I would like to respectfully discuss the recent reversion of my contribution. The second paragraph of the "Corruption" section includes a claim that Sheikh Hasina and her family embezzled $5 billion from the project, as reported by Global Defense Corp. However, this article lacks credible evidence and citations, which raises significant questions about its reliability. Additionally, the Carnegie Endowment study does not mention Bangladesh, focusing instead on potential corruption in South Africa, which is why I removed the third paragraph. The final paragraph compares the costs of constructing nuclear power plants in China and Bangladesh, but this comparison may be irrelevant, as China has the necessary infrastructure, extensive experience, and a well-established domestic nuclear industry, having built more than eight reactors. It is also important to note that Rosatom did not secure the contract to build the entire plant in China like in Bangladesh. Therefore, I kindly request that you review my findings and consider reverting the changes.
Hello, You removed sourced content that is the reason for the above message. Info added/changed need to be supported by independent, reliable source for verification. If you have info you want to added which you said it was missing, then go and find sources such as from the newspaper and books and add the info in along with the citation. Any disagreement of the content, you can go to the article talk page and raise your issues there. Any editors who are interest in the subject will join and a non involved editor will close the discussion (if any) and decide the outcome. Cassiopeiatalk10:18, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Fuad-nse-03 You are reverting my edit, which has genuine references. Do not write about what you studied or did not study. Wikipedia doesn't care about your and my degrees. You just started editing Wikipedia unless you have multiple accounts. I have a Bachelor of Engineering degree with double majors and a master's degree with various publications. I don’t brag about my studies. Do not remove any genuine edits. It’s inevitable that the media will expose all of Bangladesh’s corruption. You can't stop these exposure. Those who took bribes, they should have thought about it before taking kickbacks. Best Regards, Canberra2021 (talk) 10:59, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I deleted your statement about Rosatom's possible actions if the investigation starts, as the sources you referenced only included financial audits from 2021 and 2022 and did not discuss future possibilities. Additionally, your edit included your own commentary. I explained all this on the article talk page Talk:Rooppur Nuclear Power PlantFuad-nse-03 (talk) 11:13, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]