Hello, Legokid, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Alai00:58, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Deleting content
Deleting content without comment, as you did at the article Duane Chapman, may be considered vandalism. This may result in you being barred from further editing at Wikipedia. Duke53 | Talk22:56, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Restraining Order, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
See Injunction
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. You may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did to Lighthouse, makes it harder to read. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —EncMstr06:13, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to United States, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. --Evb-wiki (talk) 23:31, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please familiarize yourself with the difference between a bill and a law. Your repeated attempts to place erroneous information in the United States article have been and will continue to be swiftly reverted.—DCGeist (talk) 17:39, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please discuss some of these changes in talk before implementing them. I just reverted your last one which was unhelpful. --John (talk) 17:43, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Table mate requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Stijndon (talk) 15:05, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Marriage
If you continue to replace the definition on Marriage with your own definition, it will be considered vandalism. You are on the fast track to being banned by wikipedia. Please stop. Fresheneesz (talk) 08:18, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dictionary.com has two current definitions of marriage involving "a man and a woman". It has two that don't[1]:
4. "a relationship in which two people have pledged themselves to each other in the manner of a husband and wife, without legal sanction: trial marriage; homosexual marriage."
6. "a formal agreement between two companies or enterprises to combine operations, resources, etc., for mutual benefit; merger."
Cherry-picking your desired definition is not legitimate. Furthermore, wikipedia is not a dictionary and marriage clearly has many other meanings throughout history. Please take the time to read the article on marriage. Thanks. Fresheneesz (talk) 21:42, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Faith Chapel(Spring Valley), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
Little news coverage, non-notable for a megachurch
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ottre 05:15, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Nominated for deletion: Albert Einstein Charter Academy
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jminthorne (talk) 02:54, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
