Thank you! What article was it? I'm here to start making major edits to the WikiProject ProWrestling for storyline buildups as soon as I become a Confirmed user. I joined because I noticed that it would take a while for WWE story lines to be updated on Wikipedia, so I'm now here to give up-to-date information on story lines. For instance, if a major part to a storyline (like if Daniel Bryan got payback on Triple H for an attack, I'd instantly put it on Wikipedia with a source) Thank you for the warm welcome. Who knows, maybe I could be more useful for other things around Wikipedia other than WWE? Cya around :) DrewieStewie (talk) 22:12, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Drewie, I've removed your entry again. First, you broke syntax in the accessdate perimeter, which as per above, the bot corrected before I was able to. Second, the source you used to support your statement about Orton wasn't the most reliable. The editors of this article have decided to only use the most reliable sources (see WP:RS) due to the potentially contentious subject matter. Claiming that a public figure has hepatitis C is libelous, so we need to be very careful about who we add. Thanks for your understanding in this matter. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 04:32, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oh good. Whew, I'm glad you reacted this way, since this is exactly the kind of thing that can disintegrate into nastiness. You are wise beyond your years, something I can say because I read your user page. ;) And another thing: I'm going to assume that you meant "Ok brother" like Winnie the Pooh would say, "Ok, bother!" since I am sister to five humans in this world but no one's brother. ;) Anyway, I'm glad you understand, like I said. I think it's great that you're contributing to wrestling articles here. The RS requirement isn't as strict for wrestling articles, since in order to be comprehensive, you'd have to use wrestling publications, websites, and other self-published sources. However, for the hep C article, we need to be stricter. Have fun learning about writing and how to use and cite sources here, and other WP policies. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 06:00, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Black Ice World Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page River Plate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Well I did think again. You need an exact source that says what you are stating in the article, a link to his entire timeline does not cut it. We have a policy on verifiability and WP:NOR and they must be followed. STATicmessage me!23:53, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Alright glad to know you won't be continuing, you most certainly will not getting blocked that way. Making the same disruptive repeated edits is a more immediate blockable offense than long term abuse, especially if it is to a BLP. STATicmessage me!00:15, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of wrestlers in WWE video games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NXT. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hell in a Cell may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
cell, was declared the winner. The third time was on the October 20, 2014 episode of [[WWE RAW]]], when the Hell in a Cell structure was lowered, on orders from [[Kane]], during a handicap street
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Zack Ryder may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
on the 102nd episode of Z: True Long Island Story/ Episode 100 of [[The JBL and Cole Show|The JBL (not Cole Show]], [[John Bradshaw Layfield took the Internet Championship away from him, but Ryder quickly beat him for
Yeah, there's no source stating that he's still in WWE, but at the same time, I also can't find any sources from after the Raw after Payback saying that he officially left the WWE. What do we do in this case? Future WWE Champion, DrewieStewie (talk) 20:48, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of wrestlers in WWE video games, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Rock and Ultimate Warrior. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to List of WWE personnel, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vjmlhds 03:23, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
No more
You need to stop adding Triple H as the "special guest" referee for Summerslam 2013 when Orton cashe in Money in the Bank. It actually doesn't matter if he counted it or not. He was not the guest referee for that match. He was only to guest referee for Bryan/Cena. It's like you're adding Paul Heyman when he counted Cena down against Rob Van Dam at One Night Stand 2006. It doesn't work like that. I've been in the business since 2002 and been a fan since 1985. You've still got a lot to learn at your age. Do not add misrepresented information because it will be reverted. Mega Z090 (talk) 22:02, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Goldust isn't the longest performer from debut. Goldust debuted two moths before, but he left the company many times. The date you only include in the header is Goldust debuted before Undertaker. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 23:56, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In agreement with HHH, Taker clearly has the longest uninterrupted tenure. We don't need to note obvious technicalities in the lede.LM2000 (talk) 00:01, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it depends how you present the information (for example, he was in WWE for a cumulative time of...19 years?). Goldust hasn't the longest tenure in WWE. I think HHH, Mark Henry and Kane spent more time in WWE than goldust. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 00:15, 12 January 2016 (UTC) --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 00:15, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well, in this case, we're talking time apart from debut, not cumulative. Taker has cumulative 25 years 2 months (survivor series 1990, with a previous taping for superstars that aired after survivor series) , Goldust has (not cumulative) 25 years 4 months (msg show, sep 21, 1990) Once they both retire, that record will go to kane, who debuted in a raw dark match two months before hhh debuted. In 2021, if he is still active, he will get undertaker's record, provided taker retires this year. Immediately when goldie leaves, if after takers retirement, kane will take his record as well, unless goldust comes back afterward. Complex math, huh. ;) Future WWE Champion, DrewieStewie (talk) 00:34, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for June 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hornswoggle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Myers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hello, DrewieStewie. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, DrewieStewie. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.
Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.
If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone.
If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your original talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
I have blocked this account for the block evasion that you admitted at the Teahouse. If you want to appeal your block, you must do so from your original account, User:Pixiemasters. Creating a new account to evade a block is contrary to policy. Cullen328Let's discuss it22:08, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Just so people won't be confused, I am posting here. I read an archived discussion on the Teahouse and I wrongly assumed nothing had been done, since the talk page used to appeal the block had a red link. The discussion is actually here. But I got a thanks from DrewieStewie, so I knew this person was no longer blocked.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:35, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I hope you'll see the above block as a procedural and administrative necessity, and not something discouraging, and be back editing soon. Chetsford (talk) 22:32, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your thread has been archived
Hi DrewieStewie! You created a thread called Question regarding handling of past behavior at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.
Hey dude I just want to say thank you for sticking by me. I’m the guy who argued that Big Show and RVD should be WCW and ECW Triple Crown Champions, respectively. I was so annoyed about how many times the other guys kept saying that’s its ‘Original Research’ or ‘SYNTH’ and things like that. I gave up after they all banded up against me, agreeing with each other. But after reading your part recently, I just want to thank you for compromising with them. It means a lot, because Big Show and RVD are technically Triple Crown Champions, even though the won the last championship they needed under WWE, but they’re the same titles that were from WCW and ECW. So again, thank you for sticking by me and helping me out. User: Drummoe (talk) 1:03, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, DrewieStewie. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, DrewieStewie. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi DrewieStewie! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
Hi DrewieStewie! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
Hi DrewieStewie! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
Hello, DrewieStewie. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday. Sorry for wishing you this late. ☺️ Happy editing! Sincerely, Masum Reza☎18:40, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
BLP edits
Hi, please carefully review your reversion of multiple edits by multiple editors. You may wish to look over WP:BLP, WP:UNDUE, WP:TRUE and WP:COATRACK first. (The latter two are only essays, but are commonly consulted with regard to BLP issues. The first two are key Wikipedia policies.)
Some of these edits had edit summaries specifically explaining the removals, and in one case linking one of the above key Wikipedia policies. Reverting such edits purely on the grounds of "removal of info" is not OK.
By re-adding this material, you make yourself directly responsible for the material, regardless of its accuracy or relevance. This was probably not your intention -- but BLP articles about contentious overseas religious figures are probably not the easiest place to get started with reviewing pending changes! :)
If you have any specific questions about the content or about the edit -- or indeed about the policies -- feel free to ask. MPS1992 (talk) 19:41, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@MPS1992: Sorry about that. Didn't mean for your part of it to get caught in the shuffle. Your edit was good. Maybe I was sleepy and accidentally didnt see yor chane and reverted them all. Take care :) DrewieStewie (talk) 23:21, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Right, good. Thank you. The problem is, with all this reviewer rights and pending changes and whatever people call it nowadays, someone needs to fix the article. As of right now, that someone cannot be me. Specifically, these edits need re-doing by someone that is able to do that. MPS1992 (talk) 23:37, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There's now no need for any further action here if you prefer not to -- I have requested reviewer permissions myself, so I should be able to make any required edits myself. Thanks for your help. MPS1992 (talk) 18:24, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi DrewieStewie! You created a thread called How to come across vandalism? (among other topics) at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.
Pending changes reviewer is a big time sink for me. I tend to check the sources for every pending change—grammar and flow. It's like a compulsion to get everything right before signing off. Thanks again! — Neonorange (Phil) 22:43, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The CSD feature of Twinkle now allows admins to notify page creators of deletion if the page had not been tagged. The default behavior matches that of tagging notifications, and replaces the ability to open the user talk page upon deletion. You can customize which criteria receive notifications in your Twinkle preferences: look for Notify page creator when deleting under these criteria.
