User talk:Gaudio

Latin

What was the Latin project you asked user:Jowfair about? --Iustinus 00:35, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Um... you're welcome, but I'm not entirely sure how I've helped you. --Iustinus 20:50, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was more curious than anything. I would certainly be willing to help you, if I can find the time. I did take a quick look at the page, and noticed only minor errors... nitpicks even. If I get a chance I'll correct some.

Oh, and btw, my screenname starts with an i not an l... it has nothing to do with lust :P --Iustinus 18:14, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your welcome to the Latin wikipedia, what don't you understand about "these things"? --Iustinus 22:22, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not mad, I'm just not sure what you mean. --Iustinus 16:28, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understood that. It's just that you said "But maybe you didn't realize, i don't know how these things work :)", and I wasn't sure what that meant. I mean, if there's a specific problem, there's a chance I would be able to help ;) --Iustinus 19:51, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No no, I knew who you were. I don't think that's any reason not to send the welcome. More to the point, I only just made that welcome template a few days ago, so I'm eager to use it whenever possible ;) --Iustinus 16:04, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I've been getting increasingly busy lately and probably shouldn't be wasting so much time on wikipedia to begin with. I should take a look at your lunae maria page one of these days, though, like I said I would. --Iustinus 17:13, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies

Sorry if my quick use of the copyedit tag on Latina (Madrid) was offensive. I thought the article would have benefited from it, and somehow didn't realize you were still editing. –Mysid^(t) 10:16, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ladino

Hola Gaudio,

(usted prefiere hablar en ingles o español? Puedo hablar en los dos) No estoy seguro de la repuesta a su pregunta, porque tengo ninguna experiencia con la lengua en situaciones actuales donde tendria que pensar de las formas diferentes de la segunda persona para usar. Sin embargo, creo que no hay diferencias entre el useo de la segunda persona en Ladino y Español. Tambien el 'babel template' de Ladino en mi Wiki no funciona correctamente, asi mi conocimiento realmente es mas cerca de nivel dos de la lengua :P. Saludos, Hauser 12:04, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok, thank you for the clarification. Now, from what I've seen (which admittedly isn't a LOT of Ladino), 'usted' is not used at all. Tu/vozótros is the pretty much standard way of referencing each other: I think part of this could be due to the fact that Ladino speakers are a close group and don't really traditionally use the same polite forms. Vos only occurs in the accusative case from what I have seen. Hope that is of some help! Hauser 14:27, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, plus I think a lot of the time the passive 'se' form is used as well when being polite. It's possible there is a way of doing it that I've never heard, so I'll ask someone next time I see a Ladino speaker on the Ladino Yahoo Group. About the Chinese, that's good to hear (and yes I agree it's very hard!). What operating system do you use? The best way of turning pinyin into chinese characters is using the built in language thing, but si estas usando Linux o otras sistemas, tienes que obtener una programa como 'NJ star' (http://www.njstar.com hay ediciones gratis en la red ;D). Saludos! Hauser 01:22, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pues 'Windows' es la sistema de ordenadores (Podria llamarse 'Ventanas' en Español) http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Windows es la pagina de lo en Wiki. Tienes un CD de 'Windows'? Si tienes, puedes usarlo para escribir palabras chinas por el ordenador. Gracias, Hauser 12:10, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seamus Heaney

So i can classify Seamus Heaney in: writers in English, writers in Irish and writers in Anglo-Saxon, right?

That is correct.--Play Brian Moore 01:08, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem.--Play Brian Moore 00:53, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ayuda con los artículos sobre España

Hola, Gaudio, soy Garcilaso. Estoy echándole un vistazo a los artículos relativos a la cultura y el arte españoles, y me he encontrado con que hay lagunas muuuuuy grandes en esta enciclopedia, que no hacen justicia en absoluto a nuestra historia. Me he metido enWikipedia:WikiProject Spain, pero tiene muy pocos miembros (5), y no está muy activo. Te pido tu colaboración para arreglar un poco el artículo Spanish poetry, que da pena verlo. Mi nivel de inglés es relativamente bueno, pero cuando uno escribe en serio es cuando se da cuenta de las carencias gramaticales... En general la situación está muy mal. Si bien hay unos cuantos escritores españoles con artículo propio, hay carencias, sobre todo en los artículos generales: Spanish poetry, Spanish Literature, Spanish Renaissance... He visto que estás escribiendo artículos sobre poetas, actores...Creo que es bueno coordinarse un poco, así que te animo a apuntarte al wikiproyecto. Un saludo, --Garcilaso 15:01, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias por tu contestación. Efectivamente la Wikipedia en inglés es la "madre de todas las wikipedias", y se puede encontrar información a veces más amplia que en las específicas. Es por eso que es importante rellenar los huecos sobre nuestra cultura, porque si no, para un gran número de gente que consulte, ni siquiera se enterará de que existe. Como bien dices, los escritores están bastante bien cubiertos aquí. Pero, por ejemplo, échale un vistazo a Castile y alucina. La confusión de términos, y las colaboraciones mal documentadas hacen que no sea un caso aislado. Según el artículo, hoy día Castilla se divide en Castilla la Nueva y Castilla la Vieja, y luce frases como "Castilians are known as the inhabitants of those regions of Spain where there is no regional identity which conflicts with that of "Castilian". "Castilian identity is now defined negatively rather than positively", y se mete en emobados como poco discutibles, como que los extremeños del norte son castellanos y los del sur andaluces... sin mencionar nada de la cultura catellana. Este artículo es sólo un ejemplo (aunque bastante gordo) de lo que pasa en general con los temas españoles en esta enciclopedia, y supongo que se debe a lo que dices, a que los hispanoparlantes somos algo reacios a traducir textos. Yo mismo me he limitado a completar listas en varios artículos y a escribir algunos párrafos en artículos como Baroque, Baroque architecture, Romanesque architecture, Renaissance architecture y otros del estilo, pero mi capacidad es limitada. No creo que se trate de suplir todas las carencias y escribir artículos memorables, sino de rellenar mínimamente todos los vacíos clamorosos. Respecto a Spanish poetry, con que eches un vistazo sobre todo a los del último siglo e incorpores los que nombres creas conveniente creo que sería más que suficiente. Claro que el artículo daría para escribir un libro, pero poco a poco, ¿no? :-) Agradezco tu apoyo, y considero admirable la cantidad de artículos que llevas escrito sobre el tema. Un saludo, y hasta la vista. --Garcilaso 10:56, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Use of {{stub}} is no longer recommended

Hello,

Thank you for your stub submission. You may wish to note that it is preferable to use a stub template from Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types instead of using simply {{stub}}, if you can.

Thanks! -- Where 03:27, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Estefan vs. Estéfan

Regarding your edit to the article Gloria Estéfan, please do not replace articles with blank content as this is considered vandalism. It looks like you wanted to create a redirect instead. Cheers. --PeruvianLlama^(spit) 20:45, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The best way of dealing with an incorrect (yet still popular) spelling is to create a redirect to the correctly spelled article. So Gloria Estéfan should redirect to Gloria Estefan. And if it were a popular misconception of how Gloria's name were spelled, or even a popular typo, we could have Gloria Estephan redirect to Gloria Estefan as well. Redirects are cheap, and if it helps even a few potential Wiki-readers find what they're looking for, then it's worth it. Cheers! --PeruvianLlama^(spit) 07:34, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oscar de la Renta

This is the English Wikipedia, and Oscar uses the English spelling as the name space article was before your move to Óscar de la Renta, so I question this. Even his logo and signature do not use the form you have moved the article to. The redirect, it seems to me, should be the other way around. Comments? Doc 15:14, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that you would be correct for Castillian usage, but the guideline for article titles on Wikipedia is the 'common' usage most prevalent and/or what the person uses. I have never seen him use this form personally or in business. As such, at most it should be an alternative in the article as the name origin, and a redirect from Óscar de la Renta to Oscar de la Renta for the rare person that might search for it that way. Consistent MoS here on the English Wikipedia would still, I believe, dictate that Oscar de la Renta should be the article title. Doc 23:07, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As I have said before, I do not question the 'correct' if here were living in a country using Castillian, or perhaps even in the Spanish v. of Wikipedia. I am only stating was is correct by standard usage on the English Wikipedia. If he used the foreign form here that would make a significant difference, but he does not, as I have stated before. Thanks for your understanding. Doc 02:12, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know that I really consider myself 'famous' but a friend thought I should be listed and started the entry based on what she knew and my user bio here and on Find A Grave. Yes, I've been in medical research, sleep research to be specific for almost forty years, but have always loved history and had used Wikipedia as a resource for several years. When a friend of mine was picked up from his obituary in the New York Times, here on Wikipedia, but didn't have an article yet, that started my contributing. Now I'm hooked!

While I understand that English is language based, not a national project, as I understand it one of the cornerstones of naming articles here is 'common usage' and/or what the person themselves use. On that basis, I did change the title back to Oscar de la Renta with the redirect from Óscar de la Renta, but I did leave the opening name in the article which should be the full name as Óscar de la Renta. I hope that this balance is acceptable to you.

