User talk:Lappspira

Welcome!

Hello, Lappspira! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! —This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 18:23, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo
Hello! Lappspira, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! —This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 18:23, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jotnian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ladoga. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2015 Swedish submarine wreck discovery has been nominated for Did You Know

DYK for 2015 Swedish submarine wreck discovery

Gatoclass (talk) 16:52, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Constituent countries of the UK

In a recent edit to the Geology of Europe template you dismissed the constituent countries of the United Kingdom as not being 'proper countries' - just 'football countries' then later removed them entirely. This view is contested by many Wikipedians and considerable discussion over a long period of time has led to statements being included on the webpages of those countries that they are indeed countries - see for example Talk:Wales and Talk:Countries of the United Kingdom/refs. This issue is not just about football but is about the political history of these geographical entities. People will search that template for mention of the geology of each of England, Scotland and Wales - why not retain them in the way that Geowriter suggested? The UK is in fact a special case in this regard, just as there are special cases in other topics. cheers Geopersona (talk) 18:34, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You view is understandable from an Anglo-Saxon point of view. This version of Wikipedia is written in English but has to contain a world wide view. Lappspira (talk) 06:43, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That may be so - but the UK does still remain something of a special case - partly reflected by the 'football countries' issue. Geopersona (talk) 07:52, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Geography of Ireland

You appear to be a fairly new editor and with this edit you removed a whole large section of this featured article but you failed to leave behind a section summery with a link to the now main article. At least a few paragraph are really necessary similar to other sections that also have main articles. I doubt the article can possibly remain featured when such a large and important section is missing. ww2censor (talk) 10:47, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Feature article? It has severe problems. I have now done a sort of restoration and tagged many paragraphs that lack citations to comply with Wikipedia rules and FA criteria. The article is at risk of being stripped of its FA-status. –Lappspira (talk) 10:59, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kandalaksha Trough, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tersk. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination for Jotnian

Hi Lappspira, you'll need to add "(example pictured)" after the word "sedimentary rocks" in your DYK nomination if you plan to use the image of the sandstone. Mikenorton (talk) 22:45, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Nikolai A. Golovkinsky) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Nikolai A. Golovkinsky, Lappspira!

Wikipedia editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please check the link to the cited source : Russian Journal of Earth Sciences

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hogland Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Porphyry. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jotnian

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:57, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jotnian
added links pointing to Grus and Folding
Transscandinavian Igneous Belt
added a link pointing to Deformation

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Svecofennian orogeny, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ostrobothnia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thank you for your extraordinary energy in contributing to Wikipedia. sinarau (talk) 11:40, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Overprinting (geology), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deformation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:17, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Famatinian orogeny at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 21:15, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of reefs page move

I've moved it back. You moved List of reefs to List of coral reefs with the reason "...Not all reefs are of coral..." That seems backwards, right? :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:32, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Anna Frodesiak, so far I am concerned there are reefs that are not made of coral. Sometimes "reef" is meant to imply "coral reef", but not always and in Wikipedia we need clarity. And to include all reefs whether coral or not in a list is an impossible task not suitable for Wikipedia. Lappspira (talk) 04:37, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I understand. Let's start a discussion at Talk:List of reefs. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:39, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Famatinian orogeny

Gatoclass (talk) 22:04, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Svecofennian orogeny article

Hello Lappspira,

In the first sentence of the Svecofennian orogeny article, you have described this orogeny as a composite orogeny. I'm not sure what you mean by this. Do you mean that it was a set of orogenic phases analogous to e.g. the Grampian, Scandian, Taconian phases (among others) of the Caldeonian orogeny? My understanding of a composite orogeny is that it is a relatively long-duration orogeny that a creates a mosaic or patchwork of accreted microcontinental terranes by a set of orogenic deformation phases. I think the Svecofennian orogeny article would benefit from clarification and expansion of the meaning of composite orogeny. I'd be interested to learn of your opinion about this. GeoWriter (talk) 20:18, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment GeoWriter. I will try to clarify the issue. "Composite" is my own wording in an attempt to be concise and avoid close paraphrasing. A source I used states the Svecofennian orogen is "divisible into the linear Lapland-Savo, Svecobaltic and Nordic orogens and the equidimensional Fennia orogen" (Lahtinen et al, 2014). The same authors states that these sub-orogens (my word) were not all parallel to each other which would explain the "equidimensional" shape of the Svecofennian orogen (in other words why the Svecofennian orogen is of compact shape and not elongate as most other orogens are). –Lappspira (talk) 04:50, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your reply. I think the unusual non-linear shape of the orogen is well worth including in the article and I am looking forward to reading your clarification of composite in the article. GeoWriter (talk) 09:37, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Collage (geology)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Collage (geology), Lappspira!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add at least one reliable source to allow easier verification and expansion.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Globalize tag on Geomorphology

