User talk:Jason1978

Hello, Jason1978! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes ( ~~~~ ); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 06:38, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous


Image Tagging for Image:Red-Hot-Chili-Peppers-Positive-Mental-O-281894.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Red-Hot-Chili-Peppers-Positive-Mental-O-281894.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:04, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Anthony2006.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:24, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Chadsmith2006.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Chadsmith2006.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:01, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Flea2006.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Flea2006.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Angr 22:19, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers Newsletter Vol. 1, no. 2

The Second Red Hot Chili Peppers Newsletter has been published. Some interesting things have happened in the Wikipedia world of the Red Hot Chili Peppers, so please take the time to read and review any information. Thanks for being apart of the team! Regards, NSR77 (Talk|Contribs) 02:58, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers June 2007 Newsletter

The Red Hot Chili Peppers WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, no. 3 — June 2007
"When I joined the Chili Peppers Anthony and Flea could have said 'Listed, we're the whole thing, and you're just here to play guitar', ya know, but we would have never made a record like Blood Sugar or Californication had they said that to me, ya know; instead what they said was 'You're equal to us...you're ideas are no less important than ours are'." - John Frusciante
News and Announcements
New members

Since our last newsletter was sent in late May, several new contributors have joined the project: Bdifjb, stswil, Kaitonkid, G1ggy , MagnoliaPenn and Smithcool.

Editors

NSR77 TC


You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or want to receive it in a different form, please contact the publishers. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 17:54, 23 June 2007 (UTC) .[reply]

WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers July 2007 Newsletter

The Red Hot Chili Peppers WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, no. 4 — July 2007
"It was the most horrible show ever. Every single note, every single word, hurt, knowing that we were no longer a band. I kept looking over at John and seeing this dead statue of disdain...that night, John disappeared from the topsy-turvy world of the Red Hot Chili Peppers." — Anthony Kiedis
News and Announcements
New members

Since our last newsletter was sent in late May, several new contributors have joined the project: Grim-Gym, Smithcool, Geelcat, Pianoman7692, Skeeker, and Saget53.

Editors

NSR77 TC


You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or want to receive it in a different form, please contact the publishers. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 01:49, 1 August 2007 (UTC) .[reply]

WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers August 2007 Newsletter

The Red Hot Chili Peppers WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, no. 5 — August 2007
"Well, I don't even know how to drive in this life, so I'm pretty far from ever having the life of being a stuntdouble. I had an Evil Knievel doll when I was a kid, that's about it!" — John Frusciante
News and Announcements
New members

Since our last newsletter was sent in August, several new contributors have joined the project: MDowdal and Famguy3.

Editors

NSR77 TC


You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or want to receive it in a different form, please contact the publishers. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 03:54, 1 September 2007 (UTC) .[reply]

WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers September 2007 Newsletter

The Red Hot Chili Peppers WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, no. 6 — September 2007
"John was just up there like he didn't give a fuck about anything. You can't be in a band and not care. It's gunna show. And it did. A lot of the shows were terrible." — Chad Smith
News and Announcements
New members

No new members have joined the project.

Editors

NSR77 TC


You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or want to receive it in a different form, please contact the publishers. This newsletter was delivered by the automated Xihix 01:24, 10 October 2007 (UTC) .[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Underthebridge1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Underthebridge1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:08, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers January 2008 Newsletter

The Red Hot Chili Peppers WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 2, no. 1 — January 2008
"I remember I was taking a piss at a party once in this multi-urinal stall bathroom, and this guy was pissing next to me and he looks over at me pissing and starts singing 'Under the Bridge' in some twisted key and I though 'Okay. We've definitely made it now; a drunken guy is singing out of key one of our songs next to me in the urinal." - Anthony Kiedis
News and Announcements
New members

Since our last newsletter was sent in October, several new contributors have joined the project: Jack, Pifko87, Dihydrogen Monoxide and Kasperkohler.

Editors

NSR77 TC


You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or want to receive it in a different form, please contact the publishers. This newsletter was delivered by the automated xihix(talk) 05:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC) .[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Behindthesun.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Behindthesun.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Myfriends.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Myfriends.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Coffeeshoprhcp.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Coffeeshoprhcp.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:23, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fightlikeabrave.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fightlikeabrave.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Summertimecover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Summertimecover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:54, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Summertimesingle.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Summertimesingle.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:54, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Nkotb2008.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Nkotb2008.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria.

If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the image can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the image is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Nkotb2008.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Save-Me-Oprah(talk) 00:14, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hollywoodafrica.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hollywoodafrica.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:20061203_040146RHCP-LIVE2.jpg

Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:20061203_040146RHCP-LIVE2.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 01:55, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Josh Klinghoffer

I get what you're saying, but a private email message is not (unfortunately) confirmation. It will have to be a statement from the band or Klinghoffer himself. Best wishes. Sky83 (talk) 18:16, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi. Blackie may well be the best source, but he's still not suitable for inclusion here. For what it's worth, from everything I've read myself, I think they're highly unlikely to have anyone other than Josh in the band, but it will have to be an official announcement of some kind and if that doesn't happen for months, it will just have to wait. As we know, the threshold for inclusion here is verifiability, not truth :). Sky83 (talk) 19:25, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dot Hacker

A tag has been placed on Dot Hacker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. avs5221 (talk) 08:18, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shallowbethygame.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shallowbethygame.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:28, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Thursday, May 13

Re: Anthony Kiedis

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Anthony Kiedis. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 05:44, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Anthony's father, John Kiedis (aka Blackie Dammett) has his own wiki page and ran the Peppers fanclub for many years. Anthony is even working on a television show about his childhood with his father. I'm not sure why info about his father is not allowed. Jason1978 (talk) 05:55, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As stated, you need to provide a reliable source for your information, -especially- if you're adding the information to a biography of a living person. Links to other Wiki pages and/or fansites aren't considered reliable. Doniago (talk) 06:35, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of Red Hot Chili Peppers band members

Your edits to the List of Red Hot Chili Peppers band members have been undone. Zander Schloss is considered an official member of the band, as cited by Anthony Kiedis' autobiography. It shouldn't matter if Schloss was in the band for four days or four years. He is still considered an official member due Kiedis' acknowledgment. There has already been a discussion regarding Schloss' membership, and it was confirmed that he was an official member of the band. Thank you. WereWolf (talk) 04:03, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Anthony never confirms Zander was a offical member of the band in his book. He confirms that the band felw him to Sydney in hopes that he would take John's place for the rest of the tour but after rehearsing for four days things didn't work out. When Dave joined he along with the band made up guitar picks with all the past Peppers guitarists names on them, Zander's name wasn't on there. I have every book, documentary etc on the Peppers imaginable and Zander is never mentioned at all let along as a official member in any of them except for the small two paragraphs in Anthony's book. Like Chuck Biscuits, who is said to have filled in for a show or two, Zander was going to be a tour replacement if hired. I even asked director/actor Dick Rude (close friend of Zander and the Peppers) a few years ago if he was a member and he said he tried out in hopes he would be one but that's it. Of course that means nothing to you and I have nothing to back it up but here is what Anthony wrote in his book:

Page 297, Chapter 11 in Anthony's book, here is what he says about Zander:

"We met up with our friend Zander Schloss, who was going to take John's place. Zander was a talented guitar player who could read and write music, a quick study with a zandy, soulful, comic sensibility. We had seven days to teach him enough songs to rock out Austraalia. Zander met us in Sydney and we started two-day rehearsals. But after four days, it was clear to me and Flea that this wasn't happening. Zander was playing the songs but it didn't feel like the Red Hot Chili Peppers. At that point, we decided we'd rather cancel dates than present a half-assed version of ourselves."