For instance the title of Bill Clinton's article is not William Jefferson Clinton, it is Bill Clinton, which is the common usage. The opening line of the article has his full name and his name at birth. Does this make sense? Hope so, and good to dialogue with you. Doc 14:54, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure that I understand quite what you mean to be something different. I try to check my spelling for clarity. If you would like to dialogue further, how about clicking the link to email me from my user page and we could discuss further. I'm also very interested as you contribute in Spanish and French, both of which I can read and understand some, but am not adequate to write clearly. There are several articles that I would like to see included in those languages. Thanks, Doc 18:15, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When I click your 'Email this user' it says "This user has not specified a valid e-mail address, or has chosen not to receive e-mail from other users." That link on my user page should work, others have used it and when I tried it right now it links to the email form for me. Doc 20:24, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

's after z

I would recommend using "Lopez's" in all situations. Current usage in the case of names ending with s (such as my name: James) varies. Both James' and James's can be considered to be correct. Personally I have a strong preference for "James's". With names ending in z, where the pronunciation is /loupezis/ most speakers would write Lopez's, and that is what I'd recommend you do too. Zeimusu | Talk page 15:07, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Accent marks

You've done several page moves to add accent marks to several people's names. Unless the person is commonly credited with an accent mark in their name, these changes are not correct. Above, Doc has already explained why you shouldn't do this, but you haven't stopped. So I am asking you now to please stop or you might be crossing into vandalism. It would be nice if you reverted your changes (i'll be reverting some anyway, but there are quite a few to do). Also, please read Wikipedia:Naming conventions (people). Thank you. Crumbsucker 10:20, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that your intentions were not malicious, but we have to follow the naming standards on English Wikipedia. It's fine to create a redirect with the accents, but the formal article names have to follow the rules. Crumbsucker 11:05, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Þór/Thor

I replied on my talk page. Haukur 14:02, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Continuation of page moves, vandalism warning

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Crumbsucker 12:09, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

None of it matters. Even if a person doesn't credit themselves with proper accentuation, we still have to go with it. I'm not an administrator, so i can't block you, only warn you. You may, however, be blocked by an administrator if you don't stop. So please stop because you will be reverted and warned. Crumbsucker 13:57, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me what ones and i'll check them. Crumbsucker 10:58, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Concha Buika

Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Concha Buika may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, all users are entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. Jibbles | Talk 14:05, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When I spotted the article it appeared to be covered by WP:NN as a non-notible artist. The criteria for speedy deletion is "an article about a real person, group of people, band, or club that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject", and I didn't believe that the article asserted any importance. I therefore nominated it for speedy deletion, but the admin who checked it disagreed and it wasn't deleted. Having looked deeper into the topic, I see I was mistaken. My apologies. Jibbles | Talk 15:59, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hola

Gracias por tu interes en el articulo sobre Dinio, algunos quieren quitar el articulo, quizas te gustaria trabajar un poco en el Gracias.
--Trade2tradewell 15:16, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting incorrect page moves is not vandelism

Neither is doing a page move that conforms to the MoS. Placing a false warning on someone's user talk page is vandelism, tho. Especially an unsigned one. You need to accept the fact that you are wrong and move along. Crumbsucker 00:38, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another warning for improper, uncited name changes

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Crumbsucker 11:43, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Crumbsucker 12:03, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

...

Gaudio, quiero conversar un poco con usted sobre las formas verbales en djuedo-espanyol. Conozco un sitio web que contiene información sobre gramática en el idioma. Escriba una apunta en mi página de usuario o mandeme un e-mail.caz

un enlace al sitio que le mencioné: http://www.orbilat.com/Languages/Spanish-Ladino/index.html

si quiere hablar conmigo sobre el contenido, puede contactarme en AIM con el nombre opmi o por e-mail, zupnick @ wustl.edu oh, hablo inglés y bastante español, pero no me acuerdo el frances que aprendí unos años pasados. :-p caz

License tagging for Image:Portrait Weisenberg.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Portrait Weisenberg.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:08, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Il dolce suono

Hola Guadio, "Il dolce suono" no es exactamente la "aria", es el "recitativo". La "Scena della pazzia" es más larga y la "aria" empieza con las palabras "Ardon gl'incensi". De todos modos, puedes buscar más noticias en it.wiki: it:Scena della pazzia (Lucia di Lammermoor). Yo soy musicologo, así puedes fiarte ;-) Saludos --Al Pereira(talk) 11:26, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese painters

Categories and alphabetization I've had lots of issues with the alphabetization in categories. If you notice any others, please feel free to fix them as appropriate. I've since stopped alphabetizing Oriental names using Western conventions. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 16:08, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks If you make any more articles that have to do with Sahrawis, let me know! -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 16:25, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stubs: (derived from Carta blanca (TVE) edit)

Hello,

Thank you for your stub submission. You may wish to note that it is preferable to use a stub template from Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types instead of using simply {{stub}}, if you can.

Thanks! Ksbrown 19:18, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Ramírez

I see that back in May you moved the article on serial killer Richard Ramírez to the version with an accent.[1] I don't see any sources which spell the name that way, or any discussion of the change. Do you recall what your source was? -Will Beback · † · 05:32, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. "Ramírez" may be a common Spanish name, but the subject of our article was born in Texas. Do we have any source which gives his name with an accent? -Will Beback · † · 17:26, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good answer for the general surname. However my question is not about the original surname, but about the actual usage in regard to Richard Ramirez, who was born and lived in the United States. Other than this article, I have never seen his name spelled with an accent, and WP:NC says:

• Generally, article naming should give priority to what the majority of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature.

The more specific Wikipedia:Naming conventions (people) says:

1. the name that is most generally recognisable
2. the name that is unambiguous with the name of other articles

I think that "Ramirez" is more recognizable as the subject's name than "Ramírez". Some proof is that within Wikipedia most links to the article use the unaccented name.[2] If the subject were Spanish or Latin American I can see that an accented name might be more widely used. But I doubt that this particular Ramirez ever used an accent. -Will Beback · † · 01:27, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PS: I've posted a question at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (people)#Accented names to seek input on the general issue. -Will Beback · † · 01:37, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• ...the lack of accentuation in these articles proves someone's ignorance or carelessness... User talk:Will Beback#Ramírez

If the accents are appropriate and proper then I'm all for having accents. But if there's no accent on a person's birth certificate, for example, or their screen credits, or their book covers, or websites, then why should we add it to their bio in Wikipedia? There's no evidence that the person Richard Ramirez ever spelled his name with an accent or that anyone else in English-speaking world ever did either. Names change, especially among immigrants to the U.S. If the consensus of sources have the spelling without an accent then it seems more correct to follow that spelling. Otherwise we're using Wikipedia as a soapbox, proscribing instead of describing. -Will Beback · † · 10:44, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: British Sign language

Hi. I removed it because the movie is not in sign language. There are a few lines of dialouge that are in sign language, but I don't think that's enough to call it a sign language film, any more than having a few lines in French makes a film French language. Kolindigo 19:14, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I can't speak for The Exorcism of Emily Rose, having never seen it, but I disagree with your statement that all the movies which have even just a few sentences in a given language can be included in the category. Four Weddings is an English language film that has some dialouge in sign language. Listing it under sign language makes it seem like the entire movie is signed. Furthermore, all the signed dialouge is subtitled, so it's not like you need to be able to understand sign language to watch the movie. Kolindigo 23:16, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but I still don't see why Four Weddings should be classified as a British Sign Language film when there isn't more than ten minutes of signing in the entire movie. Kolindigo 23:51, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: Raiders

Hi, Gaudio. In a similar query, I'm wondering if you (maybe backed by some Wikiproject) are starting the task of including every language occurrence in all films' infoboxes? I see the point of doing so if a film is split telling its story in 2 or 3 languages (by all means no limit if significant), but not everything overheard or subtitled in a film. It makes infoboxes terribly long and mistakenly gives the impression of listing dubbed versions.. It just seems the sort of thing rather mentioned in a Trivia section if there were notably many languages featured. MURGH ^disc. 22:05, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll continue responding to you on this page since it is where it started.
Yes there are long infoboxes although the point isn't to make them as long as possible. The big problem is that it is a misrepresentation of the main language of a film. Right now, Raiders is listed in a category as a French-language film, which it just isnt. -MURGH ^disc. 22:36, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Having your own page deleted

If you create a page, and before anyone else edits it you decide to have it deleted, like what seems to have happened with Category:Afgan_Buddhists, please put a {{db-self}} at the top of the page, in stead of blanking it. This will attract an administrator to it to have it deleted. Eli Falk 11:14, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thalía is not Greek

From my research on all the posts on this article, there is nothing that indicates she is Greek (please see talkpage). An anonymous IP made the changes to all her family. If you read any bio on Thalía, she was born to Mexican parents. I forget what happened to her Dad but her Mom remarried a Greek. On the basis of the unreliable edits to all her family and the info on her talkpage, I am going to reverse your edit. If you can find a citation to prove, then that will be a different matter.

Paulina Rubio and Madonna are not Yogis

You clearly don't even know what a Yogi is. That is obvious. Madonna is not worthy of such a title, neither is Paulina Rubio.

