User talk:Extrapolaris

Welcome!

Hello, Extrapolaris, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Firsfron of Ronchester 00:08, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. mgiganteus1 (talk) 18:52, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Pervushovisaurus was accepted

Pervushovisaurus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 07:33, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Herpetocetus was accepted

Herpetocetus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 17:22, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Protororqualus was accepted

Protororqualus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 22:03, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Extrapolaris/Cetotheriophanes (January 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 23:05, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Basilotritus was accepted

Basilotritus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:19, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Cetotheriophanes was accepted

Cetotheriophanes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:44, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Archaebalaenoptera was accepted

Archaebalaenoptera, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 22:59, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Articles for Deletion nominations

G'day, this is just to let you know that there is a set procedure for creating Article for Deletion discussions, which you can easily find by typing WP:AfD in the search box on the left of the page. Instructions there will tell you how to go about it. The fact that you haven't used the proper Templates means basically that nobody knows the discussions exist, otherwise they would have been closed days ago. More specifically, if you think an article's content needs to be merged, there's no need to even open an AfD discussion; you can either post a comment on the article's Talk page to discuss it, or be bold and just go ahead and do the merging yourself. Typing WP:MERGE in the search box will get you to a page that tells you how to do that. If the two dinosaur names are typos, they should be redirected instead of deleted; type WP:REDIRECT to get you to a page that tells you how to do that. Cheers YSSYguy (talk) 11:54, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Extrapolaris/Cuba and weapons of mass destruction (April 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 13:19, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Extrapolaris/Cuba and weapons of mass destruction (April 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:46, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Information icon Hello, I'm Chris troutman. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Propaganda, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:25, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cuba and weapons of mass destruction (May 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
JustBerry (talk) 21:34, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Extrapolaris, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JustBerry (talk) 21:34, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Cuba and weapons of mass destruction

Draft:Cuba and weapons of mass destruction, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Cuba and weapons of mass destruction and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Cuba and weapons of mass destruction during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JustBerry (talk) 21:34, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hi, this was probably just a slip-up when you changed your mind, but you left an edit summary which did not refer to deletion when tagging Tilgate Formation for proposed deletion. This requirement at WP:PROD#Nominating is only fair to other editors who may have the page on their watchlist.

I hope this is not a habitual oversight, but I just noticed that you left another edit summary "added flags" for an edit in which you not only did that but also deleted several table entries at List of stratigraphic units... Your deletions may well be justified, but please be open about the changes that you are making.

Hope this helps, – Fayenatic London 10:26, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Nannocetus) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Nannocetus, Extrapolaris!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please consider expanding this stub (and other recent paleo whale articles) with morphological descriptions to supplement the taxonomy/nomenclature coverage (which is rather esoteric for most readers). don't forget WP:MTAU!

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

August 2014

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. It appears that you have added a link to an image on an external website to Propaganda, likely in an attempt to display that image on the page. For technical and policy reasons, it is not possible to use images from external websites on Wikipedia. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request an upload. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:48, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:"Let's Drive the US Imperialists Out and Reunify the Homeland!.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:"Let's Drive the US Imperialists Out and Reunify the Homeland!.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:44, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Kwangmyongsong 3-2.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Kwangmyongsong 3-2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:48, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Kwangmyongsong 2.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kwangmyongsong 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. --benlisquareT•C•E 03:28, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Dusisiren83041s.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dusisiren83041s.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:55, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Kwangmyongsong-3 1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Kwangmyongsong-3 1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:56, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Paektusan-1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Paektusan-1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:56, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2015 in paleontology

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as 2015 in paleontology, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:24, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 30 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:50, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steneosaurus obtusidens has been accepted

Steneosaurus obtusidens, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e deckertalk 05:09, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cuba and weapons of mass destruction

Hello Extrapolaris. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Cuba and weapons of mass destruction".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Cuba and weapons of mass destruction}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:33, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Kuhlia xenura.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kuhlia xenura.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:00, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:North Korean propaganda poster "Beware the US Imperialist Wolves".jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:North Korean propaganda poster "Beware the US Imperialist Wolves".jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:North Korean soldier smashing Capitol building.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:North Korean soldier smashing Capitol building.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 13 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Surviving US Veterans of World War II

I've reverted all your changes. We've been through this with people trying to remove Axis veterans and UK veterans, and the consensus is not to. Czolgolz (talk) 17:07, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of surviving U.S. veterans of WW2

The article List of surviving U.S. veterans of WW2 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article seeks to segment the U.S. personnel from List of surviving veterans of World War II. The removal of U.S. personnel was reverted at [1] and at [2]. This duplicative material is not being updated; cf at least 35 intermediate revisions by 21 users at the full list.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SBaker43 (talk) 21:23, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 7 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Phosphorosaurus has been nominated for Did You Know