Also...Zander on his official Facebook page lists all the bands he was in...and doesn't mention the Chili Peppers http://www.facebook.com/#!/profile.php?id=100000476358182

Jason1978 (talk) 05:21, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter. Facebook isn't considered a reliable source here on Wikipedia, and because he was mentioned in the book, that confirms his status as a member. Like I said, there was a debate about this a very long time ago, and we reached a conclusion that Scloss is a former member of the Red Hot Chili Peppers. WereWolf (talk) 23:14, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's unfortunate that you don't accept facebook because that's Zander's actual page and it lists his full resume but whatever. Nowhere in Anthony's book does it say he was a member. He tried out for the band, things didn't work, he never joined the band. I will also again point out that in the past when info about Zander was put on his Wiki page, it was removed because he wasn't a member but on the Peppers page it says he was. Jason1978 (talk) 23:14, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Listen, we've had this discussion before with another user. The members here on Wikipedia reached a consensus regarding his stance as a member. We consider him a former official member of the band, so please, do not remove him from the list. WereWolf (talk) 04:35, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see you're continuing to remove Schloss from the list; this is your final warning. DO NOT REMOVE HIM FROM THE LIST. WereWolf (talk) 20:52, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Dropkick-murphys-going-out-in-style.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dropkick-murphys-going-out-in-style.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:05, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive detail

Jason, please stop adding excessive detail--before you know it, what is now a halfway-decent article is turned into a list of minutia. Not every single thing that's verified is worth mentioning. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 05:34, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Jason1978. You have new messages at Drmies's talk page.
Message added 05:57, 22 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

License tagging for File:Red-hot-chili-peppers-new-album-summer-2011-banner-coachella-festival-02.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Red-hot-chili-peppers-new-album-summer-2011-banner-coachella-festival-02.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:06, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Soon.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Soon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:13, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Red-hot-chili-peppers-new-album-summer-2011-banner-coachella-festival-02.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Red-hot-chili-peppers-new-album-summer-2011-banner-coachella-festival-02.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:09, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:RHCPAUG30.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:RHCPAUG30.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 03:32, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Rhcp2011rs.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Rhcp2011rs.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. We hope (talk) 06:46, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RhcpImwithyouera.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RhcpImwithyouera.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:51, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rhcp2011.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rhcp2011.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:57, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Red Hot Chili Peppers

With respect to this request on my talk page, I'm not going to take any action against Z33k at this time, and both of you should take this response as a warning. You should bear in mind that being right doesn't prevent you from being guilty of edit-warring. In that sense, both of you are equally guilty.

I need to see both of you stop flipping the date back and forth. Continuing to do so will result in a block. You need to get an actual consensus, even if it takes an RFC to get there.

I will note that the underlying case isn't 100% clear to me. For singles, the earliest release date is routinely used, and I'm surprised to see that Jason1978 isn't just completely wrong (which is what I thought at first). There are numerous discographies that apparently use a "home release" rule. Since I've issued a warning, I can't take place in any further discussion of the topic.—Kww(talk) 00:27, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Adventures of Rain Dance Maggie

Could you please explain to me why you removed my edits and how this page meets WP:NMUSIC? I Help, When I Can. [12] 01:09, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The entire single page was wiped out and removed and there was nothing on there when I re-added everything. There has been a edit war going on and I thought that's what happened. Someone decided to delete the page for no reason. I checked the history and didn't see anything either and noticed someone else in the discussion area said they didn't know why it was removed either so I re-added it. I apologize for removing your edits. Jason1978(talk) 01:42, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I turned the page into a redirect. It does not meet WP:NMUSIC. I explained my edit. So, are you going to undo the edit or do we have to take this matter to AfD? I Help, When I Can. [12] 06:53, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Wouldn't let me undo the article so I re-directed it back to the album article. I hope this is what you want. Again, I apologize for the edit as I didn't see right away what you did. Jason1978(talk) 01:42, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Adventures of Rain Dance Maggie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Adventures of Rain Dance Maggie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Adventures of Rain Dance Maggie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. I Help, When I Can. [12] 03:26, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rhcp2011.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rhcp2011.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:19, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"The Adventures of Rain Dance Maggie" on Mainstream Rock Tracks

Do Not change to Billboard Rock Songs position, as this is misleading. The chart position is for Mainstream Rock Tracks chart peak, not Rock songs peak. It has currently peaked at #5 on Mainstream Rock Tracks, although it has gone #1 on Rock Songs. Please do not change it back to #1. Thank you. --Crocodileman (talk) 01:33, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Rock Songs took over for Mainstream Rock Tracks. Mainstream Rock Tracks is now a subscriber ONLY chart. You have to pay for access to it. Billboard.com no longer acknowledges Mainstream Rock Tracks as an actual chart.

The chart is still compiled, but it is only available through the magazine's website. The chart could be accessed free until June 2009, when it became subscriber-only. At that time, a new chart named Rock Songs was introduced that combined the data from Mainstream Rock with that from Alternative and Triple A.


http://www.billboard.com/charts/rock-songs#/song/red-hot-chili-peppers/the-adventures-of-rain-dance-maggie/25685227

Jason1978 (talk) 05:53, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Charts

The data from Rock Songs chart does not correspond with peak positions of previous songs on Mainstream Rock Tracks. They're two completely different charts. Just because Mainstream Rock Tracks aren't published on the site or the magazine does not mean it's not an actual chart. The positions on the singles chart should remain all Mianstream Rock Tracks because then all peak positions will be consistant. --Crocodileman (talk) 11:21, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Billboard changes their chart names all the time. Hot 100 Airplay is now called Radio Songs. Mainstream Rock Tracks data is now used in Rock Songs. Unless you subscribe and pay to be a member of Billboard.com you have no way of seeing the Mainstream Rock Tracks which is why Billboard created Rock Songs in 2009. Can you provide a link proving the song is at #5 on this chart because all links to this chart lead you directly to the Rock Songs chart. The previous link provided saying the song was #5 on this chart led directly to the same link I just posted in my previous response. --Jason1978 (talk) 11:23, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They are most definitely not the same charts. Rock Songs was not created to replace Mainstream Rock Tracks. It is a chart that takes in radio spins from Alternative, Active, Heritage rock, and Triple A and combines them into an overall chart. On the other hand, Mainstream Rock Tracks is a chart compiled by combining Active rock and Heritage rock only, which is the same formula Billboard has used ever since the chart debuted. Therefore, Mainstream Rock Tracks chart should be used on the singles chart instead of Rock Songs because they are two different charts compiled two different ways. If you like, you can make a new column for Rock Songs, as every other artists' singles chart on Wikipedia now uses (or should be using) Mainstream Rock Tracks. --Crocodileman (talk) 18:22, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rhcpmusicares.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rhcpmusicares.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:14, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bare URLs as references

Please stop adding bare URLs as references. Learn how to format a reference. You've been here long enough to learn how. I am likely to start reverting any changes you make if you don't. If you don't know what I mean, see WP:CITE. A full citation requires the authors name, title, publication, date, etc. You can do this manually, or you can use a {{cite}} template. Other Wikipedia editors aren't here to clean up after you. Start taking the time to properly format citations. Yworo (talk) 14:58, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RHCPpressphoto2011.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RHCPpressphoto2011.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:13, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RHCP

Dude, seriously. I'm getting really sick and tired of you removing adding Zander Schloss from the List of Red Hot Chili Peppers band members. As I've told you NUMEROUS TIMES. Kiesis states in his autobiography that he DID JOIN THE BAND FOR A FEW DAYS, NOT AUDITION. This is your FINAL WARNING. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. WereWolf (talk) 18:37, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will not edit it again but it needs to be open for a debate because it's inaccurate info. Again....PLEASE go check out the band's official biography titled Red Hot Chili Peppers: An Oral/Visual History in 2010. Anthony's book is NOT A BAND BIO. The RHCP book is written in the band's own words with interviews from almost every single band member in their history and is the ONLY book released by the band and endorsed by them. Nowhere in the book does it mention Zander Schloss name at all. So tell me why would the band's official bio omit a band member completly and never mention him or interview him like they did with everyone else? Zander states in his bio he was trialed for four days, Anthony in his book clearly states he was going to take John's place however after four days of rehearsals it didn't work out. The end of his comment however is very misleading but he was never hired. Rehearsing to be a replacement on tour is not being hired. He rehearsed, it didn't work, end of story...Arik was hired shortly after to offically replace John.