Well, you tell me I'm right, in the article of the category you can see that you can put any person who practise yoga, but a yogi is sth more than that, and you had Madonna in that category. Gaudio 17:55, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References

File:Order of Smile.png

Hola, thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. I was looking though the articles you created and none of those I looked at had any references at all. Referening articles is just as important as creating them in the first place. Before you create any more, I urge you to go back and provide references for those that you have already made. Thanks. Shaundakulbara 20:27, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Erika Ortiz Rocasolano

El tema estaba perfectamente claro hasta que tu te metiste por medio. La gente habia decidido que no cumplía las normas. Por favor, deja de meterte donde no te llaman. --Andromeda 16:28, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mira la talk page, quieres? --Andromeda 17:15, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Por cierto, ya sabes que has incumplido la norma de Wikipedia:Three-revert rule, verdad? --Andromeda 17:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Es curioso que digas eso cuando es precisamente lo que tu estas haciendo: imponer tu voluntad en un articulo sobre el cual ya se había llegado a un acuerdo. --Andromeda 19:38, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Por favor, ni me hagas reír ni te hagas el listo. No tenéis respeto por las opiniones ni por el trabajo de nadie. Ya te he puesto la votación, si tanto interés tenéis a borrar el artículo, podéis poner lo que queráis. De todas formas, eso de la redirección a mí no me acaba de convencer mucho, pero quizá sea lo más adecuado. Lo digo porque también existe el artículo de la otra hermana. No sé, Suri Cruise redirige a Katie Holmes, por ejemplo, pero tb sería la hija de Tom Cruise. Gaudio 08:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No acuses

Regarding your comments on my talk page:

• I ask you to retract inmmediately about your comments regarding my behaviour.
• There are no ballots in English wikipedia, decisions are make through consensus here, and there was consensus already on the talk page. Please do not take the rules to the limit in order to make your point.

Barcex 08:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There was just your consensus, you didn't care for anyone else's opinions, something you guys are very used to do in Spanish wikipedia. You guys cannot use your caciquism here, just in Spanish wikipedia, the worst wikpedia EVER thanks to people like you. Gaudio 08:57, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is my second request asking you to retract your comments about me. You are saying I'm a vandal, which oviously I'm not. So please retract inmmediately. Barcex 09:02, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I beg your pardon, I started with good manners. It's always you guys who want to insult or to be rude. I'm not going to retract, what you guys have done was vandalism, I have already explained you the reasons. In stead of respecting people's opinions, now you feel upset, well, you guys make lots of people feel upset with your behaviour Gaudio 09:43, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, so after more than one year repeating everywhere in the wikipedias that you should have common rules, now you realised we should.Gaudio 09:51, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still waiting your retraction for calling me a vandal and other things. Barcex

This is the first contact I have with you. I had no contact with you in the Spanish wikipedia, I did not say anything about you there. So you are saying here I'm a vandal, please retract. Barcex 20:23, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Óscar

Hi there! Just a quick note on the spelling of Oscar (eu, Oscar Ruggeri). In Spanish, most those names are accentuated in the last syllable, not the first one, and are thus spelled Oscar and not Óscar. If in doubt, leave a message in the article's talk page. As a general rule, in Argentina it is (almost) never Óscar. Take care, and good wiking. --Mariano(t/c) 12:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oscar* is a mistake due tu several limitations in computers and typewriters among others when a word should be accentuated, Even the pronunciation /Os'kar/ can be considered a wrong pronunciation due to this issue. But in the end you can accentuate those names as you wish, first because in official documents names are not accentuate, and secondly because the articles you guys have misaccentuated are articles which deal with football players, and in my opinion, those articles should not be in an encyclopaedia. Gaudio 22:17, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In Spanish Oscar is NOT a mistake due to computer limitations. And in Spanish, official names ARE accentuated, but only when they need to, and Oscar is not one of them. In Argentina, Oscar is pronounced osCAR, and has no written accent at all. Please, stop moving those pages because the proper spelling doesn't include an accent. --Mariano(t/c) 17:08, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's not true, in my ID there are no accents in my first family name, for instance. The correct spelling of this name is Óscar, Oscar* is a great mistake due to what I told you. I don't care you misaccentuate those articles, in my opinion they sho~uld not be in an encyclopaedia. If you want to know a little but more about misaccentuation in Castillian, you can read my user page in Spanish wikipedia. Gaudio 15:03, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not about spelling, it's about the guy's name being Oscar and not Óscar. In Argentina the name is Oscar without an accent, and that's what people have in ther IDs. For instance, Oscar Galíndez has the accent in the lastname, but not in the name, simply becase the name doesn't have one, even if you consider it a mistake; thats the real name of that person, without the accent. --Mariano(t/c) 18:57, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Li Dawei

An editor has nominated Li Dawei, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Li Dawei and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:00, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Chen Ran

An editor has nominated Chen Ran, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chen Ran and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:00, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gaudio

Necesito que me des una dirección de e-mail o alguna vía de comunicación externa a la Wikipedia sea cual sea el idioma. En mi página de usuaria en español me podés mandar un mensaje, pero no estoy segura de si pasará por manos de los que manejan la interfaz del sistema. Por las dudas, te dejo uno de mis correos: [e-mail] es para notificarte de algo que creo, podría interesarte. Saludos. Andrómeda Talk Talk

Quiero aclarar que no soy Andromeda que ví que tuviste algunos roces con él/ella más arriba. Soy Soda-POP ok? Andrómeda Talk Talk 10:25, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Giselda Leirner

Message posted on Sunday, June 10, 2007

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Giselda Leirner. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://www.giseldaleirner.com/person.htm in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Giselda Leirner with a link to where we can find that note;
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Giselda Leirner with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Giselda Leirner saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Stellatomailing 01:23, 10 June 2007 (UTC) My version was a translation from Portuguese wikipedia. Gaudio 07:31, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sara Ramírez

If you'd taken the time to look, you'd realise that the article was moved from Sara Ramírez to Sara Ramirez long ago, and for a good reason. Why did you move it back? A clear consensus had been established. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 17:40, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Croatian language

Gaudio, this comment on this edit of yours [[3]] is insult.
Second, you don't know Croatian language, as I see on your userpage.
How can you speak about an language if you don't speak it nor understand it?
Third, Croatian language has three dialects.
". In short: Croats are the only speakers of Chakavian (subdialects with Ikavian, Ekavian and Jekavian speech) and Kajkavian (subdialects with Ekavian and Ikavian speech) dialect. Shtokavian dialect also has more "subdialects", that can be referred exclusively to one nation. Slavonian Shtokavian (mostly Ikavian speech) is spoken exclusively by the Croats. East Bosnian Shtokavian (mostly Jekavian speech) is spoken among Croats, Bosnian Muslims (Bosniaks) and as minor, among Serbs (on the mountain Ozren). Kosovo-Resava Shtokavian (Ekavian speech) is spoken exclusively by the Serbs. Zeta-Sanjak Shtokavian (Ijekavian speech) is spoken mostly by Montenegrins, Bosnian Muslims (Bosniaks) and Serbs. Bosnian-West Herzegovina-Dalmatian Shtokavian (Ikavian speech) is spoken exclusively by Croats. Dubrovnik Shtokavian (Ijekavian speech) was in past an individual, today is more similar with East Herzegovina Shtokavian (but still has its "specialties"). East Herzegovina Shtokavian (Ijekavian) is spoken by the Serbs, Bosnian Muslims (Bosniaks), Montenegrins and Croats. Vojvodina-Šumadija Shtokavian (Ekavian speech) is spoken exclusively by the Serbs. Torlakian dialect doesn't belong to this group. In fact, this is a ...interdialect, transitional from Serb language to Bulgarian and Macedonian language. Exclusively spoken by Serbs. There's a small enclave of Croats in Romania that speaks with this dialect, but that doesn't change the picture, that's the dialect of Serb language. So, you see, it's not the case that "Croatian is just a dialect."
If you don't understand linguistic matters, as it is obviuos case, than, please, don't mess. Deal with relations of Spanish, Gallego and Portuguese. Why don't you have b*lls to provocate Portuguese with "they are a Spanish dialect, that's a linguistic reality".
Calling Croatian as part of "Serbocroatian" IS an heavy insult for Croats.
Or you think that you're more Croat than Croats themselves?
My behaviour "can be considered an insult for some people"? Whome, child? I only disturb someone's fake world built on lies.
With that what I've done on that category, I can show that to anyone in Croatia and walk freely. But with that what you've done to that category, if you show that to anyone in Croatia or Croat-inhabited areas in Bosnia and Herzegovina, you won't be to able to walk freely there, without thinking what really bad may happen to you.
Gaudio, think twice before you write something. Kubura 18:49, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to speak a language to know about its history, and the category was created because there were fims categorisied as Serbo-Croatian language films directly. Gaudio 18:22, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're not getting me, Gaudio.
Maybe such matters aren't insulting for Galicians and Portuguese (I know very well that they belong to the same group). You still haven't told me what would Portuguese say if someone call them as Spanish-speaking? And call their language as Spanish (because it developed from an vulgarized dialect of Spanish)? I would NEVER call Portuguese language as Spanish, neither put it in a category "Spanish languages".
Let's return to the original subject, calling Croatian language as "Serbocroat" is a heavy insult for Croats.
Point is, the term is heavily compromised, because under that term was hidden greaterserbian language policy, policy against independent development and existence of Croatian language. That policy was the policy of violent merging of two languages, at the expense of Croatian (there's a lot about that on the main and talk pages of Differences between Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian standard languages, as well as on the same pages of respective languages).
Because of that, the term "Serbocroatian" isn't in use in linguistics (to be correct, it is in process of abandoning).
For that diasystem, the other term is proposed "Central South Slavic diasystem" (by academic Brozović).
If you look better, here on Wikipedia, we don't use the template "Serbocroatian languages and dialects".
We have template "Central South Slavic languages and dialects", Template:Southslavlang). No user (speaker of those languages) objected to that. Neither Croat, neither Serb, neither Bosniak (Bos. Muslim), neither Montenegrin.
Why are you making problems now?
Further: if you think that categorisation is problem, you're wrong.
Then, why don't you put Dutch-language films into German-language films, because Dutch language is form of Lower German? Or why don't you put the Hindi-language films and Urdu-language films into Hindi-Urdu language films category? Or, why don't you put Galician and Portuguese in Spanish-language films?
Why don't you try to provocate speakers of those languages?
Next thing. In Yugoslavia, it was never the case that Croatian language movies could be categorised as "Serbocroatian". NEVER.
Croatian language in Yugoslavia had official name as "Croatian" (hrvatski) and "Croatian or Serbian" ("hrvatski ili srpski", from 1973.-1990.). NEVER "Serbocroatian".
Serbian language in Yugoslavia never had such designation. Serbian was called "Serbocroatian" (I don't know if they used solely "Serbian").
So, you are the one that does not care about encyclopaedic information. You are the one that push stereotypes. You are making the problems there, where shouldn't be any.
At last. Category is "films by language", not "films by diasystems", "films by languagegroups", etc.. Kubura 12:02, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well first of all, Dutch and German are two different languages, Spanish and Portuguese too, but Hindi and Urdu are basicly the same language, Hindi is written in Devanagari, Urdu with the Arabic system; Hindi takes some of its vocabulary from Sanskrit and Urdu from Persian or Arabian, but you are right Hindi and Urdu are the same language. The problem with Serbo-Croatian-language films is that there are some films categorised directly like that.