DYK for Phosphorosaurus

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Minor Trifling Quible

Concerning your excellent contributions to Eusmilus and Nimravus, I take it N. gomphodus is a synonym of N. brachyops?--Mr Fink (talk) 16:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Nimravus gomphodus is the same species as N. brachyops; see the following reference for more info: Barrett PZ. (2016) Taxonomic and systematic revisions to the North American Nimravidae (Mammalia, Carnivora) PeerJ 4:e1658 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1658. Extrapolaris (talk) 16:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian[reply]
Thanks!--Mr Fink (talk) 22:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Writer's Barnstar
Dear Extrapolaris, thank you for your contributions on Wikipedia, especially your recent creation of Prototherium. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 04:00, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merging genus articles

Hi, articles should not be merged or deleted unless there is clear confirmation they are the same as something else in the literature. Our own speculation doesn't count. Also, when merging, always transfer unique info from the redirected articles so it isn't just lost. FunkMonk (talk) 18:01, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.   Spartan7W §   01:29, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016 (2)

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.   Spartan7W §   01:32, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning Your Edit at Ichthyodectidae

Hi, I moved your edit concerning "Unicerosaurus" from Ichthyodectidae to Xiphactinus, as it appeared to concern specifically about Xiphactinus' synonym, Portheus, and didn't appear to be about ichthyodectids in general. I hope you don't mind.--Mr Fink (talk) 15:57, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of surviving veterans of World War II. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. this edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_surviving_veterans_of_World_War_II&diff=prev&oldid=711954582 is wilful vandalism of wikipedia. Martin451 20:46, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Did you really make this edit, where you removed every veteran with the last name "Brown" from the List of surviving veterans of World War II, with the edit summary; "Removed vets with the last name Brown b/c they're nothing but a bunch of brownies", then revert them back in, saying "Sorry, just was making fun of the last name Brown", then remove them all again, with the same edit summary? Wow. - theWOLFchild 22:28, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I made this edit because I was simply making fun of the last name Brown, then reverted it just to make other wiki users happy, jokingly referring to John Brown as John Brown the Brownie.Extrapolaris (talk) 01:25, 11 April 2016 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian[reply]

Proposed deletion of Richard E. Cole

The article Richard E. Cole has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This person has a temporary "notability" that may not adhere to WP:NTEMP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Paine  19:43, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove dead links as you did here just because their archive URL is at archive.is which is blacklisted, per WP:DEADREF. I'm going to restore them and look for alternative archives and request whitelisting if necessary. nyuszika7h (talk) 16:47, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Douglas XB-31 and Model 423 side views.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Douglas XB-31 and Model 423 side views.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 12:52, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-paste between Wikipedia articles

Hello. Please review Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia, as it appears that a lot of your contributions are unattributed copypaste from one existing WP article to another, often followed by deletion of the original content (which obscures the origin). Geogene (talk) 02:18, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (2-10-10-10-10-10-2) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 2-10-10-10-10-10-2, Extrapolaris!

Wikipedia editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Perhaps a photo?

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (2-8-8-8-8-8-2) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 2-8-8-8-8-8-2, Extrapolaris!

Wikipedia editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Perhaps a photo? Please also see [WPCITE]] in order to clean up naked URLs

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Giraffe redirects

Before making such bold moves, I suggest you gain a consensus to do so. I have reversed your changes. I suggest you start/join discussions at Talk:Giraffe. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:07, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Extrapolaris. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting false?

Hello I like prehistoric life as well, but don't change their names since the marked name was the original name. Or don't informally distinct the species of those genus or don't change the range of the fossil or you may be no longer available to edit that because you are blocked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.16.154.230 (talk) 08:42, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Squalodon barbarus is from Oligocene

You are wrecking the range- those are unrelated, apokryltaros, save me! I'm a damsel in distress! Squalodon fossils are mostly from Oligocene , it's not the right change of yours, You may be blocked!

-I want apokryltaros to save me!

Theriosuchus fossils also recorded in Jurassic!

You can't make the false range or fixing them again, you may be blocked or reverted by apokryltaros.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.16.154.230 (talk) 12:51, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03036758.2016.1156552. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:03, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Notocetus) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Notocetus, Extrapolaris!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice article. I've added one additional online reference, and it would be great if you would add the online links to any of the others. The Fordyce reference is certainly available at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/10662#/summary

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 14:16, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teleidosaurus

What exactly were you trying to achieve with your move of Teleorhinus calvadosii to Wikipedia:Teleidosaurus and then moving the redirect left behind to User:Teleidosaurus? I've requested deletion of the user namespace redirect, as that clearly is not supposed to go there. Note: Teleidosaurus exists as an article? Thanks. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:29, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teleorhinus calvadosii is a spelling error for Teleidosaurus calvadosii, so Teleorhinus calvadosii should be marked for deletion.Extrapolaris (talk) 23:31, 23 July 2017 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian[reply]
If it's a spelling error, it can be considered a plausible redirect. I've changed the target of Teleorhinus calvadosii to Teleidosaurus, which is what I believe you wanted in the first place. The project space redirect has been tagged for deletion. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:35, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Teleorhinus calvadosii was of course not a spelling error. It is a no longer accepted combination of the specific name calvadosii with the generic name Teleorhinus, the latter now having been replaced by Terminonaris. It means that some author(s) at some time placed the species in the genus Teleorhinus, a scientific view that has now become superseded.  Wikiklaas  14:07, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Plesiosauria