Here is Anthony's quote from his book: We would go on to Austrailia where we would meet up with Zander Schloss who WAS going to take John's place. Zander was a talented, zany, soulful, comic sensibility. We had seven days to teach him enough songs to rock out Australia. Zander met us in Sydney where we started intensive two-a-day rehearsals. But after four days, it was clear to me and Flea that this wasn't happening. Zander was playing the songs but it didn't feel like the Red Hot Chili Peppers. When we told Zander he was devestated. You'd thought he was with the band four years and not four days. Jason1978 (talk) 12:46, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Jason1978. You have new messages at Drmies's talk page.
Message added 15:55, 28 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Drmies (talk) 15:55, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Film additions

Hi Jason, thanks for all you contributions to Wikipedia. Please note that films in pre-production are not included in filmography tables. Cheers. Span (talk) 04:29, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Raymond Pettibon

Hi Jason. I've reverted your addition to the Raymond Pettibon article as Youtube is not a reliable source. However I've started a discussion on the talk page for the article to figure out where best to include the information, and where to reference it from. Please feel free to join the discussion. Pburka (talk) 04:40, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Red Hot Chili Peppers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
was linked to Madonna

Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:13, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In Look Around (song), you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Digital download (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Red Hot Chili Peppers songs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links to Chic, Heart of Gold, Clap Your Hands, Good God, Everybody Dance and Crosstown Traffic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Blood Sugar Sex Magik tour (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Primus
I'm with You Tour (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to St. Barts

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed about File:Thegeneralstrike.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Thegeneralstrike.jpg. However, it needs some more work before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:

  1. Add a description of where the image comes from (not what it is) and who the creator is. Please be specific, and include a link if you can.
  2. Find the appropriate license from the list of free, non-free media, or public domain options. Copy the license template and paste it in the file's page, and save.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Jackirons.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jackirons.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:42, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Cliffmartinez.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cliffmartinez.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. We hope (talk) 17:33, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to The Beach Boys lineups. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. The removal of John Stamos and Matt Jardine is not justified without an official source as is the addition of Brett Simons and Nicky Walusko.Gsgeek540 (talk) 01:03, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced Removals/Additions

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to The Beach Boys lineups. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. The removal of John Stamos and Matt Jardine is not justified without an official source as is the addition of Brett Simons and Nicky Walusko.Gsgeek540 (talk) 01:03, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing any additions/removals

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to The Beach Boys 50th Anniversary Reunion Tour. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Although your recent additions and deletions maybe true and justified, you have not added a source to be able to verify that. I have done your homework for you, as well as cleaned up several of your edits that were unjustified and unnecessary.Gsgeek540 (talk) 19:05, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ballad of ole betsy

Has this now been played in the regular set? I notice the reference note has been removed from the song but there is no explanation in the edit summary.
I noticed you have made some recent changes to The Beach Boys 50th Anniversary Reunion Tour without explaining the change in the Edit summary. Any future edit on this page without an explanation will be considered vandalism and reverted back to the previous post. Going forward, please refer to Help:Edit summary page to properly educate yourself on how to edit a page, as per standard, to avoid a potential conflicted as has been noted here. If you have any further questions or comments, feel free to tag my talk page. Gsgeek540 (talk) 17:02, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, it's a template message that users made as a result of several Bots actions....they have a few right now that deem any edit of more then 200 characters without an edit summary vandalism. There are a few users that didn't have an edit summary for 5 pages and had their account and IP suspended from editing...just a blunt heads up because these bots are not too kind. I'm glad that Totten still has lead on it! *listens to 2011 performance right now* Gsgeek540 (talk) 17:31, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Al Pacino. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 13:52, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:2011rhcppromo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:2011rhcppromo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:57, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RHCP Tours

I am not sure why you feel you have certain authority over other editors but you do not. I do not need your permission to make any changes to any article, major or minor. I removed all information that had no notable connection with the tour. On Wikipedia, we do no assume information, only things that are sourced. I provided two sources setlists and listed the city of origin. Nowhere did I make an assumption they were the only two setlists performed. You provided an unsourced list of songs that cannot be proven if performed or not. Josh Klinhoffer has been touring with RHCP since 2006, so how is he magically joining them on their "current tour"? Given the fact the SAWT was their last tour and he was a part of it. More importantly, there are at least five sources that state the tour begins in September. Why are you including dates from July? This article (and the others) are about the concert tour, not a promo tour for the record. That is why they were removed. My information comes from research. I don't pull things from the sky. If you have information that contradicts mine or another editors, show some sort of proof, besides your knowledge as a "fan". Wikipedia is a not a fan site and we do just assume information on here. If you have an issue with that, you are more than welcomed to start your own wiki. Itsbydesign (talk) 05:54, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You removed most information that was notable to the tour.
I didn't provide a unsourced list of songs. I provided two links: one to http://theside.free.fr/ which is one of the longest running RHCP tour sites around and one to their official website. Both links are also provided at the bottom in the external links section. I don't understand adding just two random setlists to the page. It gives off the indication to OTHERS that by showing two setlists that is all they are doing.
The tour did begin in September. I never said it started in July HOWEVER they played a bunch of warm-up shows in support of the album which are included in the I'm With You touring process. Just like with every tour they do a month or two of warm up dates before kicking off the full world tour. Josh Klinghoffer was touring as a backing guitarist in 2007 for the final legs of the tour. He became their lead guitarist replacing Frusciante in 2009. I sorta think that's pretty noteworthy of mentioning it in the article that since the 2006 tour they lost their guitarist after 8 years and he was replaced by Klinghoffer. You also removed all mention of the backing touring musicians as well, Mauro Refosco and Chris Warren who have appeared at every show during every song.
You posted during their break while Kiedis recovered from his injury they were inducted into the HOF. Again... this is not true. They were inducted in April while on the first leg of their U.S. tour. Kieids was already recovered.
And if you want to talk about providing unsourced info...you completly renamed each page with made up tour names. The Tony Flow Show? Your reasoning was that was their name for that tour, which is wrong. It was for the first two dates. 23 out of the 25 dates they were known as Red Hot Chili Peppers. Each tour didn't have a flashy name like you gave it so again, these are personal changes being made as you see fit and how you want it to look though none of it is fact.
Like I said....i'm not saying you can or can't edit all you want however you come along and make massive edits, remove info you personally feel is unimportant such as band members, members joining, songs, tourdates...which to a touring page seem pretty important to me and so far for the past year have been at least to everyone else who has made any edits to the page. Again, I noticed you have been warned more than once for randomly doing this. Not sure why all of a sudden you decided to make massive edits to the RHCP touring pages.Jason1978 (talk) 02:10, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The band was inducted into the RRHOF on April 14, 2012. The last tour date was April 12, 2012 and the next concert was April 25, 2012. That sounds to be like a break in their touring schedule. The band went on a promotional tour for the album. It has nothing to do with the concert tour for the album. Since you appear to be so hellbent on including the information, include it in the article for the album. This article pertains to the concert tour.
As for the setlist, you cannot place your way of thinking onto everyone else. Just because YOU wold assume they are the only two setlists they are doing doesn't imply that everyone else does. Anyone with common sense can see that there are over 100 dates not the tour and only two setlists, that notate date, city and venue, will put two and put together and realize that those setlist apply to those dates and venues--not the entire tour.
The sources you provided are not reliable. The policy clearly states, "Anyone can create a personal web page or pay to have a book published, and then claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason, self-published media, such as books, patents, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, personal or group blogs, Internet forum postings, and tweets, are largely not acceptable as sources"
Furthermore, we don't assume information. Until dates are made public for Australia (there is ZERO source for Africa) the tour ends in Nov 2012. When future dates are added, the article will be updated accordingly. You are on your 2nd revert of the article, not revert will result an a ANI.
I am not a fan of RHCP so I am neutral in this situation. What the fans deem notable is not important. I will reiterate, you IF have any issues with ANY EDITS that ANY EDITORS make, YOU need to provide SUPPORT for your claims. The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. Itsbydesign (talk) 06:48, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


In the article you state that Kiedis suffered his foot injury and the tour was postponned. While on the break they were inducted into the HOF. It's completly misleading and completly implies during the break prior to the tour resuming they were inducted. Two weeks into a tour, 4/12 show, 4/14 HOF, 4/15 Obama show isn't a break. April 16-26 is a break. In the article you wrote following the ceremony they played the Obama event. Again...comes off as misleading. The Obama event was 24hrs later but makes it seem like it followed the ceremony that same day.
As for the warm up dates...you yourself created a tour background section and the first line mentions they played warm up dates/festivals in the tour background section. So how isn't the tourdates do not belong in this article but you can mention them as being part of the tour? As the article states...the the tour is in support of their tenth album. Warm up dates, world tour BOTH fall into that catagory. Furthermore...can you explain why you removed dates from the actual world tour including two full shows Dec 19 and 31.
Care to explain how sources like the band's official website not reliable? www.redhotchilipeppers.com is not a reliable source because it's of the THREE sources I provided with the song list. There is even a link in the article to the official bootlegs released through the band so that's four sources, two from the band's actual website providing info on the songs played. It seems very pointless to add two random setlists rather than a full listing of songs. You personally picked out two random setists of your own choosing.
Not sure why you seem deadset on completly hijacking the artice and then throw out unfair warnings as threats when I did nothing to even warrant one. Furthermore I have already asked more than once to take this to the article's talk section before making more edits so others can weigh in on the debate however you seemed to have ignored that and for somee reason you seem hellbent on removing everything I have posted or the articles I have created, are making threats so I wont edit so I asked for a Wikipedia:Dispute resolution (WP:DR) Jason1978 (talk) 07:11, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure what you are not understanding but I will repeat that I do not need your permission to make edits to any article or justify my reasoning for editing to you. Whining about editing an article for over a year means nothing to me or any other editor on this site. For some reason, you appear to believe I am at a lower intelligence level than yourself and that I am oblivious to what your are attempting to do.
Bottom line is the article was riddled with non-notable information relating to the main subject. It is pointless to have an entire section dedicated to the RRHOF induction. What does it have to do with the tour? What is the point of highlighting a concert event and movie that has zero connection to the tour? You want to detail promotional dates, include them on the album's article, where the information is relevant.
What you are doing is adding unnecessary fluff. It's like an editor asking for an article on peaches and you write an article on peaches but 90% of the article is about the state of Georgia. A lot of the material that you are debating has no or minimal connection to the tour. Every edit was explain in edits summaries and I have done so on your talk page, referencing policies to support my changes.
Regardless of time spent or fandom you have towards RHCP, you must remain neutral when editing Wikipedia. You are rationalizing your thoughts based upon your bias. No one thinks you like and to assume others do is foolish. As I stated, you bare the burden of proof for changes. All of my additions are accompanied with a source. If you want to challenge that, provide support for your theory, within the guidelines of the policies. Itsbydesign (talk) 11:54, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Since you asked:
  • promotional tour: a series of events with the intent of increasing sales and/or public awareness of a product
  • concert tour: a series of musical performances presented to an audience

