|
User talk:FarhansherHere are some links I thought useful:
Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. Wikipedia:About, Wikipedia:Help desk, and Wikipedia:Village pump are also a place to go for answers to general questions. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~. Sam Spade (talk · contribs) 14:02, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC) ExplanationsI took my picture out and changed my user name for the same reason -- anonymity. My name is still visible anyway so I'll "re"-add my picture. I'm from Hyderabad (Deccan), which explains why my contributions are all associated with this city. Thanks for your interest. Please let me know if you need any editing or contributions. I'll be happy to oblige. Salma 04:40, 24 January 2006 (UTC) QawwaliIt is nice to see someone so passionate about Qawwali engaging with the Wikipedia. I have made the move to Qawwali as the main article on the subject. What do you think? By the way, have you heard traditional Qawwalis much? Nusrat Fateh brought a lot of us to the form, but there is also great depth and richness in the wider tradition and its spiritual background...—iFaqeer (Talk to me!) 02:31, Apr 19, 2005 (UTC)
I like the ideaA reference for Islamic and Muslim cultural concepts often referred to in the zeitgeit/pop culture, you mean :D. That's a long title, but it's needed. It would be a counterpart to: List of Islamic terms in Arabic....I like it. I am sure we can structure it so it ... er ... helps enhance the usefulness of Wikipedia as a reference rather than is just a refutation page. First thing we need to do is check if there isn't already such a page :D—iFaqeer (Talk to me!) 04:25, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC) AOACongrats on the cogent arguments on Islam. Well put. I think we share many of the same concerns about Islam-bashing on WP, which has really reached shameful levels. (Take a look at the claims re: textual criticsm on Qur'an if you're looking for something else to get angry about, which I doubt.) When you get a chance, can you email me at yusuf.toropov@gmail.com? I have an idea I'd like to discuss with you. Ma-salaam, BYT BrandonYusufToropov 20:40, 12 May 2005 (UTC) Just sent you that info you asked for via email. BrandonYusufToropov 22:11, 13 May 2005 (UTC) HududI saw you removed "such as Ali Sina" from the page... just wondering why? I figured it would be a good idea to list someone or something... (curiosity). gren 20:58, 27 May 2005 (UTC) You edited this page a few minutes ago. Please be advised that this is the message Sam uses to welcome new users. He probably doesn't like it when others change it. If you want to talk to Sam go to User talk:Sam Spade. Mgm|(talk) 20:32, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC) Sorry , wrong page ..my mistake . Origins of the name "Anonymous editor"Originally written by Farhansher: "Hi , whatsup with this name" LOL. Do you like it? I chose it a week ago on the "Islam and other religions" section when user zora told said that instead of being an "anonymous editor" I should take a name. So, from then on I became known as the "Anonymous editor". About me: I usually focus on Islam and Islam-related articles as I converted to Islam recently. Like many others, I hate extreme POVs and Islam-bashing especially by people who know nothing about this great religion. Thanks for asking.
No, I did not come because of an invitation from a forum. Thanks...--Anonymous editor 22:41, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC) Islam and SlaveryHello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Islam and Slavery, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text borrowed from web sites. For more information, take a look at our policy library. Happy editing! DopefishJustin (･∀･) 22:00, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
--The Brain 09:25, 12 November 2005 (UTC) Hey there -- could I ask you to take a look at my recent edits on Terrorism?We've fallen out of touch, and I owe you correspondence. My apologies. I fixed the balanced-example problem people claimed to be concerned about at Terrorism, but POV editors are massing the troops. Could I ask you to take a look and add your thoughts to the discussion? BrandonYusufToropov 01:48, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC) Similar (but much more longwinded) assaults at Jihad...... which took several weeks of work to get to an NPOV state. Can you please take a look when you get the chance? BrandonYusufToropov 17:43, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC) Links (response)In response: Yes, I underestand completely, but I still believe that we should provide viewers with an appropriate list of general links that educate them about the religion. This is integral to clarify the tenets of the religion. Very few users will actaully use directory for general info about the religion. Critical links are given in the directory and I clearly restate that a religion does not need POV in the first place because it is factuality rather than an issue. The links I listed are factual and I ofcourse did not link them for POV, but for factuality. But, yes, I do understand what you were saying, thanks for informing me. --Anonymous editor 19:10, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC) In response to ur question about me please see my user page. Thanks. --Anonymous editor 20:33, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC) ForumsHI Farhanser, I noticed that you asked some people from certain forums to come to Wikipedia to start editing the Islam pages. We've recently had an outbreak of trouble on these pages. Can you tell me please which forums you posted that message on? I'm trying to work out how best to stop the personal attacks and reverting on these pages, so any information at all would be most helpful. Cheers, SlimVirgin (talk) 08:14, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC) the Islam flamewarsre [1], I do not think it is helpful to add such brainless ranting to Talk pages, even with a view to making your opponents look bad. Your aim should be to help calm things down, so that cool-headed factual editing and polite discussion may hopefully be resumed in the near future. thanks, dab (ᛏ) 13:00, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC) Ed Poor has been