Twinkle's d-batch (batch delete) feature now supports deleting subpages (and related redirects and talk pages) of each page. The pages will be listed first but use with caution! The und-batch (batch undelete) option can now also restore talk pages.
Miscellaneous
The previously discussed unblocking of IP addresses indefinitely-blocked before 2009 was approved and has taken place.
In a related matter, the account throttle has been restored to six creations per day as the mitigation activity completed.
The scope of CSD criterion G8 has been tightened such that the only redirects that it now applies to are those which target non-existent pages.
The scope of CSD criterion G14 has been expanded slightly to include orphan "Foo (disambiguation)" redirects that target pages that are not disambiguation pages or pages that perform a disambiguation-like function (such as set index articles or lists).
The Wikimedia Foundation's Community health initiative plans to design and build a new user reporting system to make it easier for people experiencing harassment and other forms of abuse to provide accurate information to the appropriate channel for action to be taken. Community feedback is invited.
Miscellaneous
In February 2019, the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) changed its office actions policy to include temporary and project-specific bans. The WMF exercised this new ability for the first time on the English Wikipedia on 10 June 2019 to temporarily ban and desysop Fram. This action has resulted in significant community discussion, a request for arbitration (permalink), and, either directly or indirectly, the resignations of numerous administrators and functionaries. The WMF Board of Trustees is aware of the situation, and discussions continue on a statement and a way forward. The Arbitration Committee has sent an open letter to the WMF Board.
Well, hello there @Oshwah:! I'm happy to see you've checked up on me and were thinking of me, that was very kind of you. You really are a part of my Wikipedia family that spans in different fields on here. Many things have been happening both on and off wiki. On-wiki, I've need to resume pending changes review and AFD more often now that I have some more time on my hands, and I'm still studying and learning different things to see how to improve my productivity on Wikipedia. Maybe soon, I'll become a teahouse host, I think that could help me learn things better as I can look up the answer to a user question and learn as well or take example from another user/host's question. I am currently sourcing a draft for the article of Ricky Bell from New Edition/BBD. I created an article that was partially translated from Japanese Wikipedia, and partially English Wikipedia content. I still participate over at WikiProject Professional Wrestling. I may have problems enrolling in the CVU Academy, as the only available slot is in Australia time zone, while I'm in pacific standard time, plus I'm concerned about my time availability for that. I posted a major RFC on the WP:FRAM talk page regarding under-a-cloud status for resignations regarding normally questionable actions undertaken in relation to FRAM, which I can gladly say has an emerging consensus towards "no". And of course, on the side, I still occasionally participate in Oshwah antics (for WikiLove), while making sure I focus more on my Wikipedia duties and making sure they don't label me as NOTHERE. It's been almost a year since consensus forgave me for childhood block evasion, and while I know that some users will still be distrustful of me from transgressions that occurred halfway through my young barely an adult life, I strive to make things right and prove myself on Wikipedia and become more trusted as time passes (although I still do have a bad habit of frequently and repeatedly changing edits I just posted, LOL). Off wiki, next month I begin community college to study history, with the hopes of becoming a high school history teacher. I have just got a job washing dishes at a local pizza chain. I recently took a trip to Seattle for my alopecia (baldness condition) conference with the NAAF, which is an article I could probably expand sometime, given my knowledge of the organization and sources I could find. I am actually considering becoming a youth mentor for that organization too. So yeah, that's been whats up with me in the life of Drew. I hope you are doing well, my friend. If anything sticks out to you and you'd like to give me advice regarding things, fell free to drop some knowledge below. Happy editing! :) DrewieStewie (talk) 08:23, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Wow! You've been quite busy and active on here! That's great to see! I'm happy that you're still doing well and that you have a continued passion with gaining more experience, participating in Wikiprojects that you love and enjoy, and growing as an editor and contributor to the project. We all make mistakes and nobody here is perfect; I don't hold your mistakes and your past against you at all, and I hope that you can continue to gain more experience and become a key player in the community despite that bump in the road one year ago. You're a true example as to why we give users a second chance and why we don't show users the exit door unless we truly have no other choice. Don't burn yourself out, and don't force yourself to spend time and effort towards projects and areas that you don't enjoy. You should be here because doing so makes you happy, and you should contribute to Wikipedia and specific projects and areas because you like it. If you're not happy and having fun here, then what's the point? :-) Don't let any shortcomings get you down or leave you feeling disheartened, and don't let anyone convince you that you're not valued here or that your dedication, time, and contributions aren't appreciated and don't make an impact here - that's simply not true at all. Be healthy, be well, keep a neutral, balanced, and stress-free lifestyle, and make sure that you keep your personal off-wiki life a priority. Wikipedia will always be here should you need to slow down, take a break, or take care of other matters in your life. :-) If you have any questions, need any input, help, assistance, guidance, or just need someone to talk to, my user talk page is always open to you. You're welcome to message me there any time you need or want to, and I'll be happy to help you with anything that you need. Keep up the excellent work, and keep continuing to do what you do, and contribute where you love. I'm happy to see that you're still active here, and that you're doing well despite being what I believe to be quite busy. :-) I hope that we keep in touch, and that you have a great day. :-) Best regards and best wishes - your pal, ~Oshwah~(talk)(contribs)09:11, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much @Oshwah:, I truly appreciate it! And it means a lot to me that more users are trustful and happy with my company on here than others and see me for who I am now and that I always have you in my corner to vouch for me if necessary. I do make sure I balance Wikipedia and real life to a point where it doesn't affect my advancement toward my future or get in the way of other leisurely activities, while not becoming too inactive on Wikipedia. I'm very happy with how you take the time to check on Wikipedians and uplift them so that their experience becomes enhanced and their Wikipedia development advances more easily. As for the whole FRAM mess, I am very happy that you've stuck around and stayed positive and there for the community throughout it all, and stayed out of trouble. While I don't blame anybody for their actions (such as those by Floq and WJBScribe) given the extraordinary circumstances and deeply respect them for resigning and taking a stand in the name of the community against what they believe was the wrong move by the WMF, I just as equally respect everybody who stayed and kept on taking administrative actions and continued being optimistic that the situation would be fixed soon, such as you. You've continued being a model Wikipedian and stayed out of trouble too, even if it wasn't wrong to put yourself in trouble in this case. You are loved and appreciated around here, and I appreciate you showing me that the same applies to me. Cheers, my friend :) DrewieStewie (talk) 10:04, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Following a research project on masking IP addresses, the Foundation is starting a new project to improve the privacy of IP editors. The result of this project may significantly change administrative and counter-vandalism workflows. The project is in the very early stages of discussions and there is no concrete plan yet. Admins and the broader community are encouraged to leave feedback on the talk page.
Since the introduction of temporary user rights, it is becoming more usual to accord the New Page Reviewer right on a probationary period of 3 to 6 months in the first instance. This avoids rights removal for inactivity at a later stage and enables a review of their work before according the right on a permanent basis.
Editors using the mobile website on Wikipedia can opt-in to new advanced features via your settings page. This will give access to more interface links, special pages, and tools.
The advanced version of the edit review pages (recent changes, watchlist, and related changes) now includes two new filters. These filters are for "All contents" and "All discussions". They will filter the view to just those namespaces.
A global request for comment is in progress regarding whether a user group should be created that could modify edit filters across all public Wikimedia wikis.
Following a discussion, a new criterion for speedy category renaming was added: C2F: One eponymous article, which applies if the category contains only an eponymous article or media file, provided that the category has not otherwise been emptied shortly before the nomination. The default outcome is an upmerge to the parent categories.
Technical news
As previously noted, tighter password requirements for Administrators were put in place last year. Wikipedia should now alert you if your password is less than 10 characters long and thus too short.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
An RfC on the administrator resysop criteria was closed. 18 proposals have been summarised with a variety of supported and opposed statements. The inactivity grace period within which a new request for adminship is not required has been reduced from three years to two. Additionally, Bureaucrats are permitted to use their discretion when returning administrator rights.
Hello DrewieStewie, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Happy editing, ★Trekker (talk) 14:12, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Trekker!! Thank you! I absolutely appreciate the merry Christmas and happy new decade wishes you have provided me, and I absolutely wish the same for you. Thanks for being great to work with in Wikiproject Pro Wrestling! Happy editing! :) DrewieStewie (talk) 18:16, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A request for comment asks whether partial blocks should be enabled on the English Wikipedia. If enabled, this functionality would allow administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces, rather than the entire site.
