Hello Heyaaaaalol. Despite a recent note about this, you've continued to mark edits as minor when they do not meet Wikipedia's definition of a minor edit. Minor edits are strictly changes that are superficial and indisputable, such as correcting typos or reverting clear vandalism. Edits such as [1], [2], [3], and [4] are not minor edits. Please ensure that your future edits are properly categorized. If you want to be safe, it's fine if you simply never use the minor edit flag. Regards. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:40, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This account is not sock, nor it is used to vandalise Wikipedia. My question on WP:RfPP was a genuine one; “how could one edit their user page if it was protected?”. I was asking a question in good faith and did not mean harm. Sorry for any disruption caused. I have no interest to vandalise your account nor others. Please assume good faith. Thank you. Heyaaaaalol (talk) 00:04, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You are not helping. Let sysops handle that board please! There's nothing but reporting a non-admin should be doing there. BusterD (talk) 02:11, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
And please don't make test edis to that user's talk page. You can make test edits in the sandbox or other pages designed for testing. You're inching close towards a block for disruptive editing, so I recommend taking things slowly from now on. Fathoms Below(talk)19:25, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Requests for page protection
Hi Heyaaaaalol, I've noticed that you've made a number of requests for page protection over the last month or so and that the vast majority of them have been declined. Working out when a page should be protected can be difficult and you need a fairly strong understanding of how Wikipedia works. This is especially so when contentious topics are involved. Please stop making requests for page protection for pages that are might be covered by the extended confirmed restriction and for pages covered by contentious topics. Until you gain more experience with how Wikipedia works and how polciies and guidelines are interpreted and applied in practice it's best to leave these difficult areas for more experienced editors. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:20, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
January 2025
Hello, I'm Belbury. An edit that you recently made to Brain rot seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Adding a pp template to an article doesn't by itself protect it, see WP:RPP.Belbury (talk) 09:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The page is in fact semi protected. I logged out and sure enough I got the error message when trying to edit. Even if you add the template the lock will only show if the page is protected. Heyaaaaalol (talk) 21:31, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I'm Belbury. Your recent edit(s) to the page Help:Logging in appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Protected pages can still be viewed by logged out users.Belbury (talk) 10:56, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