kind enough to nominate me for an adminship...which I think will go a long way toward resolving unproductive disputes on pages he and I both edit. Anyone who is interested in voting one way or the other is invited to the discussion here. BrandonYusufToropov 17:08, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC) You added this: Others say he is just doing it to stay away from entering into debate with some real Islamic scholars , and as a result , risk of losing his following. to the Ali SIna article a short while ago. I removed it because you haven't included a source for this criticism yet. -- Stereotek 18:41, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) Talk:JihadFarhanser, you have done a magnificent job outlining Jihad on the talk:Jihad page. Very nice. And don't let zeno discourage you, she/he can hate Muslims all she/he wants, but can't even get a point across. Anyways, good work. Talk to you later, Anonymous editor June 30, 2005 06:57 (UTC)
Can you please ...... take a look at my work here, and perhaps add it to your watchlist? Many thanks, BrandonYusufToropov 13:05, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
MysticismHmmm. Theoretically, there can be mysticism in the Islamic context outside of Sufism, which is usually based on Sunni tradition. But then I guess some of the Shia-based mystical orders are also called Sufi...thinking as I go here. Maybe redirect? I would prefer "Islamic Mysticism" or "Muslim Mysticism" in that case... —iFaqeer (Talk to me!) 20:16, July 15, 2005 (UTC) user page reversionHi Farhansher! You're quite welcome. To answer your question, I do a lot of RC patrol, looking for vandalism. Sometimes I select only all anonymous edits to the User: space; that's a good way to catch vandalism others miss. For example, here [2] are all the recent edits to the User space by anonymous users. Happy editing! Antandrus (talk) 19:33, 16 July 2005 (UTC) Can you please take a look at the editor's poll I posted at the Jihad talk page here? BrandonYusufToropov 15:41, 21 July 2005 (UTC) Beware 3RR -- it's not worth it. Let others sort it out. BrandonYusufToropov 18:23, 21 July 2005 (UTC) Typeing ettiquetteFor my own personal sanity if nothing else, can you please avoid using "4" as for or "U" as you? It drives me up the while and makes your comments hard to read--Tznkai 19:15, 21 July 2005 (UTC) Moved 'evidence' pages to your user namespaceI moved "Sina plans to attack WP : Thread 1" to User:Farhansher/Sina plans to attack WP : Thread 1 and "Sina plans to attack WP : Thread 2" to User:Farhansher/Sina plans to attack WP : Thread 2. These are not articles and should not be in the article namespace. In your user namespace, it's unlikely they'll be deleted, but you could also move them to Talk: subpages or the Wikipedia: namespace (in the latter, though, they'll probably get deleted). Thanks, —Morven 19:05, July 26, 2005 (UTC) Talk:Islam poll[3] I thought you might be interested in this.Heraclius 17:22, 27 July 2005 (UTC) Zeno of Elea is claiming consensus when it comes to adding the crescent despite the various objections of different users.Heraclius 22:58, 30 July 2005 (UTC) Din is being POV-pushed on again, can you please take a look?Heraclius 17:03, 25 August 2005 (UTC) Hi again ... when you get the chance ...... can you please take a look at this? BrandonYusufToropov 10:07, 4 September 2005 (UTC) Thank youSalaam. Thank you very much for the welcome back. Yes there are quite a few attacks here and there. It's funny how many of those claiming to be "secularists" act so extreme. Anyways, thanks for the welcome and I will see you around in wikipedia. Peace, --Anonymous editor 19:50, September 5, 2005 (UTC) Please reviewCan you check This out and tell me what you think. I did it all my self, but still don't like it. It's ugly and does not seem to read well. Brandon has helped out a fair bit, but the more help the better it will become, inshAllah.--Irishpunktom\talk 09:58, September 6, 2005 (UTC) AstrologyHi. Are you an astrologer? --Chris Brennan 16:18, 16 September 2005 (UTC) Opposition, Criticism, or Anti-With the exception of Islam, most major religions have "Anti-". For example, Anti-Judaism, Anti-Catholicism, Anti-Protestantism, Criticism of Islam, Criticism of Mormonism. The problem with the title "Opposition to Mormonism" is that it is tooo POV. Opposition to illegal drugs, opposition to racisim, ok. How POV can you get about the pros and cons of racism? LoL. The only diehard opponents to Mormonism are other Christians. The old title assumes that all people are opposed to the religion, or that few people question reasons for its opposition, which is just not true. Anyway, I would like for you to edit the Criticism of Islam article. The article is accessible via the Islam template. As it currently stands, the article makes little attempt at being non-POV. --JuanMuslim 04:48, 20 September 2005 (UTC) TranslateFarhansher, Please translate this page अय्यावलि to Hindi. If you can also to Arabic. Hopes, Thank You - Paul Raj Happy RamadanHave a very happy Ramadan. Salaam, a.n.o.n.y.m t 00:12, 4 October 2005 (UTC) I was reading the discussion in Greavitar's talk page before getting your message. Thanks for informing me. I'll have a look. -- Svest 21:07, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
nameGo to preferences in your user menu > go to nickname. Adding something like this: < font color = name of color > (without the spaces in between) in front of your name will change it. So go ahead and make your nickname unique. Hope that helps. --a.n.o.n.y.m t 20:55, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
[[User:Farhansher|--f.a.y تبادله خيال c]] 03:08, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
ThanksThanks for the welcome back. Yuber(talk) 21:58, 13 October 2005 (UTC) testing
Farhanتبادله خيال /c 04:47, 14 October 2005 (UTC) F.a.y.تبادله خيال /c 20:22, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
IslamophobiaYour link section was vandalized by an Islamophobe. I have reinstated the links, but be on the lookout for him to revert again. Yuber(talk) 04:04, 15 October 2005 (UTC) Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files that is why I took the links out.--CltFn 04:24, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
Email for youCheck your email. Yuber(talk) 23:22, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