A proposal asks whether admins who don't use their tools for a significant period of time (e.g. five years) should have the toolset procedurally removed.
The fourth case on Palestine-Israel articles was closed. The case consolidated all previous remedies under one heading, which should make them easier to understand, apply, and enforce. In particular, the distinction between "primary articles" and "related content" has been clarified, with the former being the entire set of articles whose topic relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted rather than reasonably construed.
Following a request for comment, partial blocks are now enabled on the English Wikipedia. This functionality allows administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces rather than the entire site. A draft policy is being workshopped at Wikipedia:Partial blocks.
The request for comment seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure closed with wide-spread support for an alternative desysoping procedure based on community input. No proposed process received consensus.
Technical news
Twinkle now supports partial blocking. There is a small checkbox that toggles the "partial" status for both blocks and templating. There is currently one template: {{uw-pblock}}.
When trying to move a page, if the target title already exists then a warning message is shown. The warning message will now include a link to the target title. [6]
Arbitration
Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators that checkuser and oversight blocks must not be reversed or modified without prior consultation with the checkuser or oversighter who placed the block, the respective functionary team, or the Arbitration Committee.
Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops must not undo or alter CheckUser or Oversight blocks, rather than should not.
A request for comment confirmed that sandboxes of established but inactive editors may not be blanked due solely to inactivity.
Technical news
Following a discussion, Twinkle's default CSD behavior will soon change, most likely this week. After the change, Twinkle will default to "tagging mode" if there is no CSD tag present, and default to "deletion mode" if there is a CSD tag present. You will be able to always default to "deletion mode" (the current behavior) using your Twinkle preferences.
Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold a Arbcom RfC regarding on-wiki harassment. A draft RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC (Draft) and not open to comments from the community yet. Interested editors can comment on the RfC itself on its talk page.
Miscellaneous
The WMF has begun a pilot report of the pages most visited through various social media platforms to help with anti-vandalism and anti-disinformation efforts. The report is updated daily and will be available through the end of May.
The Wikimedia Foundation announced that they will develop a universal code of conduct for all WMF projects. There is an open local discussion regarding the same.
Arbitration
A motion was passed to enact a 500/30 restriction on articles related to the history of Jews and antisemitism in Poland during World War II (1933–45), including the Holocaust in Poland. Article talk pages where disruption occurs may also be managed with the stated restriction.
The Medicine case was closed, with a remedy authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for all discussions about pharmaceutical drug prices and pricing and for edits adding, changing, or removing pharmaceutical drug prices or pricing from articles.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
Hello, DrewieStewie!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~Kvng (talk) 17:49, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hey User:Kvng, somebody else reverted your declination of the AfC draft of Ricky Bell, citing the fact that the link you provided was copied from an old version of the article that was formerly in mainspace rather than the other way around as you alleged in your reason for declination. Thought I might let you know in case you didn't know yet. DrewieStewie (talk) 20:42, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm writing to you because you are listed as a member of the Wikiproject Pro Wrestling, and I'm in need of a third (actually fourth) opinion on two pro wrestling articles.
The thing is, Hartley Jackson recently went through an AfD that arose a lengthy of discussion.
I will try to summarize the problem below.
Jammo85 had asked me for assistance in find sources to a certain fact, and I did find some good sources, but we are still facing opposition from another user in Hartley Jackson and The Mighty Don't Kneel (TMDK). I would thus like to ask your opinion on the matter, and the edits keep being reverted.
We would like to state "Hartley Jackson was part of The Mighty Don't Kneel in 2015 and 2016."
I have found two sources from websites of official pro wrestling events (they are archived, please give it a few minutes to load):
but this website is listed in one unofficial list of reliable sources as being Marginally reliable. Strictly used for match results and not other information. Takes user submissions but is reviewed by regional editors that verify all submissions before they are added to the database. The other party uses this against us, but I actually think it supports us, as we are actually only using results here. That is, we are not using the blog posts produced in cagematch (see [7]).
I thought the above sources were enough, but there are some more if you would like to see:[1][2][3].
^Wrestle rampage's official ad on social media [1].
^Other sources on this piece of information are: [2], which is an article from a podcast on wrestling, which mentions Hartley as being part of TMDK; and also [3][4], which are official match advertisements from Wrestling Rampage, and show Hartley in the TMDK team. All links were accessed on October 7, 2020.
Ricky Bell (singer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Sysops will once again be able to view the deleted history of JS/CSS pages; this was restricted to interface administrators when that group was introduced.
Twinkle's block module now includes the ability to note the specific case when applying a discretionary sanctions block and/or template.
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Voting for proposals in the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey, which determines what software the Wikimedia Foundation's Community Tech team will work on next year, will take place from 8 December through 21 December. In particular, there are sections regarding administrators and anti-harassment.
By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorizedfor all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes). The effectiveness of the discretionary sanctions can be evaluated on the request by any editor after March 1, 2021 (or sooner if for a good reason).
A request for comment is open that proposes a process for the community to revoke administrative permissions. This follows a 2019 RfC in favor of creating one such a policy.
A request for comment is in progress to remove F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a, which covers immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
A request for comment asks if sysops may place the General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019 editnotice template on pages in scope that do not have page-specific sanctions?
When blocking an IPv6 address with Twinkle, there is now a checkbox with the option to just block the /64 range. When doing so, you can still leave a block template on the initial, single IP address' talkpage.
When protecting a page with Twinkle, you can now add a note if doing so was in response to a request at WP:RfPP, and even link to the specific revision.
By motion, the discretionary sanctions originally authorized under the GamerGate case are now authorized under a new Gender and sexuality case, with sanctions authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, any gender-related dispute or controversy and associated people. Sanctions issued under GamerGate are now considered Gender and sexuality sanctions.
Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the delete-redirect userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.
Technical news
When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. (T278350)
Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. (T277803)
The user group oversight will be renamed to suppress. This is for technical reasons. You can comment at T112147 if you have objections.
Arbitration
The community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure was closed, and an initial draft based on feedback from the now closed consultation is expected to be released in early June to early July for community review.
In your otherwise damn fine explanation of the lies behind the truth of pro, you listed three exemplary fictional locations. One of these was "the bottom of the sea". While I share your apparent skepticism that a creature like Shark Boy could last a minute in that hood, the place itself is well-documented. Well, not well, relative to "the great plains", but well enough. Director James Cameron is not a kook, he's a Canuck, there's a subtle difference! InedibleHulk (talk) 00:25, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@InedibleHulk:, I don't know how you do it, but your creative ass always somehow have me laughing my ass off every time. I should just watchlist your contributions in case I am having a mental breakdown. It gets me back to normal every time! I love you bro! I don't know, it just came off the top of my (bald) head in jest. Just don't pair me as a canuck because I look like Caillou or have the appearance of a man afraid of the germs of big sweaty men that Vince loves lol DrewieStewie (talk) 00:42, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A magician never shows all his cards, but part of the secret is listening very closely to Norm Macdonald. Always nice to meet a fan who looks like Caillou, thank you. Keep on washing in the free world! InedibleHulk (talk) 00:47, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@InedibleHulk: Need a Mr. Clean magic eraser to assist with your tricks? I've got plenty to give away. DrewieStewie (talk)|
Nah, I'm a filthy Canuck, you wouldn't like me standing up next to you. Virtual distancing only, that's my gimmick. The seats are more comfortable that way, too. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:55, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And if you do choose to follow my contribution history, be duly advised, the summaries are not intended to be read sequentially as a sideplot. Sometimes they seem like they should. But attempting to piece it together is a schizophrenia risk, especially if you succeed. InedibleHulk (talk) 01:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@InedibleHulk: I'm pretty sure that's the challenge. Might feel like im on psychedellics though. It should cancel out any bipolar disorder or depression I may or may not be experiencing. That is to be (pre)determined though, or we may never know what't in the (fucking) lockbox. Regardless of what it is, book it Hulk! DrewieStewie (talk) 01:13, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wikimedia previously used the IRC network Freenode. However, due to changes over who controlled the network with reports of a forceful takeover by several ex-staff members, the Wikimedia IRC Group Contacts decided to move to the new Libera Chat network. It has been reported that Wikimedia related channels on Freenode have been forcibly taken over if they pointed members to Libera. There is a migration guide and Wikimedia discussions about this.
Consensus has been reached to delete all books in the book namespace. There was rough consensus that the deleted books should still be available on request at WP:REFUND even after the namespace is removed.
An RfC is open to discuss the next steps following a trial which automatically applied pending changes to TFAs.
