If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If I have been active and have not yet responded, please place {{Talkback|your username}} on my page as I may have missed your response.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist. If I notice that you have been active but have not responded, I may place {{Talkback|Neonorange}} on your page in case you have missed my response.
Thank you for explaining for a new editor how to slow down! - I have three "musicians" on the Main page, one the topic of my story today, like 22 July but with interview and today's music at the Proms. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:12, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
FYI Lewis Capaldi is the 1st cousin twice removed of Peter Capaldi. ie he is two generations younger. His gg grandfather Giovanni Battista Antonio Capladi is Peter's grandfather. Giovanni passed away on the Isle of Man in 1946. I can send you a verified ancestry chart if you like. Peter McCaig (talk) 07:51, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Peter McCaig, I am afraid a genealogical chart will not help. I see two problems: information placed in Wikipedia must be from published reports (especially for biographies of living people) and such a genealogy chart would expose personal information of uninvolved individuals.
The only way forward would be to find the kinship information published by a source Wikipedia considers reliable. Wikipedia article content is supported by verifiability, not truth. Wikipedia readers must be able to verify information through citations to reliable sources, sources that have editorial management and fact checking abilities; scholarly journals, newspapers of records, and websites that meet the same requirements and that are not user generated.
If you wish to have wider discussions on your concern, try The Tea House or open a discussion on the talk page of the article you wish to edit.
The book already cited does not say anything about 'creation of what they curry'. It only mentions that anglo-indian dishes had ingredients from different part of India like mango in Bengal fish curry, coconut in mughlai dishes. These statements does not even remotely suggest that cuury was created. `mkund (talk) 15:28, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then you should add a quote from the book in the ref template that makes the point clearly or find another source. What you should not do is to continue to edit war with Chiswick Chap. It seems, from the similarity, that you have a single-purpose account that furthers the edits made by an IP editor. And now, it seems you are continuing to edit-war. Please take the discussion to the article talk page to seek consensus—edit summaries are not a discussion. — Neonorange (talk to Phil) (he, they) 15:53, 22 October 2024 (UTC) —[reply]
Many thanks for your assistance. Yes, their edits are strikingly like the IP that I gave warnings to earlier today. I've done no edit-warring here, just reverting vandalism/POV editing. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:54, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Chiswick Chap, as the more experienced editor, you should start a discussion at [[Talk:Curry]. The Edis by mkund are not vandalism; disruptive behavior, sure, but nit vandalism. ( I am past the age to eat curry. I have no dog in this this discussion). — Neonorange (talk to Phil) (he, they) 16:12, 22 October 2024 (UTC) —[reply]
Hello Neonorange, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. Happy editing, Abishe (talk) 04:16, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
