User talk:General electric p30ch

Welcome

Hello, General electric p30ch, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 14:48, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply] Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Name	This user's name is {{{1}}}.

I want protection to my username because I don't want to be deleted

General electric p30ch, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi General electric p30ch! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

Your edit to Draft:History of Michigan 's Railroad has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia: Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images— you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia: Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:02, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:CSX Train Symbols

Please stop blanking and nominating Draft:CSX Train Symbols for WP:G7 speedy deletion. G7 only applies when there is a single significant contributor. You did not create it so you can not request speedy deletion under that criterion. If you feel it should be deleted you will need to use WP: MFD. ~ GB fan 13:29, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted this draft because I created another article with the name Draft: List of CSX Train Symbols--General electric p30ch (talk) 13:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you copy the content from Draft:CSX Train Symbols to Draft: List of CSX Train Symbols? ~ GB fan 14:05, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Do not blank Draft:CSX Train Symbols again. ~ GB fan 14:07, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep the conversation in one spot, here. How did you create Draft: List of CSX Train Symbols? Did you copy the contents of Draft:CSX Train Symbols and paste it into Draft: List of CSX Train Symbols? ~ GB fan 17:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have copied the contents of Draft: CSX Train Symbols and paste it into Draft: List of CSX Train Symbols!--General electric p30ch (talk) 17:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do not ever copy and paste one page to another name. There is a move function that moves the history of the article to a new title. I have fixed your new page to include all the history from twhere you copied it from. ~ GB fan 19:49, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sodor Main Line (March 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jenyire2 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sodor Main Line and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sodor Main Line, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jenyire2 20:59, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ffarquhar Branch Line (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MarioJump83 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ffarquhar Branch Line and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ffarquhar Branch Line, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MarioJump83! 13:27, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sodor Main Line (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sodor Main Line and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sodor Main Line, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:35, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boco the Mixed Traffic Diesel Engine (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EDG 543 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Boco the Mixed Traffic Diesel Engine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Boco the Mixed Traffic Diesel Engine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thanks, EDG 543 (message me) 22:51, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boco the Mixed Traffic Diesel Engine (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Boco the Mixed Traffic Diesel Engine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Boco the Mixed Traffic Diesel Engine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 22:51, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Porchefontaine (Paris RER) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Porchefontaine (Paris RER), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thanks, EDG 543 (message me) 23:15, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying licensed material requires attribution

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Draft:Boco the Mixed Traffic Diesel Engine you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. It's also required under the terms of the license. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 13:07, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, on Draft:Daisy the Diesel Railcar — Diannaa (talk) 16:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, on Diesel 10 the Evil Diesel Engine. Please stop copying from Fandom. There's a reason why we don't want that kind of content here - Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a compendium of fan pages.— Diannaa (talk) 14:48, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

De Witt Yard

Have added some info/references to De Witt Yard, which you changed from being redirect. Perhaps you can expand on it using info? Djflem (talk) 22:26, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Metra yards (March 16)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by SounderBruce was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Per WP:NOTGUIDE. This is not appropriately sourced and belongs on a fansite.

SounderBruce 10:11, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago Line (Norfolk Southern) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chicago Line (Norfolk Southern), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Imzadi 1979 → 16:52, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brendam Branch Line (March 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EDG 543 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brendam Branch Line and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Brendam Branch Line, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thanks, EDG 543 ^(message me) 17:11, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ffarquhar Branch Line (March 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ffarquhar Branch Line and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ffarquhar Branch Line, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:34, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edward the Blue Engine (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Edward the Blue Engine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Edward the Blue Engine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:46, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edward the Blue Engine (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EDG 543 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Edward the Blue Engine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Edward the Blue Engine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thanks, EDG 543 ^(message me) 12:29, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Await Further Instructions

Hey, bud. Why did you submit that draft for review? The draft isn't ready and I haven't worked on it for months. The plot is too long and it isn't yet supported with enough references. Thanks, EDG 543 ^(message me) 21:29, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daisy the Diesel Railcar (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gobonobo was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daisy the Diesel Railcar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Daisy the Diesel Railcar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

gobonobo ^+ ^c 22:18, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced original research

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Thomas & Friends, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Laplorfill (talk) 14:57, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Splatter and Dodge the Diesel Engines (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Splatter and Dodge the Diesel Engines and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Splatter and Dodge the Diesel Engines, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:25, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

