User talk:Gorobay

This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gorobay.

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist. Please click here to leave me a new message.

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Gorobay, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!  :: œ^™ 08:41, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Let me add to the welcome above. It seems you are quite familiar with complex template coding so I am assuming you are not new here? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:26, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited as an IP for a few years, so I know my way around. Gorobay (talk) 16:47, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You can say that agai:n. I think the categories you are creating should be subcategories of Category:Redirects from alternative languages and I don't see why they should be hidden? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:13, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On second thoughts, perhaps it is appropriate that they are hidden. There is also Template:Redirect category which may be useful for these categories. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:17, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll put them in Category:Redirects from alternative languages. I did not use {{Redirect category}} because I did not know what template should be; e.g. template=R from alternative language{{!}}de for German? Gorobay (talk) 12:50, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What is the point of creating all these redirects? Redirects should be used for commonly used alternative terms or spellings. One could create millions of pointless redirects with foreign alphabet words for every Wikipedia article. Do you expect that readers do not know this is the English Wikipedia, or that they do not read English, but will somehow benefit from being redirected to an English language article when they type in a word in some other language and alphabet? Edison (talk) 21:03, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Who's creating redirects? I'm not creating any redirects.

I am editing redirects to give them categories. It wasn't my idea to make them, but someone thought they were worth creating. Maybe they are completely useless, but until they are deleted, they may as well go in the proper categories. Gorobay (talk) 21:08, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I popped up here because I saw your work at "Recent changes," and was under the mistaken impression you were creating a slew of redirects. I apologize. The talk page archives at WP:REDIRECT indicate that there is some consensus for having foreign alphabet redirects from the foreign version of the name of the article to the English article, particularly if it is a subject associated with the country where the alphabet is used. Such a redirect could be useful to a foreign person who is somewhat fluent in English, and might wish to read about the subject, but is not sure of the exact spelling or phrasing of the English name. Your categorization is useful work. If you could put in an edit summary that you are recategorizing a redirect, then "Recent changes" patrollers would not be led to click on the edit each time to see what you are doing. When a Recent changes patroller sees that someone has edited जनरेटर or whatever, the initial impression is that Wikipedia has acquired an article in need of translation (or perhaps deletion). An edit summary would be most helpful. Regards. Edison (talk) 21:30, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, glad it was just a misunderstanding. I haven't been doing edit summaries because they slow the process down considerably. Is there a tool I can use to automatically set my edit summary? Gorobay (talk) 21:36, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Redirects from non-English language terms

Category:Redirects from non-English language terms, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:27, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar time

		The Redirect Barnstar
		For creating all those useful unicode redirects. Nice job! Yunshui (talk) 12:59, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign-language Redirects

Okay, I got it. Azure Dragon of the East (talk) 17:09, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You Are a Winner!

Congratulations, Gorobay for finding this edit to Ŭ! You are the first winner of my Alpha Challenge! Your prize is this giant alpha:

ɑ

Redirects from Chinese

Done! Stormedelf (talk) 06:39, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited List of surnames in Russia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Бурый (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain

This edit Removed Category:Unprintworthy redirects. Why? Please respond on my talk. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:49, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the category because it was inconsistent with current practice used in thousands of similar redirects on two counts:

• It used a category rather than {{R unprintworthy}}.
• Redirects from alternative languages are not generally tagged for printworthiness. This redirect is no more unprintworthy than the rest.

Gorobay (talk) 00:37, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Zabranjeno Pušenje#Requested move

Hello, Gorobay. You have new messages at Talk:Zabranjeno Pušenje.
Message added 14:29, 9 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For over 20,000 edits in Wikipedia. Rafy talk 19:26, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help me

Hi. I'm just waiting to correct the Cyrillic names of political parties, films, and singers. Could you help me to resolve them? --Daniyar Mukharbatanov (talk) 11:50, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This edit (and possibly others); you may add more {{R from alternative language}} if you have much time. Thank you. --Daniyar Mukharbatanov (talk) 12:03, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged all of your Cyrillic redirects with the appropriate languages. Feel free to tag them yourself if you create any more. With that said, I think you should not create any more redirects like Д. Ловато, for the same reason various transliterations of “Selena Gomez” are inappropriate. Gorobay (talk) 21:22, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move redirects

Thanks for fixing my move redirects. Simply south...... flapping wings into buildings for just 6 years 13:10, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for improving some of my recent redirect updates too. I will try to remember the language parameters for {R from alternative language} in future. --Mirokado (talk) 14:08, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of precomposed Latin characters in Unicode, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diaeresis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:26, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

alveolar clicks

Thanks for fixing all the !'s in the Khoisan articles. However, I wonder about the page move to ǃKung language. If we're going to use the Unicode click symbol, then we should probably use the local orthography, which would be ǃXuun or ǃXũũ (plus perhaps tone diacritics). "!Kung" is the common English rendering of the name, and as such I would expect it to use a simple exclamation mark. Similarly Ekoka !Kung etc. ("!Xung", BTW, is an odd hybrid which is probably my fault. There is no actual "ng" in the native pronunciation.)

(The edits also left a fair number of new red links.) — kwami (talk) 17:11, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for fixing this. I seem to have botched the template twice and not even noticed the second time, which is a pretty bad mistake. I'll be more careful in the future. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 18:50, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move done

Hi Gorobay, I fixed the move of United Nations Command for you. Did you know you could have done that yourself? As long as there are no edits in history, you can move over a redirect. Cheers, 20:58, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Vermeer

