Hello, DavidAHull, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Victuallers (talk) 16:05, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thank you for starting this article! However, if you could please add some references to ensure that the page won't be deleted as well as categories that you feel are appropriate, that would be fantastic!
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Hello, I've done the suggested cleanup on the Tanhouse Lane railway station article, take a look to see how it now looks and ask if there is anything you don't understand.
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Sorry this was about "the first thing" you heard from Wikipedians. We do try hard not to "bite the newbies", and I do hope you have an easier time of it from here on in. However, all's well that ends well - if you keep smiling, do your bit and enjoy yourself, with a bit of learning the ropes along the way, I think you'll find that it's a lot of fun helping to build the world's best encyclopedia. All the best, and WELCOME TO WIKIPEDIA! Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:02, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Another message of support here. If you're interested in UK railways, then you may want to join our Wikiproject on UK railways. Just add yourself to the members list and you're in!. Don't worry too much about the deletion discussion, railway stations are generally notable enough to be able to reference adequately and needing improvement is never a reason to delete an article. Mjroots (talk) 17:45, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for this cheery and most welcome invitation. Alas, I have just spent half an hour trying to add myself to the list and can't find how to do so. The project sounds right up my street, however. I have contributed to Wikipedia before, but until my foray into Tanhouse Lane I have only found existing pages where I can add or correct things, which I do by going in and adopting the existing layout. My biggest contribution by far is to the Shirebrook North railway station entry, which I like to imagine shows care and attention. I am 63 and have had a lifelong interest in railways, notably Immingham, where I had several railwaymen in my family as a child and the LDECR which I could see from my school playing field in Shirebrook. I can bring three things to the party: 1) decent eye for detail, 2) reasonable written English and 3) particular affinity to the periods 1955-66 and 2013 onwards. I even use trains regularly! Kind regards, Dave
I now see that I should use Tildes to sign ou, so here goes... DavidAHull (talk) 22:06, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Aha! The penny has dropped! All I had to do was go in and edit the page by copying and pasting someone else's entry then editing that copy. I have spent a career making this the very last thing one would ever do, as allowing lay users "behind the scenes" is a recipe for disaster in public databases. I was therefore looking for something like "Click this button to add your entry", followed by a dialogue box. Wikipedia turns this on its head. Simple when you know how, impossible until then. Thanks to all who have sent messages of support. I'm up and running.... 31.54.230.173 (talk) 06:28, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wow! This is really helpful, I've gone in, figured out what I'd done wrongly, corrected it (them), learned and moved on. Onwards and upwards! Thanks DavidAHull (talk) 19:13, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
References
Hi, I see that you've been altering the order of presentation of a number of references, as here. Is there a reason for this? The thing is, references are most commonly given with authors first, then year, title and so on. The citation templates like {{cite book}} can help to achieve a consistent format - with these, you can list the various items in any order you like, but they will be displayed in a consistent order. Here's the Butt ref, first as it was before your edit:
Butt, R.V.J., (1995) The Directory of Railway Stations, Yeovil: Patrick Stephens
and after your edit:
"The Directory of Railway Stations" by RVJ Butt (Patrick Stephens, 1995) ISBN1-8526-0508-1
Hello Redrose, thank you for this most welcome guidance. I altered them to strive for standardisation, but I reckon "your" way is better still. I've had a first bash at altering Chesterfield Market Place railway station to the Wiki Way and would appreciate your comments before I get stuck in to all the others on the LD&ECR. The only thing I don't understand is the Rnnn numbers, what are they? I'm off to Cardiff tomorrow until the weekend, so won't get cracking before Sunday. Kind regards, Dave DavidAHull (talk) 21:12, 1 May 2013 (UTC).[reply]
I assume that you mean the |id=R508 - that's not actually necessary, |id= is something of a "miscellaneous" parameter. I often use it for the publisher's own identifier for the book, on my copy of Butt there is "R508" printed low down on the spine. Other publishers have other systems, many don't have one. Another example is
Cupit, J.; Taylor, W. (1984) [1966]. The Lancashire, Derbyshire & East Coast Railway. Oakwood Library of Railway History (2nd ed.). Headington: Oakwood Press. ISBN0-85361-302-8. OL19.