Dear Extrapolaris, after you changed Template:Plesiosauria, it had become a mess; you must have noticed that because you tried to repair it with several "error fixes". I guess you would have done better to undo all your changes and ask someone for help. Leaving the template broken seems unacceptable.

What exactly were you trying to achieve? If you can explain it in a few words (like: adding genus such and such to this and this list, inserting a subfamily between group x and y), I could try to help you achieve this. For now, I undid all your changes, as the template is used on quite a number of highly visible pages.  Wikiklaas  12:29, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Idiochelys) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Idiochelys, Extrapolaris!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

It would be helpful if you would include urls to online versions of the references, even if only the abstract is visible for free.(ie: http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.3374/014.058.0205)

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 19:43, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Mirocetus) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Mirocetus, Extrapolaris!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I expanded some citations with {{cite journal}}. Please consider doing this in the future. A tip: if you use the Edit toolbar, you can automatically generate a citation using by simply entering a DOI or PMID. See also Wikipedia:Citing sources#Citation templates and tools.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 19:18, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pappaceras

Hi, I've created the taxonomy templates (see WP:Autotaxobox system) so that the automatic taxobox at Pappaceras works, but I've no idea whether the taxonomy is correct or not. I see that the family the article says the genus belongs to (Paraceratheriidae) actually redirects to a subfamily. So please check. There are also missing references. Peter coxhead (talk) 15:00, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Rayanistes) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Rayanistes, Extrapolaris!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

You may want to see if you meet the criteria for WP:Autopatrolled, I have now reviewed many good articles by you.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 07:43, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Tiucetus) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Tiucetus, Extrapolaris!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

It looks like you'll need to replace to automatic taxobox as the taxon is not recognised. Because I'm not too familiar with cranial morphological terms, could you check whether theres a noun missing from this pariah sentence: "..more anteriorly projected supraoccipital and parietal, and..."? I'd have expected clarification, with a noun such as "bone", "foramen", "process" etc.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 09:25, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a good idea to leave the automatic taxobox not working. To fix this:
  • Look at the dummy taxobox generated – the second box – and find the linked word "fix".
  • Click on the link. Fill in the rank (e.g. genus) and the parent (e.g. the family). Put |extinct=yes if appropriate. Save this page.
  • Go back to the article where the taxobox isn't working, open it for editing and save with no changes. Now check the taxobox.
I regularly check the error-tracking category that monitors incorrect taxoboxes, and will create the taxonomy template if required, as I did at Tiucetus, but it really should be fixed when an article is created, and certainly when reviewed. Peter coxhead (talk) 07:49, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Allacerops) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Allacerops, Extrapolaris!

Wikipedia editor SamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Another quality stub article. You should consider going through the proceedings for Wikipedia:Autopatrolled privileges.

To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SamHolt6 (talk) 02:47, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Taxonomy templates

Hi, at Isocetus, you put 

|rank=genus
|parent=Thalassotherii
|extinct=yes

inside the automatic taxobox. This doesn't work. Autotaxoboxes pick up their taxonomy from "taxonomy templates". You can read all about the system at WP:Autotaxobox system. The simple approach is:

  1. When an incomplete taxobox appears (with a "help" box above it), look for the word "fix" in the incomplete taxobox, and click on it.
  2. This will create a partly filled taxonomy template. Add the rank, parent and whether extinct here and save.
  3. You may need to repeat the process if the parent doesn't have a taxonomy template.
  4. Now return to the article which has the incomplete taxobox, open for editing and preview. You should now see a complete taxobox; check it and save.

I'm always happy to help with autotaxobox matters. Peter coxhead (talk) 06:49, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Hyainailouridae) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Hyainailouridae, Extrapolaris!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please always check your references. If you copy citations from other articles, make sure you copy complete bibliographic information, and not just <ref name="Lambert1988"/>. When you don't do this, it creates the errors shown.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 05:07, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Extrapolaris: please see Template:Taxonomy/Hyainailouridae – this is what you should have created.
@Animalparty: I'm surprised you left a reviewed page with a non-functional taxobox.
Peter coxhead (talk) 10:34, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Equus francisci

If the name was renamed then you should put in a request to rename the article. Otherwise the edits just make the article more confusing. (also you used your IP before and if it wasn't on purpose you might want to ask for an oversight to remove it from the history log. -glove- (talk) 00:04, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Phoberodon) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Phoberodon, Extrapolaris!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please could you fix the Infobox as this taxon is not recognised by the Automatic taxobox.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 11:54, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Extrapolaris: I've fixed the taxobox by creating Template:Taxonomy/Phoberodon, but as always, I don't know whether the resulting taxonomy is correct. Please follow the notes above, and learn how to fix taxoboxes when the taxonomy template is missing! Peter coxhead (talk) 17:23, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Extrapolaris. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Exiguodon) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Exiguodon, Extrapolaris!

