Hi EBKWiki! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Baklava that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. - Sumanuil. (talk to me)02:15, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please stop. Almost all your edits are disruptive and need to be reverted.
On Economy of Iran, you claim to have corrected data on the basis of a "new GDP source" [1], but you aren't actually citing that; the source cited in the article is still the one that supports the previous figures [2]. Also, the new source you inserted for the poverty figures doesn't support the statement of "28% living on less than 3.4 million toman".
On Scimitar, the source you inserted is not a WP:RS for matters of etymology. Actual English etymology dictionaries including the OED also mention the Persian etymology but consider it uncertain.
On Persian language, the intro sentence about what the language is "known as" is about its names in English. The language is *not* known as "Parsi" in English; it's known as either "Persian" or "Farsi", so only those two names need to be mentioned. Besides, despite dozens of contributors having attempted to somehow cram "Parsi" in there too, none of them has ever come up with a reasonable source establishing that that name is even a significantly common variant in modern Persian itself. Also, your addition about the speaker numbers is still syntactically wrong, misplaced, wrongly formatted, and redundant with a statement further down in the lead.
You need to learn to edit based on reliable sources; otherwise all your edits will continue to be reverted or you will end up blocked. Fut.Perf.☼07:39, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Scimitar. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
You are pushing a pro Persian/pro Iranian point of view without providing references to reliable sources, and you have failed to engage with criticism of your edits. Your approach must change or your next block will be for a longer period of time. Cullen328 (talk) 10:40, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
