User talk:Infrogmation



Archives

Old discussion moved to archives: User talk:Infrogmation/Archive June 2019 - 2022, User talk:Infrogmation/Archive 2015-May 2019, September 2011 - December 2014, August 2010 - August 2011, November 2009 - July 2010, July 09 - Nov 09, March 09 - July 09, July 08 - Feb 09, May June 08, January April 08, November December 07, September October 07, May-August 07, March April 07, Feb 07, December 06 Jan 07, Aug Nov 06, June July 06, March May 06, January February 06, October December 05, July September 05, May June 05, March April 05, Jan Feb 05, November-December 2004, September-October 2004, May - August 2004; January - April 2004; August - December, 2003; and User talk:Infrogmation/Archive1 (oldest, October 2002 - July 2003).

Please add new discussion at the bottom of the page. Please sign comments.

Happy New Year, Infrogmation!

Happy New Year!

Infrogmation,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 16:32, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ⋠T⋡ 16:32, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I want your help, please

First of all, Happy New Year, infrogmation. Could you help me with a problem I had in the Spanish Wikipedia that I just exposed in Meta? I don't know how this works and my English isn't perfect. Here is the link:

Thanks in advance. Greeting from the white city of Mérida, Yucatán! Hunab 21 (talk) 23:06, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you, I am an admin on en:Wikipedia and on Wikimedia Commons. Sorry, I do not have admin powers on es:W nor Meta. I hope you can find someone who can help you there. (I also hope to see more photos of your beautiful city and the area!) Saludos, -- Infrogmation (talk) 00:15, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

History of adminship

Hi, I was just researching some of our early admins, of which, obviously, you are one, since February 2003 as it says on your userpage. I haven't been able to find a record of your requesting adminship and I thought maybe it was the result of Jimbo's promise in February 2003 to grant the privilege "willy-nilly" to "people who have been around for awhile" in his "no big deal" statement? ☆ Bri (talk) 18:10, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Sorry I don't recall the details. I can tell you that I was very active here on en:Wikipedia in that era. I think it might have been some page with a call for admins, who would have listed responsibilities and tools. I volunteered, and some time later (I don't remember if it was hours or days) was granted adminship. However I may be conflating this with my getting adminship on Wikimedia Commons the following year. Sorry I'm not of more help. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 22:01, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. If at a future date you find any of the details, I'd love to hear about it and improve User:Bri/Early sysops. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:57, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Henry Cowell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Menlo Park.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Photos by Robbie Mendelson on Commons

Hi...you used my photo of Art Neville on his wikipedia page credited to "robbiesaurus." If it's easy enough to do, could that be changed to my real name, Robbie Mendelson? I'm also pretty sure there are other photos of mine similarly credited. Could those be changed, too? I'm not exactly sure how many there are but if there's an easy way for you to find mine, it'd be appreciated. If the easiest way is for me to let you know which, let me know and I'll get in touch when I come across them. I know my photos of John Boutte are on his page, one credited by name, one by nickname.

Thank you and I appreciate you using my photos.

Best, Robbie 148.75.146.152 (talk) 03:23, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for sharing so many great photos on Flickr under free licenses. Since I see you've already changed your Flickr account name to real name, doing so on Wikimedia Commons is not a problem. I've found what I think are the photos you are referring to, and edited the credit accordingly. The credit on photos copied from Flickr to Commons generally reflects how the photo was credited on Flickr at time it was copied, usually using a semi-automated transfer tool.
From a quick search, looks like there are over 800 photos by you on Commons! (Copied by various different users - I was mostly interested in New Orleans subjects, but see other users found your tennis photos of value, etc.) So it will take a while to get all of them. I'll add it to my list of things to get done by pecking away at bit by bit. You are welcome to set up an account on Commons yourself if you wish. Otherwise, if you see photos you want to prioritize updating credit on, feel free to contact me again - my talk page on Commons is a better place for that. Thanks again for the photos! Red beans & ricely, -- Infrogmation (talk) 18:51, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fangusu

Been reading up on an old friend of yours. Saw how patient you were trying to explain things. Glad to see you are still with us. Best. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:53, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Izamal