Technical news
IP addresses of unregistered users are to be hidden from everyone. There is a rough draft of how IP addresses may be shown to users who need to see them. This currently details allowing administrators, checkusers, stewards and those with a new usergroup to view the full IP address of unregistered users. Editors with at least 500 edits and an account over a year old will be able to see all but the end of the IP address in the proposal. The ability to see the IP addresses hidden behind the mask would be dependent on agreeing to not share the parts of the IP address they can see with those who do not have access to the same information. Accessing part of or the full IP address of a masked editor would also be logged. Comments on the draft are being welcomed at the talk page.
Arbitration
The community authorised COVID-19 general sanctions have been superseded by the COVID-19 discretionary sanctions following a motion at a case request. Alerts given and sanctions placed under the community authorised general sanctions are now considered alerts for and sanctions under the new discretionary sanctions.
An RfC is open to add a delay of one week from nomination to deletion for G13 speedy deletions.
Technical news
Last week all wikis were very slow or not accessible for 30 minutes. This was due to server lag caused by regenerating dynamic lists on the Russian Wikinews after a large bulk import. (T287380)
Just wanted to address you directly so there's no misunderstandings.
The reason why pics are limited to just champions is so we don't have to worry about opening Pandora's box ("If we allow MITB, then why can't this/that/the other be added in to?")
It's about cutting off issues BEFORE they arise. Pics are needed to spice things up a bit, but you also don't want everyone and their uncle to be throwing pics up there because it just makes things a mess.
We've never added MITB holder pics in all the time there's been pics on that page (over a decade), and there's no reason to start now. We keep it limited to champions, everyone knows the boundaries, and there's no issues down the line.
@Vjmlhds: Fair enough. I guess MITB just seemed like a grey area compared to other distinctions (such as HOF or KOTR or royal rumble or other accomplishments), as it contains championship-like properties though isn't a championship. Though I totally get that perspective. Out of curiosity and respect for other perspectives though, has any discussion occurred over it, particularly in regards to the MITB on this article? Just to see if discussion has occurred. Regardless, I have no prejudice on either format. DrewieStewie (talk) 01:11, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Like I said, over a decade ago ('08-'09...that's how long it's been), when pics were first added to the article (which soon after carried over to other similar articles for what was then called TNA and ROH, and has now become pretty much just standard procedure) random pics were just thrown on there (likely people wanting their favorites to be highlighted) and people started having edit wars, and it was a mess. And without sounding braggadocious, I was the one who suggested limiting it to champions, so then this way there was a standard, and it kept the ruckus down. There have been no discussions on the issue since then, basically because everybody just took it upon themselves to "stay within the lines" as it were. Vjmlhds(talk)12:51, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is open to decide when, if ever, should discord logs be eligible for removal when posted onwiki (including whether to oversight them)
A RfC on the next steps after the trial of pending changes on TFAs has resulted in a 30 day trial of automatic semi protection for TFAs.
Technical news
The Score extension has been re-enabled on public wikis. It has been updated, but has been placed in safe mode to address unresolved security issues. Further information on the security issues can be found on the mediawiki page.
Arbitration
A request for comment is in progress to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the Arbitration Committee election and resolve any issues not covered by existing rules. Comments and new proposals are welcome.
How did Zhu Cilang, Emperor Dao, die? I need to prove how smart I am to a stranger on the Internet before someone smart does! Also, if you had to forget every Billy Gunn match you ever saw, Right F'n Now, which one would you still remember? InedibleHulk (talk) 04:56, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@InedibleHulk: Whats good, my barely yet inedible compatriot! Zhu Cilang is still alive as far as I'm concerned, and so is Andy Kaufman too, at least in Tony Khan's scouting report. The one id remember is Sting v. Triple H, all hints of Mr. Ass wiped. At least I have my chance meeting with Nikki Cross at a Cricket meet n' greet when I was making a Walmart run in Vegas on record now. DrewieStewie (talk) 07:10, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@InedibleHulk: No problem! Even better when the meet and greet autograph and picture was completely free, I won a ringside Summerslam chair in a game (even though the chair was the 2020 event, meaning I was allegedly in the behind closed doors crowd Cena style), as well as a Drew Mcintyre Funko Pop, some free chocolate and vanilla ice cream, and did a recorded interview for Cricket, but best of all, I didn't have to join their inferior network; I am happy after switching from AT&T to Verizon (I miss AT&T being Cingular though, that really did raise the bar). DrewieStewie (talk) 07:14, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have like, 35% on what newfangled bar measures whatever the hell you're talking about. Definitely sounds like a positive experience, though, so cheers! For the first time since 1988, I forgot SummerSlam was even a party of the summer, much less the biggest. Is Cricket a thing? I hear the Gangrel Funko Pop is the one to get this Christmas, but don't take my word for it. Free ice cream, now there's a treat. If I get a smartphone, I'm going to demand it's bundled with butter pecan, because it's soft, and you can't teach that! I'm off to doubleck whatever happened to that guy, maybe see what Virtual Don Muraco's up to, don't wait up! InedibleHulk (talk) 09:14, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@InedibleHulk: Dammit, forgot to disambiguate the fact I was referring to a wireless carrier. Shite, perhaps we could get a game of cricket on with the zombies as a consolation? I can learn. I swear. Maybe I'll play One in a Million by Aaliyah too since crickets are heard in the very beginning. But dammit Jiminy shut the fuck up! XD DrewieStewie (talk) 01:44, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I had an action figure named Cricket as a kid. She started off as more of what you might call a doll. But the forces of evil threatened to tear her material world apart, and the rest is history. I also remember disliking Aaliyah. Maybe my tastes have matured since Queen of the Damned turned cult classy and the terrorists won, I'll go check! InedibleHulk (talk) 01:56, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
OK, those ain't crickets, crickets can't pan! And it's not just the beginning, it "goes on and on and on". I like how this second-most popular one stops doing that, but it feels like she's already said "let me know" a dozen times by the end. And yeah, I know this third one, thought it'd be most popular. Still not succeeding, first date, next date, dusted off, whatever! InedibleHulk (talk) 02:48, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'll give "If Your Girl Only Knew" credit, not for lazily ripping off "Smooth Criminal" from the past, but twisting it into "Sic Transit Gloria... Glory Fades" from the future. InedibleHulk (talk) 02:57, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@InedibleHulk: Strange bedfellows sponsoring SummerSlam and subpar 5G connectivity, indeed, plus Video Poker at some convenience store in the parking lot nearby presumably! At least tomorrow on this 20th anniversary of 9/11 I cross back into Nevada from California for non-wrestling purposes. I head to the UN Reno to see some Nevada Wolf Pack Football. Some friends my buddy and I went to high school with are now playing football there, and we decided to meet up with them and watch them play. One of them, Carson Strong, is set to be drafted next year. Good to see this university with good taste in quarterbacks, they used to actually roster Kaepernick too unlike these cowardly NFL teams today! But hey, you're a positive motivating force within my life; let me see you go back and forth. Just don't rock the boat too hard and leave me heartbroken for life with overloaded Carribean planes and coked up pilots. Tell me youre NOT that somebody! This bald hardworking stressed commuter student walmart stocker still wears Aaliyah t-shirts weekly and shit talks R Kelly up the ass except for Trapped