Thanks for uploading File:Basketball Braunschweig.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
I think that €200,000 is what all the Segunda División B clubs have to pay. Celta B had to pay €265,000 to cover the unpaid salaries that Ourense owed. When Real Madrid C was promoted two years ago, they and five other clubs had to pay about €190,000 which was the average of what was owed by the six clubs that were expelled. Thanks! Raul17 (talk) 21:48, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Raúl. This case is different. Real Madrid C and Celta B ones are because of relegations due to debts, but this one is a resign to promoting. The €200,000 was a quantity established but the Federation to occupy the spot. Anyway, if the problem is only a word is not a big problem. Un saludo. Asturkian (talk) 21:53, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neither Celta B nor Madrid C were relegated because of debts. Celta B was relegated because they were second wosrt team in Group 1 and they would not have been eligible to buy Ourense's spot and would have been to the Preferente Autonómica if they were. When Castilla were relegated from the Segunda División, Madrid C had to go down because two teams from the same club can not play the same level nationally (At the regional level, that is possible.) Again, Madrid C was not relegated because of debts. I wish I could link to Soccer-Spain, because they usually have that infomation. Thanks again!! Raul17 (talk) 23:05, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oops! I made a mistake, sorry. You've got the reason. BTW, I'm preparing in my sandbox the tables of results of each group to add to the article when the groups are confirmed. Thank you! Asturkian (talk) 23:08, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Told you you did not make a mistake!! I found the link that does prove that La Roda did have to pay! You were right! Really, don't understand why Celta had to pay €265,000 while La Roda only had to pay only €200,000!! At least I know that the guarantee fee is €400,000!! Good job! Raul17 (talk) 02:09, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There really should not be a new article created making it a new page, since it's the same exact club. It should just be renamed.Bluesangrel (talk) 23:31, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but Superleague is the 2nd tier for Russia. So they are talking about keeping their training team and their youth teams intact. Not their actual senior men's team. That's two different things. Their senior men's team is the same team as always, which is moving to Saint Petersburg and just changed its name. While they want their club programs to stay intact in Moscow if they can and with the arena and everything and that could try to play in Superleague, since that's just a youth developmental league. That's two unrelated teams. Like Barca A and Barca B if you will how Barca sometimes loans out their farm teams to teams in other areas of Spain. It would be the same thing as that.Bluesangrel (talk) 07:31, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Eurocup confirmed that Triumph is the same club as Zenit, that it kept all the records and history and just changed its name and isn't the same club as Zenit, just that it is using that name because that's a famous name. But it's still the Triumph club [1] - So I redirected the Zenit page to the Triumph page and added all your edits you made on the Zenit page to the Triumph page, and then I moved it to the Zenit name. But I could not move it to BC Zenit since it has been edited a lot so I moved to B.C. Zenit. I think this is OK since it retains all of the history of all the edits of the article and it retains legit redirects. And it puts all of the edits everyone made into the Triumph article.Bluesangrel (talk) 15:14, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history at Liga ACB shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