[1]

Again, and I have said this more than once, I don't care who edits the article. I didn't create it, many have edited it however usually when it's edited there are reasons behind the edits other than I personally think it's fluff and doesn't belong. Some of the stuff in question, the so called fluff I never added. It was others who added and was accepted in the article up until your edits. I however created many of the band's other tour pages and as you can see none of them contained a massive load of your so-called fluff however you decided to rename some of them giving them made up names with no sources behind the name changes.

With the promotional dates...here is what YOU placed into the article: Before the tour commenced, the band played several one-off shows and music festivals[5]; including the Summer Sonic Festival. If the promotinal tour has no connection to the article/tour why mention that? Why not post that in the album section? As for your defintions of promotional/concert tour...10 out of the 15 of the promotonal dates full shows in front of full capacity auidences. Their Asian leg of the tour was on the promo leg. Both are tours in support of the album, to promote and sell it. The warm-up/promo dates however differ because they aren't confined normall in arenas like alot of the tour is. They were in clubs, festivals, ballrooms etc.

I'm not biased towards the band when it comes to editing. I keep everything accurate and backed up with proof like we are supposed to around here. What I posted in the tour section is about the tour, happened during the promotion of the album/tour. I do however know a little too much about this band but i'm not biased towards them. My fandom takes a backseat when editing or creating articles however it does tend to make it easier to notice made up edits/vandalism when you know alot about the subject of the article and the main article is vandalized alot. I have always worked with everyone fairly, rarely if ever having problems like this and if they are, they are quickly worked out.

Look...this is obviously going nowhere and never will so I ask if we can come to a comprimise. You layed out your opinions and reasons for changes, I layed out mine. I think you added alot to the article and made it look more cleaned up. I will leave out the so-called "fluff" however would like to re-include the song listing (and again the link i'm providing is their official site) and warm-up dates (again since it was you that mention them as background for the tour it falls in line with the tour's history). Of course I don't need your permission to edit it just like you don't need mine but i'd rather try to work together than argue everyday. Jason1978 (talk) 04:58, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

First warning

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article I'm with You World Tour, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Itsbydesign (talk) 06:27, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow that's pretty childish of you. I respond to you and you hit me with a warning for no reason yet it is you that is editing the page without citing reasons for your edits and making up falsee information like tour names. I have provided links time and time again since I started posting on here in 2006. Jason1978 (talk) 06:27, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You referenced a fan site and an open wiki as reliable sources and you wonder why you are been cautioned of verifiability? I've provided a link that says specifically that those type of sites cannot be used. What's childish is your response. You deliberately added those sites thinking I'd be aloof to them. This is why you were warned. With each response you make, you are further cementing ownership. Itsbydesign (talk) 12:01, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I referenced three links. The band's redhotchilipeppers.com, theside.com and setlist.com however you seemed to have overlooked or ignored the band's official site as a source. I didn't deliberatly add those sites like you said I did. You said I was not providing sources and I added not one but three different ones that included the info I was adding to the article. Jason1978 (talk) 05:02, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012 – Questionable claims of sources used in "Songs performed" sections

Yesterday you added "Source:<ref>http://http://backstreets.com/setlists.html</ref><ref>www.brucespringsteen.net</ref>" as the source for your "Songs performed" sections in four Bruce Springsteen tour articles: Wrecking Ball Tour, Working on a Dream Tour, Bruce Springsteen with The Seeger Sessions Band Tour, and Ghost of Tom Joad Tour. I find this hard to believe, because www.brucespringsteen.net has no set lists before 2009, meaning it has nothing on the Sessions Band Tour or the Tom Joad Tour, and because backstreets.com has no set lists before 1999, meaning it has nothing on the Tom Joad Tour. In fact I don't think you used either of these sites for when you originally added these sections in the Wrecking Ball or Working on a Dream Tours either, because doing so would require a lot of work. I believe you just pulled results off of http://www.setlist.fm, or a similar site, where they are already aggregated and listed. Just as you did for Born in the U.S.A. Tour and Tunnel of Love Express Tour and Magic Tour (Bruce Springsteen), where you added these sections without any source at all.

But http://www.setlist.fm is a fan-maintained wiki, and not suitable as a WP:RS. In fact I suspect those most of the "Songs performed" sections you've been adding to tour articles all over Wikipedia are not adequately sourced, in addition to being of dubious value to the reader. Wasted Time R (talk) 01:32, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


I get my Springsteen info from either greasylake.org, backstreets.com, brucespringsteen.net or brucebase.com. I used backstreets.com or brucespringsteen.com for more recent shows but try and include brucebase and greasylake as well. Sometimes I guess I dont, my mistake. Those sites include every setlist, from every tour dating back to pre-E Street Band and always have the setlist up within an hour after each show as seen here: http://www.greasylake.org/setlists_lists.php. With those sites you can easly type in song and see when it was last performed. setlists.com is worthless and a site that anyone can add to or update and doesn't provide detail like those Springsteen sites do which I why I dont use it. I have used that as a source in one other non-Springsteen article to provide 3 matching links but that's a different story between me and someone else. I always try and post sources/links (many times more than one) with edits or explain the edit since I first started editing and creating articles on here in 2006. Stuff can however be edited by anyone or removed. In this case I normally would put a source link following the song listing so since you brought this up I went back and added to the sources providing further proof.

And I have not been adding them all over wikipedia. I only keep watch/edit three bands. The layout of the song listing came originaly from someone else so I decided since one article had it, I would start to add it to other articles of that artist. Originaly they had one setlist posted for the entire tour, which seemed misleading. I changed it to the full song listing (and someone else decided it was better to include the albums the songs were associated with.

Check out how I changed the Wrecking Ball Tour article with the songs performed list. I made them hidden so the article looks less cluttered. If the songs remain I will do that for each article (with sources of course).Jason1978 (Jason1978) 02:18, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You've now added "Source:<ref>http://www.greasylake.org/setlists_lists.php</ref>" as the source for many of these sections, but you've still left in brucespringsteen.net as a source for the Sessions Band Tour and Tom Joad Tour. How is that possible?
And what makes greasylake.org a usable source? Per its own self-description, "Greasy Lake is a fan-based, fan-operated Bruce Springsteen website. That means we have no relations and no contact to Bruce Springsteen or his management whatsoever. ... Greasy Lake disclaims the responsibility for any negative effects caused by erroneous information published here. We don't have the time, nor the means to doublecheck all information." Does that sound like a WP:RS to you?
Finally, I've rarely ever seen tour articles with "Songs performed" sections; you are responsible for most of the ones that exist. (A lot of articles about tours with fixed setlists include the setlist, but that's a completely different situation.) As I originally said at Talk:Working on a Dream Tour, the information in these sections you have added is overly detailed and violates WP:NOTADIR. It tells the reader nothing about how often a song was performed, or what thematic meaning it had in the set, or anything else. It's just a list. In fact, for the Working on a Dream Tour, a GA article, it's downright misleading. It shows every song of six early albums being played, but that's because those albums were being performed in their entirety at selected shows. It shows almost all the songs of Working on a Dream being played, but the one of the most notable things about that tour is how little he played material from that album! I agree with you that posting just one random setlist from a tour is meaningless for artists like Springsteen. But just writing down every song that was played is equally meaningless. And adding "Soundchecked/not performed" songs is further total trivia - what about "Practiced in hotel room"? Or "Rehearsed at Convention Hall but abandoned because it sounded awful"? Then you've added even more trivia in as annotations on the Magic Tour, such as "'Cynthia' (last performed 2003)" ... do you really think it's notable that "Cynthia" got skipped on the Vote for Change, Devils and Dust, and Sessions Band Tours?
Good tour articles have narrative sections that try to describe the themes of tour shows and which songs played important roles. For possibly the best example, check out Zoo TV Tour, to my knowledge the only tour article to reach FA status. What you're doing is the opposite, and for both sourcing and content reasons, I do not believe these "Songs performed" sections belong in these articles. Wasted Time R (talk) 11:13, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


The U2 article is well written however on the otherhand I have encountered editors who feel articles like that are too wordy. Springsteen i'm asuming you know can play 100+ songs a tour, plays rarities, alot of covers so of course doesn't stick to just one setlist. I noticed with U2's articles they pretty much list every song performed throughout the article. You mentioned triva, I was told in the Wrecking Ball Tour article adding the tribute to Clarence Clemons was considered useless info. Really? A founding band member dies and the tribute his band plays to him on the tour shouldn't be included and is useless info? I also don't know how the article is misleading because it says in the article Springsteen started to perform full album shows towards the end of the tour. Of course I listed all the songs performed like I did in each article. This tour just so happened to feature the only time he felt like performing full albums.

