Hello
Has instructions on what kind of sourcing we are looking for. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:40, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you Jamplevia (talk) 13:12, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Bookmarks
Larry Kucharz
Born September 22, 1946. Latest album (CD) released 2014. Record label website went off the air in 2021.
Interviews
NYT
Finding aids
Reviews
Performance
Radio
Business websites
Books
- Text-Sound Texts, Edited by Richard Kostelanetz, New York, NY: William Morrow and Company, Inc., 1980 ISBN 0688036163 Claims Lawrence Kucharz was born in 1936 in Chicago. Contains "City Scenes II" 1978 by Kurchaz. States that essays by Kucharz are in Ear Magazine.
- Subversive Expectations - Performance Art and Paratheater in New York, 1976-85, By Sally Banes, 1998 ISBN 9780472066780 Contains an article from SoHo Weekly News August 24, 1979. Describes Canal St. performance including Kucharz' "City Street Scenes I" poem.
- Extracts from an interview with Henri Chopin by Lawrence Kucharz, Larry Wendt and Ellen Zweig at the Eleventh International Sound Poetry Festival in Toronto… October 20, 1978. Edited and transcribed by Lawrence Kucharz and Larry Wendt. Ear magazine. Volume 5, Issue 2, Summer 1979
Isla Maria ‘Loulou’ Van Damme
Interviews
Photo Shoots
maintenance messages docs
Category:CS1_maint:_url-status
A cautionary tale
History of the Chicken Tractor
There is already this article: Chicken tractor but it lacks any historical background. (talk) 12:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
POV: I first became aware of chicken tractors via online sources circa 2006. I witnessed my first operational deployment of chick tractors in 2020. Now I see Stock Cropper developing their ClusterCluck product line in 2022.
Clues
In order to know where to do research I need to find clues first.
The Book of the Farm, Volume 1, Henry Stephens Originally published: 1842,
1889 edition
Doesn't mention chicken. Search for
- poultry
- fowl
- fowls
- broods
- brooders
- eggs
instead.
Doesn't mention wattle but it does include hurdle for enclosing sheep on turnips. N.b. it's very encouraging to me to see such a design, there may be chicken tractors here.
The Book of the Farm, Volume 2, Henry Stephens Originally published: 1842, 1847 edition
How medical research makes it into medical practice?
POV: I've observed that some ideas that are supported by large amounts of medical research for hundreds of years appear to have very limited influence on medical practice. This includes a research paper directly requesting (petitioning?) that a medical textbook be updated with information based on the medical research.
How does medical research makes it into medical practice? Is there a formal process? (talk) 12:08, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Terminology and phrasing
- Translating Medical Research Into Medical Practice
- Translational Biomedical Sciences
Thank you so much for this link i love u
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moby_Project&diff=prev&oldid=1087041777 Oriolgalceran (talk) 20:26, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- You are most welcome. I'm glad to have helped you by providing you with a link to a working download site for the Moby project. Jamplevia (talk) 17:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Blue Edits. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition to Talk:Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Thank you. Blue Edits (talk) 07:23, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I was talking about myself. ... Jamplevia (talk) 14:16, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Why is my disease obscene? Jamplevia (talk) 00:35, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's harassment policy, as you did at User talk:Woodensuperman, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users potentially compromises that safe environment. --woodensuperman 16:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm sorry that my disability is causing issues, but I do have a real question: why is popular culture considered to be trivia. ---- Jamplevia (talk) 17:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- re Cocteau, the best guidance for popular culture is not whether the subject of the article is important to the popular culture referenced, but whether that culture is important to the subject of the article. So does the film have any significance to Cocteau? Or to our contemporary perception of Cocteau?
- For this instance, I'm not seeing it. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh! Now I get it. Thanks! ---- Jamplevia (talk) 11:04, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Andy Dingley is it true the other way around? If modern culture references the old culture is it ok to mention it in an article. I put a reference to Cocteau in Liquid Sky. ---- Jamplevia (talk) 11:06, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- It's already mentioned at Liquid Sky, but it still seems trivial, and the plot summary seems a bit long. --woodensuperman 11:15, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't know the film, but the mention there seems about right. I don't think the plot summary is problematically long, although it's certainly long and longer than we would usually favour.
- I wouldn't add Cocteau in an IPC section. This is just (yet another) early '80s passing reference to Cocteau in a film (and it's mentioned). Those years were full of them, Cocteau was fashionable, despite few people actually reading him or watching his films. IPC is more for when a more knowing, yet less obvious, reference is made. So as the apparent inverse of what I wrote, The Seventh Seal has an IPC section which mentions Bill & Ted's Bogus Journey. Bill & Ted mentions The Seventh Seal directly (not IPC), as a major plot device that they borrow. Seal places the reciprocal mention in an IPC section. Although Bill & Ted (whilst most excellent) obviously had no influence on a film 30 years earlier, it does demonstrate (as is our core need) that the older film is still important and relevant to popular culture much later on, and that these later references are influencing the modern perception of the original film. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:16, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I can't believe how much you are helping me learn the rules! You help is so very invaluable to me. Jamplevia (talk) 00:49, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Jamplevia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Institute for Uranian Psychoanalysis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