Wikipedia editor Babymissfortune just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for taking the time creating this page. It is appreciated.

To reply, leave a comment on Babymissfortune's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Happy New Year!!! Babymissfortune 04:17, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Streptospondylus at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 00:41, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orbital launches

Re: this edit - I've requested an update of the map to show NZ's new "status" over at Wikicommons. Hopefully it won't be long before an updated map is available. Grutness...wha? 05:32, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Linking doi

Hi, rather than putting a "bare" doi in a reference, as you did at Retroporcus, it's always worth using {{doi}} instead, because it creates a link. See the current version. Peter coxhead (talk) 11:17, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Taxoboxes

Hi. Any chance you could add manual taxoboxes to a few of the recent articles you've edited like Herpetocetus and Aeolodon? They've currently got automatic taxoboxes where the taxa aren't recognised. Cheers, Nick Moyes (talk) 23:31, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Nick Moyes: the taxobox at Herpetocetus should always have worked, as the taxonomy template has existed since 2016 – you sometimes need a purge or a null edit to get an automated taxobox to show correctly in a newly created article. The taxobox at Aeolodon is now fixed as well. Several of us watch the error-tracking categories and will eventually fix bad taxoboxes. Peter coxhead (talk) 13:29, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Etrumeus makiawa) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Etrumeus makiawa, Extrapolaris!

Wikipedia editor SamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Well done stub article, thanks for creating.

To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SamHolt6 (talk) 23:31, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Lined butterflyfish at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:00, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Extrapolaris, you never actually completed the nomination page—there is no "hook" included, that "Did you know" question that would be placed on the main page as part of a set to intrigue the reader and inspire them to click on the bold link to the Lined butterflyfish article—and you also didn't complete step 3 as noted above. If you want to proceed with the nomination, you'll need to do these things. I'll be happy to help you if you'd like.
If you've decided not to proceed with the nomination, I'll arrange for the nomination page to be deleted if you don't want to tag it with the db-g7 template as noted above. Just let me know what you want to do. As it's been over a month since this was posted to your talk page, if I haven't heard back from you in another seven days, I'll assume you've lost interest and proceed accordingly. Thanks for your submission to DYK. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:47, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The edit you made was not what was asked for (you created a page at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Lined butterflyfish, which is not what step 3 says), and you still haven't modified the actual nomination to include a hook—an interesting statement about the fish based on the sourced information in the article—like those displayed on the main page. As I said, I'd be happy to help, but you need to let me know what you'd like to do. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:44, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your edits on Hühteeg Svita

First off you reverted my parameter to cretaceous rather than albian, as per wikiproject geology's talk page, the parameter was originally (and is still used) to mean interval, as the time frame of this formation is well characterized (middle to late Albian) Albian should be used in the "period" parameter. Secondly have you read the most up to date paper on the stratigraphy of the Choyr Basin?, there are only two formations, the lower Khalzan Uul Formation and the upper Khuren Dukh Formation. The Öösh formation appears to be in a completely different part of Mongolia, so isn't part of the Choyr basin, and therefore doesn't overlie the Khalzan Uul Formation, and the Öösh formation is 600-800 m thick rather than 100 m. Hemiauchenia (talk) 09:48, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, I wondered if there might be a temporal disconnect between the Oosh and Choyr Basin localities, because Shanag, Psittacosaurus, Asiatosaurus, and Prodeinodon are older than the dinos found in the Khoyr Basin, which is why I reinstated the Oosh Formation page, because Oosh is in a different locality in Mongolia.68.4.252.105 (talk) 00:19, 5 August 2018 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian[reply]

A page you started (Soumyasaurus) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Soumyasaurus, Extrapolaris!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Do you think you meet the criteria to go for WP:AUTOPATROLLED?

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 05:49, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying licensed material requires proper attribution

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Macrosqualodelphis you included material from a webpage that is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this legal requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:32, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the Creative Commons license. Please have a look at this example of how it is done. Alternatively you can use the {{CC-notice}} template. Please leave a message on my talk page if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:04, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chiromyiformes

Thanks for restarting Chiromyiformes. Please check the tags that I entered, solve them, and then remove them. Also, please double check the infobox, so that this article is issue-free. I am not an expert in the subject, so I'm going to rely on your expertise. Again thanks for the contribution! --1l2l3k (talk) 20:19, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Lined butterflyfish

Extrapolaris, it appears that you created this DYK nomination page back on June 9. However, you didn't propose an actual hook for it, nor complete the nomination process.