Yellowikis in UrduSalaam Alaikum, Is there any chance you could help translate the Main Page of Yellowikis into Urdu? It is about 320 words. I've set up a link from the main page in English to the صفحہ اول Everyone that helps translate the main page into a new language gets a limited edition Yellowikis t-shirt. Best wishes PaulY (paul@yellowikis.org)--Payo 11:07, 24 October 2005 (UTC) Thank youThank you very much for your support. :) --a.n.o.n.y.m t 20:57, 24 October 2005 (UTC) Islamic scientistsThe list that I worked on contained scientists mostly from Iran and Persia. But I did give a list of names and short biographies of non-Iranian muslim scientists to User:Yuber a while ago. He said he would work on the list. I dont know whether he finished it. We also planned to make one huge jumbo muslim list of all the scientists from all countries. I dont know if that project was started either. I also recently finished writing the article Ophthalmology in medieval Islam which deals with ocular Islamic medicine regardless of nationality.--Zereshk 21:27, 24 October 2005 (UTC) Empty articlesInstead of making empty articles, please use Requested articles. Thank You. 42istheanswer 01:55, 25 October 2005 (UTC) Hey thereAOA -- I am back from travel overseas, and I know I have been delinquent in answering your messages on my talk page. Please forgive! Almost back in the swing of things again. I meant to encourage you to vote here [5] but then saw that you already had. Spread the word! BrandonYusufToropov 11:50, 25 October 2005 (UTC) Hey, before you do any more work just know that it should be Category:Muslim_scientists... no capital for scientist... just thought you should know since it will have to be changed at some point. Also, you're getting into tricky ground with Arab astronomoers being Muslim scientists... to an extent yes.... but, we mustn't forget that Arab does not equal Muslim... because, in literature at least Arab Christians helped with a huge revival during An-nahdah Al-adabiyah... (do we have an article on that?). So... the first thing is just techinical... the second gets a lot trickier and I don't think we can really generalize quite that much. gren グレン 12:17, 25 October 2005 (UTC) AdminshipHey, thanks for the congratulations. Hopefully I'll do a good job, well, at least not a bad job. Thanks for the vote too. gren グレン 22:57, 26 October 2005 (UTC) QareenJust a heads up. I don't know what you normally do but if you can avoid it, don't delete the content when adding speedy tags. I do it accidentally sometimes but, figured I'd mention it, you might also want to look at Category:Candidates for speedy deletion for more specific tags to give your reasoning. gren グレン 01:29, 27 October 2005 (UTC) The Muslim GuildI thought you might be interested in joining The Muslim Guild. --JuanMuslim 03:07, 28 October 2005 (UTC) Hi -- please take a look at thishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Islam#A_brief_recap_--_please_read It's quite important. BrandonYusufToropov 13:08, 28 October 2005 (UTC) I think it would be better if we started a single article named Sufi Philosophies and add cosmology & Lataif-e-Sitta in it . Since there will be a lot more concepts/philosophies coming up , I think it would be nice to have all of them in one article , rather than different pages . F.a.y.تبادله خيال /c 21:33, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
Hey, for this picture you need to add what license you release it under since you are the creator. You can do something like Template:PD-self or Template:GFDL-self, there might be other options... but, you creating it gives us the source, we now need to know how you release it... and for it to be on wikipedia it has to be a free license. That's pretty clever :) gren グレン 20:39, 29 October 2005 (UTC) SufismI saw you trying to clean up the Sufism article. :) Maybe you can write and propose what you want as the article at user:Farhansher/Sufism and then the others can vote on it. Salaam --a.n.o.n.y.m t 01:11, 30 October 2005 (UTC) yesyou should look at this [[6]] Eid MubarakEid Mubarak to you and best wishes. --a.n.o.n.y.m t 02:47, 3 November 2005 (UTC) Eid MubarakBest wishes to you and yours, brother. Thanks so much for all the good work you do here. BrandonYusufToropov 16:44, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
re: Eid MubarakThanks, and Eid Mubarak to you too. - ulayiti (talk) 19:59, 3 November 2005 (UTC) Eid MubarakEid Mubarak to you and your familia. --1Muslim 17:30, 4 November 2005 (UTC) FYI[7] You might be interested. --a.n.o.n.y.m t 01:15, 4 November 2005 (UTC) A "Spirituality" portalHi Farhansher, Some editors have been discussing the possibility of creating a “Spirituality” portal. What do you think of the idea? — RichardRDFtalk 14:29, 4 November 2005 (UTC) I entered some basics to get the ball rolling. I look forward to your participation in the Spirituality WikiProject and reading your contributions to the Spirituality portal. :-) — RichardRDFtalk 00:47, 7 November 2005 (UTC) خیر مبارکHappy Eid mubarik to you also yeah i'm from Pakistan. الثاقب (WiseSabre| talk) 16:04, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
Eid Mubarak and thanks for your greeting. Could you please take a look at Nikah? The usual people are trying to add a link to a Daniel Pipes article that has little to nothing to do with nikah itself. Yuber(talk) 16:45, 6 November 2005 (UTC) Eid MubarakSorry I was away and could not reply! Heartiest Eid Mubarak from me as well. PassionInfinity 06:13, 7 November 2005 (UTC) Thank youI just wanted to thank you for your support of my RfA which finally passed! I greatly appreciate it! Ramallite (talk) 04:09, 9 November 2005 (UTC) SpiritualityOkay I understand, but it still sort of looks strange down there. --a.n.o.n.y.m t 20:55, 10 November 2005 (UTC) TfD nomination of Template:SpiritualityTemplate:Spirituality has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:Spirituality. Thank you. — RichardRDFtalk 17:42, 11 November 2005 (UTC) W.Salaam'Thanks for the heads up and info, it was appreciated. --Street Scholar 19:26, 12 November 2005 (UTC) Muslim GuildActually, those Cyrillic character are just 'SFGiants' in Russian. I have no idea how to pronounce them. I'll get around to the description sometime in the next 