With all those commentaries, you're proving that you have no idea about languages. If you consider the whole Europe, for instance, you can realise that in the zones of every language, you see lots of resemblances. If you consider the development of French, for example, you can see that, as in German, French is also a created language from several linguistic realities in France (langues d'oïl, langues d'oc). I'm sure that there must be studies which deal with geography and changes from dialect to language, and of course I know that almost every language name is based on political issues, but the problem with that category in concrete is that there are films categorised as Serbo-Croatian-language films.

And if you had investigated a little bit more, you could have realised that there are some categories which include several languages in the same category, such as Chinese-language-films, a Mandarin speaker does not understand Cantonese for instance, if s/he has not learnt that language. Gaudio 08:56, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Muchisimus gracias!

Thanks so much for entering the Tibetan script in the boxes for some of the Dalai Lamas. Would it be possible to do the same for the Panchen Lamas, if and when you have time? I have been trying to get Tibetan script running on my machine with very limited success - so I really appreciate the help. Do you know of the easiest way for me to enter Tibetan script - I am running Windows XP and Office 2003?

Buena suerte,

Hasta luego! John Hill 09:46, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Muchisimus gracias otra vez! Thanks so much for all the useful info you have posted on my Talk page - I was aware of (and using) some of it already - but there is new info there for me to follow up on. Please excuse me for not writing to you in Spanish. Although I spoke it fluently when I was young, and love the language, I am really out of practice after living in Australia most of the time since 1964. I speak it haltingly now and cannot write it well at all, but I can still read and enjoy it (with a dictionary to hand for the odd word). Hasta la vista! John Hill 23:03, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cornelis de Heem

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Cornelis de Heem, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Cornelis de Heem. — alex.muller (talk • edits) 17:12, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sophie Costa

Hi, I can't find any sources online for the Sophie Costa article, which you created in 2006. The article itself makes no claim that the artist is significant, or has even exhibited anywhere. Do you have access to any sources yourself? --Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 10:39, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've prodded the article.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 09:27, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The prod was contested so I've taken the article to AfD. Please comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophie Costa. Thanks,--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 17:48, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

English clarity

Hola! You wrote in Isabel Coixet: "She has worked as a journalist and for spots besides".

This is not a proper thought. Is "Spots" a company? Spots, S.p.A.? Does this means she cleaned up spots in the carpet? You need to write in an encyclopedic manner, not in abbreveated slang. What exactly did she do?

Thanks, 207.69.139.138 (talk) 18:35, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of David C. Roy

A tag has been placed on David C. Roy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Millbrooky (talk) 19:41, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Erica Eyres

A tag has been placed on Erica Eyres requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Clubmarx (talk) 01:39, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Abdelkader Benchamma

A tag has been placed on Abdelkader Benchamma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. [roux » x] 05:16, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Responses

It's a pity you guys don't give enough time to complete or enlarge these articles. A short article is not irrelevant just for being short. These peole are not obviously as famous as Britney Spears, for instance. But that doesn't mean that they are not famous at all, or that they have made nothing during their professional careers. Gaudio (talk) 15:07, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Rex Lee Jim

A tag has been placed on Rex Lee Jim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mblumber (talk) 01:49, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Extremaduran explorers and conquistadores

Category:Extremaduran explorers and conquistadores, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 13:10, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yves De Wolf-Clément

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Yves De Wolf-Clément, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

"This article appears to be totally unreferenced biography of a living person. Please remove this tag only if you can provide at lest one source AND you believe the subject to be otherwise encyclopedic"

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Scott Mac (Doc) 10:30, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Yves De Wolf-Clément

I have nominated Yves De Wolf-Clément, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yves De Wolf-Clément. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Scott Mac (Doc) 21:50, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nicasio Safadi

A tag has been placed on Nicasio Safadi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Bonewah (talk) 15:54, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Nicasio Safadi

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created, as you did with Nicasio Safadi. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

1. Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
2. Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 15:59, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you put this tag?

Removing Speedy at Nicasio Safadi

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Nicasio Safadi. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 16:00, 10 June 2009 (UTC) I'm not removing the tag[reply]

Listas

Hi there. I've noticed you've changed the listas on Basil and Damian D'Oliveira's pages to the fomat Oliveira, Basil D'. Surely this would put them in the O's when listed rather than the D's as one would expect. Was that intentional? Is that how its meant to be done? --LiamE (talk) 10:41, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Liam :)

In theory, in order to classify people with these family names, you have to ignore the particles meaning of, such as van, von in Dutch or German (Gogh, Vincent van) or de, d', di in Romance languages like Spanish, Catalan or Italian (Ors, Eugeni d'; Vinci, Leornardo da; Velázquez, Diego de); but you're right, this can be very confused, and there also classifications considering these particles, besides, sometimes they start with a capital letter in some places Otto Von Bismarck*, when this is wrong, it's Otto von Bismarck, but you write Von Bismarck when you omit the given name, so if you like the previous classification, you can revert my change :) Gaudio (talk) 18:43, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. I'll try and get a concensus at the cricket project page as to whether people expect them to be listed as D's or O's. --LiamE (talk) 19:08, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know the guys that reponded over at WP:Cricket thought D was they way to do and perhaps more importantly that Wisden lists them as D's so I'll make the changes based on that. --LiamE (talk) 21:53, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maciunas and art dealing

Intrigued to know your reasoning to include George Maciunas as an art dealer. Not exactly an everyday example of the category, since he consistently denounced professional artists and abhorred traditional art objects. Comments? Franciselliott (talk) 19:37, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I found that categorisation in other wikipedias, I overread the article, and he could be categorised as an art dealer, but if you think he should be in a different category, or at least not in the category of art dealers, you can erase those categories in the different wikipedias :).Gaudio (talk) 14:12, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it either implies Maciunas 'dealt' in Fluxus (which he sort of did, but not in a profitable way like, say, Pierre Matisse), or was a dealer on the side (which he definitely wasn't). The original gallery he ran had been set up to put on performances and non-saleable work, whilst he tried to make a living selling antique musical instruments and exotic canned food, and anyway it went bust within a few months forcing him to leave the country to escape creditors. I think he should simply remain in the category:artist, albeit an unusual one. Franciselliott (talk) 12:35, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Amado Hernandez

Amado V. Hernandez is a Filipino, and he was born after Spanish regime (he was born 1903) in Philippine history, so the orthography of his name must be Amado Hernandez, not Hernández. Here is your 2006 edit. You never mentioned then why you did such move, especially that it is against the Filipino naming convention on manual of style.--JL 09^Talk to me! 15:01, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, in theory it's Hernández because it's a Spanish family name as you can see here [4], Hernandez changes the whole stressing of the word, but if you think it should be without the accent, you can revert what I did, and if you are not an administrator, you can copy the whole article with accent, correct the accent, and paste it all in the first article, you can redirect the article created while moving, so that the article can't be moved again.

Violeta Luna

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Violeta Luna. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:11, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Carmen Berenguer

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Carmen Berenguer. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:11, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kelly Joyce

A tag has been placed on Kelly Joyce requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 15:58, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Kelly Joyce

Hi there Gaudio! I saw that you added a {{hangon}} tag to a page which you created, Kelly Joyce. This is good, but in the process you removed the tag requesting deletion under CSD A7. Even though there is a hangon on the page, the deletion template should remain there. But don't worry, this doesn't mean that the page is going to get deleted. Make sure you edit the talk page of the page nominated for deletion, located at Talk:Kelly Joyce, administrators will look at your reason why the page should remain before they decide what to do. Thanks - SDPatrolBot (talk) 16:05, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Gaudio! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 50 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Almudena Grandes - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Candela Peña - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Francisco Massiani - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Piedad Bonnett - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Myriam Moscona - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Ward de Ravet - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. Belén Dreik - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
8. Óscar Acosta - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
9. Ferrán Marín Ramos - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
10. Roger Foulon - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...

