User talk:Inferno, Lord of Penguins



Welcome to the talk page of the Empire!


Inferno, Lord of Penguins



Hello

Well I am just fed up with them. I spent hours doing an equipment table for the British army. something that no one has done on wikipedia yet. I put it on a sub page and it get selected for deletion! So I blank the page as its going to be deleted and put the equipment tables back on the main British army article. Not long after it gets removed. I don't know why, but all I know is it took me hours to do and now its gone and I know if I try and put it back it will be removed or if I try and debate reasons why it should stay they wont listen. Any way, there has been many situations like this. They just nit-pick all the timne. I don't care if I get blocked any more. Rademire2 (talk) 19:29, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AGF

Yep, did that, but got called a Wikipedia Nazi. And after calling all Polish pilots shit, I decided to disengage entirely, beyond reporting my experience of this editor up at AN/I. I've tried at least twice to help him understand what should be done, in particular regard to this British Army list, but to no avail. But I applaud your efforts (without wishing to sound patronising in any way). The Rambling Man (talk) 15:25, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quick request

May I please see a link to the tornado emergency you mentioned? --Dylan620 (contribs, logs) 16:58, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's still up. It had just been issued when I mentioned it. I don't know how to link to specific products, just scroll through the current warnings. Inferno, Lord of Penguins 17:00, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Found it, thanks. --Dylan620 (contribs, logs) 17:02, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Whoa!

Your split of the article by cut and paste does not comply with the GFDL and CC-BY-SA, and was not discussed. Please revert yourself. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:02, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case you check my talk page before you check yours, WP:SPLIT. Inferno, Lord of Penguins 00:21, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Inferno, Lord of Penguins. I left a note at AN/I, but just in case you didn't notice it, I'll leave it here as well. A split does require the editor to post the {{copied}} template on the talk pages of both the old and new articles. Additionally, an edit summary must be made identifying the copying of that text. This is a requirement of our Copyright Policy -- it provides proper attribution to the contributing editors whose text has been copied. In this case, I've gone ahead and posted the talk page templates as well as made the null edit summaries to both articles for you. You can take a look at those edits for an example-- just in case there is a next time. Cheers. — CactusWriter (talk) 04:01, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for your tireless work on the Tornado Outbreak page

Censusdata (talk) 18:17, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Membership of the Counter-Vandalism Unit

As you may know, the Counter-Vandalism unit is inactive. So for reviving the WikiProject, we will need to sort out the members. So if you are active, please put your username at the bottom of the list at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit#Sort out the members.

You are receiving this message as a current member of the CVU.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Counter-Vandalism Unit at 00:28, 30 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Naming conventions for tornado outbreaks

There is currently a discussion ongoing regarding altering the naming conventions for tornado outbreak and tornado outbreak sequence articles. Please feel free to view and comment on the discussion here. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) via User:Ks0awb 22:32, 9 September 2013 (UTC) You are receiving this notice because you are listed as a member of WikiProject Severe Weather. If you would not like to receive future WikiProject Severe Weather notifications, please add your signature at User:Ks0stm/Notify list.[reply]

Discussion on changes to the format of the tornado table

Due to your membership in [[WikiProject Severe weather, I thought that the discussion going on there regarding proposed changes to the tornado table might interest you. If you are interested in participating in discussion, please feel free to join in at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Severe weather#Reference column in the tornado table. All views are welcome, and please do not feel obligated to participate if you are not interested. Inks.LWC (talk) 00:19, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quixotic plea

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 06:29, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]