More, as best I can tell, this nomination does not qualify for DYK: It was not new nor newly expanded by a factor of 5 within seven days prior to June 9, nor was it a newly made Good Article.

I am going to be putting this page up for a speedy deletion, since it does not qualify and the nomination wasn't fully completed, but I wanted to let you know about the basic DYK rules in case you decide to nominate another article there in the future. Best of luck! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:39, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly reminder about SVP abstracts

Hello, Extrapolaris;

Just to let you know, results from the SVP abstracts are not supposed to be disseminated until after presentation:

"Unless specified otherwise, coverage of abstracts presented orally at the Annual Meeting is strictly prohibited until the start time of the presentation, and coverage of poster presentations is prohibited until the relevant poster session opens for viewing. As defined here, “coverage” includes all types of electronic and print media; this includes blogging, tweeting, advanced online publication, and other intent to communicate or disseminate results or discussion presented at the SVP Annual Meeting."

J. Spencer (talk) 23:44, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GOLauncher1

Not "Goes Launch 1". No wonder I couldn't find it, so thanks for the link. - BilCat (talk) 00:46, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ciuciulea davidi

Hi. While doing new page patrol I saw your article on Ciuciulea davidi. The article had several issues with templates not formatting correctly. I have moved it to draft space to let you work on and improve those before moving it back to mainspace. If you have any questions feel free to ping me here or leave a message on my talk page. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:34, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just fixed the template so everything should be good.Extrapolaris (talk) 03:47, 16 October 2018 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian[reply]

Richard E. Cole

I've recreated the Richard E. Cole article from previous versions. I believe it can survive another AfD, as his is the last surviving Raider. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 21:19, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Isotta Fraschini Asso 750

Thanks for creating Isotta Fraschini Asso 750.

A New Page Patroller Boleyn just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Hello, can you please help solve the issues with the references here?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 08:37, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Extrapolaris. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Vorombe

On 7 December 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Vorombe, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Vorombe titan, an extinct elephant bird from Madagascar, shared its habitat with dwarf hippos, giant lemurs, and giant tortoises? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vorombe. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Vorombe), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:02, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Hylerpeton) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Hylerpeton.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Nice work, there is no such category as "Bashkirian amphibians of North America", you can either create the category or delete it from the page. Cheer

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 21:36, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

airplanes

Just as a suggestion, it might help to have some text. DGG ( talk ) 05:25, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Fokker XHB-2

Hello, Extrapolaris,

Thanks for creating Fokker XHB-2! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please take a look at WP:CIT and WP:CITE on how to format citations and footnotes.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 TT me 14:21, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ufag C.I

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ufag C.I requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:dTOKyHywNegJ:https://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.asp%3Faircraft_id%3D744+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ca. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:43, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

new articles

thanks for having a go, but as you can see above your efforts fall short of the mark. This is not a disaster and can be rectified relatively easily. Firstly you might like to use the templates at Template:WPAVIATION creator for easy article creation that will avoid other editors bringing it up to acceptable standards. Secondly, do not just cut and paste from other articles. Even books are not allowed to be repeated verbatim. If you don't want to follow the guidelines you may find that your efforts will, at best. be re-wriiten or, at worst, deleted. Happy editing - the articles are great to see, but.......--Petebutt (talk) 22:57, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Potez 34 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Potez 34, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:46, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Halberstadt C.VII) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Halberstadt C.VII.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

When providing an offline source, please provide more information, including relevant page numbers. See WP:CIT and WP:CITE on how to format footnotes. But keep up the good work on these aviation articles.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 TT me 21:55, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Blériot XLIII

Hello, Extrapolaris,

Thanks for creating Blériot XLIII! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please take a look at WP:CIT and WP:CITE on how to format citations and footnotes.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 TT me 20:15, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New aircraft articles

Thanks for plethora of articles, however, the vast majotity use an unacceptable single source i.e. Airwar.ru, which is not accepable to Wikipedia due to its widespread copyright abuses. By all means use it as a backup, or a source of references, but try not to cite from it directly. The other issue is the style of your articles, which leave a lot to be desired; to produce good articles, that won't get re-written, try using Template:WPAVIATION creator, and write using your own words and not just cutting and pasting a translation program's output. Just a few thoughts. Nice to see articles coming for these more obscure aircraft, but it becomes tiresome having to re-write the majority of them!! --Petebutt (talk) 16:13, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sopwith AT

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sopwith AT requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.ctie.monash.edu.au/hargrave/rpav_britain.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:13, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Morane-Saulnier MS.200

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Morane-Saulnier MS.200 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_morane_saulnier_MS200.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:26, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bréguet Br 902 Cinzano

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bréguet Br 902 Cinzano requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.j2mcl-planeurs.net/dbj2mcl/planeurs-machines/planeur-fiche_0int.php?code=303. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:33, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Nihon L7P