Please refrain from moving articles on well-known paintings without discussion - see Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Requesting_controversial_and_potentially_controversial_moves. It is a nuisance to restore the titles. About half of Vermeer's output might be described as "Portrait of a Young Woman", which is not even the name that the museum uses. Also see WP:VAMOS on the titles of artwork articles. Thank you. Johnbod (talk) 15:09, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry; I didn't know it was controversial. I have read WP:VAMOS, but I do not see the problem. If the painting is not called Portrait of a Young Woman, it should be moved to its true name. Since there are no other Vermeer paintings called Portrait of a Young Woman on Wikipedia, the "New York" disambiguator was unnecessary. Gorobay (talk) 17:44, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To avoid ambiguity it is not enough to say there is no other other article title that is exactly the same, when most Vermeers, like many old paintings have several alternative titles, none of them especially authoritative, as the works had no actual original title (let alone one in English), and all the titles have been given to them by museums and art historians subsequently. Vamos goes into the issue of the extra degree of disambiguation that is often necessary to avoid ambiguity in the titles of paintings articles: "If the title is not very specific, or refers to a common subject, add the surname of the artist in brackets afterwards, e.g. Reading the Letter (Picasso). It is generally better to disambiguate by the artist's name than by medium, as there may be other paintings or sculptures of the same name by other artists. If the artist painted several works with the same, or very similar, titles, add the location of the work if it is in a public collection. For example, Annunciation (van Eyck, Washington), as van Eyck painted several Annunciations. A title such as Madonna and Child (Raphael) is of little use (see Category:Raphael Madonnas). The names of less well-known artists may not be suitable disambiguation terms." Johnbod (talk) 18:38, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Hi. I have blocked your account because it appears that you are running an unapproved bot on it. Please read our Wikipedia:Bot policy for more information. Post using {{unblock}} when you have stopped the bot and I or another admin can unblock. --Rschen7754 08:51, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Gorobay (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not a bot. If I were, would I make silly mistakes like Ctrl+V without the Ctrl? I realize I edit quickly, but that is only natural when I am creating multiple identical redirects. Gorobay (talk) 09:06, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I've gone ahead and unblocked, but please consider slowing down. You may want to use WP:AWB to make these edits and possibly open a separate bot account for doing that. Mass page creation tends to be problematic here and has resulted in some editors getting into trouble. Rschen7754 09:25, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are you using any form of automation, such as scripts? If not, how are you making all these edits? --Rschen7754 09:13, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am not using automation, but I will be more cautious henceforth. Gorobay (talk) 09:30, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A magnifying glass

To creator and fixer of redirects from exotic characters. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:14, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

🔔

I have reverted your change to 🔔 because targeting the redirect page was the outcome of an RFD. If you want it to be targetted somewhere else please either take it to WP:DRV or start a new WP:RFD. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:15, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unicode

Just curious, Gorobay, about your usage of the {{R from Unicode}} template on pages such as this one. The reason I ask is that I thought that template should only be used on /doc pages, as per its own /doc page. Actually, when you boil it all down, even the Latin letters like A, B, C are on the List of Unicode characters, so I think that template is now only good for /doc pages. Or have you found another use for it? a use that isn't like the redirect shortcut I linked to above? – PAINE ELLSWORTH ^CLIMAX! 18:30, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The template is for listing Wikipedia’s Unicode redirects, which are not everything listed at List of Unicode characters. {{R from Unicode}}’s documentation says there is special handling when it is used on a /doc subpage, not that the template should only be used for subpages. Gorobay (talk) 20:01, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense, Gorobay, and I see by your recent contributions that you do a great job of categorizing pages! All those edits make sense to me. I still wonder, though, about shortcuts like the one I noted above. The title of the redirect is "Wikipedia:H". All of those characters are on the Unicode list, but does your "R from Unicode" refer to all of those characters? Where is the discernment from every other redirect we use? Was it the "colon (:)" you were referring to? Wasn't R from Unicode once used for diacritics? And we have {{R from diacritics}} for that now. – PAINE ELLSWORTH ^CLIMAX! 19:26, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It refers to the “H”. The idea was that “Wikipedia” was the namespace, “H” was the title, and the colon wasn’t important. I did that (and many similar redirects) a year ago, but now I have changed my mind: I don’t think it is appropriate anymore. I don’t know the history of {{R from Unicode}}, but you are right: it has a different purpose from {{R from diacritics}}. Gorobay (talk) 20:33, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Thank you very much! – Gorobay I've learned a lot from you! – PAINE ELLSWORTH ^CLIMAX! 00:47, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unicode block vs unicode block

As I started thinking about the matter, my original interpretation fell apart under the weight of internal inconsistency, so I changed all the articles. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. VanIsaac_{WS Vex}^contribs 04:24, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects for Deletion – April 28

Hello, Gorobay. You may want to participate in the most recent RFD discussion concerning redirects from Unicode characters to the articles on the writing systems to which they belong. Particularly, this discussion involves the redirects from Vai syllabary characters, although the underlying purpose of their proposed deletion could soon expand to include characters from all Unicode aliases—many of which are redirects that you (← mostly) and I have created. In case this discussion is of any of your concern, I would recommend participating in it. Thank you.

    — |J~Pæst| 21:49, 28 April 2013 (UTC) (original RFD request by BabelStone (talk) 20:44, 28 April 2013 (UTC) →)[reply]

Indic letter articles

Since you've commented on the {{Indic glyph}} template, and the deletion discussion for Devanagari ka, I thought you should know that I've just finished out the first quarter or so of the Ka (Indic) article. I've invited Kwami to work through that content, adding and cutting, and seeing if we can't work on having an archetype of this whole class of articles should look like. Please comment at the template, article, or Kwami's talk page, and we'll see if we can't start getting this content created. VanIsaac_{WS Vex}^contribs 05:20, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your removals of "R from Unicode" from various redirects

Hi Gorobay,

I reverted a number of edits where you removed the "R from Unicode" categorization from redirects, although these redirects were in fact redirects from the Unicode representation to the more common (extended) ASCII representation. Can you explain what you were trying to accomplish by removing these Rcats? Thanks. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 22:01, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

{{R from Unicode}} is for redirects from individual Unicode characters, not from redirects which use such characters. Category:Redirects from Unicode characters contains the sort of redirects this template is meant for. Gorobay (talk) 22:58, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I see your point now, but I'm still not sure if it's valid one.

Template:R template index lists "R from Unicode" as kind of opposite to "R from ASCII" (which may not be properly defined in itself, but clearly is/was meant for strings, not only single characters). Neither there or in the template's documentation can I find a statement that "R from Unicode" would be meant for individual Unicode characters only. Even the description at Category:Redirects from Unicode characters does not make this clear, although it uses the word "character".