in the Closet. Damn, I was only 4 months and I'm 20 now and it still affected me that deeply growing up? Sheeesh!DrewieStewie (talk) 06:13, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Football just never did it for me, either, but I can still appreciate Carson Strong as a damn fine name for any sports hero! I kinda(?) get what you mean about crash impact; Randy Rhoads died shortly before I was zero, so despite only knowing him after the fact through a few tunes, I was born with the right attitude toward aircraft safety just plain instilled. Those things aren't toys! And yeah, it made him "mythical", too, something living guitar legends just can't match, even through beating the devil at dice. Anyway, have an excellent interstate adventure and try not to bring back any radioactive pollen or eggs, especially by accident. Go Wolf Pack! InedibleHulk (talk) 09:33, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Dude, just heard the news about KSU, sorry for your loss! ESPN tells me the bastards wildcats used Rushing Attack. Tell your buddy's defensive coach to sweep and hit Rolling Thunder if Boise City tries anything like that (I hear they're weak to it). Anyway, hope you still had fun. My hero died!InedibleHulk (talk) 22:53, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@InedibleHulk: Yeah, that sucked. I'll spread the word, I gotchu. Haha it was a good night tho! We won when I went and I got to reunite with him and his family! His father was a teacher at my middle school that I didn't have but I talked to sometimes; he was also at one point the principal at our high school before Carson and I went there (yes, he stepped down to teach again). They asked if I was a fan of Carson before the game and I told them we went to high school together, flashing my high school ID to prove it. They absolutely loved that, thanked me for coming up, and invited me to attend the rest of the home games, so now I got my time off approved at Walmart to do that! Plus, up at Reno, I also discovered my undying love for Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers. They just started construction on a location in my hometown and I'm fucking stoked but until then I have 5 more trips to Reno to make for my beloved Raising Canes! That shit is addictive, just like it was laced. That damn sauce is like no other sauce I've ever had before. Got a Smackdown in San Jose and a Raw in Sac right after im out of class to attend too. Plus a bunch of Sacramento Kings games with different friends too down the road. So now it is time to live my best life, work my ass off at work and school (Walmart is being generous to me starting at $18.50 an hour), and just enjoy it. Full plate with little time to rest but I got it! So sorry about your hero too. That sucked, I loved him too. No Recent Deaths justice either! DrewieStewie (talk) 23:23, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Meh, RD is overrated, YouTube sent him off in class. You couldn't pay me to eat chicken, but I do savour a good sauce story, thanks! My government doesn't let me be publicly entertained anymore, even if I wanted to, and most of my old friends are in Parts Unknown, so it's good to live vicariously through you like this, sometimes. Get that moolah and go Kings! InedibleHulk (talk) 23:55, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Trippy. Just yesterday, I saw that "racist" call Atlas and Johnson "boys, and I do mean boys", verbatim to Mean Gene, before beating Special Delivery Jones like a government mule. I still think he's just working the tail end of The North-South Connection, even in 2021. That murderer, though, yeah, no! Speaking of 2021, check out Poppy's new album, Flux. A lot of it is that techno crap California grrrls liked in the late '90s, might "speak" to you. And Harry Monsoon is your hookup for post-Backlund, pre-WrestleMania Dark Ages WWF, holla! InedibleHulk (talk) 22:02, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Just now realized you linked one hell of a rant there! And you weren't the only one. I need to pack my thinking bowl for this deep dive, and track down the right background music, but I will "mull it over and get back to you on that". If I'm not here in 28 days, 6 hours, 42 minutes and 12 seconds, my baby wrote me a letter. Everything will be alright, a'ight? InedibleHulk (talk) 01:57, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@InedibleHulk: Sorry for late response, been doing a lot lately. Yeah, that definitely spoke to me. I'll see where youre at at the end of that allotted time. Some punk bands will be playing a concert at my halloween party at the crib. lol (Yeah, I have a temper from time to time. That moment from 2018 was one of those moments. XD DrewieStewie (talk) 19:17, 7 October 2021 (UTC))[reply]
No need to apologize for staying active! Besides, you're technically early. I don't know what I was on at that 2018 party, but I see I was there, also somewhat incoherently. Aside from misusing "murder" monstrously, you did the right thing there in venting, I think. Sometimes when things get bad, every cheesed dude has to go to his window and let it rip, so to speak. Since that was literally too long to actually scream or tweet, where the hell were you supposed to go, Myspace? No way, brother! Anyway, sorry if I responded inappropriately somehow then, too, unless it's about offending the sort of wrestlers who claim to have been "trained" by copying moves from bootleg Japan tapes. Fuck those guys, moves aren't everything! Sometimes hitting your partner with a Michinoku Driver through a coffee table won't pop anyone, but if the mood is right, look out!InedibleHulk (talk) 02:30, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@InedibleHulk: The mood is indeed right my friend. Your response was very smart and batshit funny actually back in the day; it's what I remembered you for until we started constantly going back and forth. lol I just got out of Smackdown in San Jose, threw my voice away for Edge. But indeed, it won't always pop, but here and there it shall! DrewieStewie (talk)<
Time's almost up, California Kid, but if you hurry antisouthwise by some degree or another, you might still catch that big haunted house in the sky handing out pure green power like it was candy! And yes, I hear good things about Edge in the desert lately. Sight unseen, though, possibly a reverse mirage? InedibleHulk (talk) 19:50, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@InedibleHulk: GOOD FORTUNE INDEED HALLILUJAH!!! Sadly, I'm a bit too far down south for these northern lights. Even Reno, where I was last night, is too low as well. How ironic to the start of this comment. Its absolutely a mirage. DrewieStewie (talk) 00:44, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If it's any consolation, the sky was clouded over up here in the real CA. Flickering green clouds, like in Bart's Nightmare, though, so not a total waste of space or energy. You kids today could probably recall finer analogous effects in video games, but that's how I saw it! You ever see one of those three-eyed fish or laser squirrels out in the nuclear desert? Good times, one must presume. InedibleHulk (talk) 14:37, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@InedibleHulk: Indeed, my man. I have not, though a squirrel did high five me at the Sac State campus over the summer. That squirrel must have been outta his goddamned mind to touch me rather than walk away. Lol (sorry for late response, been busy as shit with school. SEMESTER A WEEK AWAY FROM OVER THO!! :DDDD DrewieStewie (talk) 16:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. I've always maintained that maintaining a decent GPA is slightly more important than online mystery thread maintenance. Semiurban woodland critters have long gathered as much, too, high fives all around for that time of year! InedibleHulk (talk) 11:07, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@InedibleHulk: Passing everything so far, just got finals now and a handful of outstanding work. Soon though it shall be Time to watch that South Park episode, that season finale of Survivor 41 (I better create another audition tape!), play some NBA 2K, Madden, and GTA Online, attend back to back Sacramento Kings games (the first being a free game the Kings personally invited me to, and the second being in Frisco against the Warriors), and eventually write a sequel to my 28 year old girlfriend's book by her mom from 12 years ago describing how she survived pediatric brain cancer and became partially deaf. (HERE IS THE APPLE BOOKS COPY: [1] ) Now THATS a trip! Not as much of a trip as I'll be taking to Vegas at the April to celebrate both my 21st birthday and Carson being drafted with him and his family. I did choose my alopecia conference in DC over Money in the Bank though, which is on the same weekend as each other. Oh well. Living like crazy. Maybe I'll try to become a Dutch Bros broista again soon after I wasn't selected the first time, who knows!
