User talk:Gonzaka

Welcome!

Hello, Gonzaka, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Joaquin008 (talk) 08:40, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Obila CB.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Obila CB.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Cbvic.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Cbvic.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:ForoAsturias.png

Thanks for uploading File:ForoAsturias.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ForoAsturias.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ForoAsturias.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:42, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Basket Zaragoza 2002

Gracias por hacerme saber acerca de la Basket Zaragoza 2002 el artículo. No entiendo por qué alguien no querría que los vínculos correctos en el artículo. Oh, bueno, no voy a perder mi tiempo Rikster2 (talk) 20:22, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Gonzaka, this may be fruitless at the end of the day, but I've opened an ANI discussion about Basket Zaragoza 2002 and how some anonymous editor thinks he owns the thing. It's at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Basket Zaragoza 2002 → severe ownership issue. Thought you'd like to know. Jrcla2 (talk) 00:50, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding File:AD Universidad de Oviedo.png

I have removed File:AD Universidad de Oviedo.png from AD Universidad de Oviedo (basketball) because it does not have a valid non-free media use rationale for the article. Please see Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria for the applicable policy and Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline if you want to address the issues. Thank you. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 11:43, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An award for you

A Barnstar!
Golden Wiki Award
In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! 66.87.0.36 (talk) 18:59, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AD Universidad de Oviedo

Hola Gonzaka. Creo que los equipos federados de la Universidad de Oviedo no compiten como un club único, sino que están inscritos en cada federación como entes diferentes, aunque tengan el mismo nombre. Perdona si me equivoco, pero no hay que confundirlos con los equipos universitarios (solo estudiantes matriculados) que no están federados, y que compiten con el nombre de la Universidad de Oviedo en los CEU.--Banderas (talk) 10:39, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eso sí, que los federados son diferentes de los universitarios está claro, pero es que, dentro de los federados, creo que cada deporte tiene su club y no creo que haya un club (Asociación Deportiva Universidad de Oviedo) con diferentes secciones, aunque ya me entra la duda en el caso del fútbol masculino y del baloncesto porque tienen el mismo nombre... En otros deportes está claro porque tienen diferentes nombres ("Cowper Rugby Club" y "Club Campus de Gijón Rugby" en rugby, "Club Deportivo Universidad de Oviedo" en vela, o "Club Universidad de Oviedo" en esquí). Por eso retité la plantilla del artículo AD Universidad de Oviedo. Opino que la plantilla iría mejor en el artículo University of Oviedo con los links correspondientes a cada club/deporte (es decir, quitando "the club" y enlazando a baloncesto el de baloncesto y a fútbol el de fútbol). Saludos --Banderas (talk) 11:30, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:TribunaLaCruz.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:TribunaLaCruz.jpg, which you've sourced to http://www.ucceares.com. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:14, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Urraca CF

The article Urraca CF has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable football club. No claim of notability. No independent refs.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Not your siblings' deletionist (talk) 08:49, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Euroleague current roster navigational boxes

I am glad that somebody saw what I have created (when you edited for Saski Baskonia current roster). But please, don't put new pages until I complete full 'project' with all Euroleague teams. For 2 days all the Euroleague teams will have almost same quality roster templates like NBA teams have, so pleas, be patient. It will be much easier to update rosters after this project. Greets! AirWolf (talk) 12:39, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FIBA Europe rankings

You added the rankings from 2000-2007 onto the new article FIBA Europe rankings. But those rankings from 2000 to 2007 were done by Euroleague and not FIBA Europe. So they should have stayed on the original article.173.216.233.111 (talk) 02:04, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the team rankings from inthegame website are not actual rankings. They are not the actual team rankings from Euroleague. They are just the personal rankings of that website. I'm not sure that they should be placed their in that article because it makes it seem like those are Euroleague's rankings. At the very least it should state that those are a different ranking in UEFA style, and not the actual team rankings from Euroleague.173.216.233.111 (talk) 02:08, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OK.173.216.233.111 (talk) 23:05, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sito Alonso

Hi, if you have an issue with a redirect that doesn't qualify for speedy deletion, please take it to Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion rather than blank the page as you did with Sito Alonso. Thanks! -- KTC (talk) 17:19, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thanks for fixing the Exposito, Riera and Berlanga links on the ACFC wiki page.

I find it a bit confusing when Wiki won't allow a link to their pages because it is not an "English" link. Frankr12 (talk) 05:35, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1988–89 FIBA European Champions Cup

Hello, Gonzaka, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on 1988–89 FIBA European Champions Cup, appears to be directly copied from http://www.linguasport.com/baloncesto/internacional/clubes/c1/C1_85.htm. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on 1988–89 FIBA European Champions Cup if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 22:30, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Euroleague 2013/14

Hi, just to explain my edits, Euroleague and ABA league agreed after negotiations that the 1st and 2nd ABA team that will play in the Euroleague next season will be finalists of the final four. It's because BC Igokea doesn't meet requirements for the Euroleague games (arena and adequate airport) and they didn't want to play anywhere else, so the final four finalists - Crvena zvezda and Partizan will play in the Euroleague next season. It's in all media here, everybody already congratulated them, even a director of ABA league, so it is official. The final will only determine which team will be ranked 1st and which 2nd.

Russian 1st place will be determined by combining results from the Russian domestic league and the VTB league. Practically the winner of VTB semi-final between CSKA and Khimki will be the number 1 team in Russia.

Kind regards. VoodooDerina — Preceding unsigned comment added by VoodooDerina (talk • contribs) 22:42, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just added references for these cases.

All the best. VoodooDerina (talk) 11:30, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I saw it at the GBL Wikipedia page, but now I'm searching and can't find any other source to confirm it.

