User talk:DavidMinhPham

A belated welcome!

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, DavidMinhPham. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome!  Seagull123  Φ  22:09, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


License tagging for File:Segs4Vets Mobilizing America's Heroes.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Segs4Vets Mobilizing America's Heroes.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:06, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Madame Khánh

The article Madame Khánh has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 05:40, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Segs4Vets

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Segs4Vets, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  » nafSadh did say 10:02, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your invitation to participate in a Wikimedia-approved survey in online behavior.

Hello, my name is Michael Tsikerdekis[1][2], currently involved as a student in full time academic research at Masaryk University. I am writing to you to kindly invite you to participate in an online survey about interface and online collaboration on Wikipedia. The survey has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Foundation Research Committee.

I am contacting you because you were randomly selected from a list of active editors. The survey should take about 7 to 10 minutes to complete, and it is very straightforward.

Wikipedia is an open project by nature. Let’s create new knowledge for everyone! :-)

To take part in the survey please follow the link: tsikerdekis.wuwcorp.com/pr/survey/?user=90222342 (HTTPS).

Best Regards, --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 12:04, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS: The results from the research will become available online for everyone and will be published in an open access journal.

UPDATE: This is the second and final notification for participating in this study. Your help is essential for having concrete results and knowledge that we all can share. I would like to thank you for your time and as always for any questions, comments or ideas do not hesitate to contact me. PS: As a thank you for your efforts and participation in Wikipedia Research you will receive a Research Participation Barnstar after the end of the study. --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 19:31, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Research Participation Barnstar
For your participation in the survey for Anonymity and conformity on the internet. Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 11:16, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Segs4Vets

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Segs4Vets requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. –sumone10154(talk • contribs) 21:29, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Segs4Vets, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Segway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Ngô Đình Lệ Quyên, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of Rome (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Segs4Vets

Hi. In your recent update to Segs4Vets you added a new entry with several references and a bare url link. Please can you take the trouble to format the bare link properly as another inline reference? Such bare links should not appear in articles. --Mirokado (talk) 07:34, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Valerie Van Leer-Greenberg

The article Valerie Van Leer-Greenberg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

References about the the trials and defendants. There needs to be independent, reliable references about Ms. Van Leer-Greenberg and not about the trials.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 07:16, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Valerie Van Leer-Greenberg, DavidMinhPham!

Wikipedia editor Modern.Jewelry.Historian just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Notable because of Daily News, just barely - notability isn't supposed to be inherited. I feel there are too many sections - at least consolidate cases, ie under Career. Book, education and awards could be consolidated in Biography.

To reply, leave a comment on Modern.Jewelry.Historian's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nomination of Valerie Van Leer-Greenberg for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Valerie Van Leer-Greenberg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valerie Van Leer-Greenberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wkharrisjr (talk) 18:46, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Mme Nhu

Thank you for your warm comments and it was a pleasure for me to have posted the portrait. I didn't know there was a book recently released about her, but it'll certainly be an interesting read and i look forward to reading it soon. Has Mme Nhu's memoirs been published yet? She was said to have been working on it in 3 separate sets, 2 of which were completed but the last was incomplete. Unfortunately, I couldn't make it to commemoration in France because I reside in Canada, but i send my deepest regards to the Ngo-Dinh family. Let's hope history never repeats itself again.

Also i have a question about the death of Ngo Dinh Le Thuy. What was the cause and circumstances of the accident that caused her death? I suspect it might be something sinister but I'm not sure. Nguyen1310 (talk) 22:57, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Shwebomin, Crown Prince of Burma

Please be aware that article titles should be neutral, and the "crown prince" status of Shwebomin is contested (see article text). Article titles should not be more complex than is necessary, see Wikipedia:Disambiguation, and they should not contain honorifics. See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (royalty and nobility). Also you should be aware that edit warring in the Wikipedia is frowned upon. Differences of opinion should be discussed on the talk pages and an attempt at reaching a mutually satisfactory solution in accord with Wikipedia policy and guidelines.. Also there is a three-revert rule which provides: Editors who engage in edit warring are liable to be blocked from editing to prevent further disruption. --Bejnar (talk) 23:58, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to United States Volunteers

Sorry, it has been a busy year. I once again removed your additions to the above article for the following reasons.

1. It doesn't belong in that article. The term refers, EXCLUSIVELY, to the lawfully mustered state militia forces that were mustered into Federal Service, prior to the creation of the modern National Guard system with the Militia Act of 1903. The only connection to this organization is simply a name. When two things, with the same name, have only that in common, they go in separate articles.

2. I highly doubt that, once a separate article were to be created, it would survive WP:AfD, simply because this organization is not notable by Wikipedia standards. Please see WP:GNG and WP:SPIP.

3. You did not justify your revert on the talk-page. And not charging money isn't a good enough reason. Different things go in different articles, and articles should only exist for things that are notable. --KRAPENHOEFFER! TALK 09:32, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Shwebomin

Please review our policy WP:BLP before you make another edit like this one. I agree that there are problems with that webpage as a source, and I removed that webpage from the article, but you cannot insert text into the article attacking the author of that webpage as an "alleged historian". Please let me know if you have any questions regarding the BLP policy or any other. Thank you. Gamaliel (talk) 19:40, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lapthe Flora, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chinese and Indonesian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, DavidMinhPham. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:General Nguyễn Khánh & Captain James Văn Thạch.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:General Nguyễn Khánh & Captain James Văn Thạch.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:29, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, DavidMinhPham. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DavidMinhPham. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DavidMinhPham. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]