if the designated archive bot (in this case Lowercase sigmabot III) does it. The notifications don't go out if someone else archives the threads. Best to leave the task to the bot. —usernamekiran (talk) 00:35, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article American Football (1999 album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 49p -- 49p (talk) 23:46, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion

Hello, why did you revert my edit on Courtship (disambiguation)? 68.2.138.130 (talk) 01:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

68.2.138.130, was patrolling recent changes for vandals. I reverted your edit by accident. — 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) 01:58, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You're good 68.2.138.130 (talk) 05:48, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article American Football (1999 album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:American Football (1999 album) and Talk:American Football (1999 album)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 49p -- 49p (talk) 02:27, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm puzzled about the need for the {{censor}} notice in the talk page of the article. TarnishedPathtalk 08:27, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The image in the Later section is pretty much why. If you object to me adding the notice, I can revert it. I don't mind. — 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) 08:31, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
And yes, I am aware of the CTOP restriction on BLPs. — 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) 08:32, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I'd forgotten about that image. I have no issues with keeping the notice, but I might move it above the Aus English one per WP:TALKORDER. TarnishedPathtalk 08:44, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 66

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 66, November – December 2024

  • Les Jours and East View Press join the library
  • Tech tip: Newspapers.com

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --17:33, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A bear for you!

Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 03:11, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 January 2025