General Electric, what happened to your commitment to follow Wikipedia's core rules? Less than an hour after making that promise on my talk page you submitted Draft:Splatter and Dodge the Diesel Engines when it suffers from exactly the same issues as it did the last time you submitted it, and that all the other articles you submitted have been rejected for. It has no sourcing, it is written like a fan page and it is very clearly not notable. You appear to be ignoring the good advice that multiple experienced editors have given you, and are not bothering to learn how Wikipedia works at all. Please, stop creating new articles - and stop uploading copyrighted images to Commons - until you understand and are able to follow the core rules of Wikipedia. Thanks, Laplorfill (talk) 16:59, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Baltimore Gay Street station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Baltimore Gay Street station, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 00:07, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ffarquhar Branch Line (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EDG 543 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ffarquhar Branch Line and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ffarquhar Branch Line, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thanks, EDG 543 ^(message me) 12:43, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Baltimore Gay Street station services

Template:Baltimore Gay Street station services has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Laplorfill (talk) 17:32, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Competency

Despite lengthy attempts to help you from myself and several other experienced editors, you have continued to create inappropriate articles. Neither Draft:Ffarquhar Branch Line or Draft:Sodor Main Line show any sign that you understand how to source articles, or the basics of notability or writing from a neutral point of view. This despite these concepts being explained to you multiple times. Your draft articles are repeatedly rejected due to these issues, but you have done nothing to address them. You are also continually violating copyright which is absolutely unacceptable as it potentially puts the entire Wikipedia project at risk. It has become clear to me that you are unwilling or unable to follow the basic rules that govern how Wikipedia works. I don't believe you are competent to edit here. I will shortly be asking the administrators to consider banning you from editing. I am sorry it has come to this, but your inability to improve at all is a significant concern. Laplorfill (talk) 17:41, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

Stop adding images which violate copyright. It is very important that you do not include such images in articles (including draft articles). Copyright infringement puts the entire Wikipedia project at risk and is taken very seriously. You cannot upload images you found on the web to commons and then us them in articles. Do not add these images back to the 'Arry and Bert draft. Laplorfill (talk) 14:16, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chicago Line (Norfolk Southern) (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chicago Line (Norfolk Southern) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chicago Line (Norfolk Southern), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:50, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Duck the Great Western Railway Engine (March 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Duck the Great Western Railway Engine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Duck the Great Western Railway Engine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 09:36, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 'Arry and Bert (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:'Arry and Bert and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:'Arry and Bert, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CSX Blue Island Subdivision (April 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CSX Blue Island Subdivision and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:CSX Blue Island Subdivision, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:21, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Thomas & Friends Characters in real life (April 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DanCherek was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Thomas & Friends Characters in real life and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Thomas & Friends Characters in real life, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DanCherek (talk) 13:25, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Thomas & Friends Characters in real life (April 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Thomas & Friends Characters in real life and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Thomas & Friends Characters in real life, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fake "in review" notice and inadequately sourced draft

Why did you make this edit?. That notice should only be put there by a reviewer, not by you. Claiming that gbawden was reviewing the draft is, at best, misleading. I am also concerned that you have yet again submitted Draft:List of Thomas & Friends Characters in real life for review without addressing the very serious sourcing issues that have caused it to be rejected twice before. It is going to be rejected again. YouTube is not a reliable source - as you have been repeatedly told. None of the other sources mention the Thomas characters at all, so they are not sources that support this article. I highly recommend that you withdraw the draft from review, and don't rsubmit it until you are able to properly source it. You also cannot add this table to the List of Thomas & Friends characters article until it is properly sourced. Laplorfill (talk) 19:02, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:About the list of the fictional characters of Thomas & Friends in real life

Template:About the list of the fictional characters of Thomas & Friends in real life has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Laplorfill (talk) 16:03, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Template:User registration time/General electric p30ch

Template:User registration time/General electric p30ch, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User registration time/General electric p30ch and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:User registration time/General electric p30ch during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Laplorfill (talk) 16:06, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:User:Secret Saturdays/Proud to be Greek

Template:User:Secret Saturdays/Proud to be Greek has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:52, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User registration time/General electric p30ch

Please do not remove TfD templates. Instead discuss at the entry at WP:TFD. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:41, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to reinforce this message. If you continue to edit war over this, you will find yourself blocked from editing. stwalkerster (talk) 12:40, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of P.A. Problems (episode)