Hi, when I wrote above that "|id= is something of a "miscellaneous" parameter", I didn't mean that it was literally miscellaneous, which is how you seem to be using it in edits like this. It's intended for an identifier which doesn't fit any of the other parameters designed for specific types of identifiers. For a DVD, the |id= parameter would be for the publisher's catalogue number. For example, if I were to use this DVD as a reference source, I would put |id=BBCDVD 3482, that being the number printed on the packaging (it's also shown in the "Product Info" tab of that web page). --Redrose64 (talk) 22:35, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ho hum. Having spent rather a lot of time going back to Chesterfield Market Place and working east to put the DVD refs in the manner I thought you wanted - ie to tell the punter what s/he would be getting - I'm less than enthusiastic about going over it all again. Perhaps you could send me one of my references in the style you want, not something from Dr Who or whatever, but send me a concrete example of what I've put and what would conform to the rubric, two different examples would be even better. I will then stand a better chance of getting it right. Hope this finds you, as I'm lost in the mists of talk pages. Dave DavidAHull (talk) 23:45, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Right, I've done a bit of digging. Let's consider the ones where you've put something similar to
DVD (2005). The Lancashire, Derbyshire and East Coast Railway - Memories of a Lost Route. Chesterfield: Terminus Publications. Collection of stills on DVD. {{cite AV media}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
DVD2 (2005). Diesels Along:-The Lancashire, Derbyshire and East Coast Railway. Chesterfield: Terminus Publications. DVD, stills and film with commentary, 60 mins. {{cite AV media}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
Do they have numbers like TP321D or TP014D marked on the packaging? If so, we can change them to:
DVD (2005). The Lancashire, Derbyshire and East Coast Railway - Memories of a Lost Route. Chesterfield: Terminus Publications. TP321D. {{cite AV media}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
DVD2 (2005). Diesels Along:-The Lancashire, Derbyshire and East Coast Railway. Chesterfield: Terminus Publications. TP014D. {{cite AV media}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
Do they have any credits - writer, director, or presenter? If they do, one of those would be best for the |last1= and |first1= parameters, since "DVD" and "DVD2" are somewhat vague. --Redrose64 (talk) 14:53, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again, thank you for going to this trouble. Where DVDs have presenters etc I have cited them rather than "DVD", though I have nevertheless sought to indicate to readers that something is a DVD, not a book or mag. As you haven't mentioned it, I presume Wiki doesn't have a "cite DVD" or "cite film" feature, which seems rum, given that it is a vast medium; what do our counterpart film buffs do, I wonder? I resorted to using "DVD" when I couldn't find any distinguishing identifiers AND I wanted to alert readers that such-and-such a source is a DVD, a sort of last resort. I then got carried away with an exuberanceo of helpfulness saying things like "stills with commentary", we don't say books have "writing and pictures", so why do anything so helpful with DVDs? I won't do it again and I'll let you zap all occurrences. I do understand what you're on about with identifiers, your original example on the spine of Cupit & Taylor was admirably succinct and eloquent. The fundamental nature of the two LDECR DVDs is that they were produced by a couple of blokes who had a load of good pictures and some local knowledge, but none of the production fol-de-rol of a pro publishing house, so they have produced lamb dressed up as mutton, and identifierless mutton, at that. Cheers, Dave DavidAHull (talk) 15:47, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Escape Orbit(Talk)22:37, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Redrose, thank you for contacting me. I have noticed you walking behind me sweeping up, I hope I'm getting better. I appreciate your patience. I have two DVDs re the LD&ECR, the first concerns my particular field - the area West of Warsop (I grew up in Bolsover, went to school in Shirebrook and lived later in Scarcliffe, though I'm now in exile in Southport.) It is the only one I've cited in my recent, sustained effort to make a contribution on the Clog and Knocker, but I have a third which includes long sections on the MR Clowne and Doe Lea Branches, which I've also cited as I write them up. I expect to cite the second as I work my way East. I have three other Marsden Rail DVDs containing supporting evidence, notably re Tuxford and a couple with evocative but all too brief shots at Arkwright and Staveley GC. All in all, I have a mixed bag, some with brief snippets, others with long shots. To return to the one I've cited re ChMP etc it is an absolute gem, essentially, and unavoidably, it is a "photobook", ie stills presented by DVD rather than physical book. There is a lot of overlap with books and booklets I have cited, but there are some priceless shots, unique to the DVD as far as I can see, notably of the Boythorpe and Doe Lea Viaducts, the second includes a mix of stills and moving film, eg at Arkwright in the 1970s. All in all, long, short, moving and still! As you will have realised, I am keen to play ball with following standard procedures and will welcome learning how to do so with this medium. Finally, while I've got you, I shared your view that the line of text in my LD template was intrusive, but I couldn't see how to put it in properly, eg as a sub-heading. Can such a thing be done, and if so, how? Finally finally I see that Butt (which I don't have, alas) has a template of his own, is this a technique worth pursuing for standard works, eg Cupit and Taylor? If so, how? Kind regards, Dave DavidAHull (talk) 09:09, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There are indeed template pages for specific books, including {{Butt-Stations}}, but these lack a certain degree of flexibility, particularly when there has been more than one edition, as is the case for Cupit & Taylor. They're most useful either where that book is used on dozens of different articles, or a lot of information needs to be packed in. I have created very few myself, these were {{RCTS-LocosLNER-8A}} and a few others in the same series, because of the long list of authors.