In either way, the reason why I added this Rcat to these redirects was to make it more obvious for other editors that these redirects do not use the standard representation of characters as they would result from typing the title under most Western keyboard layouts without using special tools to input Unicode characters. At least in my environment, both representations of µ are totally indistinguishable on screen, and I will have to use a hex editor in order to find out which code point was actually used by someone else. When I was working on the NEC µPD articles a while ago, this actually caused some confusion as some articles were created under the "extended ASCII form" whereas others used the "Unicode form" originally, and I was wondering why some links remained red although the corresponding articles existed. That's why I created this set of redirects.

Do you know another template like "R from title with Unicode characters" similar to "R from title without diacritics", "R from transliteration" etc.? --Matthiaspaul (talk) 10:15, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:R template index was wrong; I have fixed it. I don’t know of any template that means exactly what you want. You might use {{R from alternative spelling}}. If that is insufficiently precise, you can create a new template. Gorobay (talk) 14:26, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Then let's use "R from alternative spelling" for now. Sorry for the late reply, I'm rather busy right now... --Matthiaspaul (talk) 10:33, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Unnecessary disambiguation" Comment

Hi Gorobay, I see you have moved a number of German articles to remove the disambiguator. Please be a little careful because in each case there is a reason for it. For example there is a village called Lopau on the Luneburg Heath as well as the Lopau river; it's just that we have yet to create the former article. When I translate these articles from German Wiki, I usually leave the disambiguator in because, sooner or later I, or someone else, will translate the other articles from which they need disambiguating. If you're not sure, do ask the editors involved - we're always happy to help. --Bermicourt (talk) 22:07, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I’ll stop moving them. Gorobay (talk) 22:27, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

100 yard dash

You just renamed the article by adding the hyphen. Why? Are you now going to damage all of our athletics, swimming or other distance related events across wikipedia by adding a hyphen to each of them? We are describing a distance run. The hyphen is unnecessary and improper. Trackinfo (talk) 00:00, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article referred to the event as a “100-yard dash”, and now the title is consistent with the body. Similar titles include 40-yard dash and 440-yard dash. Per well-established English usage, this is not improper. See WP:HYPHEN and WP:AGF. Gorobay (talk) 02:36, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually we are talking about number, measurements. Where in Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers#Numbers does it say to hyphenate? You found a couple of obscure articles that might not have been corrected to follow MOS, the are hundreds to thousands that disagree. You are going in the wrong direction. And don't pull that AGF crap. Trackinfo (talk) 05:23, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers#Unit names says When they form a compound adjective, values and unit names should be separated by a hyphen: for example, a five-day holiday. “100-yard” is a compound adjective. The hyphenless alternative is “100 yards dash”. Gorobay (talk) 12:57, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You found the answer yourself. That was using text, which is discouraged. By MoS we call our events by numerical values. 100 yards is a measurement. We don't call it the hundred yard dash. Trackinfo (talk) 19:22, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The same MoS also includes the example twelve 90-minute volumes, i.e. it doesn’t matter whether the number is written with letters or with digits. This is perfectly consistent with WP:HYPHEN, which I encourage you to read. Gorobay (talk) 20:44, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're going to have to get much more specific than to point to a full article and claim it tells you to do something like this. There is a convoluted section on measurement, but you're going to need to show where measurement values need to be hyphenated. If you persist in this line of thinking, you will potentially damage thousands of established article names. Trackinfo (talk) 17:33, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Budōkan karate

Please move this article back to the disambiguated title, and change the resultant redirect to point to Budokan, an appropriate disambiguation page. The macron is insufficient disambiguation, and an obscure minor style of karate is hardly the primary topic. If anything, the Tokyo arena should be the target if the redirect, and the undisambiguated title, as it is clearly the primary topic. oknazevad (talk) 16:59, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That all sounds reasonable. Go ahead. Gorobay (talk) 17:26, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All done. Thanks. oknazevad (talk) 17:33, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

⁜

Greetings,

I notice you added Template:R from symbol back to ⁜. You are correct that not all symbols are Unicode characters, but I realized today that all Unicode characters are symbols and that Category:Redirects from Unicode characters is a subcategory of Category:Redirects from symbols. It seems like classifying a redirect with Template:R from Unicode is enough to indicate both that it is a symbol and that it is specifically a Unicode character.

Thanks!

Beland (talk) 21:13, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I realized right after I saved the change that I wrote my edit summary backwards. What I meant to say is that not all Unicode characters are symbols (for all but the vaguest definition of “symbol”). There are also letters and numbers, for example. I hadn’t realized that one category is a subcategory of the other. That is wrong. Gorobay (talk) 21:35, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, you also see "R from symbol" used for e,g, Γ ray, where Γ is a letter, but it's a Greek letter in an English phrase. Maybe we should discuss on Wikipedia talk:Categorizing redirects; I'll start a thread there. -- Beland (talk) 00:04, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dina Korzun, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kuka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Anipoli & Alesk

Can you please consider reverting the move? As with most Hasidic dynasty articles, the name of the dynasty is the Yiddish name of the shtetl where its founder lived; Anipoli should redirect to Hannopil', the name of the town, while the Hasidic dynasty article should be at the original title. הסרפד (call me Hasirpad) 19:02, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The same goes for Alesk. Both towns have a long Jewish history, and the Jewish name of the town should redirect to the article about the town (or, where available, the article or or section about the history of the town's Jews), not to an article about one family of rabbis from the town. הסרפד (call me Hasirpad) 19:05, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It depends on whether, in English, “Anipoli” and “Alesk” primarily refer to the dynasties or to the towns. You know more about this topic than I do, so please do revert my edits if appropriate. Gorobay (talk) 19:10, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's somewhat ambiguous: both towns are usually mentioned in reference to famous rabbis who lived there, e.g. "Zusha of Anipoli", which, I feel, refers more to the town than to the dynasty.