I'm going to delete the following paragraph from Izamal:

In 1975 the official in charge of land redistribution was repeatedly accused of political corruption; letters of complaint were sent from citizens of Izamal to Mérida and Mexico City with no response. The official was found stoned to death under a large pile of rocks in the town's main square. A Mexican Army unit occupied the town for some days after the incident, but investigators failed to find anyone in town who knew anything about what happened. <!-- I recall this being talked about quite a lot in Yucatán, but have found no information on the web. If anyone knows the official's name, exact date, or other info please add it. -- User:Infrogmation -->

Diario de Yucatán recently reproduced an article from 31 October 1972 ("violenta respuesta de campesinos deja dos muertos") that covers an incident similar to what you described, yet with significant differences in detail. I can't verify all the details in your story, and I'm not sure how significant this event ultimately was to Izamal's history, so I'm going to take it out; but I thought I'd let you know here in case you wanted to follow up on this. Cheers, Cobblet (talk) 22:42, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Looks like something I put in the early days of Wikipedia about 20 years ago, when one could often make a starter article if one could knew a couple of paragraphs about a subject off the top of one's head. Thanks for finding the article - I don't know if that's the same incident or not, either way, glad Wikipedia continues to improve. Thank you for your work. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 23:22, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm surprised that you didn't follow up more substantively after accusing Yourcousinvinny614 of "massive copyright violations with insulting false claims". I see that you've opened discussion about their image uploads but your edit also removed a lot of text. If you are also accusing them of lying about that material, I think you need to make that clear for all of us. Whatever the situation, a message on the article's Talk page would probably be appropriate and helpful. ElKevbo (talk) 21:53, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated false claims about image sources and authorship with highly dubious claims of license. User has responded - possibly well intended (?!) but absurd false claims and copyright violations are still absurd false claims and copyright violations even if done without malice, and shouldn't be in articles. Apparently the user didn't pay attention to warnings and attempts to discuss on Commons and saw no need to make any attempt to be accurate or honest with uploads. My edit to the article was made in great exasperation, the purpose to promptly remove large amounts of copyright violations. Help with remedies and improvements is always welcome. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 22:14, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please post some of that information in the article's Talk page? It would help other editors understand why so much material was removed and what needs to be done about it. Thanks! ElKevbo (talk) 22:29, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Alt.slack" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Alt.slack has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 21 § Alt.slack until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 10:14, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Old IP indef

Hi, Infrogmation. I've been looking through old IP indefs and came upon Special:Contribs/75.145.183.129. It's not clear to me that that IP is still allocated to a school. Would you object to my unblocking and seeing what happens? If vandalism recurs, they can be reblocked for some number of months of years. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 21:14, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Similar question on Special:Contribs/66.30.100.130, an {{anonblock}}. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 21:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • No particular objection, presuming you'll keep an eye on their contributions. I don't recall details off hand, but do know that there must have been multiple shorter blocks and warnings before an indef block. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 21:47, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Battle for Midway" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Battle for Midway has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 5 § Battle for Midway until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:24, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Chris A. Hadfield Rocket Factory

This is an absolutely fascinating hoax. Don't you think all these different users are the same person? Viriditas (talk) 00:07, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. I have no strong opinion as to if it's just one person or a couple of people promoting it. I will offer my suspicion that "Daniel Molybdenum" is not a real person, LOL. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 00:12, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The closer you look at this, the weirder it gets. Take a look at the YouTube account being linked by the Facebook account. The owner has 10k followers and injected this into one of 100 or so videos on the site. My guess is this started as an inside joke by friends of the astronaut and quickly grew out of control. The fact that it was posted to r/space and this guy just showed up to defend it is mind boggling. This reminds me of the work "hacker x" did as a contractor between 2015-206.[1] Viriditas (talk) 00:21, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Viriditas My partner and I spent about 3-4 hours last night chasing all of this down too; it was just too baffling to stop looking. Kind of feel bad for the guy, because he was talking about being bullied on his KSP Wiki page, and clearly he's got some things to work through. But it's just so strange how it manifested in perpetuating misinformation about NASA-MAF specifically - down to the PSAs/promotional videos with the spoofed name added to the information splash screen and with the doctored images interspersed throughout on his YouTube, and ripping the MAF Family Day poster on Facebook and slapping the "CAHRF" name on it, and then multiple accounts cross-referencing each other (which I assume are all him, based on how they talk about each other, phrases like "my good friend").
Our guess was there was allure because one of the few NASA installations that doesn't have a center open to the general public, and it's probably one of the most obscure facilities (as opposed to Kennedy or Goddard), so that hoax went under the radar for so long. I just can't believe it endured for so long, and what a web was woven.
Anyway, I feel some solidarity with y'all for also going down that twisted rabbit hole. Thank you for taking action on fixing it. 198.120.15.117 (talk) 17:23, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for doing what you do. I wish I was in control of the federal budget, as it's hard to believe you guys are only getting 0.3% when your wider work is so important to improving the health and safety of our planet. Viriditas (talk) 17:43, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I Want to Thank You for Thanking Me