11. Jean-Baptiste Baronian 12. Eva Lallemant 13. Iker Jiménez 14. Mora Torres 15. Antonio Orozco 16. Jorge Fons 17. Álvaro Urquijo 18. Marc Quaghebeur 19. Clara Janés 20. Amparo Llanos 21. Cristina Llanos 22. Marta Botía 23. Marilia Andrés Casares 24. Marie-Mathilde Ducatillon-Sauthier 25. María Jiménez 26. Anna Lizaran 27. Ariel Wizman 28. Giselda Leirner 29. Ana Paula Ribeiro Tavares 30. Maria Teresa Horta 31. Brígida Baltar 32. Fernando Schwartz 33. Nacho Cano 34. Chen Ran 35. Cristina Almeida 36. René Froger 37. Kossi Efoui 38. Soledad Fariña Vicuña 39. Vassilis Alexakis 40. Nadya Larouche 41. Donald Alarie 42. Ana Tena 43. Arianna Puello 44. Nina (singer) 45. Lilia Merodio Reza 46. Cayetana Guillén Cuervo 47. Usun Yoon 48. Sahara Sunday Spain 49. Maravillas Rojo 50. Ángela Vallvey

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:03, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ya Ding

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Ya Ding. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:14, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gattaca and Esperanto

Hello Gaudio. Your comments would be appreciated on the Talk:Gattaca page in light of question about Gattaca and Esperanto. Thank you. --Loremaster (talk) 21:22, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Loremaster, according to IMDb and other websites, that film has parts in Esperanto. I think they speak in that language in the PA system or something like that of some parts of the movie, but I can't remember, I saw that film a long, long, long time ago :)

María Inés Falconi

I notice that this page is lacking reliable third-party references, which also should be in English. I've added one in Spanish but that really isn't adequate. I notice that you have, in the past, contributed to the page (did you create it?). Could you help by expanding the article and getting it properly referenced, please?--Plad2 (talk) 07:23, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Plad2, yes, I created it, but I saw some people have expanded the article. You're right, the references should be in English in this Wikipedia, but if you find some good references in other languages, you can add them too. :)Gaudio (talk) 14:25, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding but I realise that I have not made myself clear. I could only find references in Spanish. As it stands, the article might end up being proposed for deletion due to the lack of sources. It seems to me that you are more likely to be able to rescue the article than I a) because you have an interest in the subject and b) because you can read Spanish.--Plad2 (talk) 16:44, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Plad2, English is not the only language in the world, if the references are only in Spanish, that means that the references are in Spanish, not that there are no references. And nowadays, you can also use translators if you are interested in the references of that article. Here, you can find articles with references in other languages, for instance ([5] Victor Hugo) with references in both French and English, and that doesn't mean that the French references are useless here. I really think that that's one of the aims of Wikipedia, making something which is in a different language available to everybody, no matter which language s/he can speak.Gaudio (talk) 17:01, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Antonio Machín

Your redirction to Antonio Machín, which is fine by me, seems to have left out the complete list of contributors, possibly because you did the redirect by blanking. I know I added the references and much of the material between 1998 to 1999, when I was editing Moisés Simons. No history of this remains on the page. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:18, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Macdonald-ross, I'm sorry for being this late but I'm very busy. Your contributions are not erased. Sometimes, when you redirect pages you have that problem, but you can find all your contributions in Antonio Machin and Moises Simons, the articles without accents in this case :) Gaudio (talk) 13:11, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amparo Llanos

The article Amparo Llanos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP, fails WP:ARTIST

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 12:23, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ana Tena

The article Ana Tena has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP, fails WP:ARTIST

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 12:26, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cayetana Guillén Cuervo

The article Cayetana Guillén Cuervo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP, August 2009

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 14:15, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clara Janés

The article Clara Janés has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP, August 2009

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 14:18, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cristina Llanos

The article Cristina Llanos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP, May 2009, fails WP:MUSICBIO

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 14:25, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fernando Schwartz

The article Fernando Schwartz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP, June 2009

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 15:08, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ferrán Marín Ramos

The article Ferrán Marín Ramos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP, may fail WP:AUTHOR

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 15:20, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Iker Jiménez

The article Iker Jiménez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP, September 2009, may fail WP:BIO

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 15:57, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Isabel-Clara Simó

The article Isabel-Clara Simó has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP, June 2010

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 16:00, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Josep Guijarro

The article Josep Guijarro has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP, February 2010

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 16:26, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Bona Mangangu

I have nominated Bona Mangangu, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bona Mangangu. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fæ (talk) 10:26, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Núria Albó

The article Núria Albó has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, notability therefore unclear

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SlimVirgin ^talk|contribs 03:19, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eva Lallemant

The article Eva Lallemant has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:CREATIVE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anneyh (talk) 15:12, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Benozzo di Filipuccio

The article Benozzo di Filipuccio has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It looks like this painter has never existed; no relevant results in Google nor in Google Books (apparently, everything comes from Wikipedia); already deleted today on es:

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Orlodrim (talk) 19:18, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Leoncio Evita Enoy

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Leoncio Evita Enoy, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.litencyc.com/php/speople.php?rec=true&UID=12835.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:47, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aminta Buenaño

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Aminta Buenaño. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jenny Estrada

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Jenny Estrada. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Glecia Bear

The article Glecia Bear has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Poorly sourced BLP for well over three years. Prove notability or delete.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 07:55, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Florencia Abbate

The article Florencia Abbate has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mhiji 03:13, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bart Santana

The article Bart Santana has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. --Non-Dropframe _talk 19:19, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Karina Jordán

The article Karina Jordán has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Logan _Talk ^Contributions 22:33, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carla Ortiz

The article Carla Ortiz has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Logan _Talk ^Contributions 22:47, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Carla Ortiz

Right from the first version you created, this article says she was born in both 1976 and 1985! Could you sort it out, please? PamD (talk) 09:51, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, PamD, yes, it seems some people have many birthdays, according to IMDb and other links she was born in 1976, the other link says she moved to L.A. Gaudio (talk) 10:15, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Broken links when you added accents to Juan T. Vazquez Martin

Please Gaudio undo the change you did to Juan T. Vázquez Martín page. It has created broken links on a significant number of sites which have been using Wikipedia as trusting source of information on this important Cuban artist. Also some of my friends from all over the world has told me they can not find it until I help them to. It would be difficult or impossible to fix this situation contacting the sites one by one or help the public on this; better to bring back the page as it was and written in English. It is nice to collaborate together to become Wikipedia in the best World Encyclopedia possible and easy to use by everybody from any computer and system they have. Thanks, Mercuba (talk) 02:41, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mercuba, there are no broken links, just redirections, and <<Vázquez Martín>> is the correct accentuation in Spanish :)

Nomination of Marie-Mathilde Ducatillon-Sauthier for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marie-Mathilde Ducatillon-Sauthier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marie-Mathilde Ducatillon-Sauthier until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. joe decker^talk to me 19:46, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Adelbert-von-Chamisso-Award

I left you a question. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 18:22, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Drmies, they are like co-prizes Gaudio (talk) 18:26, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain that in the article? The German article has some more info but I didn't read all of it. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 18:37, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I've been thinking,...I could say that the promotion p. is to promote a writer, and the honor p. is to give a tribute or honor to someone, but since 'definitum in definitione ingredi non debet' I'm sure you could explain it much better than me :)Gaudio (talk) 18:49, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Irene Escolar

The article Irene Escolar has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jezhotwells (talk) 05:52, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't link dates

Hallo, you've recently created Lina Morgenstern and Doris Runge, in both of which you linked their birth and death dates (and another date in one of them). Please don't: it's against WP:MOSNUM and just makes work for other editors de-linking them. Thanks. PamD 11:41, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And you're still doing it as at Dhoodaan. Please stop. PamD 08:37, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Samadhi Zendejas

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Samadhi Zendejas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Pesky (talk …stalk!) 08:39, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of María Carámbula

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on María Carámbula requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Pesky (talk …stalk!) 08:41, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fernando Andina

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fernando Andina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Pesky (talk …stalk!) 09:08, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cristina Umaña

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cristina Umaña requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Pesky (talk …stalk!) 09:45, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Luz María Aguilar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Luz María Aguilar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Pesky (talk …stalk!) 09:47, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anastasia Acosta

The article Anastasia Acosta has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.  Mbinebri  ^talk ← 13:11, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suri Cruise (2nd nomination)

Hello. You previously voted in the 2006 AfD for Suri Cruise. At the time, Suri was less than 10 days old, and the ultimate verdict was to turn the article into a redirect to her mother's page.

Since then, Suri has become much more notable in her own right as a toddler fashion icon, with over 13 million hits on google image search. After getting an administrator to lift the protection on the redirect, I recently restored the article as a stub, but an editor who believes that "6 year olds are not inherently notable" has again requested deletion.