Anyway, before I forget to ask again, who do you see in the history books winning the 2022 World Series? And don't say you don't know, or the Astros or the Mets! I already considered them. Too obvious (or so their publicity departments would have us believe). Just be honest. And have a nice day! InedibleHulk (talk) 07:24, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@InedibleHulk: Ayyyy what’s guud brotha brotha! Nice to see you lurking on the talk page like always. Personally, I’m hoping it’s my St. Louis Cardinals; it would be nice to see Pujols, Molina, and possibly Wainwright see one more chip for them before they retire. Plus they are on a hot streak right now since the trade deadline, so I’m confident they’ll get the division to begin with. Hopefully they fare good against the Dodgers, Braves, or Mets in the postseason though. I hope the Mariners and Blue Jays clinch a berth and do alright too, but the AL truthfully is anybody’s game right now. I went to five games this season so far personally: Giants-Rockies, Athletics-Blue Jays, Giants-Dodgers in SF, Cardinals-Cubs in STL, and A’s-Giants in Oakland. The last three were in the span of 6 days this month. So much bay shenanigans and STL adventures along the way: beer spilling and fights in the left field bleachers, splash hits flipping canoes, Oakland sky gunshot fragments landing on fans during a July 4 fireworks show on the field at the Oakland coliseum, and the Cardinals bringing together a city with some crime infested neighborhoods. What an experience! Hope all is well with you Brody! DrewieStewie (talk) 14:52, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You seem a way bigger baseball fan than I'd anticipated (which is good). But you tell a tale of hope (could be bad). At least we now both absolutely positively know the Cardinals will be in it to win it! Thanks for the hot tip. I've never been to pro ball game of any feather, or tuned into a whole one before, but I did play the odd underhanded five innings back when teachers forcing children to exercise was still socially acceptable. I don't even think I remember how to run anymore. But that's no reason I can't still profit from the blood, sweat and tears of some enchanted athletes. The only thing that can possibly stop me now is good old misinformation! But yes, those "little birds" are definitely "in the mix", and Oakland certainly is a fine place to visit; glad you had fun, A! InedibleHulk (talk) 03:39, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Anyway, before I forget to ask again, who do you see in the history books winning the 2023 Royal Rumble? And don't say you don't know, or Cody or Sunny! I already considered them. Too obvious (or so their publicity departments would have us believe). Just be honest. And have a nice day! InedibleHulk (talk) 03:25, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@InedibleHulk: Benoit will shock the world. JK. If it’s not Cody, Sami Zayn would be a nice windfall. Very possibly Austin too given the rumors and the fact that they’re in San Antonio. Just don’t let Ozzy Osborne piss on the cenotaph near the Alamo again 41 years later! Anyways, a little life update: I just got hired to grade papers for a US history class at Sac State taught by one of my professors, Dr. Joseph Palermo! He used to write for HuffPo and once owned Tucker Carlson on his show. I also learned a lot about the Kennedys and LSD from him too. Apparently, I am the first ever undergraduate our history department has ever hired for this position! Everybody else was a postgrad student. Also, I’m really enjoying attending most of the Kings games this season and Lighting the Beam! Third in the west and leading the division so far after not being in the playoffs since 2006! We lost to my second favorite team yesterday, but it’s still okay! Cheers! DrewieStewie (talk) 03:39, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's more than okay, that's all right! I knew you'd be the one to do it. Not that, in particular, but something historic. Way more interesting than my personal life, which merely continues. Sorry to hear about Benoit, and less so that you're not talking about the L.A. Kings. I'm going to watch an entire basketball game one day, though, mark my words! Keep up the upgrading in the grading department and all that, and we shall see. Anyway, I'm off to Houston tonight, if only vicariously. InedibleHulk (talk) 03:52, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I did recently in Vegas go see a Golden knights vs Kings game! Kings won 5-1 with a hat trick against my team. Also saw the chiefs spank my raiders, a David Copperfield Show, a local wrestling show my friends participated in, and ate at the Heart Attack Grill! I didnt get spanked because I finished, but my girlfriend Janessa did! it's a hilarious video. If you attend or watch a basketball game in full, I'll give you an A+ (basically a fancy term for bragging rights). The challenge is on! DrewieStewie (talk) 04:16, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You're too quick, too. Just checked your Edit History to see if you even lived anywhere, and bam, first place. Anyway, yeah, good question for Cullen, if he wants. InedibleHulk (talk) 20:53, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't gone beyond the title of your homeland (yet), but can think of few nicer sounding places. Cheers to your stance, I say. A few close personal friends of mine have been murdered and eaten by wolves over the years, though none human or commercially important, and I always find myself compelled to forgive these hardwired predators for various reasons, not the least of which are their slick singing voices. One at a time, anyway. A pack at once can go to some "pretty dark places", discordancewise, and sometimes I think it's nature's way of telling me to run. All in all, I'd rather be eaten by wolves than die in a car, plane or train crash, though, so I'll stay. The former's also less likely and moving is expensive. Besides, they're like dogs you can't pet and who doesn't love dogs? The people you should really be worried about, I say. Anyway, enough about me; have you seen any strange new animals lately? InedibleHulk (talk) 04:17, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There's this remarkably furless raccoon I think you should meet. Or at least be aware of. He's kind of taking Canada by storm lately, making alopecia cool. Or at least something we're aware of. Potential podcast partners? Happy St. Patrick's Day, in any case! InedibleHulk (talk) 06:50, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@InedibleHulk: The name’s Rocket. Rocket Raccoon.*pinch* In all seriousness, I’d be damned if I wasn’t wearing green today. That’s my university’s colors, green and gold, and my president, boss, and buddy J. Luke Wood would be on me about it. At least I beat him and his cabinet in a game of Family Feud with fellow student government leaders Friday. I’d totally pay to listen to an InedibleHulk podcast. Just don’t get a crazy political rant from my other boss and thesis advisor Joseph Palermo. SkeeYee! DrewieStewie (talk) 16:40, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In more seriousness, though, it's Rufus. Not Rudolph nor Ralphus non Rex. Back to collegiate joviality, I'm more a blue and gold guy myself, but whatever keeps you from damnation and pinchitude! Plus, it rhymes with money money (yeah yeah). On that note, are we talking the Family Feud or some home version? Either way, I'm not Wasting My Time on no podcast, I meant you and the coon, friends forever. Too soon? I get it, it's cool. Haven't clicked Joseph Palermo yet; good name for a boss character, though, and I look forward to learning how he earned it. For now, to the moon! InedibleHulk (talk) 22:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On the bright side, you don't have to put up with Steve Harvey's bullshit while a producer reminds you that you're contractually obligated to put it over. I've read Palermo's life story now, it was shorter than I'd imagined. I'd say more, but am not at Wikiliberty to discuss his cup of thesis tea. Cheerio! InedibleHulk (talk) 22:42, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@InedibleHulk: Agreed on Steve. This bit is solely informational about the person and not his professional topics, but Aside from being my boss, his rants when he lectures can be hilarious; he even appeared on Tucker Carlson twice. I recall hilarity ensuing on several occasions over the Kennedys and LSD when I took his 1960s US history class. DrewieStewie (talk) 06:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@InedibleHulk: I would say the latter. Even though this was self reverted, I thought I might reply anyway. lol. Sorry for inactivity and for being late here, grad school has been kicking my ass. Fast pace of reading, writing, and prepping for seminar has been brutal on ADHD alongside work. But I'm pushing. Still though, I am finding ways to wreak havoc on Wikipedia, no matter how much is disagreed on between us about a Darth Vader Blurb. I also should figure out an archive almost every section on this talk page, with a few exceptions, including this long running thread. lol. Gonna prep for class tonight now! DrewieStewie (talk) 17:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And it took me a while to follow that sick breadcrumb you left on my desk, so we're even. As you're young, you'll get no sympathy from me; these are the days life is supposed to kick your ass. Cheers to looking back on them later! If you want to archive this, too, I won't mind. It certainly lasted long enough. You're a potentially harmful Contrarian, I'll remind you in closing, and trust you'll use such knowledge for better and worse "before the night is through". Here's to ways! InedibleHulk (talk) 01:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@InedibleHulk: Living up to my Contrarian reputation, this shall remain on my page in perpetuity. 3 years is too much to stop now! [sic] shall be spread like a virus; only with WikiLove (or bitterness, if the admins insist!) I'm kind of enjoying the perks to these educational hardships, as sadistic as it sounds. It makes it worth it. lol. Rejection sensitivity dysphoria makes it pretty hard to use knowledge for the worse. Actually, theres exceptions to the rule, but that's for my other socials instead of Wikipedia; except to mention that several Wikipedia ledes duly highlight these sentiments of mine in NPOV, and is in the ongoing tab. Cheers mate! DrewieStewie (talk) 01:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Following an RfC, extended confirmed protection may be used preemptively on certain high-risk templates.
Following a discussion at the Village Pump, there is consensus to treat discord logs the same as IRC logs. This means that discord logs will be oversighted if posted onwiki.
A motion has standardised the 500/30 (extended confirmed) restrictions placed by the Arbitration Committee. The standardised restriction is now listed in the Arbitration Committee's procedures.
Following the closure of the Iranian politics case, standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed.
The Arbitration Committee encourages uninvolved administrators to use the discretionary sanctions procedure in topic areas where it is authorised to facilitate consensus in RfCs. This includes, but is not limited to, enforcing sectioned comments, word/diff limits and moratoriums on a particular topic from being brought in an RfC for up to a year.
Miscellaneous
Editors have approved expanding the trial of Growth Features from 2% of new accounts to 25%, and the share of newcomers getting mentorship from 2% to 5%. Experienced editors are invited to add themselves to the mentor list.
The community consultation phase of the 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process is open for editors to provide comments and ask questions to candidates.
Phase 2 of the 2021 RfA review has commenced which will discuss potential solutions to address the 8 issues found in Phase 1. Proposed solutions that achieve consensus will be implemented and you may propose solutions till 07 November 2021.
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Unregistered editors using the mobile website are now able to receive notices to indicate they have talk page messages. The notice looks similar to what is already present on desktop, and will be displayed on when viewing any page except mainspace and when editing any page. (T284642)
The limit on the number of emails a user can send per day has been made global instead of per-wiki to help prevent abuse. (T293866)
The already authorized standard discretionary sanctions for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes), broadly construed, have been made permanent.
Following consensus at the 2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.
The functionaries email list (functionaries-enlists.wikimedia.org) will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.
The user group oversight will be renamed suppress in around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for technical reasons. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections.
The Reply Tool feature, which is a part of Discussion Tools, will be opt-out for everyone logged in or logged out starting 7 February 2022. Editors wishing to comment on this can do so in the relevant Village Pump discussion.
A RfC is open to discuss prohibiting draftification of articles over 90 days old.