The article P.A. Problems (episode) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Episode of a TV series with no evidence of notability. It fails both WP:GNG and WP:FILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Laplorfill (talk) 12:46, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of P.A. Problems (episode) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P.A. Problems (episode) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P.A. Problems (episode) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Laplorfill (talk) 05:28, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:General_electric_p30ch reported by User:Laplorfill (Result: ). Thank you. Laplorfill (talk) 05:35, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Your recent editing history at P.A. Problems (episode) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I have already reported you for edit waring on to remove the TfD tag from Template:User registration time/General electric p30ch. Now stop doing the same on P.A. Problems (episode) Laplorfill (talk) 05:37, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Draft:CSX Dean Subdivision has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Laplorfill (talk) 05:42, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Template:User registration time/General electric p30ch

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Edit warring to remove WP:TFD and WP:AFD tags from pages. Per a complaint at the noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 15:57, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Isle of Wight Railway diagram

Template:Isle of Wight Railway diagram has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Laplorfill (talk) 16:28, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daisy the Diesel Railcar (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Spicy were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daisy the Diesel Railcar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Daisy the Diesel Railcar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spicy (talk) 23:46, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your WP:PERM requests

Hi General electric p30ch, you've now made three requests for the extendedconfirmed permission at WP:PERM/EC - see request 1, request 2, and request 3. Each time, you've requested page protection, and twice now you've been told that you're in the wrong place and been given a link to the correct place - Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Continually asking for something in the wrong place is not conducive to your request being answered, it's only conducive to annoying the admins who patrol those pages.

Additionally, your most recent request described this edit as vandalism - it is not. It is a bot edit updating a userbox on your userpage to point to the correct location after that template was moved. I'd also ask you to review WP:Vandalism to get a better understanding of what vandalism is and what vandalism is not. Thanks! stwalkerster (talk) 11:10, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging pages for speedy deletion

Hello, General electric p30ch,

Before you tag another page for speedy deletion, review Criteria for Speedy Deletion. You can't tag a page CSD G7 if you are not the page creator. This must be requested by the editor who created the page. Please understand the criteria if you intend to tag pages for speedy deletion. If you don't want to take the time to review and understand policy, do not tag pages for deletion.

If you have questions about the deletion process or editing on Wikipedia, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^Read! Talk! 05:48, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Altering AfC notices

This edit is completely unacceptable. You absolutely may not alter an AfC submission notice to pretend you wrote it. That is extremely dishonest and a clear example of vandalism. Stop doing it. Laplorfill (talk) 16:23, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for an apparent inability or unwillingness to understand and follow even the most basic policies and concepts of what Wikipedia is and how it works.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Beeblebrox (talk) 17:31, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

General electric p30ch (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don't think that I must be blocked, because I didn't something to be blocked. General electric p30ch (talk) 17:39, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

WP:CIR would seem to apply here. Yamla (talk) 17:47, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've been watching this page for while, and you seem to have/cause a new problem nearly every day. I'm sorry to have to be this blunt but I don't think Wikipedia editing is a good fit for you. Writing and maintaining an encyclopedia requires being willing and able to understand core content and behavioral policies, and you seem either unwilling or unable to do that. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:35, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The block does not expire. That is what "indefinite" means. It will be lifted if and when you successfully appeal it. See WP:GAB. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:46, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boco the Mixed Traffic Diesel Engine (April 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Boco the Mixed Traffic Diesel Engine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Boco the Mixed Traffic Diesel Engine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 20:14, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:List of Thomas & Friends Characters in real life

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:List of Thomas & Friends Characters in real life, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Remagoxer (talk) 21:16, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xxx anon, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Beeblebrox (talk) 22:08, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/General electric p30ch. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~^(talk) (contribs) 17:02, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Xxx anon per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xxx anon. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~^(talk) (contribs) 05:31, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CSX Chicago Heights Subdivision (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ken Tony was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CSX Chicago Heights Subdivision and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:CSX Chicago Heights Subdivision, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ken Tony ^Shall we discuss? 15:30, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CSX Dean Subdivision (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ken Tony was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CSX Dean Subdivision and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:CSX Dean Subdivision, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ken Tony ^Shall we discuss? 16:58, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CSX Altenheim Subdivision has been accepted

CSX Altenheim Subdivision, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

scope_creep^Talk 15:08, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CSX Grand Rapids Subdivision has been accepted

CSX Grand Rapids Subdivision, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Deb (talk) 08:49, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of CSX Dispatchers Desk Codes

Hello, General electric p30ch. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of CSX Dispatchers Desk Codes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of CSX Dispatchers Desk Codes

Hello, General electric p30ch. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of CSX Dispatchers Desk Codes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 03:38, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Altenheim Subdivision

Template:Altenheim Subdivision has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:49, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:CSX Blue Island Subdivision

Template:CSX Blue Island Subdivision has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:47, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Chicago Heights Subdivsion

Template:Chicago Heights Subdivsion has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]