If it's not too much trouble, I'd appreciate your making your opinion known at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suri Cruise (2nd nomination) Warren Dew (talk) 07:38, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Auður Ava Ólafsdóttir

The article Auður Ava Ólafsdóttir has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Gaijin42 (talk) 15:34, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nuray Lale

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nuray Lale requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JoelWhy (talk) 12:54, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Canan Topçu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Canan Topçu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JoelWhy (talk) 12:58, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Zeller

Please get back to this article and sort out the templates which are producing error messages. It's a good idea to at least have a quick look at every stub you produce, after you've hit "Save", so that you can fix things immediately. Thanks. PamD 16:10, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And please decide which of the three spellings you intend: "Zeller" as in title, "Zeiler" as in lead, or "Zelier" as in the defaultsort and persondata! PamD 16:15, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Make that four spellings: the problematic ADB template seems to use Zellier! PamD 16:17, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And also, please remember when creating an article that the {{stub}} template should go at the end, after everything except inter-language links (see WP:ORDER). If it's in the right place it makes life easier for stub-sorters and makes it less likely that someone will accidentally add a subject specific stub tag and not remove the general one. Thanks. PamD 16:27, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Canan Topçu

Please take the time to make sure that your articles are in English, even if you have copied them from other Wikipedias. Here you have a section heading "Referencias" and the bibliography is annotated in German ("Essay von Canan Topçu auf dem Internetportal Qantara.de vom 2. Juni 2005 (abgerufen am 28. Januar 2009)."). Rather than bulk-create low-quality stubs, please slow down and take more care. Thanks. PamD 16:41, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And please clarify the "External links" section: do you mean that this article includes material from the German WP article and also, as a separate EL, the link to the article in Perlentauch? If so, put them on separate lines and expand the ref to Perlentauch. It's very confusing at present. PamD 16:51, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Güney Dal

The Perlentaucher ref here was to the wrong person. Thanks for your note on my talk page... but the rest of us shouldn't have to clean up after you, you should not be creating such messy stubs (with odd bits of German thrown in, a whole lot of "Turish-German" (no "k") writers, and so on. I'm doing some cleanup while stub-sorting, others have probably slipped by, but please try to get it right at the start. Thanks. PamD 15:13, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Antoni Bal•lero

The article Antoni Bal•lero has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. joe decker^talk to me 02:55, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Antoni Serra Serra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Palma

Dele Charley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Londres

Joan de Girgio Vitelli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Roma

Onofre Pratdesaba (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Roma

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Şadi Üçüncü

Don't link dates. If you're creating articles by using some copying technique or template which gives you linked dates, then unlink the dates. We've discussed this before - please stop adding wrongly formatted stuff to the encyclopedia. Thanks. PamD 07:51, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pam, no, it's not coying...I thought it was the best way to put external links, because templates can change in all wikipedias...Gaudio (talk) 07:58, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you mean: do you mean that although you know it's against WP:MOSNUM to link dates, you do so because the rules might change some time? PamD 08:28, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, I mean that templates related to external links can change in the different wikipedias, so, in this case, I put directly a link without its template. But I have already changed it to English-language Wikipedia template related to DNB :)

The dates I was referring to were the dates of birth and death in the lead sentence. PamD 13:45, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Árpád Berczik

or Berczik Árpád? Please clarify in this article. PamD 08:20, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hungarian people usually put their family names before their names [6]Gaudio (talk) 08:52, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discrepancy between article title and start of text is confusing for the non-Hungarian reader of English Wikipedia. Please make clear which is the family name and which is the given name. The article title ought to be in Western order: "With Hungarian names, use Western name order (given name before surname)." from Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(people)#People_from_countries_where_the_surname_comes_first. And the name in the "PERSONDATA" is totally wrong, just to confuse further. PamD 13:56, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Krzysztof Rymszewicz

The article Krzysztof Rymszewicz has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Scopecreep (talk) 10:36, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. When you recently edited Rossend Perelló, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montblanc (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Murat Kaya (writer)

Please remember that if you create an article like this you need to provide a way for people to find it. In this case, a "hatnote" at Murat Kaya: in other cases an entry on a disambiguation page. I've added the hatnote, but it shouldn't be left to a stub-sorter to spot the gap and add the hatnote. PamD 13:39, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Krzysztof Kłosek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to From the Inside and Killjoy

Roc Llop i Convalia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to CNT and Gusen

Murat Kaya (writer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to MAD

Zbigniew Fil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to TVN

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hüseyin Şimşek

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Hüseyin Şimşek. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hüseyin Şimşek

The article Hüseyin Şimşek has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. joe decker^talk to me 03:57, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mauro Garofalo

The article Mauro Garofalo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, only ext link is his own website, no reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 10:22, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mauro Garofalo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mauro Garofalo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – hysteria18 (talk) 01:40, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please slow down and take more care - Hüdai Ülker

While stub-sorting I was puzzled to see this chap sorting under "B": you'd left someone else's name in his "DEFAULTSORT". The sentence "Since 1985, he's the Berlin's member of the Verband deutscher Schriftsteller (VS)" doesn't really make sense, certainly isn't good English. At the end there's a muddle where the line about German Wikipedia is muddled with the External link to the author's home page (which needs to be labelled in English, please, not German).

In short, please slow down and produce better quality stubs, rather than just a massive quantity of them. Thanks. PamD 19:55, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Atto I for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Atto I is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atto I until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Hahc21 ^[TALK][CONTRIBS] 00:10, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Defaultsorts on footballers

Hi there Gaudio, AL from Portugal here,

This subject has been discussed at length in the football forums and indeed, these guys (i suppose it can happen too in other sports) have a twist to them that has to be taken into consideration. Take for example Jacobo Sanz Ovejero: he's known in his "world" as JACOBO, not SANZ or OVEJERO, so he has to be ordered under the letter "J", not "S" nor "O".

Attentively, happy week - --AL (talk) 23:31, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ninomiya Masayuki

The article Ninomiya Masayuki has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

A list of works is not a list of reliable references

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. G. C. Hood (talk) 03:10, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of María Jesús Nieto for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article María Jesús Nieto is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/María Jesús Nieto until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 22:17, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pio_Chiaruzzi

Hello, Gaudio. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Pio_Chiaruzzi, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Pio_Chiaruzzi to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you need help doing so, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Itemirus^Message me! 13:31, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pio_Chiaruzzi

Hello, Gaudio. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Pio_Chiaruzzi, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Pio_Chiaruzzi to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you need help doing so, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Itemirus^Message me! 14:10, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing tags

You should not remove a proposed deletion tag if you do not provide reliable sources. The source you indicated is not reliable as it is a primary source directly affiliated with the subject; anyway it does not include any reference to the Mr. Chiaruzzi. Also the article can be proposed for deletion as it does not meet the general notability guideline. --Itemirus^Message me! 14:12, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I did not do it on porpuse. I put everything in a Word document and when I copied and pasted the text, the tag disapeared.Gaudio (talk) 19:50, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zvi Yanai

Firstly, please take more care with your editing: you had him born in both 1935 and 1952, and you added the redlinked category Category:Israeli writters. Please slow down and take a moment to look at what you've added to the encyclopedia before moving on.

Secondly, please tell us something about what this man writes about: translate his titles into English - it's the English Wikipedia. Or at least tell us whether he writes about politics, cookery, romantic fiction, or what. Thanks. PamD 19:11, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marta Repullo

The article Marta Repullo has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:05, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alfonso Clemente de Aróstegui (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cuenca

Basilio Zanchi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Canon

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nadia Cavalera

Thanks for creating this article. It's been tagged for notability for 5 years now. Could you look it over, see if you think it meets WP:NOTABILITY and see if you can improve it? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 13:26, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pablito de Cádiz

The article Pablito de Cádiz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP, notability has not been established

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Patchy1 REF THIS BLP 06:25, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Carles Cases

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Carles Cases requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Epeefleche (talk) 02:43, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elisabeth Axmann

The article Elisabeth Axmann has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article contains no references

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AlanS (talk) 10:34, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Brina Svit

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Brina Svit requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Forbidden User (talk) 12:14, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nadia Cavalera for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nadia Cavalera is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadia Cavalera until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 20:15, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maria Rybakova, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The New Times. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:09, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DPL, I don't know if you're telling me that as a human being or as a robot, anyway I'm replying you:

As you could see I had problems with some parts of that article and I didn't know how to mend them, so thank you :)

Bye Gaudio (talk) 16:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hōmei Iwano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Awaji. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shigeko Yuki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kobo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thanks, it was not Kobo, but Kobe...Gaudio (talk) 15:14, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gaspard Musabyimana

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gaspard Musabyimana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or an organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --Finngall ^talk 21:34, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lorenzo Mediano

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lorenzo Mediano, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.lorenzomediano.es/obras_indice.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:09, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lorenzo Mediano

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lorenzo Mediano, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of lorenzomediano.es/obras_indice.html. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

  If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Compassionate727 (talk) 15:00, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gianluca Ferraris

added a link pointing to Master

List of songs about cities

added a link pointing to Jewel

Para todos la Dos

added a link pointing to Consume

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the informationGaudio (talk) 09:22, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information again. I'm going to be busy; but I'm going to check if I can vote. Gaudio (talk) 09:23, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gaudio. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Asuka Fujimori for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asuka Fujimori is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asuka Fujimori until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 07:07, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Denis Henriquez