As for reverting your edits, I would do so myself, but I now need to request the move, as you've edited the redirect, so I wanted to discuss it with you first. הסרפד (call me Hasirpad) 19:24, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've requested a technical move. הסרפד (call me Hasirpad) 18:41, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decision Sciences (journal)

Hi, Decision Sciences is a field of study (and now that it exists, should be redirected to an appropriate target, such as decision making). Decision Sciences is an academic journal and should therefore have a dab. I'd appreciate if you could revert this move. Similarly, we have anti-cancer drug, which redirects to chemotherapy, but anti-cancer drugs now goes to a journal article. This should properly also go to chemotherapy and Anti-Cancer Drugs should be moved back to Anti-Cancer Drugs (journal). Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 16:44, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

According to WP:DIFFCAPS, it is acceptable to differentiate titles only by capitalization. The fields of study are not titlecased, whereas the journals are, so there is no need to disambiguate. Gorobay (talk) 18:13, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I think you need to read that again. You are moving pages to remove dabs, but you are not putting any hatnotes where necessary. If a reader searcher for anti-cancer drugs, they are most likely not searching for a scientific journal... Likewise anybody searching for "decision sciences". DIFFCAPS states that caps can be used to differentiate pages if that doesn't create confusion. Me thinks you're creating confusion here. --Randykitty (talk) 18:30, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good work

...on finding and nominating all those unlikely Cyrillic redirects. — Scott • talk 17:34, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Scott • talk 11:34, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Because you thanked me...

You thanked me for one of my recent edits, so here is a heartfelt...  YOU'RE WELCOME! ...along with seventeen layers of fun because you deserve it! I sincerely hope that you enjoy your continued improvement of this awesome encyclopedia and the staggeringly huge community effort behind it! – Paine Ellsworth ^CLIMAX!

20:54, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Greek

Gorobay old darling can't you list Greek stupidies in in groups? I know I have been told I forget by whom that they must be all discussed individually. Patently they are all of a pattern and should be rubber-stamped as delete, and you yourself point out the exceptions when you think there is any doubt on those that you list: but most are not in doubt and I am fed up with doing elegant variation on these. Thanks for finding them but don't do a second flood: we have another one going at WP:RFD with nicknames of teams in the National Football League (whatever that is, some America thing apparently). I can't sep them out because you have been canny to write a very slightly different comment under each, that has the same meaning. If tha is your intent, then well done, you succeeded: I can't group them cos I won't remove your comments. You could, though.

Si Trew (talk) 23:56, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A reasonable editor could conceivably disagree with me about one RfD and not another, so I list them separately. I don’t think it matters much either way. Feel free to consolidate my nominations if you find them untidy.

And, for the record, most of my comments are identical. Gorobay (talk) 00:42, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, most are, most say "Not especially Greek". I kinda misunderstood that at first: and thanks very much for hunting them down. Hellenic Wikipedia doesn't have most of these articles and they are not Interwiki'd but looking up EL:WP I tend to find nothing: that is not our fault. But for external search engines to mislead Greek speakers into the tar pit that is English Wikipedia must be a bit of a WP:SURPRISE.

So I am with you all the way, just wondering if there is a better way to list them French: en masse. Maybe I didn't put it elegantly, but obviously you know what you are up to and will point out any exceptions that you think need discussion. Si Trew (talk) 05:40, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

By the way I thought I had said but appear not to have, thank you very much for your contributions to Wikipedia. That sounds trite written but one day we will have a beer or a drop of pálinka and I can thank you properly. Your help in improving this encylopaedia is noticed by at least one other editor. Sincerely Si Trew (talk) 05:44, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Partidul NaAPSional Liberal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Partidul Național Liberal

Partidul NaA£ional Liberal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Partidul Național Liberal

Partidul NaÅ£ional Liberal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Partidul Național Liberal

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Roman gentes and disambiguation

Until now, all Roman gens articles shared the same titling format, making it easy to identify and link to them from articles concerning members. The disambiguation "(gens)" contained in the title also distinguished the articles from individual members; all of the women in a gens would share the name of the gens as a nomen. While there are some smaller gens articles with no individual biographies of women members at this point, it's entirely possible that there may be in the future, which would require moving these articles back over the redirects just created (and thus administrator assistance).

A persistent problem with existing Roman biographical articles is their inconsistent naming and organization; for instance a number of individuals might be referred to as "Sempronia," and each of them might be entitled to a separate article. But several of them are (or at one time were) lumped together into a single article, for no better reason than that they shared the same name. Others who also shared that name have their own articles, thanks to other methods of disambiguation. There is no systematic organization to the titling and contents of Roman biographical articles; hence the use of consistent disambiguation for the gens articles, as a remedy for some of these issues. Please consider moving the articles back to their original titles. P Aculeius (talk) 15:42, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Briers (surname)

Hello,

I see you moved page Briers (surname) to Briers over redirect ‎(Remove unnecessary disambiguation (per typical name conventions)).

For consistency, should we move Brier (surname) to Brier?

Thanks for your assistance Gjs238 (talk) 12:21, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Short answer: no. The convention is to only include the disambiguator if the surname alone is ambiguous. There is no other article on Wikipedia named “Briers”, so adding “(surname)” is not necessary. On the other hand, Brier exists, so the surname article needs to be called Brier (surname). If you look at Category:Surnames you will see that most surname articles have no disambiguator.