24 hours. ςפקιДИτς СФГиганты 21:42, 12 November 2005 (UTC) Mohra SharifI have updated the page with a picture of Darbar-E-Aaliya Mohra Sharif and await your feedback. خرم Khurram 15:32, 17 November 2005 (UTC) SufismDear Farhansher , I did several edits to Sufism article , my goal was to clarify what different people think about Sufism , I guess it is worth its effort because no branch of Islam is prone to basic misunderstanding as Sufism.Some call it basically of non-Islamic origin and some try to define it in the framework of orthodox Islam to the point of ignoring the fact that Sufism is indeed more than religious piety and devotion.IF you feel my edits present a distorted image , please add or change as needed.Pasha 04:02, 20 November 2005 (UTC) HelpPlease vote to redirect Islamofascism to Neofascism and religion... ... which is where it belongs. Vote here: [8] BrandonYusufToropov 14:59, 23 November 2005 (UTC) Alaykuma'SalaamThanks for your welcome message. :-) Marzyeh 05:46, 26 November 2005 (UTC) --[[9]], the discussion of which you may or may not consider worth reviewing. BrandonYusufToropov 18:01, 29 November 2005 (UTC) Urdu WikipediaAsalam-o-Alikum I request you to please contribute to Urdu wikipedia. We are trying hard to build this wiki. Current article count is 617. Your help in any way would be appreciated. Please ehlp us to expand Wisesabre 06:37, 7 December 2005 (UTC) "Islamaphobia"You said that the Qu'ran doesn't say that turning away from Islam is punishable by death, and that that sentence was put in the article by an islamaphobe. The Qu'ran may not say this, but that doesn't mean it doesn't occur. I've heard of thousands of deaths of muslims who turned away from islam. Scorpionman 16:13, 8 December 2005 (UTC) HiI emailed you. --a.n.o.n.y.m t 20:38, 15 December 2005 (UTC) ThanksThanks for you welcome. I would appreciate if you would snd me information about Urdu keyboard instructions for Urdu wikipedia. Siddiqui 20:31, 20 December 2005 (UTC) My RfAHi Farhansher! Thank you for your kind support on my RfA. -- Szvest 17:29, 25 December 2005 (UTC) Wiki me up™ Pakistani WikipediansAsalam-o-Alikum Farhan could you please help in deciding which cat. we should keep. Category:Wikipedians in Pakistan or Category:Pakistani Wikipedians see this also Category:Wikipedians_by_location Wisesabre 07:42, 26 December 2005 (UTC) SalahSalaam. By your edits to the salah thread, I'm going to go out on a limb and say you are Sunni and you follow the Hanafi mahdhab? I say this because of your seperating the Duha and the Ishraq. While most of the sub-continent hanafi ulema will say that it is two seperate prayers, many of the Arab hanafi's, as well as, to my knowledge, the ulema of the other mahdhabs will say that it is just one prayer. Pepsidrinka 22:03, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
Offensive jihadDude, you should only replace an article with a redirect when what you're redirecting to provides an adequate substitute. Unfortunately, the article "Combative jihad" is a chaotic ungrammatical misspelled disorganized mess (with a stupid name) which does not provide an adequate substitute for the "Offensive jihad" article at this time. Therefore, stop blanking the Offensive jihad" article. AnonMoos 02:45, 28 December 2005 (UTC) It would be appreciated if you could contribute to the current disputes at these articles. Yuber(talk) 20:08, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
Sockpuppet accountsThanks for letting me know about these. Both Mr Data and Countering Systemic Bias have been blocked. SlimVirgin (talk) 21:44, 29 December 2005 (UTC) Rfa thanks
Thanks!Hi Farhanshar! Thanks for your congratz on my adminship, I will do my best to be a good one. I don't remember having any negative interactions with you! I'd ask you when they were, but perhaps it's better to leave it in the past. Look forward to seeing you around! Babajobu 15:11, 7 January 2006 (UTC) ContextI have tagged a few of your articles {{wikfy}}{{context}} but it probably applies to several others. As far as context goes, it is probably sufficient to begin each article: In Sufi philosophy Haal is ... But the total absence of wikilinks is unforgivable. Please spend more time on each article providing proper outgoing links. -- RHaworth 07:02, 8 January 2006 (UTC) Eid MubarakEid Saeed ! All the best for the holidays! --Irishpunktom\talk 17:19, 10 January 2006 (UTC) Salaam. Eid Mubarak. Insha'allah everything went (and is going) well. Pepsidrinka 20:28, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
DivisionsHi, regarding Divisions of Islam, maybe you could put the info you told me about Qadiriyyih onto the article. Add a summary of the two schools in the proper place and mention the name thing. Cuñado Sufi poetryI've been working on the article on Persian literature and one of the main things lacking is a reference to the influence of the poetry of Rumi, Sa'di, Hafiz, Attar, etc. on Sufi poetry throughout the Islamic world. I'll try to put a section there and then set up a link to an article on Sufi poetry, with special attention to poetry as used in dhikr. Zora 21:25, 16 January 2006 (UTC) Salaamspls check out the discussion at Talk:Islamofascism (term); proposal is to redirect to Neofascism and religion. BYT 20:21, 17 January 2006 (UTC) Sufism templateFantabulous job! Keep it up! deeptrivia (talk) 21:33, 18 January 2006 (UTC) Re:AllahHi Farhansher! Literally speaking, Allah or Al-lah means "The God" (as you can see the definite article of Al which means The in English). However, theologically, the issue is a bit complex. When you say la ilah illa allah this would translate to there's no god but The God. IMO, as of most Muslims, Allah is the arabic word of God (the Abrahamic God). Lahoot is a derived word, yes. I am not sure if I could answer your questions. Cheers -- Szvest 15:17, 19 January 2006 (UTC) Wiki me up™ 2006 bin Laden videoI recently started 2006 bin Laden video. Please improve it in any way you see fit. Thanks. KI 23:24, 19 January 2006 (UTC) TemplateHello Farhansher. I have created a new template which you might be interested in called Template:Pakistan topics .--a.n.o.n.y.m t 20:19, 21 January 2006 (UTC) formal support voteIt seems like you support the compromise at Islamist terrorism, could you place a formal vote of support?(60% is required for a page move).--Urthogie 13:11, 22 January 2006 (UTC) RfA ThanksPlease accept my embarrassingly belated thank you for supporting my RfA, which much to my surprise passed 102/1/1, earning me minor notoriety. I am grateful for all the supportive comments, and have already started doing the things people wanted me to be able to do. And hopefully nothing else... Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C]