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Denis Henriquez requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —Non-Dropframe _talk 18:44, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ¿Y cómo es él?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Por Amor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you're welcome! I think I've just mended it. Anyway, I found that song in other articles, and maybe it has to be renamed…Gaudio (talk) 10:51, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Auguste Daum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nancy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jacques Grüber, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daum. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zsolt Hauber, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paino. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, sorry it was actually "piano", the instrument, but I have already corrected it.Gaudio (talk) 08:15, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andrea D'Angelo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrea D'Angelo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea D'Angelo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DrStrauss talk 18:55, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Luz María Aguilar

The article Luz María Aguilar has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Α Guy into Books™ § (Message) -  13:06, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gunnel Ahlin

The article Gunnel Ahlin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insufficient content, context and references

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Atlantic306 (talk) 01:07, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fabio McNamara

The article Fabio McNamara has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ravenswing 11:52, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Gaudio. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Maj-Britt Bæhrendtz

Hi, I'm Babymissfortune. Gaudio, thanks for creating Maj-Britt Bæhrendtz!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Could you possibly find more sources?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Merry Christmas! ^Babymissfortune 11:30, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nicholas Verrall

The article Nicholas Verrall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ARTIST and [{WP:GNG]] notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - MrX 22:48, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jef Friboulet for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jef Friboulet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jef Friboulet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theredproject (talk) 23:45, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Paolo Cognetti

Hi, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. Gaudio, thanks for creating Paolo Cognetti!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add references with in-depth coverage about the subject from independent reliable sources to the article to meet our verifiability and notablility requirements.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 10:36, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, he's lo scrittore del momento della letteratura italiana, you can find many references, sources or videos…For instance there is a recent interview in "Página 2", a program of RTVE [I guess, you can check it easily in RTVE A LA CARTA], it's nice, you can see how he is, although the conductor makes a little big spoiler of his last novel.Gaudio (talk) 18:01, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vee F. Browne

The article Vee F. Browne has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unef blp. I couldn't establish that it meets WP:NOTABILITY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:08, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sylvestre Simon Samb for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sylvestre Simon Samb is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sylvestre Simon Samb until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:35, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Gaudio. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm busy, but I'll check it later, thanks :) Gaudio (talk) 11:59, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jamila Abitar

Hello, Gaudio,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you:-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Jamila Abitar, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept, either in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. At any case, please consider improving the page to address the issues raised or it may be deleted later anyway.

If you have any questions, leave a comment here and ping me.

Onel5969 ^TT me 14:52, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jamila Abitar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jamila Abitar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamila Abitar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^TT me 11:13, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Beret (singer)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Beret (singer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. noq (talk) 12:16, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Patrick Ilboudo

Hello, Gaudio,

Thanks for creating Patrick Ilboudo! I edit here too, under the username Citrivescence and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This page needs more in-text citations. Thank you!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Citrivescence}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Citrivescence (talk) 04:13, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Arnaud de Comps moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Arnaud de Comps, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 08:33, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of stubs with questionable notability and/or sourcing

Hi Gaudio. From the articles by you currently in Special:NewPagesFeed and the long-standing series of messages on this talk page, a number of the articles you create don't clearly show how the subjects meet any kind of notability guideline, whether the general WP:GNG or a subject-specific one such as WP:CREATIVE. This does not mean that they may not be notable, but even in stub form, an article should very clearly state the credible claims of significance which make the subject notable in their field rather than being WP:RUNOFTHEMILL (there are lots of singers, sculptors, writers, etc, but what significant critical attention have these ones received). It's a waste of everybody's time -- yours, reviewer(s), and admin -- for articles to be speedy deleted as WP:A7. At best, it's inconsiderate to throw a single-source sub-stub into mainspace for one or more reviewers to try to puzzle out how to deal with it -- whether tagging, proposing it for deletion, or fixing up so that notability is clear(er). As a suggestion: Ensure each article uses (at least) three different reliable sources for at least three different sentences/examples. As a start, I have moved the following pages to draftspace: Draft:Sándor Svéd, Draft:Jules Déchin, Draft:Guillaume Bruère, Draft:Wilhelm Georg Dettmer. The first three were unquestionably WP:A7 deletion candidates. The last made what might be a weak claim of significance, but this did not appear to be supported by the reference. I also draftified Draft:Arnaud de Comps, Draft:Armengol de Aspa, and Draft:Gastone de Murols, all of which would appear to be notable, but all of which do not appear to be covered by their shared source[7]. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 08:38, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Armengol de Aspa has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Armengol de Aspa. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 06:27, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mercè Company

The article Mercè Company has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ツStacey (talk) 15:13, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Olga Flor

Hello, Gaudio,

Thanks for creating Olga Flor! I edit here too, under the username MurielMary and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Thanks for creating the article on Olga Flor; please add some more references to it. If you need help with this, you can ask at the Teahouse. Happy editing!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MurielMary}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MurielMary (talk) 10:03, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Yosef Levi-Sfari

Hello, Gaudio,

Thanks for creating Yosef Levi-Sfari! I edit here too, under the username MurielMary and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Thanks for creating this article. Can you add more references? One isn't really enough for a WP biography. You can ask at the Teahouse if you need help to do this. All the best!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MurielMary}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MurielMary (talk) 11:44, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gianluca Ferraris

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gianluca Ferraris requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:00, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Antoni Ballero

The article Antoni Ballero has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. --SacredDragonX (talk) 20:41, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jules Déchin concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jules Déchin, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:39, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Armengol de Aspa concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Armengol de Aspa, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:40, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Arnaud de Comps concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Arnaud de Comps, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:58, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Wilhelm Georg Dettmer concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Wilhelm Georg Dettmer, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:06, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sándor Svéd concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sándor Svéd, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:07, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Gastone de Murols concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Gastone de Murols, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:10, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gioacchino Criaco

The article Gioacchino Criaco has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. Sources are two promotional blurbs and a book review. The it.WP article's sources are all broken links, promotional, or personal blogs.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Scott Burley (talk) 16:47, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Renate Habinger

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Renate Habinger requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 大诺史 (talk) 08:17, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yusuf Kadel

The article Yusuf Kadel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems to fail WP:GNG, with no evidence of notability except an award that doesn't seem enough for WP:ANYBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — MarkH21 (talk) 08:44, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lorenzo Caprile

The article Lorenzo Caprile has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability by WP:GNG, WP:NARTIST, or WP:ANYBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — MarkH21 (talk) 08:45, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rossana Balduzzi Gastini

The article Rossana Balduzzi Gastini has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability via WP:GNG or WP:NAUTHOR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — MarkH21 (talk) 08:46, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fanny Bergenström

The article Fanny Bergenström has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability by WP:GNG or anything else.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — MarkH21 (talk) 08:47, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carmen Guaita

The article Carmen Guaita has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability by WP:GNG or WP:NAUTHOR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — MarkH21 (talk) 08:48, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ali Shogentsukov

The article Ali Shogentsukov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability by WP:GNG or any other guideline

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — MarkH21 (talk) 08:50, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Espérance-François Bulayumi

The article Espérance-François Bulayumi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of passing WP:GNG or WP:NAUTHOR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — MarkH21 (talk) 08:50, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Harti Kanukov

The article Harti Kanukov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nothing to suggest WP:GNG or WP:NAUTHOR notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — MarkH21 (talk) 08:51, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notability guidelines

Please review the notability guidelines here, which is how the English Wikipedia determines whether subjects merit articles. Many of the articles that you have created do not seem to be considered notable by the guidelines, as demonstrated by the number of deletion proposals for your created articles.

It might help to go through the articles for creation process, where another editor can help guide you through creating an article. You can create a draft and then submit it for creation!

Thanks in advance! — MarkH21 (talk) 08:54, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as you’ve created another several articles with only one or two sources, often without any suggestion of notability, please please show how a subject may be notable if you decide to send an article to Mainspace. — MarkH21 (talk) 06:24, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John Smelcer (writer)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on John Smelcer (writer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 16:54, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, have you checked if that person and this person ([8]) are the same person? Gaudio (talk)

Wolfgang Zdral moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Wolfgang Zdral, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^TT me 02:45, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fedor Chispiyakov

The article Fedor Chispiyakov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No secondary evidence of notability by WP:GNG or WP:NAUTHOR. The claim to being the “father of Shor language literature” only has a reference to the subject’s own work.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — MarkH21 (talk) 06:12, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Duduh Durahman

The article Duduh Durahman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of satisfying WP:GNG, whereas the only evidence for WP:AUTHOR/WP:NACTOR is only mildly suggested by a list of seemingly unmovable awards in the Sundanese wiki article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — MarkH21 (talk) 06:19, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gastone de Murols

Hello, Gaudio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gastone de Murols".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Catorce2016 (talk) 04:16, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pilar Mateos