Now, I see you have added some non-surname entries to Briers, so in this particular case it is no longer a surname article. If those surnames are ever split off into their own article, that article should be called Briers (surname). Gorobay (talk) 12:31, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For fixing up the tons of surname disambiguation pages. Sure, it's creating more work for me with all the G6 deletions, but it's something (tedious) that needs to be done. Thanks! Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 20:24, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gorobay. You have new messages at Ezhiki's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

August 2014

Hello, I'm Bmicomp. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Iso88592, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. BMIComp 03:48, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question about a few redirects from foreign languages

Hey there, I am currently categorizing the items in Category:Redirects from non-English-language terms so that it only contains sub-categories, but I have encountered an issue that it will not go into a subcategory, Batswana, for example, is tagged with <code>{{R from alternative language|tn}}</code> but it is placed inside Category:Redirects from non-English-language terms instead of Category:Redirects from Tswana-language terms, which I created, any help would be appreciated. - TheChampionMan1234 03:39, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please ignore the above message, as I found out that clicked "edit" on the redirect, doing nothing, and saving the page did the trick. - TheChampionMan1234 07:31, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Say What?! (video game)

Hi. Side thought to your move proposal, any idea on where to get a suitable image via WP:File Upload Wizard into the infobox? In ictu oculi (talk) 07:00, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t, sorry. Gorobay (talk) 12:48, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lubomir

Mir means world, rather then peace in the name Lubomir -> the one who loves the world. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lubomir)

http://bridgetomoscow.com/word-day-mir-mir-peace-world 92.247.20.94 (talk) 13:22, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question

What is the difference between Category:Redirects from alternative languages and Category:Redirects from non-English-language terms. I notice pages in both categories have {{R from alternative language}} (without a parameter) on them. But how do I know which category it will be placed in? Regards. - TheChampionMan1234 09:30, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Redirects from alternative languages should only contain subcategories. The thousands of redirects in that category are a mistake no one has fixed yet. {{R from alternative language}} puts a page here. (Don’t do that though!)

Category:Redirects from non-English-language terms is for redirects from one language to another. Its subcategories correspond to specific source languages. {{R from alternative language|qqq}} puts a page here, where |qqq represents any language that doesn’t have its own subcategory. {{R from alternative language}} should never put anything in Category:Redirects from non-English-language terms. If you have a counterexample, please let me know. Gorobay (talk) 12:55, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I am in the process of cleaning up both categories. - TheChampionMan1234 22:11, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please tag redirects from Korean hangul

See Hangul_consonant_and_vowel_tables#Hangul_syllables. Thanks. I am also doing some of this with AWB - TheChampionMan1234 07:27, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to MEP may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * [[People's Electoral Movement (Aruba)]] ({{langx|pap|Movimiento Electoral di Pueblo|links=no}}, an Aruban political party

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:44, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hello this is skitzo

i was wondering why my wikipedia page was deleted

i am an american multi-platinum producer who works with several hip hop artists, why was my wikipedia page deleted? i still exist, and continue to do active work in the industry

can you please undo the deleted page, and restore my page please. the skitzo (band) is the rock band, i am more relevant and known in the music industry, and i appreciated using wikipedia as a reference page

please e-mail me at [e-mail]

thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.86.123.162 (talk) 14:03, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Moving journal articles

Hi, when you move journal articles, please tag the redirect for ther project ({{WPJournals|class=Redirect}}). In addition, when moving unambiguous titles such as "The Cerebellum (journal)" to the more ambiguous "The Cerebellum" (and, yes, I realize that this follows guidelines, but the fact remains that "The Cerebellum" is ambiguous), could you please add a "for" template or such to the top of the article, so that readers looking for "the cerebellum" get that, too. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 17:41, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged the redirects and added a hatnote to The Holocene. Gorobay (talk) 18:07, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Randykitty (talk) 18:54, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: The Child Dreams

FYI, it was at "(opera)" because it's based on a play of the same title, but I suppose that's a bridge we can cross if there's ever an article on the play. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 01:20, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please restore

Could you please restore (album) (book) etc. to all the articles you have removed (album) (book) from where there are other topics - songs, books, whatever - mentioned in article content. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:13, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation is only used when a title would otherwise be ambiguous. If these other topics have no Wikipedia articles, there is no ambiguity. The albums and books can be redisambiguated if the other topics get articles. Gorobay (talk) 22:36, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please review WP:DISAMBIGUATION which says that we disambiguate by article content and not by article titles. Could you please restore (album) (book) etc. to all the articles you have removed (album) (book) from where there are other topics - songs, books, whatever - mentioned in article content. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:00, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What does disambiguating by content mean? Can you give an example? I can’t find anything relevant in WP:DISAMBIGUATION. Gorobay (talk) 16:56, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you continuing to ambiguate more articles when you have been asked to revert what you've already done? Please undo all your moves where the term can refer to content in other articles. Disambiguating by content means what it says, that there is content on the other topics, even though they don't have standalone articles. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:14, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Now I see what you mean by disambiguation by content. Not all ambiguity requires disambiguation in the title, though. Take Try Out as an example. I moved it because nothing else is called “Try Out”. On the disambiguation page you created, the hockey contracts aren’t capitalized and the film begins with “The”. Or A Tian → A Tian (album): why add “(album)” if there is no other “A Tian” to disambiguate from? On the other hand I see the logic behind the creation of Outloud and will be more careful henceforth. Gorobay (talk) 03:04, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unilateral moves with inappropriate edit summaries

Hi, Gorobay. I ask you to please stop removing text in brackets from article titles based in foreign languages using inappropriate and misleading edit summaries. There's nothing "unnecessary" about abbreviations. Abbreviations are not disambiguations. Please make a note of the difference in the meaning of these two terms. Abbreviations are used when the actual English translation of the original name is not officially recognized in that language. You moved unilaterally, the Belarusian Home Defence (BKA) to Belarusian Home Defence over redirect. Meanwhile, Belarusian Home Defence is not an official name of BKA, read it. It is one of the possible translations of Беларуская краёвая абарона. Another translation is "Byelorussian Home Guard". The only constant is 'BKA' in its name. Please restore the official abbreviation. Thanks, Poeticbent talk 18:58, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are there multiple entities known in English as “Belarusian Home Defence”? There aren’t on Wikipedia, so it is not ambiguous. Therefore the disambiguation is unnecessary. If that is the wrong name, move it to the right name. If no English name is good enough, use the original Belarusian name or abbreviation. Gorobay (talk) 19:17, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You keep flogging these two words: "ambiguous" and "disambiguation" as if there was no way out. The "Belarusian Home Defence" is not a name of a movie like in your other unilateral moves. Round brackets are not "ambiguous". "Belarusian Home Defence" is used in English literature, and so is "Byelorussian Home Guard". The wp:article name would allow for both. The only constant is BKA. However, BKA (on its own) would not be good enough because of German Bundeskriminalamt (BKA, Federal Criminal Investigation Bureau) and the Chinese BKA (Red Hats). Why didn't you pose a question in talk before acting? The original Belorussian spelling is not so popular in English literature. Poeticbent talk 19:46, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I didn’t post on the talk page because I didn’t expect this to be controversial. Articles ending with redundant parenthetical abbreviations are moved regularly, and not just by me. What is the BKA most often called in English sources? Gorobay (talk) 20:02, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hello (skitzo)

you guys erased my skitzo wikipedia page, i am a hip hop producer, a notable one at that, and my credentials just got wiped clean, please email me at [e-mail] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.215.185.77 (talk) 17:28, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So go write an article. If you’re notable it won’t be deleted. Gorobay (talk) 17:57, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mojibake