 AfD? 12:13, 24 January 2006 (UTC) Some articles to look out forThere is some bigoted POV-pushing on Islam:_What_the_West_Needs_to_Know, Jihad_Watch, and Honor Killing. Yuber(talk) 23:15, 24 January 2006 (UTC) ImagesYou will usually have to ask the person who made it or has it on his website to give you permission, maybe be email. Otherwise you can also try to find some on the internet which are under the free license. Check Wikipedia:Copyrights. Those images that you found are pretty good. --a.n.o.n.y.m t 23:14, 28 January 2006 (UTC) PhilosophyYou are correct. I added it to the science template instead. Maybe we should just have one template with science, arts, and more. --a.n.o.n.y.m t 21:59, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
CunyadoMight I suggest you nominate such a cheery and experienced user for adminship? I would do so my self, but I am relatively new here. Let me also suggest, since this is the 100th comment on your talk page, that you archive. Thanks. P.S. Jeff3000 would also be a great admin. KI 02:07, 31 January 2006 (UTC) Infidel pageI protected it because of the edit war. --a.n.o.n.y.m t 00:36, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
DhimmiI have put the "in use" tag on the Dhimmi page to avoid edit conflicts. Please refrain from editing the article while the tag is in place. Thanks.--Pecher 22:09, 1 February 2006 (UTC) Re:KafirI see no reason why the relation of "kafir" to "infidel" must be made conditional upon the relation of "goy or "nastik" to "infidel". These are separate issues meriting separate consideration. Anyway, if you wish to make an argument, supply your sources. On a separate note, you may want to archive your talk page, as it has become unwieldy.--Pecher 14:54, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Pool 3Dear Ferhansher, I would like you please support Pool 3. It can help to delete these insults and have something acceptible. Thanks 216.248.124.210 10:04, 4 February 2006 (UTC) HelloI took a look at those pages (i.e. Infidel/Kafir/People of the Book, there was another one), and looking through the history, its the usual people reverting, over essentially semantics. I think of the pages had content that was being disputed, but its really just a game they seem to be playing. Essentially the same people are/were involved with Dhimmi Watch and Jihad Watch. Right now those articles redirect to Robert Spencer. I don't think there's any reasoning these people to see one way or the other; each side is determined to have thier "version" put forth without any care for what the other side is even saying. Pepsidrinka 21:40, 4 February 2006 (UTC) Noor (light)Hello, Farhansher. I have listed Noor (light) as a copyright violation from here. If you have permission to use the text, please give details on the copyright problems page (below the Noor entry), which is linked to in the template. Thanks, Kjkolb 04:20, 8 February 2006 (UTC) Image: Allah MosqueI assume you want to GPL the image, I tagged it as assumed, if you have moment could you tag it with your intent. Thanks Tawker 06:42, 17 February 2006 (UTC) Edit summaryPlease do not use edit summaries like 'rv hatemongering.'[10] It does not usefully describe your edit, and may be misunderstood as calling another editor a hatemonger, which I am sure you do not intend. Thanks, Tom Harrison Talk 14:21, 22 February 2006 (UTC) Maybe mediation would be useful. The mediation cabal does a good job, and it's informal. Tom Harrison Talk 20:28, 23 February 2006 (UTC) "rv Islamophobic POV"[11] is not a useful edit summary. Commentary like this just increases the level of tension, and can become disruptive. Please, just narrowly and factually summarize your edit. 'rv to version x' is neutral and at least minimally informative. Thanks, Tom Harrison Talk 13:50, 8 March 2006 (UTC) Request for edit summaryHi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 21% for major edits and 50% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 40 minor edits in the article namespace.) This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear impolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 20:31, 26 February 2006 (UTC) North african SufismCan you give a link to any site that tels about African flavour of Sufism . Living in Pakistan , I never get any info about african Sufi practices . Thanks . F.a.y.تبادله خيال /c 19:35, 27 February 2006 (UTC) North African Tradition The Badawiyyah 13 th century CE is big The Shadhaliyyah 13 th century CE is big too and many orders are offshoots of them. They mainly depend on repeating Qur'anic verses, and the 99 Names of God in specific orders in chapters called Hizb, your mix of Ahzab (plural of Hizb) depends on your class of knowledge of Sufism. [orders|Orders listed here] have a few North African ones, feel free to ask me any question. --The Brain 23:42, 27 February 2006 (UTC) 3RRPlease be informed that you have reached a 3-revert limit on Dhimmi and Jizya. You may be blocked if you continue reverting. Pecher Talk 07:55, 28 February 2006 (UTC) Alhizb Al-kabirHere is a portion of Alhizb Al-kabir (the big Hizb) (Arabic: الحزب الكبير) , it deals with fear, God was talking in the majority of the Ayats to Moses his brother Aron and their mother (once in (20:77)). They are in this specific order. They are somtimes part of the Ayat (verse):
"Fear you not. You have escaped from the people who are wrong-doers." (28:25) Fearing (or fear) neither to be overtaken [by Pharaoh] nor being afraid (of drowning in the sea)." (20:77) "Fear not! Surely, you will have the upper hand. (20:68) "Fear not, verily! I am with you both, hearing and seeing. (20:46) Fear not, verily! The Messengers fear not in front of Me. (27:10) And He will surely give them in exchange a safe security after their fear. (24:55) And has made them safe from fear. (106:4) (Then the Sufi prays): Allah (God) please secure and shelter us from all fear.....