Are you sure that if Lokomotiv Kuban doesn't win VTB league they'll be ahead of Khimki, although both teams would have the same number of points (15)?

Ok, thank you for your answer, and I'm sorry I accidentally changed your edit about that, I only noticed later. Best regards!

VoodooDerina (talk) 20:50, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Embalse de Alfilorios

Hi, I'm Ghostboy1997. Gonzaka, thanks for creating Embalse de Alfilorios!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. A spanish version is enough, but more referrences is better.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Ghostboy1997 (talk) 15:50, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confederations Cup table

Thanks for colorizing that Participating teams and results table at the Confederations Cup article! Now it looks more like a proper soccer results table, in my humble opinion (I do wonder, on a tiny side note, if there's anything better than "RU" that we can call the second-placers; "RU" just looks weird). Simplebutpowerful 04:06, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notable players

Hi, since you've been editing wikipedia longer than I do, maybe you know whether there is an agreed criterion for mentioning players as notable in basketball articles? I don't agree with some of the names last editor added in Lietuvos rytas page, but I'm not sure, maybe he is doing everything right, so I'm not sure if I should remove it and I don't want to turn it into edit war. Do you know about it? Thanks. 78.57.139.198 (talk) 19:46, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Baltai and LSU-Atletas

Yes, it is the same basketball club. -- Pofka (talk) 14:23, 6 October 2013 (GMT +2)

Ways to improve Spain men's national lacrosse team

Hi, I'm Mycomp86. Gonzaka, thanks for creating Spain men's national lacrosse team!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Great job on your recent page creation! If you check back i have added some tags to help the quality of the page.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Mycomp86 (talk) 17:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Cajabilbao

Hi, I'm Verdict78. Gonzaka, thanks for creating Cajabilbao!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks for creating this article. It needs references in order to be verified. There are quite a few pages that link into the page, which suggests that this page should exist. Adding references will allow for the notice to be removed

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Verdict78 (talk) 11:33, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tercera División seasons

I am very surprised that there appear to be loads of tables that have not been completed for Template:Tercera División seasons. I am quite happy to tidy-up etc but would appreciate help in preparing the basic tables. The source material can be accessed at http://www.league321.com/spain-football-historic-league-tables.html . Kind regards. League Octopus 20:49, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Colors

Thank you! The colors are in this module: Module:Basketball color. I don't know if you can edit it, because it is a protected page, but you can use this one as well: [[Module:Basketball color/data/sandbox ]]. --Harryhurry (talk) 16:37, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

European national league rankings article

Why did you remove the current league rankings on that article?Bluesangrel (talk) 23:41, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, those are the actual real league rankings, which are now updated and published every single year. The B license allocation criteria is not a league ranking and has absolutely nothing to do with the league rankings. They are two completely separate and totally different things. The B license criteria is the order of places that Euroleague gives to teams in the order after the A license teams get places. It has nothing at all to do with the league rankings, which is totally separate and different. The league rankings are complete separate and are a totally different list and are published every year. Those were listed in the separate category and you removed them. You are confusing the two things. They are two completely different things. If we want to get totally into B allocation license rankings, club rankings and all of this and not into league rankings at all, then we are completely putting stuff that is not related in any way to the title or topic of the article. So we either need to change the title and topic of the article, or we need to keep that stuff back in the article. Now, if you want to simply have this article just for the B allocation licenses, and the club rankings, and all of this kind of stuff, then that is fine. I can understand this, as this kind of stuff is taking up huge amounts of info and is constantly being updated and changed and is very pertinent to the nature of the structure of the current Euuroleague formats. But then we can't be claiming that this article is for the league rankings and calling it that, and we certainly 100% cannot be claiming the B license allocation criteria is the league rankings. Because it isn't. It's absolutely not the rankings of the leagues, which is something completely different and is done separately every year. Otherwise it's just posting totally false info in the article. So, we can discuss how we want to do this, but no, we cannot claim that the B license allocation is the league rankings, because it isn't.Bluesangrel (talk) 00:07, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ExYuCup.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ExYuCup.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:42, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CB Tizona logo.jpeg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CB Tizona logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LEB Oro Logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LEB Oro Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LEB Oro Logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LEB Oro Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:33, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ourensebaloncesto.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ourensebaloncesto.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:03, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BC Palanga logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BC Palanga logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Liga Endesa.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Liga Endesa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SD Lenense.gif

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SD Lenense.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:50, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Oviedo CB logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Oviedo CB logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Força Lleida logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Força Lleida logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Urraca CF logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Urraca CF logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:59, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RealTapia.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RealTapia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:12, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BasketNavarraClub New Logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BasketNavarraClub New Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Iraurgisb.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Iraurgisb.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:L'Entregu CF Logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:L'Entregu CF Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Obila CB.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Obila CB.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:New CB Valladolid Logo.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:New CB Valladolid Logo.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:BC Andorra Logo.png

Thank you for uploading File:BC Andorra Logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BC Andorra Logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BC Andorra Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BC Andorra.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BC Andorra.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of EuroLeague clubs performance comparison

Notice

The article EuroLeague clubs performance comparison has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

clubs performance comparison are not notable according: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EHF Champions League clubs performance comparison

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Malo95 (talk) 08:46, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of EuroLeague clubs performance comparison for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EuroLeague clubs performance comparison is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EuroLeague clubs performance comparison until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Malo95 (talk) 14:14, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:8TeamBracket-Best of Five Playoffs Except QF

Template:8TeamBracket-Best of Five Playoffs Except QF has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 03:32, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Liga eba.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Liga eba.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:28, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]