Hi Lappspira,

I noticed you put a globalize tag on geomorphology. At first glance, I disagree it's necessary. I opened a section on the talk page - could you put your case there? Thanks! DanHobley (talk) 22:54, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for participating

Logo of Women in Red
Thank you for your participation in the Women in Science Virtual Edit-a-thon, 8 to 29 November 2015, hosted by Women in Red together with Women scientists. It was held in parallel with a meet up at the New York Academy of Sciences on 22 November. In addition to improvements, we created well over 300 new articles. Your contributions are appreciated!

Hope you will also join us for the WiR Women in Religion Virtual Edit-a-thon from 5 to 15 December.--Ipigott (talk) 11:17, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Listing CFD proposals

Hi, on 18 October you tagged Category:Monadnocks for renaming, but did not ([1]) copy the nomination to the list at WP:CFDS. I'll do it for you as you don't seem to be active here at the moment. – Fayenatic London 13:33, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fayenatic, I did not knew I had to list the proposal. I thank you for the help! Lappspira (talk) 12:18, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This day's This Special Day's article for improvement (day 1, month 4, 2016)

Skvader - Tetrao lepus pseudo-hybridus rarissimus in the wild at Örnsköldsvik
Hello!

The following is WikiProject This Special Day's articles for improvement's daily selection:

Skvader

Please be bold and help to improve this article!

Previous selections: Snipe hunt • Jenny Haniver

Get involved with the TSDAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Share this message with other editors

Posted by: w.carter-Talk 00:13, 1 April 2016 (UTC) using New improved MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of WikiProject TSDAFI • [April Fools!][reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Muddus plains, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drainage pattern. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fluvio-thermal erosion
added links pointing to Colville River and Lena
Blockfield
added a link pointing to Andrew Goudie

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Inland dune, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stratification. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Denudation (medicine)

Still unreferenced.Xx236 (talk) 13:14, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Satakunta dike swarms

dyke or dike?Xx236 (talk) 13:16, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cap of the North, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sami. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of A. I. Popov

The article A. I. Popov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

sources are so vague that this almost qualifies for a BLP PROD. are there any other sources for this guy? if not I doubt that he qualifies for notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  00:06, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stratified slope deposit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Granulometry. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of landforms, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doline. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Lappspira. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Protogine Zone

Hello Lappspira,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Protogine Zone for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

L3X1 (distant write) 23:39, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Tilton Hack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kirk Bryan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Northwest Russia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Valdai. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scandinavian Mountains, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drainage pattern. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Reusch's Moraine) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Reusch's Moraine, Lappspira!

Wikipedia editor Mduvekot just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment on Mduvekot's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Mduvekot (talk) 23:41, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Mesozoic volcanism in Scania) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Mesozoic volcanism in Scania, Lappspira!

Wikipedia editor Insertcleverphrasehere just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good work, it is nice to see someone working on geology articles.

To reply, leave a comment on Insertcleverphrasehere's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

— InsertCleverPhraseHere 01:29, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Lappspira, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Malinaccier (talk) 04:11, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good news... I guess. –Lappspira (talk) 05:21, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Geography of Ireland

What are you expecting with this? Please mark the actual problems you see rather than a blanket section tag, as this passed WP:FA much as it is now. There are 10 citations in this section and just 2 very short paragraphs without one. Please be more specific and add {{cn}} tags where you think they are actually needed or respond on the article's talk page. Thanks ww2censor (talk) 16:29, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ww2censor, your question is a bit strange. When I see some issue on page put an inline tag. The the issue appears on many phrases I put a tag on the head. Lappspira (talk) 16:52, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strange? I don't see the problem which is why I asked. Can you be more specific in what you consider the problems. Your tag is too general as I already pointed out. You seem to want more citations, so where do you want them? What statements do you consider could be questioned that would require a citation? ww2censor (talk) 17:16, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
ww2censor, I think I have addressed your concern. I will check out for more problems in the article soon when I have time to check that sources are actually backing the content. Keep an eye on the article so we can continue to improve it so it does not lose its FA status. Lappspira (talk) 17:38, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's on my watchlist. So, surprise surprise, you happened to jump onto the two short paragraphs without citations. I have added citations to both but moved one "cn" tag up. I presume that may have been synthesis gleened from one of the sources but I have not found it. I think it might be a bit more productive all around if you provided a citation or two instead of tagging the article, especially considering it is an FA. Thanks ww2censor (talk) 22:10, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Southernmost city (with over 10,000,000 people)

