Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Diff.Xymmax (talk) 21:25, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Info - If you have a problem with the pornography section, find sources and change it so that it befits an encyclopedia. Don't add your own unencyclopedic entries - it only will get you blocked. Xymmax (talk) 21:32, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Stereotypes of blacks. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. GDonato (talk) 21:41, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Holy **** I'm sorry!!! Dude, that was the worst thing I have ever done here. I cannot believe I just warned you for that. Man, I gotta pay attention. J.delanoygabsadds21:52, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Re: porn
I don't disagree, and I think removing the unsourced material is a proper editorial decision that could improve that article. However, I disagree with adding a commentary about the other editor within the article - that's why I reverted you the first time, and that probably what attracted the other people's attention as well. If you use the edit summary bar to explain what you're doing, you often can avoid such misunderstandings. Enjoy, Xymmax (talk) 22:20, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:24, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.
Sterotypes of Blacks
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.
Please act according to the rules of Wikipedia. On this page you have received numerous warnings. You cannot elimit whole sections, especially sourced ones, due to your personal opinion or to what you believe is appropriate for an encylopedia. What you personally consider as valid encyclopedic content has to be in accordance with other users and Wikipedia guidelines. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. So please use the talk page first for making suggestions, and wait for the outcome. There is no need for hurry. Otherwise eliminating sourced content is considered vandalism. Be aware of possible consequences that do not heighten your chances for improving the articles. Thank you in advance --Catgut (talk) 10:46, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