Have you looked at the Pearl Jam tour articles? Like Springsteen they don't stick to one setlist and always change it nightly. They also happen to list the songs performed the same way I did in the Springsteen articles although minus the albums the songs were on. Oh and none of it seems to be sourced either. Take a look at Ten Tour, Backspacer Tour, Riot Act Tour etc. It's all the same and NO, I had no role in editing their articles.

Look at Paul McCartney's tour articles especially his 2011 On The Run Tour which includes 28 different setlists in the article. Really is 28 different setlists needed? On top of that, you want useless triva, ALL of his tour articles then list out every song performed in a large layout and detail what instrument each band member performs on each song. It already once lists each band member's name in the article and instruments they play. Jason1978 (talk) 06:00, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding U2, the tour articles do what they're supposed to: describe the meaningful aspects of the tour, not list all the tour details. Regarding Zoo TV, there's a lot of text there because it's one of the most famous and most written-about tours of all time. And there were about 55 songs played on it; the article mentions only about 25 of them, the ones that had an important role in the shows. Regarding Springsteen, how the death of Clarence was handled is the most important thing to describe about the Wrecking Ball Tour - continuing at all, Jake, the full horn section, the unnamed mention of Clarence (and Danny) during "My City of Ruins", the explicit pause (and later video tribute) during "Tenth". Anyone who argued this is trivia is totally wrong. Regarding the Pearl Jam tour articles, I don't think "Songs performed" sections belong there either. Regarding the McCartney tour articles, yes I've seen those before, the table of instruments vs songs is ridiculous and the 28 different setlists is ridiculous. But these are all WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS arguments. Wasted Time R (talk) 02:44, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:RHCP2011promo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:RHCP2011promo.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 09:55, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Page titles

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Red Hot Chili Peppers 1988 Tour a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Turd Town Tour. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. R'n'B (call me Russ) 16:38, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Imwithyououttakes.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Imwithyououttakes.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Imwithyousessions.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Imwithyousessions.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:15, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Adding utter useless trivia to articles

Jason1978, we discussed the dubious value and sourcing for your "Songs performed" sections before, but at least they were songs that were performed. Now you are adding "Soundchecked/on setlist but not performed" lists to tour articles. What is the rationale for this? These articles are supposed to be about what was played at concerts that audiences heard. They are not about what was not played or what audiences did not hear. For example, at Tunnel of Love Express Tour you have listed about 50 songs in the "Soundchecked/on setlist but not performed" list - a longer list than the songs that were performed. And what is your sourcing for this? A fan site, Greasy Lake, that is not a WP:RS to begin with, and that furthermore, doesn't list any "Soundchecked/on setlist but not performed" entries for any of the shows that I've checked. But even if they did, this information is of no value to the article - it's just the bottom level of Bruce trivia for Bruce ultradiehards. It's the kind of stuff that belongs on the BTX fan boards, not here. And you've added this to a dozen articles at least. Wasted Time R (talk) 02:41, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Everything has been in the article since July. If you go and look at my edits, the soundcheked/onsetlist info has been in the article since July. All I did with my recent edits was divide the sections, make them hidden like I said I would when we discusssed this before. Like I said before...there are many articles on here on here that have tour pages similar to this with full song listings however you have pages like Pearl Jam and David Bowie that feature ZERO sources/links to any of their song listings yet that doesn't seem to matter to anyone. Jason1978 (talk) 06:33, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Checking again, it looks like in July you were listing "Soundchecked/not performed" but now you've expanded it to "Soundchecked/on setlist but not performed". But regardless of whether I mentioned this in July or not, what is the rationale for including such songs? The Pearl Jam and David Bowie tour articles do not include these - they only mention songs played in the shows themselves. The same with every other tour article that shows setlists. There is no rationale for including soundchecks (mostly heard by roadies and janitors only) and setlist changeouts (heard by nobody). This is fancruft of the worst kind. Wasted Time R (talk) 11:05, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


I did expand the name because the other Springsteen articles had that. If it's such a major problem I can remove them however is there are reason the various other articles I mention with no sources are ignored? As for roadies/janitors only hearing these songs...it's usually the fans who attend that post info on the soundchecks because like I said, Springsteen is known to allow them in to hear the soundchecks. On this tour he has been coming out performing special acoustic performances for the fans allowed in early if they have a General Admission/Pit ticket. Those other artists mentioned are not known to do this so I doubt soundcheck info for every performance is easily obtainable for Bowie. He also makes various onstage changes to his setlists and takes sign requests that are not part of the setlist which is why on setlist, not performed is mentioned. It was supposed to be played but wasn't. Jason1978 (talk) 11:16, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I know what you're talking about - I've been to lots of Bruce shows - but listing such songs still isn't significant to a general audience. The text for the article for the current tour should mention the practice of special pre-show acoustic appearances, as those are real performances for a subset of the actual audience. But not soundchecks - those are practice, not performance. As for setlist dropouts, no also. We describe what he does, not what he doesn't do. (And the sourcing for these things is very patchy, as you know. Tours in the 1980s don't always have reliable setlists known, much less soundchecks. And even on the current tour, the Bruce website has stopped putting up handwritten setlists and fans are guessing what the changeouts were.) Please respect the fact that you are writing for a general audience, not a fan site, and improve the quality of what you are doing here. Wasted Time R (talk) 11:32, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Frankenberrycereal.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Frankenberrycereal.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:44, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Concertforsandy.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Concertforsandy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:31, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:DHPELIGRO.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:DHPELIGRO.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:19, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RHCP at Sullivan Arena

The easy answer would be in a recent edit summary I saw in another article: "Wikipedia isn't Ticketmaster." You must have missed the link to WP:CRYSTAL I provided, which clearly states that an event which hasn't taken place yet should be notable enough on its own merits to mention ("Individual scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place. Dates are not definite until the event actually takes place."). That they announced an upcoming concert offers no guarantees that it will actually take place, hence the reference to The White Stripes. Judging from your contributions and talk page, your fanaticism for the Red Hot Chili Peppers is perhaps admirable, but not quite what is needed to make this event notable. Your edit summary which states "It's Red Hot Chili Peppers" probably says it all. Except that the article you're editing is about the Sullivan Arena, not the Red Hot Chili Peppers, and isn't standing up as encyclopedic content pertaining to the Sullivan Arena, for the reasons I outline above. RadioKAOS  – Talk to me, Billy 20:07, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Orion2013promo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Orion2013promo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:32, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, is it possible to add an imagine of an RHCP performance in the page roll on the red tour? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.250.36.33 (talk) 11:33, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah sure it's possible. There are plenty of photos from the Hyde Park show out there which was released on CD. Jason1978 (talk) 04:54, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Springsteen&ilogo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Springsteen&ilogo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 08:30, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Anthony Kiedis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |first=Michael |url={{Allmusic|class=artist|id=p93719|pure_url=yes}} |title=((( Anthony Kiedis > Biography ))) |publisher=allmusic |accessdate=2010-10-09}}</ref> His father was a struggling
  • *[[Wicked (song)|Wicked]] (1992) as himself (music video for [[Ice Cube]] song which also features Flea

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:05, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bruce Springsteen may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • appeared for portions of a Springsteen and E Street Band performance at [[Conseco Fieldhouse]] in [[Indianapolis.. Less than one month later on April 17, 2008, Federici died at the [[Memorial Sloan-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:42, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cursechucky.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cursechucky.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:56, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rhcpalaska.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rhcpalaska.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:51, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Springsteen 2014 Tour