Technical news
The deployment of the reply tool as an opt-out feature, as announced in last month's newsletter, has been delayed to 7 March. Feedback and comments are being welcomed at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project. (T296645)
No problem brother I understand, everything fine xd, hope your geography schoolwork and exam for Sac State go on the very good path. I know they will:) Indeed, Scott was one of the very first wrestlers I learned of when I started watching wrestling/lucha libre and specially WWE back in 2013, such a shame he is gone by now :( ... Greetings from the State of Mexico my dude:) good luck with your stuff and enjoy the game jjj. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 21:46, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Access to Special:RevisionDelete has been expanded to include users who have the deletelogentry and deletedhistory rights. This means that those in the Researcher user group and Checkusers who are not administrators can now access Special:RevisionDelete. The users able to view the special page after this change are the 3 users in the Researcher group, as there are currently no checkusers who are not already administrators. (T301928)
When viewing deleted revisions or diffs on Special:Undelete a back link to the undelete page for the associated page is now present. (T284114)
Following an RfC, a change has been made to the administrators inactivity policy. Under the new policy, if an administrator has not made at least 100 edits over a period of 5 years they may be desysopped for inactivity.
A public status system for WMF wikis has been created. It is located at https://www.wikimediastatus.net/ and is hosted separately to WMF wikis so in the case of an outage it will remain viewable.
Arbitration
Remedy 2 of the St Christopher case has been rescinded following a motion. The remedy previously authorised administrators to place a ban on single-purpose accounts who were disruptively editing on the article St Christopher Iba Mar Diop College of Medicine or related pages from those pages.
Administrators using the mobile web interface can now access Special:Block directly from user pages. (T307341)
The IP Info feature has been deployed to all wikis as a Beta Feature. Any autoconfirmed user may enable the feature using the "IP info" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features. Autoconfirmed users will be able to access basic information about an IP address that includes the country and connection method. Those with advanced privileges (admin, bureaucrat, checkuser) will have access to extra information that includes the Internet Service Provider and more specific location.
The New Pages Patrol queue has around 10,000 articles to be reviewed. As all administrators have the patrol right, please consider helping out. The queue is here. For further information on the state of the project, see the latest NPP newsletter.
Your recent editing history at Bad Bunny shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ChicagoWikiEditor (talk) 05:17, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Bad Bunny is not a wrestler, get over it.
I've looked through your edit history and discovered that for the better part of a year, you've been constantly reverting editors who clearly disagree with your inclusion of listing bad bunny as a professional wrestler. It's in your best interest to open an RFC on his talk page, because if you continue to revert edits without majority consensus you will be reported to the admins board and may be blocked from editing. ChicagoWikiEditor (talk) 05:23, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An RfC has been closed with consensus to add javascript that will show edit notices for editors editing via a mobile device. This only works for users using a mobile browser, so iOS app editors will still not be able to see edit notices.
An RfC has been closed with the consensus that train stations are not inherently notable.
Administrators will now see links on user pages for "Change block" and "Unblock user" instead of just "Block user" if the user is already blocked. (T308570)
Arbitration
The arbitration case request Geschichte has been automatically closed after a 3 month suspension of the case.
Miscellaneous
You can vote for candidates in the 2022 Board of Trustees elections from 16 August to 30 August. Two community elected seats are up for election.
Wikimania 2022 is taking place virtually from 11 August to 14 August. The schedule for wikimania is listed here. There are also a number of in-person events associated with Wikimania around the world.
Tech tip: When revision-deleting on desktop, hold ⇧ Shift between clicking two checkboxes to select every box in that range.
i appreciate what you're saying about kayfabe, but here, we stay in the real world.
Kayfabe - Lumis is a rouge stalker
Real World - he's been appearing on Raw since he returned (with the one-off on NXT to give closure to InDex)
It's like when a title change happens but it doesn't air
Kayfabe - X is champion
Real World - Y is champion, but the match hasn't aired yet.
Same idea. Vjmlhds 14:42, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
@Vjmlhds: I'm actually going seek WikiProject consensus on this one, as it's a bit more complicated than that. Title changes are far more precise of a record than roster brand designations. With Cena, it hasn't even been a year since his last recorded match, and even less time since his latest appearance, where a future feud with Theory had been teased. Many wrestlers have been out longer than that with injury or part time status, like Undertaker or Bayley.DrewieStewie (talk) 14:49, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Cena's last TV match was 8-21-21 at last year's Summerslam - more than a year ago (not by much granted, but still past the year mark), and wrestled an unannounced dark match on September 10 during the SD tapings at Madison Square Garden...just shy of a year in that case. Only other appearance since then was his 20th Anniversary show, which was a unique one-off special occasion. As I said, he's more in ambassador mode than an active wrestler these days. With Lumis, it's easy to track where he's been - just by referencing TV reports from the shows. Not trying to give you a hard time or argue with you, but I think you're overthinking everything here just a tad. Vjmlhds(talk)15:09, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is open to define a process by which Vector 2022 can be made the default for all users.
An RfC is open to gain consensus on whether Fox News is reliable for science and politics.
Technical news
The impact report on the effects of disabling IP editing on the Persian (Farsi) Wikipedia has been released.
The WMF is looking into making a Private Incident Reporting System (PIRS) system to improve the reporting of harmful incidents through easier and safer reporting. You can leave comments on the talk page by answering the questions provided. Users who have faced harmful situations are also invited to join a PIRS interview to share the experience. To sign up please emailMadalina Ana.
Arbitration
An arbitration case regarding Conduct in deletion-related editing has been closed. The Arbitration Committee passed a remedy as part of the final decision to create a request for comment (RfC) on how to handle mass nominations at Articles for Deletion (AfD).
The arbitration case request Jonathunder has been automatically closed after a 6 month suspension of the case.
Miscellaneous
The new pages patrol (NPP) team has prepared an appeal to the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) for assistance with addressing Page Curation bugs and requested features. You are encouraged to read the open letter before it is sent, and if you support it, consider signing it. It is not a discussion, just a signature will suffice.
Following an RfC, consensus has been found that, in the context of politics and science, the reliability of FoxNews.com is unclear and that additional considerations apply to its use.
The Articles for creation helper script now automatically recognises administrator accounts which means your name does not need to be listed at WP:AFCP to help out. If you wish to help out at AFC, enable AFCH by navigating to Preferences → Gadgets and checking the "Yet Another AfC Helper Script" box.
Arbitration
Remedy 8.1 of the Muhammad images case will be rescinded 1 November following a motion.
Instead of going back and forth on the article page, let's hash it out here.
99.9% of the time, I'm usually on your side on issues like this, where if someone is both a manager and a wrestler, I'd put them on the wrestler roster
MVP is the 0.1% - he's almost 50, has bad knees (just recently had surgery...the cane isn't just a gimmick), and the few matches he had in July were to eat pins in handicap matches with Omos.
If MVP were 35, had 2 good knees and wrestled regularly, I'd be with you a million percent, but he's 50, his knees are shot, and only wrestles sporadically.
The occasional wrestler tag seems like a fair compromise, which his why I went that route. Vjmlhds 03:01, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
@Vjmlhds: Fair enough, I can settle for that. Those points are fair; my main worries are usually with regards to whether or not we can make that distinction on our own observation or if we need explicitness and transperity first. Thats a good argument. The other side of the issue is that while his knee is bad, the pattern seems to be that on occasion he'll go on a wrestling spree and then go on hiatus in a managerial role for awhile (he did get a pinfall against Cedric, to be fair). He'll probably have a match that he announces (before or after) will be his last. Eventually we'll have that clarity, but for now I can roll with that compromise, given that we likely haven't seen the last of him in a WWE ring. Although he is doing a lot of managerial work, I can see some more tag matches, a potential tag title match (in the vein of Styles/Omos), Rumble appearance, etc. But for this very moment, "occasional wrestler" is fine. Be advised, the placement on the page between active and manager could fluctuate at any given moment per these parameters we are discussing. DrewieStewie (talk) 04:01, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If MVP were to come out and do a "I got one more run left in me!" spiel and wrestle a more frequent schedule, I'd be the first to put him back on the roster. When the Hurt Business was at its peak, MVP listed as a wrestler would have been fine, because he was basically doing what Ric Flair did in Evolution - playing the elder statesman player/coach role. But in the here and now, with the factors currently in play, where he is now is about right. Vjmlhds(talk)12:50, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An RfC is open to discuss having open requests for adminship automatically placed on hold after the seven-day period has elapsed, pending closure or other action by a bureaucrat.