I added a bit at Wikipedia_talk:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#Mojibake_redirects not well put but in your favour. Si Trew (talk) 22:25, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mojibake Rs (Pokémon)

Hi Gorobay,

Thanks for your tireless work listing these tiresome mojibakes at RfD. I for one appreciate it, but usually stay silent to let them go delete by default. Doesn't mean I don't notice how much hard work you must put in to hunting these down and trapping them.

It piqued my interest with some of the Pokémon ones, since "Pokémon" is already a transliteration of katakana "ポケモン", and presumably chosen deliberately by the marketing department (since they could have called it anything in other markets, as car brands frequently are, for example). So the "é" was presumably deliberately chosen for distinction even though it is not usual in English words. (e.g. Nestlé's seems to have become keener on pronouncing its e acute, which in my childhood rhymed with nettles and indeed members of the company pronounced it that way).

Anyway that is probably beside the point, but that what would happen if the katakana itself was mojibaked? Do we have a mojibake for ポケモン, for example, or for titles that are half English and half kana? I don't know much about the mojibake algorithm (and don't want to know more than I have to!) but I am curious about this.

Happy new year, belatedly. Si Trew (talk) 06:26, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

⟨ポケモン⟩ would become ⟨ポケモン⟩. I don’t know if there are any such redirects, but I haven’t finished looking yet. Gorobay (talk) 12:52, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, ポケモン does not exist (yet). You've a Herculean task with them anyway, without an idiot like me adding more to your list. Si Trew (talk) 09:28, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you! 3

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	I award you this barnstar for your continuous and dedicated efforts in the very unglamorous work of rooting out mojibake redirects and other technical dross. Keep up the good work! --BDD (talk) 18:24, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

🕷 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 🕷. Since you had some involvement with the 🕷 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mr. Guye (talk) 23:42, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Panther Power

If you are going to move articles because of "unnecessary disambiguation" then it would follow that the incoming wikilinks also need to be amended. If the links are not amended it becomes "unnecessary move. Thanks in advance for amending the Wikilinks. --Richhoncho (talk) 09:35, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since Panther Power (song) still redirects to the right article, there is no need to update the internal links. See WP:NOTBROKEN. I have updated {{Tupac Shakur}} to bypass the redirect, though, per WP:BRINT. Gorobay (talk) 15:21, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you felt it was so important to move - I can only assume you expect others to clean up after you. Black Panther Power, anyone? --Richhoncho (talk) 16:40, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t expect that. Nothing needs to be cleaned up. Gorobay (talk) 16:59, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Then it was an unnecessary move. You can't have it both ways. --Richhoncho (talk) 17:16, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is only one thing on Wikipedia called “Panther Power”: the song, so the song is the primary topic for “Panther Power”, so the disambiguator “(song)” is redundant, so I moved the page. As you have noticed, there are still pages linking to Panther Power (song). That is not a problem, because it redirects users to the right page, which is the whole point of a redirect. I don’t know how to explain it better. If you think I should have updated all the links, write a proposal on WT:Redirect to repeal NOTBROKEN. Gorobay (talk) 17:55, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Unnecessary disambiguation" at Alan Hall

I just wanted to make sure that you were aware of this discussion. The "born 1952" was added so that the notable biologist Alan Hall's article would not again be contaminated with material about the not-quite-as-notable Alan Hall, also a biologist. It is my understanding that they were not born in the same year, which potentially makes the pre-emptive disambiguation useful. Samsara 15:37, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was not aware of that. I think disambiguation is not the right way to protect against confusion with a not-notable-enough-for-an-article topic. Gorobay (talk) 15:57, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moves

Hi, most of your moves seem fine, but can I ask please don't add this template to redirects, when you do this it prevents moves being reverted by WP:BRD, thank you In ictu oculi (talk) 08:30, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but did you not see this message? In ictu oculi (talk) 10:39, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The following moves are not uncontroversial and should be reverted pending a RM, can you revert please:

• Talk:Green Council (Hong Kong) to Talk:Green Council (unnecessary disambiguation) (revert)
• The GC (TV series) to The GC over redirect (unnecessary disambiguation)
• Jorge Rios (cyclist) to Jorge Rios (unnecessary disambiguation) (revert)
• Twelve West (building) to Twelve West (unnecessary disambiguation) (revert)
• Lady Thetis (wreck) to Lady Thetis (unnecessary disambiguation) (revert)
• Powdered corn cob (rodenticide) to Powdered corn cob (unnecessary disambiguation) (revert)
• Kim Young-jae (actor) to Kim Young-jae (unnecessary disambiguation) (revert)
• Ćao zdravo (song) to Ćao zdravo (unnecessary disambiguation) (revert)
• Research Institute for Groundwater (Egypt) to Research Institute for Groundwater (unnecessary disambiguation) (revert)
• Penny Cooper (field hockey) to Penny Cooper (unnecessary disambiguation) (revert)

I did see the message, and I tried hard to find subjects you had not warned me off before (e.g. albums) and which could not possibly be seen as ambiguous. When I moved one that I thought qualified, I added the template because that is the whole point of the template. You can list these at Wikipedia:RM#Requests to revert undiscussed moves. Gorobay (talk) 11:28, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion

Hi, you tagged three categories for speedy renaming on 4 February,[1] but you did not list them at WP:CFDS. Please do so now. – Fayenatic London 17:09, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! – Fayenatic London 17:34, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects in the category Redirects from alternative languages

Most of them should be moved to a subcategory of it, since they mostly use a non-English language which has a corresponding "redirects from x-language terms" category, and the redirects from alternative languages category has more than six thousand redirects, which is not acceptable since usually a category should not contain so many articles or redirects, and I don't have enough time to do all the job. You are known for organizing so many redirects. so please help me.--RekishiEJ (talk) 08:21, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware of this category and every so often I do recategorize its contents. As you say, it takes time. Gorobay (talk) 20:00, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Simone Buti and unnecessary disambiguation

Hello Gorobay. Recently you edited a redirect from Simone Buti (Volleyball). Could you clarify why the 'unneeded disambiguation' category is needed? It does appear that the category is widely used, but is it a marker of some maintenance that ought to be performed in the future? Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 20:55, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect categorization

Hi Gorobay! You've been interested in redirect categorization and the This is a redirect template in the past, so I wanted to let you know that there is a discussion at Template talk:This is a redirect#One parameter that might interest you.  Good faith! Paine  21:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

misspelling?

I'm puzzled by this: no misspelling involved, just an "R to dab", surely? Unless you're going to add that to every redirect which goes to a dab page which has a See also for a near-miss spelling? PamD 15:08, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• It is a misspelling because the word disambiguaton is missing an i. Gorobay (talk) 15:20, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Ah, of course - missed that! Sorry about that. PamD 18:04, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Though it might have been more useful to move it to the right spelling! I've now created the correct redirect. PamD 18:08, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moin qazi

I see you tagged the latest version A10. The author is trying to cover up his autobiography and his removal of a speedy tag. I'm restoring the older version so he knows why it's going and to discourage another attempt at an autobiography. Thanks, Bazj (talk) 21:05, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ආයුබෝවන් listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ආයුබෝවන්. Since you had some involvement with the ආයුබෝවන් redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Uanfala (talk) 22:22, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe/Nicosia listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Europe/Nicosia. Since you had some involvement with the Europe/Nicosia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --BDD (talk) 18:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects from Greek misspellings

Hi, your opinion is welcome at WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 24#Eπανάσταση (Mixed Latin/Greek letters). Uanfala (talk) 10:41, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Puebla

Saw your request at WP:RMT. It seems that there might be many links at Template:Puebla that need correction. Just an FYI if you find any. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 14:47, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for the reminder. I’ll fix the template when they’re all moved. Gorobay (talk) 14:48, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

افلام سكس listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect افلام سكس. Since you had some involvement with the افلام سكس redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Uanfala (talk) 08:23, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gorobay. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Béton listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Béton. Since you had some involvement with the Béton redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 22:52, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

🙂 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 🙂. Since you had some involvement with the 🙂 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:23, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

🙁 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 🙁. Since you had some involvement with the 🙁 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:23, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moves

Hi. Are you using some kind of bot or software to alert you when there is an apparent overtitling? Because a bot won't pick up when there are good reasons why the article creators title their creations as they did. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:51, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• I am not using a bot, or any software other than Wikipedia. Gorobay (talk) 17:48, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, well okay. Sorry to be a bit confused. It was that Turkish singer tech move that had already been deleted five times. Keep up the good work. All the best. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:34, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You mean Özgür Doğruöz (singer)? Yeah, I did notice the previous deletions when I proposed the move. I purposefully make move proposals anyway in cases like this: if the subject is now notable, the page should be moved, and if not, proposing the move will give the page visibility and lead to its deletion. Either way, the right thing happens. Gorobay (talk) 18:48, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ݨ for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ݨ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B̤ē until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:59, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

🏴󠁥󠁳󠁩󠁢󠁿 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 🏴󠁥󠁳󠁩󠁢󠁿. Since you had some involvement with the 🏴󠁥󠁳󠁩󠁢󠁿 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. snood1205^(Say Hi! (talk)) 19:40, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Kleuske (talk) 20:22, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

🏴󠁩󠁮󠁫󠁡󠁿 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 🏴󠁩󠁮󠁫󠁡󠁿. Since you had some involvement with the 🏴󠁩󠁮󠁫󠁡󠁿 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 23:58, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Flag redirects

An interesting observation. After installing the latest Mac OS the flags in the above two sections have changed. Now they are not just black flags but black flags with a garbled icon adjacent to them. I write 'adjacent' not 'following' as the garbled icon appears on top of the following text. I noticed it first in my contributions but it’s easiest to see on this page.

Seems Apple have added support for them in both Mac OS and iOS. But the only flags that actually work now are the three British countries, 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 England, 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Scotland and 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 Wales. Others are not yet supported, but it displays the characters of the tag superimposed after the black flag to show that something is there. If you zoom in and squint you can tell the two redirects’ tags are different, made up of different chars. Reading around a bit and which other flags are supported, if any, is up to the OS. Unlike national flags (of e.g. countries in the UN) there’s no obvious way to decide which sub-national flags are most important so I would not like to guess when others will be supported.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 14:21, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Interesting. Thanks for letting me know! Gorobay (talk) 14:46, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wintermärchen

In German, de:Wintermärchen is highly ambiguous. Do you understand that a disambiguation may become neccessary in English as well? It should not have been moved, imho. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:17, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• If it becomes necessary, the page can be moved back. The English Wikipedia does not typically disambiguate based on the potential for future ambiguity. Note that I didn’t move the page: I just tagged the redirect. Gorobay (talk) 22:38, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that, but was so puzzled about the example Jupiter. Isn't the planet named after the god? But I should have stopped wondering with the Engelbert Humperdinck case. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:47, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Gorobay. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Experiences survey

The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:

• https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.

• Sign up here to receive a link to a survey

Please be aware this survey will close Friday, Dec. 8 at 23:00 UTC.