Hello, Extrapolaris,

Thanks for creating Nihon L7P! I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Nice work on the article but additional references would be needed. Note that the russian wiki article is not suitable as a source and should be removed.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 07:30, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Grigorovich M-23

Hello, Extrapolaris,

Thanks for creating Grigorovich M-23! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please provide references for this article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 TT me 22:38, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Copyright problem icon Your addition to BFW CL.I has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:32, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:45, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated warnings, you continued to add copyright material to Wikipedia in violation of our copyright policy. You cannot resume editing until you provide a clear statement that demonstrates that you have read and understand our copyright policy and intend to follow it in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:46, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Extrapolaris (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry, my bad, didn't realize incorporated content was copyrighted. Next time, when I create a paleontology-related page, I won't use copyrighted info, but instead will make the intro of each article brief so that other people will have the incentive to add non-copyrighted info to the article. Extrapolaris (talk) 14:31, 16 February 2019 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian[reply]

Accept reason:

The statement below shows that you understand our expectations from a copyright point of view and intend to follow the copyright policy in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 04:28, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Extrapolaris is a very valuable editor, who is probably more up to date with new palaeontological developments than anyone else here (losing him would be a big loss). Blocking indefinitely seems very excessive, since he doesn't even appear to have been blocked before. At most, it should be a temporary block. FunkMonk (talk) 17:15, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Repeated copyright violation is one of those things where we regularly block indefinitely as a first block, as it can get Wikipedia into legal trouble and so is something we have to take very seriously. But the block is only until Extrapolaris can satisfy a reviewing admin that they do properly understand Wikipedia's copyright policy and that no more violations will occur. Hopefully someone will review the request soon. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:19, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Extrapolaris. I'm not sure why you didn't realise that the material you were adding was copyright and that it was not okay to add here. Could you please answer a question: When is it okay to copy from your source and when is it not okay? How can you tell the difference? — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:16, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Diannaa, it's not okay to copy material from my source when not asking permission of the copyright holder from sources that are not public domain or compatibly licensed (unless it's a brief quotation used in accordance with Wikipedia's non-free content policy and guideline). Even inserting text copied with some changes can be a copyright violation if there is substantial linguistic similarity in creative language or sentence structure; this is known as close paraphrasing, which can also raise concerns about plagiarism. Such a situation should be treated seriously, as copyright violations not only harm Wikipedia's redistributability, but also create legal issues. It's okay to copy material from my source if my write in in my words, not the copyright owner.Extrapolaris (talk) 00:12, 18 February 2019 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian[reply]
Thanks, I have now unblocked, as you do have a clear understanding of our copyright policy and intend to follow it in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 04:28, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Dioplotherium) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Dioplotherium.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|PCN02WPS}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 22:46, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Domningia) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Domningia.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

You may want to look at applying for autopatrolled rights, seeing as you're fast approaching your 600th article. You can read more at WP:APAT and apply at WP:RFP/A.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|PCN02WPS}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 04:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chatterjee 1995, Bruhathkayosaurus reference.

Hi Extrapolaris, I noticed that you cited Chatterjee, S. (1995). “The last dinosaurs of India”. The Dinosaur Report, Fall 1995. p. 12-18. in the Bruhathkayosaurus article. Do you happen to know where a copy of this exists? Thanks. Steveoc 86 (talk) 20:54, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Castel C-310P

Hello, Extrapolaris,

Thanks for creating Castel C-310P! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please take a look at WP:CIT and WP:CITE on how to use, place and format citations and footnotes.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 TT me 15:00, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Review of your articles

Hi,

I'm leaving you a message to let you know that I've reviewed the following articles you created. Please check them and let me know if you have any questions regarding the feedback!

  1. IAR-811
  2. IAR-813
  3. IAR-817
  4. IAR-818
  5. IAR-831
  6. Horten H.VII
  7. Eta (airship)
  8. Delta (airship)
  9. Epsilon class blimp
  10. Kalinin K-12
  11. Fauvel AV.46
  12. Fauvel AV.42
  13. Friedrichshafen FF.67
  14. Friedrichshafen FF.63
  15. Friedrichshafen FF.21
  16. Friedrichshafen FF.19
  17. Friedrichshafen FF.17
  18. Friedrichshafen FF.11
  19. Friedrichshafen FF.8
  20. Friedrichshafen FF.4
  21. Friedrichshafen FF.2
  22. Friedrichshafen FF.1
  23. Caspar CLE 12
  24. Caspar CLE 16
  25. Caspar CLE 11
  26. Caspar CS 14
  27. Caspar CJ 14
  28. G Elias & Brother
  29. Akaflieg Berlin B8
  30. Akaflieg Berlin B6
  31. Akaflieg Berlin B5
  32. Akaflieg Berlin B4 F.F.
  33. Akaflieg Berlin B3 Charlotte II
  34. Akaflieg Berlin B2 Teufelchen
  35. Akaflieg Berlin B1

Many thanks!

