en User talk:Epbr123

/Archive 1 15 Aug 2006 – 23 Jan 2008
/Archive 2 24 Jan 2008 – 2 Mar 2008
/Archive 3 2 Mar 2008 – 26 May 2008
/Archive 4 26 May 2008 – 14 Oct 2008
/Archive 5 14 Oct 2008 – 15 Jan 2010
/Archive 6 15 Jan 2010 – 9 Sep 2010
/Archive 7 9 Sep 2010 – 14 May 2012
/Archive 8 14 May 2012 –

Shaw and Crompton scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 15 August, 2021. Please check that the article needs no amendments. A coordinator will draft a blurb - based on your draft if the TFA came via TFA requests, or from an existing blurb on the FAC talk page if one has been posted. Feel free to comment on this. We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 13:31, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the article! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:48, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:56, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kate Bush This Women's Work Sample.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kate Bush This Women's Work Sample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FAR for Sheerness

I have nominated Sheerness for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 15:55, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FAR for Birchington-on-Sea

I have nominated Birchington-on-Sea for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Bumbubookworm (talk) 20:41, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FAR for Herne Bay

I have nominated Herne Bay for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Bumbubookworm (talk) 12:59, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected that it has been compromised. If your account is locked, please contact ca

wikimedia.org. Otherwise, if you are able to confirm that you are the user who created this account, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section), then add this below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}}.Drmies (talk) 01:30, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Level 1 desysop of Epbr123

Under the Level 1 desysopping procedures, the administrator permissions of Epbr123 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) have been temporarily removed as a suspected compromised account.

Supporting: CaptainEek, Casliber, Maxim For the Arbitration Committee, Maxim_(talk) 02:47, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Level 1 desysop of Epbr123

Nomination of Mia Rose (actress) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mia Rose (actress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mia Rose (actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:01, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kimber James for deletion

A discussion is taking place to determine if the article Kimber James is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimber James until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spartaz ^Humbug! 14:37, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brian Pumper for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brian Pumper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Pumper (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:57, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mr. Pete for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mr. Pete is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Pete until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:59, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Old Boston

The article Old Boston has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a town or village, or even a suburb, but now an industrial park / trading estate. Any content should be part of the Haydock article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Koncorde (talk) 20:55, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, back in 2008 you deleted the article on Alex Donahue. The article has been published anew (maybe for a different person of the same name?) but again is being considered for deletion. You are invited to participate in the deletion deliberations. Thank you. Al83tito (talk) 18:03, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Barrett Blade for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barrett Blade is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barrett Blade until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

gnu 57 17:11, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Kate Bush Running Up That Hill Sample.ogg

The file File:Kate Bush Running Up That Hill Sample.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

another sample of the same song used in two other articles supersedes this sample. not an improvement to understanding the singer-songwriter. may fail WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Joe Jackson - Steppin' Out sample.ogg

The file File:Joe Jackson - Steppin' Out sample.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

sample insufficient to understand the whole song. also unnecessary when the whole recording is searchable. may fail WP:NFCC#8.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Kate Bush King Of The Mountain Sample.ogg

The file File:Kate Bush King Of The Mountain Sample.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

sample unnecessary when the whole recording is searchable, especially online. article already explains the song in context without the sample. thus, may fail WP:NFCC#8.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bentfield Green for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bentfield Green is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bentfield Green until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mebigrouxboy (talk) 23:07, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Michael Jackson - One Day In Your Life.ogg

The file File:Michael Jackson - One Day In Your Life.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

sample unnecessary to contextually understand the whole song, which is searchable online. may fail WP:NFCC#8.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Epbr123. Thank you for your work on Skye Blue. User:Pyrrho the Skipper, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your contribution to Wikipedia

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Pyrrho the Skipper}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Pyrrho the Skipper (talk) 20:13, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Kate Bush - Hammer Horror sample.ogg

The file File:Kate Bush - Hammer Horror sample.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

sample unneeded to do the same purpose of one prevalent portion of a single release, and lacks ability to display contextual significance to the whole song. may fail WP:NFCC#8 and/or WP:NFCC#3a.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coldplay - Don't Panic.ogg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Coldplay - Don't Panic.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Kate Bush - Army Dreamers sample.ogg

The file File:Kate Bush - Army Dreamers sample.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

sample unnecessary to help readers understand the whole song. the sample's role similar to the article's: promoting (awareness of) and marketing the song just by song title and artist's name, both searchable. may fail WP:NFCC#8.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Kate Bush - Ne T'EnFuis Pas sample.ogg

The file File:Kate Bush - Ne T'EnFuis Pas sample.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

justification for sample usage not well illustrated in the song article. sample unnecessary to help readers contextualize and understand the whole song. the sample's role similar to the article's: promoting (awareness of) and marketing the song just by song title and artist's name, both searchable. may fail WP:NFCC#8.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Kate Bush - Suspended In Gaffa sample.ogg

The file File:Kate Bush - Suspended In Gaffa sample.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

justification for sample usage not well illustrated in the song article. sample unnecessary to help readers contextualize and understand the whole song. the sample's role similar to the article's: promoting (awareness of) and marketing the song just by song title and artist's name, both searchable. may fail WP:NFCC#8.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Michael Jackson - Black Or White.ogg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Michael Jackson - Black Or White.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ansley Common for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ansley Common is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ansley Common until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DragonofBatley (talk) 15:27, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Laurent Sky

The article Laurent Sky has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable bio with no news sources or non-primary sources used outside of the award section.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:16, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Laurent Sky for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laurent Sky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurent Sky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:16, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Boylestonfield

The article Boylestonfield has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a village, possibly a farm. No reliable sources to say what it is. Boylestone is already an article but this is not the same place

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of S. Muthukrishnan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article S. Muthukrishnan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. Muthukrishnan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jax 0677 (talk) 15:51, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Beck Bottom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beck Bottom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beck Bottom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PamD 12:49, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Auldyoch

The article Auldyoch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable farm

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tagishsimon (talk) 21:02, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kate Bush The Sensual World Sample.ogg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kate Bush The Sensual World Sample.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peter Gabriel & Kate Bush - Don't Give Up.ogg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Peter Gabriel & Kate Bush - Don't Give Up.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Joan Osborne - One Of Us.ogg

The file File:Joan Osborne - One Of Us.ogg has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the file should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Caemorgan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Caemorgan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caemorgan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pretzelles (talk) 19:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Perajärve for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Perajärve is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perajärve until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Estopedist1 (talk) 12:28, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Suhka for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Suhka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suhka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Estopedist1 (talk) 08:22, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bradaford

The article Bradaford has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources found. Possibly a typo of Bradford, Devon, propagated by the Town & Village Guide website about Bradford that misspells it "Bradaford" exactly once in the title.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cielquiparle (talk) 07:53, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]