--The Brain 16:50, 28 February 2006 (UTC) Re: Some ArticlesHi Farhansher, Yes, I saw edits of Pecher on the dhimmi article. I have a meeting with my advisor tomorrow, and then after doing some research, I'll try to help making this and other articles more NPov. Have nice times --Aminz 21:54, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
ArticlesSalam - thanks for your note, I recently tried to push back some POV on Kafir. I'll take a look at the others as soon as I can, and let you know if there are more problems. Sorry for the delay in my response. Ramallite (talk) 16:48, 11 March 2006 (UTC) Ongoing mediationYour presence is requested in an ongoing mediation regarding the contents of several Islam-related articles. Thank you for your understanding. --Cyde Weys 02:40, 12 March 2006 (UTC) NafsSalam! I will see what I can do for an nafs-article - when I have time to do that... Take care, Mounir 08:05, 15 March 2006 (UTC) AdabAdab from an Indian wikipedian. --Bhadani 09:20, 16 March 2006 (UTC) Alexander in the Qur'an articleJust a question about the part [12]. I don't know much about the Homer's view of the world, but it seems to me that if Qur'an wants to refer to this theory, it should say that "The sun rises/sets from/in the ocean (which is not fetid)". Is that true? Also, The title reads as sun rising from the fetid sea but I see the " spring of murky water" in translation. Does this support the Homer's view of the world? Thanks --Aminz 10:30, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
Hi, We started a proposal Wikipedia:Wikiethics to state the existing policies coherently and make suggestions on improving the editorial standards in Wiki. I thought you might be interested in contributing to that proposal. Unfortunately, a pro-porn and pro-offense lobby is trying to make this proposal a failure. They unilaterally started an approval poll although almost no one including me believe that it is time for a vote, simply because the policy is not ready. It is not even written completely. Editors who thinks that it needs to be improved rather than killed by an unfair poll at the beginning of the proposal, started another poll ('Do we really need a poll at this stage?') at the same time. The poll is vandalized for a while but it is stable now. A NO vote on this ('Do we really need a poll now?') poll will strengthen the position of the editors who are willing to improve the policy further. If you have concerns about the ethics and editorial standards in Wiki, please visit the page Wikipedia:Wikiethics with your suggestions on the policy. We have two subpages: Arguments and Sections. You might want to consider reviewing these pages as well... Thanks in advance. Resid Gulerdem 19:43, 22 March 2006 (UTC) The mediationI just read "The articles" part of the ongoing mediation. I do agree with you and wrote my opinion there. Unfortunately it seems that there are much more people on the other side. Take care --Aminz 07:47, 24 March 2006 (UTC) Please post your favorite version of the controversial articles. They'll be kept there at least for awhile per "mediation". Thanks. --Aminz 01:54, 25 March 2006 (UTC) Since people are not convinced yet. We will post your version of the articles soon. --Aminz 02:38, 25 March 2006 (UTC) Best wishesI'm sorry to hear about your injury. Best wishes for a speedy recovery. Tom Harrison Talk 23:36, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Urdu questionPlease look at Human#Language and tell us on the talk page if the word in the image is Human in Urdu, Arabic, or if it is a shared word. Thank you so much! KillerChihuahua?!? 16:23, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:humanGood to see you again! I remember your thoughtful edits at the sufism page. Please stick around and help at Talk:Human, were having alot of trouble and could use your wisdom and insight! Cheers, Sam Spade 11:46, 30 March 2006 (UTC) HiYou might be interested in the topic Persian Jews and some of the claims made in the history sections in regards to the status of Jews in Islam and medieval Persia. --ManiF 07:07, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Thank youA BIG THANK YOU for your support--Aminz 13:33, 1 April 2006 (UTC) By the way, I don't know how the copyright law is; but I can at least say that for example many sentence of the criticism of Islam article, part Muhammad: [13] such as: "Western scholars such as Sprenger, Nöldeke, Weil, Sir William Muir, Koelle, Grimme and D. S. Margoliouth give a more positive estimate of Muhammed's life and character and agree as to his motives, prophetic call, and sincerity. They suggest that Muhammad was at first sincere but later became deceptive. Koelle finds "the key to the first period of Muhammad's life in Khadija, his first wife", after whose death he became prey to his "evil passions". Sprenger attributes Muhammed's revelations to epileptic fits or a "paroxysm of cataleptic insanity"" are exactly copied and pasted from Catholic Encyclopedia. I don't know who have done this. It seems to me that Catholic Encyclopedia is one of big sources for this part of the article. If we really analyze that article for example, we see that the editors have been familar with certain sources and filled in the article with quotes from their sources. This is not new thing. It occurs over and over in wikipedia. Many articles are like this. I have a suggestion: Can we get the copyright permission from IslamOnline; At least a permission that we can quote from them (if it is not already allowed). They should be willing to issue such permission since wikipedia has a lot of readers. This will be also good for them. Anyway, take care and thanks again for your support. Take care--Aminz 13:43, 1 April 2006 (UTC) Criticism of Islam articleIf it is 90% quotes from hadith and Qur'an, then their argument is not valid. We can always quote from their site then. Regarding criticism of Islam article, it may be true but the article is good to be there for one reason: *) We know people often hear these criticisms. Some of them maybe quite illogical to my mind, but we can not stop it. What some people may not hear is the Muslim responses to these criticisms. I think it is good to have the criticisms there but try to work on Muslim answers. This was my job for a long time :). Copyright issue is of course something different. Salam --Aminz 19:52, 1 April 2006 (UTC) A suggestion (Excellent to my mind :D )I think RFC is not a good idea since we are not sure both articles may have some problems. I have a suggestion: All editors involved in this mediation nominate a few editors(not among themselves). They are better to be administrator or at least experienced editors(e.g. Zora) and concede their editing right to their nominated editors. These people will form the editor committee. All the editors have to promise not to edit the articles directly anymore, but just try to convince the editor committee if they want to make any change to the article(The articles can be blocked from editing). The final decisions are however made by the editor committee(maybe voting). I hope that concensus could be achieved easier there. How is my idea? --Aminz 03:32, 2 April 2006 (UTC) Farhansher, I have made an slot for you on the mediation page.