Hello, Jason1978, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Bruce Springsteen 2014 Tour, appears to be directly copied from http://brucespringsteen.net/. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Bruce Springsteen 2014 Tour if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 21:40, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bruce Springsteen may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • friend. Van Zandt, who co-starred with Gandolfini on the hit television series, ''[The Sopranos]]'', said of his passing "I have lost a brother and a best friend. The world has lost one of the

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:32, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to Blood Sugar Sex Magik, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.    DKqwerty    23:10, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All of my changes have now been provided with a proper link from the band's official website. It was my mistake because I forgot to add the link, thought I did. Yesterday they released a timeline giving correct dates for all of their releases, events in their history. http://redhotchilipeppers.com/timeline Jason1978 (talk) 08:12, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Curseofchuckycd.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Curseofchuckycd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. STATic message me! 23:38, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keith Morris

Hi Jason! With this edit to the Keith Morris article you added references to "Kiedis, Sloman, 2004". Do you remember what that stands for and if so, could we put the full details into the article (maybe using a {{cite book}} template)? Cheers ~ benzband (talk) 18:39, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Anthony Kiedis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |first=Michael |url={{Allmusic|class=artist|id=p93719|pure_url=yes}} |title=((( Anthony Kiedis > Biography ))) |publisher=allmusic |accessdate=2010-10-09}}</ref> His father was a struggling
  • * Changing Fashions (1993) as himself (a very rare short film released by [[Details Magazine]] that also featured [[Debbie Harry]], [[

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:29, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"For the Thrashers"

This is kind of interesting, but I'm afraid you added information to Mother's Milk without providing a reliable source. Since that is a Featured Article, I've reverted your addition. Please locate a reliable source backing up what you wrote (discogs is not a reliable source). --Laser brain (talk) 22:03, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discogs contains a photo of the actual 12" with a sticker containing the info. Not sure what other proof is needed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:For_The_Thrashers.jpg http://www.spirit-of-rock.com/les%20goupes/R/Red%20Hot%20Chili%20Peppers/For%20the%20Thrashers/For%20the%20Thrashers.jpg--Jason1978 (talk) 12:51, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I missed that, sorry. --Laser brain (talk) 21:46, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem...and discogs has been very reliable since everything there is for sale. I have bought a lot of this stuff there. RHCP have a lot of rare promos from all over the world that many do not seem to know about. --Jason1978 (talk) 06:09, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

High Hopes Tour

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of High Hopes Tour, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Bruce Springsteen 2014 Tour. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 18:42, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Rhcpsuperbowl.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Rhcpsuperbowl.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 05:29, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Rhcpalaskapromo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Rhcpalaskapromo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 05:29, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Responding to your comment about unperformed Springsteen songs

This is in response to your comment on my talk page about Springsteen's setlists. I'm well aware he does a handwritten setlist for each show, that he often deviates from it once he actually takes the stage, and that on the Working on a Dream Tour he simply left a couple of spots essentially blank with the notation "Requests," or sometimes just a question mark, to reflect the "signs segment." Springsteen's own website, which contains concert info only as far back as 2009, published the handwritten setlists for tour dates in 2009 and 2012 (but, notably, not 2013 or 2014). Springsteen's website is clearly a reliable source. Other websites are not necessarily so. Greasy Lake, for example, states that the site is fan-based and fan-operated, expressly disclaims any reliability and says they don't double-check information, and says they are not responsible for errors. A site that explicitly says they do not double-check cannot be considered a reliable source according to Wikipedia's guidelines. The "Brucebase" wiki site does not satisfy WP:RS because it doesn't give any source for the information—it's simply posted by anonymous individuals. Obviously, just because something is on the Internet does not automatically make it true, and anyone who's ever revised anything on Wikipedia knows that it's susceptible to misinformation from (a) well-intentioned but overzealous people who take rumor as fact and (b) pranksters who deliberately set out to falsify information. I'm not suggesting a site like "Brucebase" regularly suffers from those problems, but there's nothing preventing it, and I also firmly believe citing to a wiki that does not include sources may violate Wikipedia's ban on original research.

But, setting all that aside, the bigger question when it comes to songs listed on a setlist and not ultimately performed, or songs soundchecked and never performed during the show, is how they are relevant here. This is an article about a tour and about what was actually performed on the tour. If there were a particular reason for a song being dropped at the last minute and a reliable source could be offered, then it might be noteworthy (but again, it might not)—suppose, for example, Springsteen had been scheduled to perform a concert in Asia on September 11, 2001, and shortly before he took the stage word of events in New York and Washington came in and he dropped "Darlington County" in response in favor of a subdued set. That might be notable. But otherwise, except for obvious situations (adding "Viva Las Vegas" in that city, for example), generally nobody knows what went into Springsteen's decision about whether to add or drop a particular track, so there's really no significance to it for purposes of a tour article. It's trivia. The "External Links" section of each tour article is a fine place to include links to Brucebase, Backstreets.com, Greasy Lake, etc., for people who are truly interested in delving into that level of minutia. But unperformed songs and soundchecked material simply are not notable for the tour in general. After all, it's well-documented that some artists (Paul McCartney being a good example) routinely soundcheck stuff they never add to the set, whereas others (Springsteen, for example) sometimes soundcheck songs they're considering adding—but even then, they may or may not actually add them.

I guess this is a long way of addressing two issues. The first is the WP:RS issue. The second relates to guidelines such as WP:NOTNEWS and WP:IINFO, both of which strongly counsel against the idea that every single appearance an artist like Springsteen makes, and every single song he might perform at every such appearance, automatically deserves mention on Wikipedia. They don't. Wikipedia doesn't attempt to provide a show-by-show database because it's not the function of an encyclopedia and because there are other sites for that purpose and they perform the job admirably well. Certainly there are particular instances that deserve mention. The performance of "Sun City" last week in Cape Town is one such example because of where it was performed, the song's meaning, the country's history, and the song having been banned there in the past. But something like a song off the Wrecking Ball album not being performed is minutia. A very good guideline is the ten-year test, which suggests asking, "In ten years will this addition still appear relevant?" In the context of a Springsteen tour, in ten years will anyone other than hard-core Springsteen devotees (who are likely to be well-aware of the other sources for detailed concert information) care that he soundchecked a particular song but did not perform it?

Another way to consider this issue might be that in 2008 and 2009, the "signs segment" often saw the revival of songs Springsteen hadn't played in 30+ years. That's relevant, it's interesting for the context of that tour, and it's worthy of mention. What song was played when is not—for example, "On August 23, 2008, at a show in St. Louis Springsteen began the show with Then She Kissed Me, a cover of a Crystals single he had not played live since 1975" is overly detailed for this sort of article. In the WP:10YT context, in ten years the Magic and Working on a Dream Tours will still be memorable for the "signs segment" and the seemingly-spontaneous nature of that part of the show, but what songs were actually played in that segment will likely be of far less interest except to the devotees.

You also mentioned the acoustic pre-show sets. I'm well aware of those (I wish he'd perform one in Washington, DC, sometime!) and I think as a general matter Springsteen's occasional practice of doing that bears a brief mention, but that's all it has to be. Saying that on dates X, Y, and Z Springsteen performed acoustic sets two hours before showtime and listing what songs he played is again getting into excessive unnecessary detail that's better provided through the fan sites. Saying that at a number of shows Springsteen revived a sporadic practice from past tours of occasionally coming onstage to perform a few songs for early arrivals in a solo acoustic performance is sufficient. It's a bad idea to make too big a deal out of this because it's obviously not a routine practice—it's the exception, not the rule. (Of course, who knows? Maybe he might change his practice so as to make it routine, although that seems unlikely. If he does that, then the article can obviously be revised later. That's an important consideration as well: It's not a good idea to try to draw conclusions in advance based on a three- or four-song sample. Appearing early in Johannesburg doesn't mean he'll do the same thing in Sydney or Auckland or wherever. I'm sure everyone with tickets would love to have some way of knowing!)