The article Pilar Mateos has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Snowycats (talk) 08:28, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Azouz Statra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Azouz Statra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azouz Statra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rorshacma (talk) 01:44, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Armengol de Aspa concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Armengol de Aspa, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ch'aska Anka Ninawaman concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ch'aska Anka Ninawaman, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Konstantin Vasilioglu concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Konstantin Vasilioglu, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Winfried Opgenoorth concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Winfried Opgenoorth, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Habokok River concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Habokok River, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:41, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Wolfgang Zdral concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Wolfgang Zdral, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:41, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Gerda Anger-Schmidt concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Gerda Anger-Schmidt, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:43, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Zulfuqar Ahmadzoda concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Zulfuqar Ahmadzoda, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:43, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Zoltán Vásárhelyi concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Zoltán Vásárhelyi, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:45, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Vasily Ledkov concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Vasily Ledkov, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:47, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Olga Savary concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Olga Savary, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Etim Ėmin concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Etim Ėmin, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:44, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Armengol de Aspa

Hello, Gaudio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Armengol de Aspa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 14:12, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Wolfgang Zdral

Hello, Gaudio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wolfgang Zdral".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:43, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Winfried Opgenoorth

Hello, Gaudio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Winfried Opgenoorth".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:44, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vasily Ledkov

Hello, Gaudio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vasily Ledkov".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:45, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Konstantin Vasilioglu

Hello, Gaudio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Konstantin Vasilioglu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:46, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Habokok River

Hello, Gaudio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Habokok River".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:48, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lobé Ndiaye moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lobé Ndiaye, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sulfurboy (talk) 10:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Elandré

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Elandré requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Isingness (talk) 21:33, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Eva García Sáenz de Urturi

Hello Gaudio,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Eva García Sáenz de Urturi for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 03:53, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your page creations

Hi Gaudio.

Many (if not all) of your page creations are very very poorly sourced. WP:GNG requires evidence of significant coverage in reliable independent secondary sources. WP:THREE is a good practice when creating pages. To use your creations from 2 May as examples:

• Wladysław Szerner: Article makes no claims of notability (currently suggests WP:RUNOFTHEMILL). The two sources are effectively database information and provide no indication of notability - and at least one is probably unreliable given the biographical info links to pl-wiki. The pl-wiki article shows unclear but more likely notability by en-wiki standards. May meet WP:NCREATIVE if he appears in multiple significant collections, but that's not shown.
• Jos van Manen Pieters: It's entirely unclear that the Athos Award is a significant one (there were only three awardees back in the 1956-65). You have provided no sourcing to justify the contents of the Life section. The nl-wiki article is terribly sourced, and nor does it contain justification that her Tuinfluitertrilogie was actually successful.
• Elandré: Needs evidence of critical coverage of his music (WP:NMUSICIAN). Minor viral success is almost always insufficient for a full article (WP:SUSTAINED). Apple Music can't be used as sourcing except for track info. The other source maroelamedia.co.za fails WP:INDEPENDENT -- it's based on an interview (plus the site might not be sufficiently reliable -- there's no editor or staff writer list[9], but it does list its general contact address for corrections[10]).
• Eva García Sáenz de Urturi: Lecturalia appears to be user-editable, so unreliable. The El Mundo article is not fully independent. The article makes no claims of notability, and is an easy WP:A7 candidate in its current state. I have reviewed the es-wiki sources and those don't look sufficient either. What she needs is sufficient independent critical coverage of her works.

Please change your referencing habits when creating pages, and fix up those pages you have already created. You are not a new and inexperienced editor. It is inconsiderate to dump a poorly sourced sub-stub into mainspace for others to have to deal with. It is inconsiderate to not fix up your articles (particularly those draftified) to a suitable standard for them to clearly show that they do meet the notability bar. There should not be this many pages being draftified. There definitely should not be this many pages being deleted.

Would you please consider:

• voluntarily creating pages in WP:DRAFTSPACE; and
• submitting your pages through WP:AFC until your articles consistently pass through first time; and
• limiting the number of your creations stuck in draftspace at any one time to some small number
  

Alternatively you can just —just— do what is expected and create properly and substantially sourced pages in mainspace the way you should have been doing for more than a decade.
Alternatively you can be taken to WP:ANI with a request that your page creation rights be involuntarily restricted. Please don't choose this path. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 04:02, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Evgeny Vladimirovich Chetvergov

IMO, the article Nadja Vidije should be moved to Evgeny Vladimirovich Chetvergov. Nadja Vidije is not the transliteration auf Евгений Владимирович Четвергов nor Нуянь Видяз. Dont't find any sources to Nadja Vidije, it's only the Wikipedia in some western languages who call him Nadja Vidije. Look also at this WP-pages:

• "Евгений Владимирович Четверго́в (псевдоним — Нуянь Видяз)",
• "Четвергов Евгений Владимирович (псевдонимы — Нуянь Видяз)",
• "Нуянь Видяз (руз. Четвергов Евгений Владимирович)".

It seems that the versions in the western Wikipedias are only translations of this article in en:WP. I moved the article in de:WP to Jewgeni Wladimirowitsch Tschetwergow (Evgeny Vladimirovich Chetvergov), and made a redirect from Nujan Widjas (Nujan Vidjaz). The lemma Nadja Vidije should have been deleted. -- Sebastian Gasseng (talk) 09:06, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo,

Thank you for your message/Danke für ihre Nachricht

You're very kind and polite/Sie sind sehr nett und höflich

I saw the transliteration here [11], but I do agree with you & I was not very convinced with this letter conversion. I thought that maybe that transliteration could be explained because this writer writes in more languages than Russian, and that transliteration was in Erzya.

You guys have told me that even wrong common misspellings should be put in redirections, but if you know that that transliteration is very wrong, yes, it should be erased.

What can we/you do?/ Was können wir/Sie tun?

Well, I can tell you to put “bravely” all the information of the article in the now redirection page & put the information # redirect in the current article. But I think you should talk to an administrator better, administrators can do more things.Gaudio (talk) 07:33, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lobe Ndiaye

A tag has been placed on Lobe Ndiaye requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DannyS712 (talk) 17:43, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Guillaume Bruère

Hello, Gaudio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Guillaume Bruère".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 07:12, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gerda Anger-Schmidt

Hello, Gaudio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gerda Anger-Schmidt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:59, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ch'aska Anka Ninawaman

Hello, Gaudio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ch'aska Anka Ninawaman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:14, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Sílvia Marsó

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Sílvia Marsó to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Auric talk 21:45, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zulfuqar Ahmadzoda

Hello, Gaudio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zulfuqar Ahmadzoda".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:27, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teresa Aveleyra Sadowska moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Teresa Aveleyra Sadowska, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Jeans (writer) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Blue Jeans (writer), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^TT me 13:17, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zoltán Vásárhelyi

Hello, Gaudio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zoltán Vásárhelyi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 01:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lobé Ndiaye

Hello, Gaudio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lobé Ndiaye".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:24, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Etim Ėmin

Hello, Gaudio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Etim Ėmin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:14, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zdzisław Suchodolski moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Zdzisław Suchodolski, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^TT me 13:26, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I fixed this article and moved it back to mainspace. I found two more sources for it, and one was a dictonary of national biography, so he meets WP:ANYBIO. I found your talk page because I have been translating articles on French artists from fr.wikipedia.org. I see you have already translated many, so thank you!--- Possibly (talk) 01:50, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributuions. I'm not perfect, not an expert, and I guess this thing of drafting articles is a way to improve them or to complete them, so since you did, thank you.Gaudio (talk) 08:03, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Blue Jeans (writer)

Hello, Gaudio. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Blue Jeans (writer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:03, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wilfried Hochholdinger for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wilfried Hochholdinger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilfried Hochholdinger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Celestina007 (talk) 23:02, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Juliette Nothomb moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Juliette Nothomb, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^TT me 20:51, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Rousseau (composer) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Samuel Rousseau (composer), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^TT me 20:52, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Olga Savary

Hello, Gaudio. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Olga Savary, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Olga Savary

Hello, Gaudio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Olga Savary".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 15:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Etim Ėmin

Hello, Gaudio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Etim Ėmin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 09:53, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Modern Greek-language singers has been nominated for renaming

Category:Modern Greek-language singers has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 09:12, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dunia Ayaso and Félix Sabroso

The article Dunia Ayaso and Félix Sabroso has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:35, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Estonian-language singers

A tag has been placed on Category:Estonian-language singers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^Read! Talk! 17:39, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Almudena Grandes

On 28 November 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Almudena Grandes, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 17:53, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Namur (city) has been nominated for renaming

Category:Namur (city) has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 14:19, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Veronica Segura" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Veronica Segura and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 22#Veronica Segura until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:28, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wedding Days

The article Wedding Days has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM as no reviews were found pertaining to the actual film.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People by city or town in Costa Rica has been nominated for renaming

Category:People by city or town in Costa Rica has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 16:10, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People by city or town in the Gambia has been nominated for renaming

Category:People by city or town in the Gambia has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 16:13, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Xela Arias for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Xela Arias is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xela Arias until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Iljhgtn (talk) 15:56, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ferrán Marín Ramos for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ferrán Marín Ramos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ferrán Marín Ramos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn (talk) 16:35, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohamed Ahmed-Chamanga for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohamed Ahmed-Chamanga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohamed Ahmed-Chamanga until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

 // Timothy :: talk  15:01, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ginesa Ortega

The article Ginesa Ortega has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article, does not seem to meet notability criteria per WP:MUSICBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. InDimensional (talk) 16:00, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]