Tech tip: Wikimarkup in a block summary is parsed in the notice that the blockee sees. You can use templates with custom options to specify situations like {{rangeblock|create=yes}} or {{uw-ublock|contains profanity}}.
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
An RfC on the banners for the December 2022 fundraising campaign has been closed.
Technical news
A new preference named "Enable limited width mode" has been added to the Vector 2022 skin. The preference is also shown as a toggle on every page if your monitor is 1600 pixels or wider. When disabled it removes the whitespace added by Vector 2022 on the left and right of the page content. Disabling this preference has the same effect as enabling the wide-vector-2022 gadget. (T319449)
Arbitration
Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 12, 2022 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.
The arbitration case Stephen has been opened and the proposed decision is expected 1 December 2022.
A motion has modified the procedures for contacting an admin facing Level 2 desysop.
Miscellaneous
Tech tip: A single IPv6 connection usually has access to a "subnet" of 18 quintillion IPs. Add /64 to the end of an IP in Special:Contributions to see all of a subnet's edits, and consider blocking the whole subnet rather than an IP that may change within a minute.
Voting for the Sound Logo has closed and the winner is expected to be announced February to April 2023.
Tech tip: You can view information about IP addresses in a centralised location using bullseye which won the Newcomer award in the recent Coolest Tool Awards.
Voting in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey will begin on 10 February 2023 and end on 24 February 2023. You can submit, discuss and revise proposals until 6 February 2023.
Tech tip: Syntax highlighting is available in both the 2011 and 2017 Wikitext editors. It can help make editing paragraphs with many references or complicated templates easier.
Following a request for comment, the Portal CSD criteria (P1 (portal subject to CSD as an article) and P2 (underpopulated portal)) have been deprecated.
The Terms of Use update cycle has started, which includes a [p]roposal for better addressing undisclosed paid editing. Feedback is being accepted until 24 April 2023.
The rollback of Vector 2022 RfC has found no consensus to rollback to Vector legacy, but has found rough consensus to disable "limited width" mode by default.
A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.
Technical news
Progress has started on the Page Triage improvement project. This is to address the concerns raised by the community in their 2022 WMF letter that requested improvements be made to the tool.
Following an RfC, editors indefinitely site-banned by community consensus will now have all rights, including sysop, removed.
As a part of the Wikimedia Foundation's IP Masking project, a new policy has been created that governs the access to temporary account IP addresses. An associated FAQ has been created and individual communities can increase the requirements to view temporary account IP addresses.
Technical news
Bot operators and tool maintainers should schedule time in the coming months to test and update their tools for the effects of IP masking. IP masking will not be deployed to any content wiki until at least October 2023 and is unlikely to be deployed to the English Wikipedia until some time in 2024.
Arbitration
The arbitration case World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been closed. The topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland is subject to a "reliable source consensus-required" contentious topic restriction.
Why do you keep commenting at blocked user Talk pages? I suspect you're doing even more than I see because I can't imagine that you're targeting only those users I've blocked. I don't think it's helpful. You are not an administrator, and for the most part you muddy the waters, especially when multiple admins are discussing what to do. Please stop and allow administrators to do their job.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:41, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Bbb23: Hey there, everything I’ve commented on was solely things appearing on your talk page between the time I made my query about the undeletion request and the time that got resolved. I just did that as a way to keep busy and occupied while waiting on that. Any further comments after that were simply because I had previously commented on something before mine was resolved (specifically Key of G minor and Fantasticer). I have not commented on anything that has appeared after my inquiry was resolved, nor do I intend to unless it involves me or I become legitimately involved through other means/gets my interest on a noticeboard. It helped me better understand the process of unblock requests from a policy and procedural standpoint from admins. Aside from these two cases, I have largely not been involved with blocked user requests (except for InedibleHulk, who I’ve been connected to on-wiki long before his Arbitration Enforcement saga). Hope this explains everything. Have a good day. DrewieStewie (talk) 16:26, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Following an RfC, TFAs will be automatically semi-protected the day before it is on the main page and through the day after.
A discussion at WP:VPP about revision deletion and oversight for dead names found that [s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment.
The SmallCat dispute case has closed. As part of the final decision, editors participating in XfD have been reminded to be careful about forming local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged to note when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful.
Miscellaneous
Tech tip: The "Browse history interactively" banner shown at the top of Special:Diff can be used to easily look through a history, assemble composite diffs, or find out what archive something wound up in.
Following a motion, the contentious topic designation of Prem Rawat has been struck. Actions previously taken using this contentious topic designation are still in force.
Following several motions, multiple topic areas are no longer designated as a contentious topic. These contentious topic designations were from the Editor conduct in e-cigs articles, Liancourt Rocks, Longevity, Medicine, September 11 conspiracy theories, and Shakespeare authorship question cases.
Following a motion, remedies 3.1 (All related articles under 1RR whenever the dispute over naming is concerned), 6 (Stalemate resolution) and 30 (Administrative supervision) of the Macedonia 2 case have been rescinded.
Following a motion, remedy 6 (One-revert rule) of the The Troubles case has been amended.
An arbitration case named Industrial agriculture has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case close 8 November.
Miscellaneous
The Articles for Creation backlog drive is happening in November 2023, with 700+ drafts pending reviews for in the last 4 months or so. In addition to the AfC participants, all administrators and New Page Patrollers can conduct reviews using the helper script, Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in the Gadgets settings. Sign up here to participate!
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Following a talk page discussion, the Administrators' accountability policy has been updated to note that while it is considered best practice for administrators to have notifications (pings) enabled, this is not mandatory. Administrators who do not use notifications are now strongly encouraged to indicate this on their user page.
Arbitration
Following a motion, the Extended Confirmed Restriction has been amended, removing the allowance for non-extended-confirmed editors to post constructive comments on the "Talk:" namespace. Now, non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace solely to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided that their actions are not disruptive.
The Arbitration Committee has announced a call for Checkusers and Oversighters, stating that it will currently be accepting applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions at any point in the year.
Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee rescinded the restrictions on the page name move discussions for the two Ireland pages that were enacted in June 2009.
An RfC about increasing the inactivity requirement for Interface administrators is open for feedback.
Technical news
Pages that use the JSON contentmodel will now use tabs instead of spaces for auto-indentation. This will significantly reduce the page size. (T326065)
Arbitration
Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee adopted a new enforcement restriction on January 4, 2024, wherein the Committee may apply the 'Reliable source consensus-required restriction' to specified topic areas.
Community feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE.
A vote to ratify the charter for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is open till 2 February 2024, 23:59:59 (UTC) via Secure Poll. All eligible voters within the Wikimedia community have the opportunity to either support or oppose the adoption of the U4C Charter and share their reasons. The details of the voting process and voter eligibility can be found here.
Community Tech has made some preliminary decisions about the future of the Community Wishlist Survey. In summary, they aim to develop a new, continuous intake system for community technical requests that improves prioritization, resource allocation, and communication regarding wishes. Read more
The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes. (T313405)
Arbitration
An arbitration case has been opened to look into "the intersection of managing conflict of interest editing with the harassment (outing) policy".
Miscellaneous
Editors are invited to sign up for The Core Contest, an initiative running from April 15 to May 31, which aims to improve vital and other core articles on Wikipedia.
Partial action blocks are now in effect on the English Wikipedia. This means that administrators have the ability to restrict users from certain actions, including uploading files, moving pages and files, creating new pages, and sending thanks. T280531
Local administrators can now add new links to the bottom of the site Tools menu without using JavaScript. Documentation is available on MediaWiki. (T6086)
Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via Special:GlobalVanishRequest. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked.
Following an RfC, there is a new criterion for speedy deletion: C4, which applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past.
The arbitration case Historical Elections is currently open. Proposed decision is expected by 3 September 2024 for this case.
Miscellaneous
Editors can now enter into good article review circles, an alternative for informal quid pro quo arrangements, to have a GAN reviewed in return for reviewing a different editor's nomination.
Following a discussion, the speedy deletion reason "File pages without a corresponding file" has been moved from criterion G8 to F2. This does not change what can be speedily deleted.
Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Following an RFC, the policy on restoration of adminship has been updated. All former administrators may now only regain the tools following a request at the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard within 5 years of their most recent admin action. Previously this applied only to administrators deysopped for inactivity.
Following a request for comment, a new speedy deletion criterion, T5, has been enacted. This applies to template subpages that are no longer used.
A request for comment is open to discuss whether admins should be advised to warn users rather than issue no-warning blocks to those who have posted promotional content outside of article space.
Technical news
The Nuke feature also now provides links to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.
