User talk:Canberra2021Canberra2021, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Redundant draftHi, when you create a draft article, please do a search to make sure that a draft for that topic does not already exist. Because Draft:TAI T929 ATAK 2 already exists, I've redirected Draft:T929 Atak 2 Helicopter to it. I haven't copied any material from your draft to the older one, but you can do that yourself if you'd like. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 05:49, 16 July 2021 (UTC) AfC notification: Draft:TAI T929 ATAK 2 has a new comment
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:TAI T929 ATAK 2. Thanks! Hatchens (talk) 05:27, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:TAI T929 ATAK 2 has a new comment
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:TAI T929 ATAK 2. Thanks! Hatchens (talk) 07:53, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: TAI T929 ATAK 2 has been accepted TAI T929 ATAK 2, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .Thanks again, and happy editing! AntanO 03:37, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Always cite reliable sourcesPlease do not add or change content, as you did at Corruption in Bangladesh, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:27, 23 August 2021 (UTC) Wikipedia and copyrightHello Canberra2021! Your additions to Corruption in Bangladesh have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 02:25, 24 August 2021 (UTC) Virginia-class submarine articleRegarding you revestion of my edit, one your additional citations support my edit and contradicts what you wrote. Specifically this artilce you cited: https://thediplomat.com/2021/09/the-strategic-symbolism-of-australias-nuclear-subs/ says: It is not clear yet whether Australia will buy an off-the-shelf design from the U.S. or U.K. (of which there are only two real contenders: the American Virginia class or the British Astute class), or develop a class of its own, in partnership with" Which is what my edit said. The Virginia class has not been selected as the Australian SSN. No class of vessel has been chosen - according to statements by the Australian PM and Defence Minister the vessel selection will take place over the next 18 months acording to public information -including the article you cited above. Furthermore none of the articles you have cited support your position, none of the citations talk about what weapons, hull, sonar etc have been selected by or offered to Australia. Jtan163 (talk) 11:18, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter messageDecember 2021Your edit to Corruption in Bangladesh has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:03, 7 December 2021 (UTC) ArbCom 2022 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ArbCom 2023 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Edits Related to the Investigation of Embezzlement AllegationsI removed your statement about what could happen if the investigation begins because the sources you cited only included financial audits from 2021 and 2022 and didn’t cover any future possibilities. If you’d like to discuss this further, please head over to the talk page Talk:Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant Fuad-nse-03 (talk) 10:04, 8 October 2024 (UTC) November 2024Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Bangladesh Army. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Niasoh (talk) 03:06, 7 November 2024 (UTC) Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Bangladesh Army, especially if it involves living persons. Your edits have been reverted. Don't push POV and every recent events like newspaper. Niasoh (talk) 03:08, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
SuggestionAlways but always try to include into the body of the article as sections within an article dedicated to negative criticisms are discouraged. As per WP:UNDUE and WP:CRIT. 2400:C600:3381:CE44:89B3:8FF6:69C5:FD41 (talk) 03:06, 16 November 2024 (UTC) ArbCom 2024 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Reverted your edit as it contained incorrect informationYou cited two citations in the Allegations of Embezzlement section but there is discrepancy between your writing and the sources. The court writ which was seen by sky news was submitted to High Court of Bangladesh and investigation has been launched by the Anti Corruption Commission of Bangladesh. The sources you have cited does not state at all that the British government has launched an investigation. Therefore, I reverted your edit. Additionally, the information you seem to be wanting to provide is already there. All that is missing is "including British MP Tulip". I will add that part shortly. Fuad-nse-03 (talk) 09:57, 20 December 2024 (UTC) |