How is Buenos Aires 10,000,000 people when it has just over 2,9 million within city limits? If you mean the metro area (which is of course over 13 million people), then it should be noted in that list. São Paulo has over 20 million people which also boast a larger metro area.

So how this is clarified? Roif456 (talk) 09:42, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One has to make a difference between de jure and de facto. That the Argentine state has separated, administratively, the core of BA from the rest of the city does not mean the city is just that sole place. Lappspira (talk) 11:13, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Goplans

Hi Lappspira, I wanted to let you know that I removed your edit/wikilink in the Goplans article. The software doesn't like wikilinks in reference titles because it conflicts with the url link. Cheers! Leschnei (talk) 14:09, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon, Leschnei. I am confused. First I did not wikilinked the reference title, just the journal where it is published. Geographia Polonica is a scientific journal not a book, and should be cited accordingly. Seconad the external link in journals is usually provided for articles, not for the journal itself. In books, if possible, the external link should go to the chapter.. –Lappspira (talk) 14:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I meant the book title, not reference title. According to Template:Cite book, a title "Can be wikilinked to an existing Wikipedia article or url may be used to add an external link, but not both". The reference ends up looking like this:[1]
  1. ^ [[Geographia Polonica]]. Polish Scientific Publishers. 1974. Un des premiers fut le petit état tribal de Goplans occupant le territoire dont le centre se trouvait en Cujavie. Ce centre fut probablement la ville de Kruszwica, qui fut fondée (comme le prouvent les découvertes archéologiques) au VIe siècle de ... {{cite book}}: URL–wikilink conflict (help)
and the wikilink doesn't work. Supposedly 'title-link' can be used, but I haven't gotten it to work. Leschnei (talk) 14:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Edited the reference above, I had removed the wikilink while I was trying to get title-link to work! (Not on my game this morning.) Leschnei (talk)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Lappspira. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

History of science

I am very sorry to see that you have now again inserted your top-level section into this major article. According to the normal WP:BRD cycle, you boldly proposed it, I reverted it with an appropriate explanation that it was WP:UNDUE and far too prominent for such a minor topic, and you should as an experienced editor have gone to the talk page to discuss it. Instead I regret that you have seen fit to replace it, with equal prominence. Had you been an IP or newbie doing this, I would have templated you for edit-warring, so I am disappointed in your conduct. I have started a discussion on the talk page and will put a notice on the relevant project, but frankly I can't begin to see why you think the topic should be of equal status with the whole of "Modern Science" which gets a single top-level chapter. A starred entry in the "See also" list would surely be quite sufficient. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:27, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Studentlitteratur

The article Studentlitteratur has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:50, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Plain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pohjanmaa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sudetes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crust (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Denudation (medicine)

The article Denudation (medicine) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not follow the guidelines of WP:MED.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 22:32, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Geology of Finland, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Greenstone and Imbrication (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lapland (Finland), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parkland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nordfjord-Sogn Detachment

Hi Lappspira, when I created the Nordfjord-Sogn Detachment article I balked at adding any references to my own work, but as that seems the simplest way to provide source references for some of the statements, I have now added citations to my 1987 paper. Could you check that that paper does provide support for those statements as I am not exactly unbiased in this regard. Thanks, Mikenorton (talk) 19:45, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thak you for your commentary Mikenorton. I have checked your article and with the Wikipedia article and things seem fine. I can also tell you I have recently created the articles Western Gneiss Region and Scandinavian Caledonides that I now linked in the Nordfjord-Sogn Detachment article. —Lappspira (talk) 21:14, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I'll check those out. Mikenorton (talk) 12:25, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of geological time navboxes in categories