[14] Please post your opinion there. thx--Aminz 07:22, 2 April 2006 (UTC) Farhansher, I am a Muslim. There maybe some cases in which Muslims have done wrong actions, but I believe that bad Muslims do not condemn Islam as bad Christians do not condemn Christianity and so on. I would like to have the truth be projected in the article. Pecher's edits are at least the opinions of some scholars, though we may not like them. This is by itself a truth and should be defended. --Aminz 09:30, 8 April 2006 (UTC) Assalamo alikum . The article is in need of attention . I have added some useful links , whenever you get time plz take a look at it . See also Sermon on the Mount to get an idea of what can more be done with the article . Thanks . F.a.y.تبادله خيال /c 19:56, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
re:apostasyThank you very much Farhansher for the verse. I can now see the reasons behind this commandmand: " because he tried to turn you away from the LORD your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery. 11 Then all Israel will hear and be afraid, and no one among you will do such an evil thing again. The following verses are: " 12 If you hear it said about one of the towns the LORD your God is giving you to live in 13 that wicked men have arisen among you and have led the people of their town astray, saying, "Let us go and worship other gods" (gods you have not known), 14 then you must inquire, probe and investigate it thoroughly. And if it is true and it has been proved that this detestable thing has been done among you, 15 you must certainly put to the sword all who live in that town. Destroy it completely, [a] both its people and its livestock. 16 Gather all the plunder of the town into the middle of the public square and completely burn the town and all its plunder as a whole burnt offering to the LORD your God. It is to remain a ruin forever, never to be rebuilt. 17 None of those condemned things [b] shall be found in your hands, so that the LORD will turn from his fierce anger; he will show you mercy, have compassion on you, and increase your numbers, as he promised on oath to your forefathers, 18 because you obey the LORD your God, keeping all his commands that I am giving you today and doing what is right in his eyes." Thanks --Aminz 04:43, 10 April 2006 (UTC) Need my helpPlease let me know if/when you need my help --- Faisal 23:23, 30 April 2006 (UTC) Hi Farhansher, I notice you are one of the editors who contributed in creating the image of the Islam template. My opinion is that Islam template should carry the Shahada as the image and not the mosque as it gives the impression we muslims worship the mosque (the fact is we worship in the mosque and not the mosque). I earnestly hope that you agree with me. Please join me on the discussion page. «₪Mÿš†íc₪» (T) 18:41, 4 May 2006 (UTC) Hi , I have included a new image in the talk page of the Islam template, please make your comments about it to be included in the template, thanks
Invitation and Recommendations for writing articles on Hindi Wikipedia
Thank you, Cygnus_hansa 02:39, 6 June 2006 (UTC) Hi, I noticed the article Khawaja Shamsuddin Azeemi, and it seems that it consists of copyrighted text borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.azeemiafoundation.org/khawaja.htm. As a copyright violation, Khawaja Shamsuddin Azeemi appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Khawaja Shamsuddin Azeemi has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source. If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Khawaja Shamsuddin Azeemi. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Khawaja Shamsuddin Azeemi, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thans Garion96 (talk) 16:05, 5 July 2006 (UTC) 47 in SindhiHi, I am collecting translations for the number 47 (forty-seven). So far I have 509 translations, which you can see here. Can you help and tell me how to say and write 47 in Sindhi? I'd be most thankful; please reply on my talk page. Thank you! — N-true 15:39, 19 August 2006 (UTC) Islamic Barnstar AwardPlease offer your opinion, vote, or whatever about your choice for the image to be used with the Islamic Barnstar Award at the Barnstar proposals page. Although there is consensus for the concept of an Islamic Barnstar Award, some editors would like to change the image for the award. I was just thinking you should be aware of this discussion because you have contributed to Islamic-related articles, received the Islamic Barnstar Award, or have contributed to the Islam-related Wikiprojects, etc.--JuanMuslim 1m 03:05, 22 August 2006 (UTC) WikibooksHello! Can you contribute to the Urdu Wikibook (in Wikibooks) Please? Thanks and Successfully!!! Good to see you back! --Aminz 21:23, 22 September 2006 (UTC) They have both resigned. --Aminz 21:29, 22 September 2006 (UTC) User: TruthSpreader --Aminz 21:49, 22 September 2006 (UTC) WBWelcome back mate. -- Szvest 16:07, 23 September 2006 (UTC) Islahi tafsirThe tafsir is extended over nine volumes of six thousand pages. It was originally written in Urdu, but now it is being translated in English.[15] You can buy for $127.5 from [16]. Cheers!
and a few others. It is interesting to see that how these scholar differ from traditional scholars. But I would rather tell you that I recently came to know that I am not a strict Sunni because these scholar vary in a few things. These scholars challenge some of the traditional concepts like, testimony of women, Jesus second coming, hijab and a few others. But I am very comfortable with their literature, because they take everything from Qur'an and Sunnah, so I don't find myself following something which I don't know. TruthSpreaderTalk 08:36, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
killed for selling alcoholcontinuing our discussion on terrrorism (from islamic extremeist terrorism) theres something for you from the BBC http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/6039256.stm could you explain what this has to do with in your exact words "Land recovery from fachist invaders".Hypnosadist 15:57, 11 October 2006 (UTC) I Dig The Template...But.Should Shah Waliullah remain with the medieval Sufis ?
Sorry, ask a silly question, what?