Please understand that I'm not trying to attack you with these comments. I can tell you're interested in the topic and that you're probably quite knowledgeable about Springsteen's tours. That's a good thing. It's just a case where it appears you're often a bit too eager to include every bit of detailed minutia without giving serious thought to whether the average reader (who, let's face it, is unlikely to be a serious Springsteen devotee) either wants or needs that level of information. I guess in a way it's sort of like responding to e-mail. We all know how sometimes it's important and necessary to take a step back and say "do I really need to say that?" and "is it really a good idea to send this?" I think that same principle often applies to adding heavy detail to Wikipedia articles. 1995hoo (talk) 14:47, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I completely understand where you are coming from and do not consider it an attack. I understand the reasoning behind not adding the songs not performed. Your reasons are much better than some I have encountered. There have been some back and fourth debates on if songs performed/setlists should even be added. Someone a while back was constantly removing them. Considering most band's tour articls feature songs performed or a setlist, I didn't see why Springsteen should be different. Also noticed you mentioned DC...I am from Maryland and go to all the DC/PA shows. Hopefully an announcement happens today. Looks like if rumors hold up, the PA, NY, DC shows could be in May. Seems like forever since that Nationals Park show. Wouldn't mind a return there (though staff handled it poorly getting into the venue). Pit tickets were easy to get for that show.Jason1978 (talk) 10:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rumored Springsteen dates

hey, I'm aware of the picture (and countless sightings at various venues). However, the picture itself is not a quality reference, meaning not up the quality standard that wikipedia tries to provide. As long as there is no confirmation via a reliable source (such as springsteen's official page, shorefire media, billboard.com or other respectable sources) it is regarded as a rumour and does therefor not belong in that article. nashvillescene.com clearly states in the article that is not confirmed yet, therefore it does not belong on this page. we expect the official confirmation of tour dates any minutes, until then it is suitable for this article. please adhere to the quality standards of wikipedia. zwirnie (talk) 13:54, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rhcpsuperbowl.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rhcpsuperbowl.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 03:16, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Red Hot Chili Peppers 2013 Tour

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Red Hot Chili Peppers 2013 Tour a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Red Hot Chili Peppers 2013/2014 Tour. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. — Status (talk · contribs) 14:49, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Springsteen's High Hopes

Hello, Jason1978, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Bruce Springsteen's High Hopes, appears to be directly copied from http://www.thefutoncritic.com/news/2014/03/06/bruce-springsteens-high-hopes-in-depth-documentary-about-the-making-of-his-latest-album-debuts-april-4-on-hbo-702212/20140306hbo01/. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Bruce Springsteen's High Hopes if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 14:35, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Rhcpalaskapromo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Rhcpalaskapromo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 18:55, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Starwars7teaser.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Starwars7teaser.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:52, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to X-Men (film series) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • May 13, 2014 that [[Channing Tatum]] has been cast for the role of [[Gambit (comics)|Gambit]].<ref>{{cite web|first=Sam | last=Ashurst|url=http://www.totalfilm.com/news/lauren-shuler-donner-confirms-
  • x-men-origins-wolverine |title=X-Men Origins: Wolverine (2009): Reviews |publisher=Metacritic (CBS|accessdate=July 27, 2013}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:29, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Rising (album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ]''. A cover of "Give My Love to Rose" was released on a [[Johnny Cash]] tribute album while "[[American Skin (41 Shots)" was released on a promotional CD. A re-recorded version of that song

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:51, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


File:Starwarsepisode7cast.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Starwarsepisode7cast.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --TriiipleThreat (talk * comment on List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films FL nomination) 15:25, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Soliciting comment...

Hi! Would you care to review or comment/vote (support/oppose) at my FA nomination for the article New York Dolls (album)? Information on reviewing an FA nomination's criteria is available at WP:FACR. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 21:10, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Starwarsepisode7cast.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Starwarsepisode7cast.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:59, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 3 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gethurtdeluxe.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gethurtdeluxe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:33, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of songs recorded by Red Hot Chili Peppers may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | "What It Is )aka Nina's Song)" (Demo)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:54, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wwfmagazine.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wwfmagazine.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:46, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fandemonium (book)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Fandemonium (book), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.bokus.com/bok/9780762451487/fandemonium/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:56, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Oralvisualrhcp.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Oralvisualrhcp.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:42, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Smithferrelldrumoff.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Smithferrelldrumoff.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 19:18, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of songs recorded by Red Hot Chili Peppers may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • in 2014. The released version appeared on the "Knock Me Down", "Higher Ground" and "Taste the Pain]" singles along with the [[Freaky Styley|Freaky Styley 2003 Remastered Re-release]]''

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:11, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Whatpromohits.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Whatpromohits.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:28, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rolling Stone Magazine - Live from the Pit

The article Rolling Stone Magazine - Live from the Pit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable promo. Hundreds of these are made a year.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:26, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Hits (Red Hot Chili Peppers)

The article The Hits (Red Hot Chili Peppers) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable promo. Hundreds of these are made a year.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:26, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Whatpromohits.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Whatpromohits.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:44, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rhcprolling.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rhcprolling.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:37, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Thehitsrhcp.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thehitsrhcp.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:39, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Global account

Hi Jason1978! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:11, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:10greatsongs.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:10greatsongs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:05, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rumours

Hello, the reason I removed the current rumours around his relationships (and they are rumours as neither party has confirmed a split) was that this section was tagged with 'unreferenced' before and contained a lot of speculation (thus BLP issues). If you look at the Kiedis Talk page, you will notice quite a large amount of discussion around this. My suggestion would be to keep this encyclopaedic and try to avoid putting in what amounts to WP:gossip. And I'm sure you agree that if we are going to list every woman that Kiedis has ever been pictured with, we'll end up with a very long list indeed. Let's wait until we get some kind of official confirmation? Karst (talk) 09:48, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mallrats 2 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mallrats 2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mallrats 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rob Sinden (talk) 08:37, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FAC input

Hi! Since you're a frequent contributor to music articles, would you be interested in commenting or reviewing my FAC for the article xx (album)? It's received on editor's comments but no follow-up yet, so anything would be appreciated. Dan56 (talk) 19:56, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Information icon Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Anthony Kiedis, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 17:35, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Forceawakenspromo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Forceawakenspromo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 16:09, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Hi,

I appreciate the huge ammount of work you've done for all Red Hot Chili Peppers related pages.

I've been compiling a list of cover jams played during 2010-2015 and i noticed that you have quite a bit of knowledge regarding this.

Been listening to official bootlegs back and forth but i haven't found a a show where they jammed zeppelins d'yer mak'er and it was listed on wikipedia page of I'm With You Tour.

Do you remember which show this was?

I've also seen that there are couple of cover jams missing from the list. If you are interested in updating the pages i can send you my own list with dates so you can confirm those jams.

Thanks in advance! Goodtimeboy (talk) 13:54, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I recall the tease of "D'yer Mak'er" being just Anthony singing the first few lines of the song (Oh oh oh oh oh oh, you don't have to go) prior to their own song. Usually a Zeppelin song when covered has been a jam. Chad has done a few during his drum solos. There are a lot of covers missing from the full list, which does badly need updating and I have attempted to do so. Jason1978 (talk) 10:00, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 10 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Fleetwood and Force Awakens

I have reverted your edits in Force Awakens article about Daniel Fleetwood. There is currently a discussion in the talk pages about whether this should be included in the article. Please contribute to the discussion rather than include anything in the article. Thanks Robynthehode (talk) 06:39, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The link is dead. And hello from Pittsburgh! :) --Varkman (talk) 11:18, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Anthony Kiedis, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. I'm not sure why you left that statement unsourced given that you supplied a reference for the other information you added. Alas. DonIago (talk) 17:27, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It has been fixed. I was unaware I didn't add the link as my computer went offline when I was adding it. Jason1978 (talk) 17:36, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! DonIago (talk) 19:06, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 5 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Springsteeni.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Springsteeni.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Getaway(album)

Hello Jason1978,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Getaway(album) for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, The Getaway (Red Hot Chili Peppers album).