SITH (talk) 13:43, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Chatelain AC-5

Hello, Extrapolaris,

Thanks for creating Chatelain AC-5! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please take the time to format your citations, rather than using raw links. See WP:CIT and WP:CITE.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 TT me 17:14, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-existent categories

Information icon Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Fauvel AV.29, please make sure that the category page actually exists. In some cases, it may be appropriate to create a new category in accordance with Wikipedia's categorization guidelines, but it is usually better to use the most specific available existing category. It is never appropriate to leave a page categorised in a non-existent category, i.e. one whose link displays in red. You may find it helpful to use the gadget HotCat, which tests whether a category exists before saving a change. Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:53, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Akaflieg Hannover AFH-24

Hello, Extrapolaris,

Thanks for creating Akaflieg Hannover AFH-24! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please look at WP:CIT and WP:CITE on how to format citations.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 TT me 03:41, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Akaflieg Karlsruhe AK-1

Hello, Extrapolaris,

Thanks for creating Akaflieg Karlsruhe AK-1! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please learn how to format citations/footnotes

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 TT me 03:43, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Akaflieg Stuttgart FS-32

Hello, Extrapolaris,

Thanks for creating Akaflieg Stuttgart FS-32! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please format your footnotes properly.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 TT me 03:46, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission, as you did at Starck AS.20. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:50, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Extrapolaris (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry, my bad, didn't realize incorporated content was copyrighted. Next time, I won't use copyrighted info, but instead will write articles in my words so that other people will have the incentive to add non-copyrighted info to the article. Extrapolaris (talk) 14:55, 10 March 2019 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian[reply]

Decline reason:

This is your second block for copyright violations. What has changed? Moreover, I am concerned that you do not understand the collaborative nature of this project and are not responsive to others concerns - you only have 0.2% user talk edits. We shouldn't have to resort to the banhammer in order to communicate with you. MER-C 16:14, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I was struck by the nearly identical text used in the "reason" part of this "unblocked" template as on February 16 for the previous copyvio block. Surely something more should have been provided to explain why, in this specific case, it happened again despite reassurances three weeks ago that it wouldn't. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:12, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Based solely on this talk page, I see very little evidence that Extrapolaris didn't cause more problems then they solved. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:20, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The source webpage does not have a copyright notice, but it doesn't have to. Under current copyright law, literary works are subject to copyright whether they are tagged as such or not. No registration is required, and no copyright notice is required. So we have to assume that all material we find online or in other sources such as books or magazines is copyright. Exceptions include works of the US Government and material specifically released under license. Even then, proper attribution is required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Extrapolaris (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry that I used copyrighted material from another source without permission when making the Starck AS.20 article. Next time, I will write an article using my own words. Extrapolaris (talk) 00:49, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian[reply]

Decline reason:

Given your history of copyright violations and not living up to past assurances, I don't believe you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:32, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • The user added this comment in an attempt to have the page speedy deleted: "My account was blocked, hope to create new account and new IP address." This shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the terms of the user's block, which I'll leave to a watching administrator to explain. - BilCat (talk) 20:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Extrapolaris (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I feel very sorry for my history of copyright violations. I've lived up to past assurances. I won't resort copyright violations again for a third time. Extrapolaris (talk) 21:29, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not demonstrate that you understand what copyright is and specifically what WP:COPYVIO states. I suspect your only pathway to being unblocked will be the standard offer, and only then if you can demonstrate that you understand these things. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 22:25, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Extrapolaris (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I now understand that copyright is a legal right, existing in many countries, that grants the creator of an original work exclusive rights to determine whether, and under what conditions, this original work may be used by others. Copyright violations involve copying material without the permission of the copyright holder from sources that are not public domain or compatibly licensed (unless it's a brief quotation used in accordance with Wikipedia's non-free content policy and guideline) is likely to be a copyright violation. Even inserting text copied with some changes can be a copyright violation if there is substantial linguistic similarity in creative language or sentence structure; this is known as close paraphrasing, which can also raise concerns about plagiarism. Such a situation should be treated seriously, as copyright violations not only harm Wikipedia's redistributability, but also create legal issues. The situation for images and other media is slightly different, as a wider variety of licenses is accepted. But, in short, media which is not available under a suitable free license and which does not meet the non-free content criteria, should be assumed to be unacceptable. Extrapolaris (talk) 00:04, 12 March 2019 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian[reply]