(Lunarian 11:06, 22 October 2006 (UTC)) Your commentFarhansher, this kind of comment really isn't helpful or acceptable. Please focus on content and not on the backgrounds of editors. Cheers, SlimVirgin (talk) 18:43, 3 November 2006 (UTC) Your help would be appreciatedHi Farhansher. Could you please have a look at Marwat? There are 2 contributors who are arguing since a long time about the insertion of a few notable (or not as it may be the case) into the article. Thanks in advance. Szvest Wiki me up ® 09:53, 14 November 2006 (UTC) Well the article goes on is a very un-encyclopediac way. May be we should put peer review template or something like that . We have all stuff that quran never says but people claim it does in that article, & these people base their clams on english translations that dont even come with the context of revelation. Unless we have a clearcut guideline as to what makes a critic & what makes a criticism , & that too being backed by a few interested admins, it gonna go on. Thanks . F.a.y.تبادله خيال /c 12:01, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Hello Farhansher, I see you've been trying to add the Islamophobia article to the Islam template but you've been reverted. Myself and other editors have been removing links to Criticism of Islam in the template due to there not being equivalent links in other equivalent templates. This same logic would apply in this case would it not? Also if one adds a link to the Islamophobia article then a link to the criticism article would need to be added concurrently to correspond to it... does that make sense? (→Netscott) 11:23, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Ottoman language WikipediaHello Farhansher I am a history teacher from Istanbul, in Turkey. We need your vote [18] for opening Ottoman Language wikipedia --Tarih 20:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC) Hi - I noticed you uploaded this image and it is tagged with {{GFDL-presumed}}. If you created the image, please change the tag to {{GFDL}} or another appropriate free license. If you did not create the image, or if you need help picking an appropriate license, please leave a message on my talk page. Thanks! -SCEhardT 15:57, 25 November 2007 (UTC) Image:Allah_Mosque.JPG listed for deletionAn image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Allah_Mosque.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Lokal_Profil 10:24, 8 December 2007 (UTC) Re:SufismWalaykum salaam. In this case, it actually wouldn't be necessary at all. The main source is sunnah.org, a site which satisfies neither WP:RS nor WP:V and is also in violation of WP:NPOV. Sites like that are polemical in nature, and not appropriate for an objective/encyclopedic website. That they are fabrications is just a separate issue I mentioned on top of that, as they're copy paste quotes of a rather recent history which are often used by young Muslims on internet forum debates. Since they were recent additions by an anonymous IP with a tendency to inject POV , and additions based on an unreliable site pushing a specific sectarian viewpoint, I wouldn't consider it appropriate to even include the given insertions as an external link or anything like that. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:58, 15 July 2008 (UTC) Credible authorHello. A credible authors' reference is being "overrided" by edit-warring. I recently tried to add to the telescope article but this editor seems to think that his opinion overrides a VERY credible author in Mr. Richard Powers. I've been blocked before for edit-warring recently, so I don't want this to be another incident on my record. Anyway, the other editor seemed to have asked his friend-type editors to form a consensus, so I will do the same. The Islamic connection here is, Al-Haytham. He is FUNDAMENTAL to the telescope and the FATHER of optics. By definition, the summary can include him since the radio and electro-magnetic telescopes are derogatory to the average person looking at the article; I wanted to add it to the history section since it looked cleaner. Can you help your fellow InternetHero?? InternetHero (talk) 21:02, 23 July 2008 (UTC) Urdu WikipediaDear friend, You seem to be an active Wikipedian from Pakistan. We have an Urdu Wikipedia that needs all the help that it can get. Currently, we do not have many active users and we will really appreciate if you would consider becoming an active contributor. As you are already familiar with Wikipedia's style and rules, your presence would also help elevate the overall content quality. Hope to see you soon at Urdu Wikipedia Regards, Copyright problem: MaqaamHello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Maqaam, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://books.google.com/books?id=CciwZl_owWIC&lpg=PA263&dq=Maqam%20spiritual%20station%20or%20developmental%20level&pg=PA263#v=onepage&q=Maqam%20spiritual%20station%20or%20developmental%20level&f=false and http://www.ibnarabisociety.org/articles/osmanyahya.html (search for "topmost"), and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing. If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Maqaam saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! VernoWhitney (talk) 13:50, 28 October 2010 (UTC) Join us at FBHello Pakistanis Wikipedians! Assalam-o-Alaikum, I hope you are enjoying editing Wikipedia and helping around. I want to join every Pakistani Wikipedian on facebook so I hope you would like to join us in our community. We would/could help each other and make Pakistani articles more better. Join us:
And then sign my guestbook for memories. Regards: -- Captain Wikipedia! ( T - C - G ) 12:49, 15 November 2012 (UTC)  The article Apostasy in Shafi tradition has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why. While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!
Wiki Loves Monuments - Pakistan Hi Farhansher! Wiki Loves Monuments, the world's largest photography competition, will be taking place in Pakistan this September. The competition is all about capturing the cultural monuments and heritage sites of Pakistan and uploading these images on Commons to create an online repository which will be freely available to all. Start taking photos of the sites enlisted here and upload them in September to be eligible for national and international prizes. Email: contact@wikilovesmonuments.pk Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:10, 8 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Pakistan Hi Farhansher! Wikimedia Community User Group Pakistan is organizing an edit drive for Pakistani Wikipedians on Pakistani Cultural Heritage throughout the month of July. You can read the event details here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Nomination of List of Sufi texts for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Sufi texts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Sufi texts until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — kashmiri TALK 00:41, 14 May 2017 (UTC) Concern regarding Draft:Kabir Helminski
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:03, 22 March 2021 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Kabir Helminski Hello, Farhansher. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kabir Helminski". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:24, 24 March 2021 (UTC) The article List of da'is has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 11 August 2023 (UTC) |
||||||