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shooting at the 1912 Summer Olympics – Men's 30 metre rapid fire pistol

@Gorobay: I noticed that you marked the redirect at Shooting at the 1912 Summer Olympics – Men's 30 metre rapid fire pistol as misspelled. If you let me know what was misspelled, I can fix it. Jeff in CA (talk) 17:11, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• That’s not a redirect. Did you mean Shooting at the 1912 Summer Olympics – Men's 25 metre rapid fire pistol? The mistake is that the redirect says “25” where it should be “30”. Gorobay (talk) 18:46, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks. Jeff in CA (talk) 23:18, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please come and help...

Should MoS shortcut redirects be sorted to certain specific maintenance categories? An Rfc has been opened on this talk page to answer that question. Your sentiments would be appreciated!  Paine Ellsworth  ^put'r there  17:04, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewing

Hello, Gorobay. AS one of Wikipedia's most experienced editors, Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. ~~~~

Articles for Creation Reviewing

Hello, Gorobay. AfC submissions Random submission 2+ months 1,778 pending submissions Purge to update v t e I recently sent you an invitation to join NPP, but you also might be the right candidate for another related project, AfC, which is also extremely backlogged. Would you please consider becoming an Articles for Creation reviewer? Articles for Creation reviewers help new users learn the ropes of creating their first articles, and identify whether topics are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Reviewing drafts doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia inclusion policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After requesting to be added to the project, reviewing is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the reviewing instructions before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^(or here) 01:49, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

〦 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 〦. Since you had some involvement with the 〦 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. PrimeHunter (talk) 00:54, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of HalfNoise (EP)

The article HalfNoise (EP) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no assertion of notability fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Widefox; talk 21:10, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Gorobay. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Redirects from Eastern Min-language terms has been nominated for discussion

Category:Redirects from Eastern Min-language terms, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  04:10, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

¬ listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ¬. Since you had some involvement with the ¬ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 22:07, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to [e-mail], so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at [e-mail].

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Bоtir Qоraev" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bоtir Qоraev. Since you had some involvement with the Bоtir Qоraev redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:20, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Çakya-Mouni" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Çakya-Mouni. Since you had some involvement with the Çakya-Mouni redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:53, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"🄂" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect 🄂 should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 22#🄂 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:28, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"🅰" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 🅰. Since you had some involvement with the 🅰 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:58, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"🅱" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 🅱. Since you had some involvement with the 🅱 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:00, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"🅾" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 🅾. Since you had some involvement with the 🅾 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:00, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"VS Sup" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect VS Sup. Since you had some involvement with the VS Sup redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 12:49, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"🏴󠁵󠁳󠁭󠁳󠁿" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 🏴󠁵󠁳󠁭󠁳󠁿. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 10#🏴󠁵󠁳󠁭󠁳󠁿 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm (talk) 23:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Ꜥ" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Ꜥ. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 8#Ꜥ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:57, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Ꜣ" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Ꜣ. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 8#Ꜣ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:58, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"ඞ" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ඞ. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 6#ඞ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 21:46, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Dani Fernández (disambiguatuion)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Dani Fernández (disambiguatuion). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 25#Dani Fernández (disambiguatuion) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:26, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mass change of emoji redirect categories

I am not sure why you have removed so many emojis from Category:Redirects from emoji, evidently without discussing it anywhere beforehand. The issue of whether a glyph is specifically assigned to the Emoji block of code points is irrelevant to whether it's an emoji (a character used as a pictorial representation of non-textual information). See Emoji §Unicode blocks: they're all over the place. The unicode.org boolean for whether a character is an emoji does not indicate what you're saying it does (for example, it says that ©️ is an emoji and 🥆 is not, despite © being in Latin 1 Supplement and 🥆 being in Supplemental Symbols and Pictographs).

The issue of whether a character "is an emoji" is complicated (there are some characters outside the emoji block that are rendered pictorially by many devices, as well as some characters in the emoji block that are not rendered pictorially). One example is your removal of 🤻 from the category -- this doesn't make sense. It's in the Supplemental Symbols and Pictographs block — the same as 🥋, 🤣, 🥰, 🤩, and 🤪 — and its lack of a pictorial representation is cited in RS as being due to political considerations.

I am not saying that there is a proper order of things where all of these pages are in the same category, or that the way it was before is perfect — just that some discussion about the issue (perhaps at Category talk:Redirects from emoji) would be preferable to a WP:FAITACCOMPLI. jp×g 21:57, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"🛩️" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 🛩️. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 19#🛩️ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 10:37, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Ɥ" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Ɥ. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 29#Ɥ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:54, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ilmarë (moon)

Hi. Not sure what to do with the talk page. It's a little confusing because it looked like it was saying the article on the moon had been deleted in 2019. — kwami (talk) 03:11, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"🏋" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 🏋 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 21#🏋 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Bonoahx (talk) 14:47, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"๑" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ๑ and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 1#๑ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 192.76.8.77 (talk) 00:04, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"꤉" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ꤉ and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 4#꤉ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 22:56, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"🃠" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 🃠 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 10#🃠 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:43, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Slovénie" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Slovénie and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 10#Slovénie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 15:13, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Nausicaae of the Valley of the Wind" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Nausicaae of the Valley of the Wind and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 3#Nausicaae of the Valley of the Wind until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC^678 16:48, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested Move of Ex Falso (tag editor)

An editor has requested for Ex Falso (tag editor) to be moved to Ex Falso. Since you had some involvement with Ex Falso (tag editor), you might want to participate in the move discussion (if you have not already done so). Aaron Liu (talk) 17:24, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"🏴󠁩󠁱󠁫󠁲󠁿" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 🏴󠁩󠁱󠁫󠁲󠁿 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 25 § 🏴󠁩󠁱󠁫󠁲󠁿 until a consensus is reached. Gonnym (talk) 12:15, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"ඞ" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect ඞ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 8 § ඞ until a consensus is reached. Duckmather (talk) 23:14, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ɥ (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ɥ (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Unbranded

The article Unbranded has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:54, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"BlockParty (game portal)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect BlockParty (game portal) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 19 § BlockParty (game portal) until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]