If you'd like to express an opinion about the placement of geological time navboxes in categories, please feel free to join in the discussion at WT:WikiProject Geology#Geology time navboxes in categories (again). Thanks! —hike395 (talk) 16:33, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Geology of Finland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zink (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Q-slope, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Strandflat

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Strandflat you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:41, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Peneplain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Biota
South Småland peneplain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Horst

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Strandflat

The article Strandflat you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Strandflat for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seems fine to me. BTW you shouldn't edit the GA1 page after completion. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:50, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thank you for your hard work on Strandflat and many other geology articles! Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 04:18, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Weichselian glaciation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sandur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Continental drift, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Geodetic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Astrid Cleve, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oscillation theory (geology) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Strandflat

On 26 March 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Strandflat, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that strandflats are the most studied coastal landform in Norway? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Strandflat. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Strandflat), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Studentlitteratur

The article Studentlitteratur has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:04, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sheet erosion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clod (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kalba-Narym batholith, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Porphyry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help pls

Hello Im new here I found u on lgbt pages I posted and created new pages concerning lgbt wikiproject Can u please edit them accept them and link them to other languages and if a table of info is needed can u do it And can u please do the portal and the categories please How can i be part of lgbt wikiproject please I translated new pages hope u see and check them They are these https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?preload=Template%3AAfc+preload%2Fdraft&editintro=Template%3AAfC+draft+editintro&title=Draft:LGBT_Føroyar&create=Create+new+article+draft#See%20also 

AdamPrideTN (talk) 21:29, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Conceening categories

I have 2 questions please First Sophus Thalbitzer is about a straight ally doctor who like Evelyn Hooker helped to decriminalise homosexuality in Denmark His categories are only LGBT history in Denmark But i added the categories of sexual orientation and psychology and the one of sexual orientatiin and science just like those of Evelyn Hooker ones. So should Evelyn Hooker be added to LGBT history in the US category Should Evelyn hooker and dophus trablitzer both be added to the category of LGBT activists in the us and in denmark resoectively Since that category contains a lot of LGBT allies and friends and scientists or what?

Second the page Lesbian Movement (Denmark) is in the category of LGBt history in denmark It is an lgbt assiciation that is defunct now Should it be put in LGBt assiciatii's in denmark category or what Or be created in a new categor of defunct lgbt association in the denmark as i qaw this category with many associatiins Or what what do u think Sorry for the bother again This may sound stupid and unnecessary for some But it is so important and improving believe me AdamPrideTN (talk) 01:49, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The "show preview" button is right next to the "publish changes" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:47, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jökull, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Icelandic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:23, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Lappspira. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Earthquake edit

Hi. Are you okay with why I reverted your edit to Earthquake, or would like more explanation? ♦ J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 21:56, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Gotland

Hello there User:Lappspira

A few days ago you kindly thanked me for my edit on Gotland#Notable_people. The editors have now swooped and there is discussion about changes on the talk page. Would you like to contribute? Talk:Gotland, Item 7.

ArbieP (talk) 14:51, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gentrification, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Middle-Urals Ring Structure for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Middle-Urals Ring Structure is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Middle-Urals Ring Structure until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Russian geomorphologists

A tag has been placed on Category:Russian geomorphologists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:12, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Planetary boundary layer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inversion layer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Piotr Migoń

I would be inclined to nominate Piotr Migoń for deletion, if is not improved with sources showing encyclopedic notability in the fairly near term. It has been tagged for notability concerns for years, and I can't tell whether it is up to date. BD2412 T 01:14, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Karelia (historical province of Finland)

Hello.

I am in full agreement with you that Swedish is a language on Finland. That is to say the modern Finnish republic.

However, this article is about a historical province, and in similarity to my last point, I don't really see the point of Russian on the opener. Veldig Viktig (talk) 21:34, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Veldig Viktig, where there not there people speaking Russian inhabiting the province back then? Lappspira (talk) 01:17, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No idea. I believe you. I think the best remedy in that situation then is to move the heavy-loaded section onto a different part of the article. I'll give it a try so you can assess it after. Veldig Viktig (talk) 06:04, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Standard ArbCom discretionary sanctions notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Newimpartial (talk) 15:50, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kiruna mine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Porphyry.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ytterby, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greenstone.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Water pollution in Sweden has been nominated for merging

Category:Water pollution in Sweden has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 16:31, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of important publications in geology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tunneling.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of important publications in geology for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of important publications in geology, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of important publications in geology (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]