I'm new to editing Wikipedia and you were the first person to thank me. Although it was a minor edit regarding "Maya vs Mayan" I appreciate the acknowledgment. I'm really trying to learn how to get around on here and it took me a while to even notice that you had thanked me. I'm such a noob. Anyway, thank you Infrogmation!

Eric Gato Bello (talk) 23:08, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciation award

Thank you for the recognition with the appreciation award. That's really a classy sheet music cover! I'm glad that you and I share a common interest in documenting the people, history and culture of NOLA, arguably the nation's most exotic city. Nolabob (talk) 18:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of True Tone Records (US label)

Notice

The article True Tone Records (US label) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NORG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mach61 (talk) 21:28, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of West Craft Records

Notice

The article West Craft Records has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Wp:NORG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mach61 (talk) 21:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Schirmer Records

Notice

The article Schirmer Records has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NORG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of West Craft Records for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article West Craft Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Craft Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mach61 (talk) 13:50, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Presidential lecterns

Hi, I can see that you were trying to expand the Presidential lecterns article a few days ago in good faith. I've actually practically reverted your edit as it was causing readability issues, but I've started a discussion on the talk page so I can get my opinions across about my opposition to an expansion, and to suggest a name change instead. I hope that's alright!

JamJamSvn (talk) 19:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Arnaud's

Notice

The article Arnaud's has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The subject of this article is neither generally notable, nor independent of the subject. Most of the sources are directly linked to the restaurants own website and cannot be exchanged for other reliable citations. A google search for the restaurant turns up little more than the restaurants website and reviews from services like Yelp, and there seem to be no notable news stories involving this restaurant. This page is little more than an tertiary advertisement written in a passive voice for a non-notable restaurant and I believe it should be deleted per WP:Notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Vllatava River" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Vllatava River has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 16 § Vllatava River until a consensus is reached. —Mykhal (talk) 09:37, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Hm, first logged in edit... I may have decided to log in specifically so I could do edits like that. -- Infrogmation (talk) 14:48, 16 June 2024 (UTC): Hm, first logged in edit... I may have decided to log in specifically so I could do edits like that. -- Infrogmation (talk) 14:48, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Faubourg Marigny Mardi Gras costumes

Notice

The article Faubourg Marigny Mardi Gras costumes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Just a gallery of images; page creator has endorsed deletion (see talk)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 02:58, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please note my comment on talk page from a few years ago. This page is an artifact from before the existence of Wikimedia Commons; it has long been outdated; no objection to deletion. -- Infrogmation (talk) 04:07, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of French Quarter Mardi Gras costumes

Notice

The article French Quarter Mardi Gras costumes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Just a gallery of images; page creator has endorsed deletion (see talk)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 02:58, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • Look on the talk page, as I noted there, this is an artifact from before the existence of Wikimedia Commons. I stated I had no objection to deletion on the talk page back in 2019; I'm a bit surprised it's still here. Delete away. -- Infrogmation (talk) 04:06, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BoingBoingShirt1.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BoingBoingShirt1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lower9thWardGraduate.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lower9thWardGraduate.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. JayCubby 23:17, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect listed at Redirects for discussion

A redirect or redirects you have created has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 4 § Western civilization until a consensus is reached. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 19:26, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]