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TimothyJosephWood 15:15, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Getaway(album)

Hello Jason1978,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Getaway(album) for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TimothyJosephWood 15:29, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Darknecessities.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Darknecessities.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Thegetawaylithograph.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thegetawaylithograph.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Savepopulation.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Savepopulation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:08, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Red Hot Chili Peppers 1998 Tour

The article Red Hot Chili Peppers 1998 Tour has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be notable per WP:NTOUR. There are no sources at all that discuss the tour as a tour--and individual reviews of individual shows won't help that. This was just not a notable tour.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 17:30, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Red Hot Chili Peppers 1998 Tour for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Red Hot Chili Peppers 1998 Tour is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Hot Chili Peppers 1998 Tour until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 22:19, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rhcp1998tour.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rhcp1998tour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:32, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chapter and Verse (Bruce Springsteen album)

I have removed the content you added to the above article, as it appears to have been copied from http://brucespringsteen.net/, a copyright web page. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa (talk) 03:19, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bouncingsoulssimplicity.jpeg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bouncingsoulssimplicity.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 25 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tiesthatbindspringsteen.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tiesthatbindspringsteen.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 19:01, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Springsteensummer17.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Springsteensummer17.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:56, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Live at Fenway

Hi! Just a quick question about the new article you created - I noticed it has a tag on it with a 2010 date, that was placed there from the beginning when the article was created. Was this a copy/paste page move, or perhaps an old article that was deleted (hence the tag from 2010 on a completely new article). Thanks for any insights. Garchy (talk) 18:59, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I copied and pasted the infobox from another article (previous Dropkick Murphys live album) but appears I forgot to remove the 2010 tag from that article. It has now been removed. Thanks for pointing that out. Jason1978 (talk) 19:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ok, that explains it :) Garchy (talk) 21:02, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jason1978. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RHCPGETAWAYWORLDTOUR.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RHCPGETAWAYWORLDTOUR.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:53, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Gremlins has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:55, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Starwarsthelastjedi.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Starwarsthelastjedi.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mz7 (talk) 22:38, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Information icon Hello, I'm Robby.is.on. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Freaky Styley, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Please note that the verifiability policy mandates that unsourced material that has been challenged, such as by a "fact" tag, or by its removal, may not be added back without a reliable, published source being cited for the content, using an inline citation. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article, and the burden is on the person wishing to keep in the disputed material. So if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so, following these requirements! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Robby.is.on (talk) 00:15, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Performance numbers

The number of times a band has performed a song live is little more than trivia and does not belong in a Featured article, or any article really. You also need to find sources that discuss this. Counting performances and coming to your own conclusions is considered WP:OR. It would also be nice if you would make more of an effort to communicate with fellow editors, use edit summaries, and so on. This is a collaborative environment. --Laser brain (talk) 18:55, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at WWE Hall Of Fame, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. See WP:PW/RS for sites that are reliable on Wikipedia Wrestling articles. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 19:12, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


The edit I made to WWE Hall Of Fame was legit and was actually a reliable source as the WWE in conjunction with Bleacher Report broke the news today. This is from the WWE's website: "The news was broken first by Bleacher Report, who also revealed that Rude will be inducted by one of his greatest rivals, 2009 inductee Ricky “The Dragon” Steamboat." http://www.wwe.com/shows/wwe-hall-fame/wwe-hall-of-fame-2017/article/ravishing-rick-rude-wwe-hall-of-fame-class-of-2017 Jason1978 (talk) 19:19, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:PW/RS is it non reliable. Find a reliable source. Like the WWE one you just posted. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 19:21, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The WWE link was posted with it. WWE has been using other media outlets to announce Hall of Fame inductees this year. ESPN, USA Today and with Rick Rude it was Bleacher Report that made the official announcement. WWE didn't have anything on the website at the time (now they do) and were going to announce it on Raw tonight with credit to Bleacher Report. Jason1978 (talk) 19:25, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Again per WP:PW/RS bleacher report is NON RELIABLE on wrestling articles period. I suggest checking out WP:PW/RS and familiarize yourself with what is reliable on Wikipedia Wrestling articles. I have restored you edit with the WWE link which is clearly reliable, Bleacher report is not. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 19:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Havana Affair.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Havana Affair.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dkmliveatfenway.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dkmliveatfenway.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:56, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Venom

Please see: http://www.ign.com/articles/2017/03/28/spider-man-homecoming-director-confirms-venom-solo-movie-is-not-connected-to-mcu -AnonWikiEditor (talk) 19:01, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Anthony Kiedis. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DonIago (talk) 15:39, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake as I thought I added the link with it. I have now added a link to an article from last night's show featuring a review the comments made by Kiedis about his father. There also is video from family members out there however I do not want to directly link their Facebook page here and will post the link when the band releases the concert or someone else posts it Jason1978 (talk) 15:56, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! DonIago (talk) 16:04, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Ethan Cutkosky‎ . Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 05:09, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There already was a link in his article to his imdb page which includes his birth date http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3103119/ Jason1978 (talk) 12:20, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb is not a reliable source for bio details (anyone can post information there). Materialscientist (talk) 22:38, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Colin Trevorrow

Hi. We don't know if Colin Trevorrow will be credited or not as screenwriter of Episode IX of Star Wars, THR says, in second paragraph, "It is unclear how extensive the rewrites will be", http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/star-wars-episode-ix-gets-a-new-writer-1026003

We can't remove for now, 'til more information. The articles of Derek Connolly, Star Wars sequel trilogy, Lucasfilm and Star Wars, still credited him as screenwriter.OscarFercho (talk) 13:45, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce articles

I'm doing some general clean up on articles. The Bruce ones you do have some cosmetic issues.

  • On this edit, the long dash should never be used in the Personnel section. And they should also be spaces out like so:
Bruce Springsteen – vocals, guitar
Name – function

Your dash usage is also inconsistent in this article [as well as the other Bruce articles you've done.]

Also, do not overlink instruments in the Personnel section. We don't need 10 instances of "background vocals" being linked. If "guitars" is linked next to the first person's name, the person who is 10th on the list doesn't need to have it linked. MOS:OVERLINK.

Please see MOS:ALBUM for more album style guidelines. And "except as noted" should be "except where noted" [in the track listing]

Thanks --Jennica✿ / talk 09:32, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wachovia Spectrum, Philadelphia, PA 10/20/09

The article Wachovia Spectrum, Philadelphia, PA 10/20/09 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. No charting info or reviews

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jennica✿ / talk 09:37, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jason1978. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brucephilly2009.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brucephilly2009.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:06, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brucebelfast1996.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brucebelfast1996.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Select Survey Invite

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Your survey Link: https://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_bEL8YIrMcT53iFn&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 12:37, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Streetdogsstand.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:13, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:MMBwhilewereatit.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:13, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bookofbaddecisions.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:17, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bookofbaddecisions.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bookofbaddecisions.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joestrummer001.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:18, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jason1978. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Flea (musician), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization Talk 23:08, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crucialmoments.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:07, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Cummings

Hi. I reverted an edit you made to the Jim Cummings article because of an apparent violation of the "Biographies of living persons" policy. The material in question has also been suppressed from public view. Please understand that I do believe you made this edit in good faith, but we need to be very careful on biographies of living people about what is said, quality of sourcing, proof vs. allegations, etc. Please do not re-add the material in question or refer to its contents explicitly (either in the Jim Cummings article, or here on your talk page, or anywhere else here on Wikipedia). If you believe I have acted in error and wish to discuss the matter further, you can e-mail the oversight team or contact me directly off-wiki. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 15:11, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Songsoftheroad.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Songsoftheroad.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Songsofhope.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Songsofhope.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Songsoffriendship.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Songsoffriendship.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LiveseriesSongsoflove.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LiveseriesSongsoflove.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Theliveseriessongsundercover.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Theliveseriessongsundercover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Theliveseriessongsfromaroundtheworld.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Theliveseriessongsfromaroundtheworld.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kiedisgorobot.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kiedisgorobot.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:52, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bloodsugartour.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bloodsugartour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rhcp1988lineup.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rhcp1988lineup.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rhcp1988tour.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rhcp1988tour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rhcpbythewaytour.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rhcpbythewaytour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rhcpohmtour.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rhcpohmtour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Freakystyleyt.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Freakystyleyt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:41, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rhcp1983tour.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rhcp1983tour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:01, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rhcp1984tour.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rhcp1984tour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:02, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rhcpfreakytour.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rhcpfreakytour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rhcp2001tour.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rhcp2001tour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rhcp2004tour.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rhcp2004tour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RHCPCoffeeshop.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RHCPCoffeeshop.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Imbesideyou.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Imbesideyou.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fat City Presents...One for the Ages!

Notice

The article Fat City Presents...One for the Ages! has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:50, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Onefortheages.gif

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Onefortheages.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 16:27, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Theartofpaulmccartney.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Theartofpaulmccartney.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Red Hot Skate Rock for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Red Hot Skate Rock is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Hot Skate Rock until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mbdfar (talk) 22:59, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Redhotskaterock.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Redhotskaterock.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Positive Mental Octopus

Notice

The article Positive Mental Octopus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced with no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mbdfar (talk) 17:16, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fandemonium (book)

Notice

The article Fandemonium (book) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Largely unsourced article about a book with no indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mbdfar (talk) 00:09, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Positivementaloctopus.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Positivementaloctopus.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fandemonium (book)

Notice

The article Fandemonium (book) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability tagged back in Aug 2014 with no indication of WP:NBOOK

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:36, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fandemoniumrhcp.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fandemoniumrhcp.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:For The Thrashers.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:For The Thrashers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Trickfingersect.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Trickfingersect.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sock-cessalbum.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sock-cessalbum.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:40, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:5albumstudioset.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:5albumstudioset.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука13 07:54, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]