Decline reason:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Extrapolaris (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have an understanding of what constitutes copyright violations. In essence, violations of copyright include copying text a public source without the permission of the copyright holder. Even copied text with some changes is a copyright violation, and so is media unavailable under a suitable free license. I also promise not to resort to sock puppetry by creating more than one account. Extrapolaris (talk) 00:53, 12 March 2019 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. See below. Huon (talk) 01:21, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Extrapolaris (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want my account to be unblocked because I fully understand what constitutes copyright violations. In general, violations of copyright include copying text a public source without the permission of the copyright holder. Even copied text with some changes is a copyright violation, and so is media unavailable under a suitable free license. I also promise not to resort to sock puppetry by creating more than one account. Extrapolaris (talk) 00:07, 28 March 2019 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian[reply]

Decline reason:

Given that I just declined an unblock request for an IP address that you used to evade your block after all these nice promises to not engage in sockpuppetry, I'll have to decline this request, too. Huon (talk) 01:21, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:36, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to clean up List of notable surviving veterans of World War II

Hi, I was thinking that in order to clean-up article about living WW2 veterans, an autopatrol could be set up to track obituaries for any vets on the list, because a number of veterans removed from the list in the past died a few months earlier.

We could also create separate subsections on the page detailing living famous athletes, politicians, scientists, and historians who fought in WW2.Extrapolaris (talk) 21:54, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian[reply]

Akaflieg Braunschweig SB-14 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Akaflieg Braunschweig SB-14, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DannyS712 (talk) 10:11, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Société d'Etude pour la Locomotion Aérienne moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Société d'Etude pour la Locomotion Aérienne, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources to establish notability. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DannyS712 (talk) 10:13, 12 March 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Extrapolaris (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24487 was submitted on Mar 28, 2019 01:43:19. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 01:43, 28 March 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Extrapolaris (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24685 was submitted on Apr 11, 2019 21:39:16. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 21:39, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Société d'Etude pour la Locomotion Aérienne concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Société d'Etude pour la Locomotion Aérienne, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of surviving German veterans of World War II

Notice

The article List of surviving German veterans of World War II has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Criteria for list is vague and too general

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 07:46, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Société d'Etude pour la Locomotion Aérienne concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Société d'Etude pour la Locomotion Aérienne, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:34, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Douglas XNO-2

Notice

The article Douglas XNO-2 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NPRODUCT Airplane was never built, no SIGCOV

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rogermx (talk) 16:56, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Société d'Etude pour la Locomotion Aérienne

Hello, Extrapolaris. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Société d'Etude pour la Locomotion Aérienne".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:14, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #55050

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 05:22, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Update

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Extrapolaris (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block for this account is unnecessary because I gave honored my promises not to engage in anymore copyright violations (the reason this account was blocked in the first place), and I accidentally created the account User:Snubble unaware of rules governing sockpuppetry. I also regret creating the accounts User:Supercalifornication and User:Convariety because those actions were acts of sockpuppetry. I sincerely apologize for the convenience that my short-sighted acts of sockpuppetry caused. 70.181.120.55 (talk) 04:26, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; unblock request made in bad faith while violating WP:EVADE. Clearly no chance of an unblock at this time. Yamla (talk) 09:48, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Extrapolaris has left out his most recent blocked sock account, User:Nothosaurus, which was blocked only 2 days ago. He has also used numerous IPs, apparently dynamic, including this one in the block request. I don't know exactly what the root cause here is, but he seems unwilling or unable to understand that he is not permitted to edit Wikipedia in any way for any reason whatsoever. Overall, he does good work, and as such I've tried to encourage him to respect his block for at least 6 months, but for some reason he thinks the block shouldn't apply to him any more because he is no longer adding copyvio text. I don't know how else to get this point across to him: His initial block was for copyright violations, but once he started using other accounts, the block is now for sockpuppetry also. In order to be unblocked, he MUST stop using other accounts or IP addresses to edit on Wikipedia. If he does not stop, he will never be unblocked. Further, any work he does on Wikipedia using other accounts, including on IPs, will be reverted and deleted. So continuing to work on Wikipedia is just wasting his time and ours. From what I can tell, perhaps English is not his first language, so he just isn't getting the point, but there could be other reasons a!so. I've spent the last several years trying to get these points across to him, but to no avail. I've offered to support his unblock if he will stop editing on Wikipedia for at least a year, but he won't even do that. Again, I don't know exactly what the issue is here, but whatever it is, he isn't getting the point. Perhaps someone else can get through to him, maybe in his native language, if it's not English. But my patience is almost expired. If he doesn't get the point soon, I will no longer advocate for his return. I know what his editing looks like, and I will continue to revert them or get the pages deleted, whichever is appropriate. I hate doing it, but Wikipedia does have rules, and they apply to everyone. BilCat (talk) 19:31, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #60703

is closed. Noting block evasion in March, checkuser block. G-locked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:31, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly did he say? 142.188.125.113 (talk) 02:56, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #63868

is closed. Check user block. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:46, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of DFW Dr.I

Notice

The article DFW Dr.I has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A quick Google search shows that the subject is not notable. The only result that was relevant is the only source in the article (Which I consider as dubious for Wikipedia use).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Equalwidth (C) 10:20, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]