Returning to the DVD, it's not that I want to rush out and buy one, but for those who do have the DVD, it would help to know just where in the DVD the relevant information is to be found. So, we need to know how far through (minutes and seconds) the particular snippet starts; and if there is more than one feature, we would need the feature name as well as the overall DVD title. Obviously the |p= parameter of {{sfn}} is intended for a page number, so instead we would use the |loc= parameter, as in |loc=A Grand Day Out, 13:42 --Redrose64 (talk) 10:36, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, this is helpful and should keep me out of mischief. I also asked "Finally, while I've got you, I shared your view that the line of text in my LD template was intrusive, but I couldn't see how to put it in properly, eg as a sub-heading. Can such a thing be done, and if so, how?" any thoughts? Kind regards, Dave DavidAHull (talk) 12:04, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Knowing you have an interest in the LD&ECR, I thought you might be interested to know that there's a new book published and it looks quite good. See here. Lamberhurst (talk) 20:04, 18 May 2013 (UTC) Thank yoou very much, it looks fab, quite a few photos I haven't seen before, hope the text is good. It'll be on my birthday wishlist by morning.... Kind regards, Dave DavidAHull (talk) 21:41, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for May 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
The funny little rules and conventions on Wikipedia can take months to get the hang of. If you have any questions, just ask. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:49, 20 May 2013 (UTC)Thanks for your patient advice and for sweeping up after me. I may well take you up on your kind offer. Dave DavidAHull (talk) 21:46, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for May 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shirebrook South railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Northern Railway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Please take a look at User:Useddenim/Duckmanton and tell me what you think. I redrew the lines around Duckmanton/Arkwright much closer to the actual layout. (Pale blue will be replaced with pale grey in the final version to further de-emphasize lines that have been removed.) I do, however, have a question about the colours (you) used: does pale pink represent 'lines in place but not in use' or 'other lines'? Useddenim (talk) 23:20, 1 June 2013
Seriously fab. We have consensus on overall design. The Duckmanton East Junction wording needs to go up a row to match the junction itself. The curve off to Chesterfield Central just below Staveley Central, would, for once, be more accurately represented by a 90 degree turn than 45 degree, but that is hardly material. Are the two reds now standard colours for passenger and former passenger lines? If so, OK, but I prefer the old ones, maybe I'm just used to them, the new ones don't seem different enough to me. Very impressive. I hope this is the right place to reply! Kind regards, Dave DavidAHull (talk) 22:03, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
See this for the latest revision. I hope I have satisfactorily represented Arkwright Town & Junction. I think it best to stick to the standard dark red/pink combination to represent open and closed lines in order to avoid confusion, and I chose red for passenger services because it's the same colour as used by BR (and yes, I'm old enough to remember when was considered ‘new’ and ‘mod’). However, we now have a whole rainbow of colours to choose from (LNER blue? GWR brown? LMS green?), so if you'd prefer something else, by all means say so. Cheers. Useddenim (talk) 04:54, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Something's happened to the overall layout, if I missed it last night, I apologise. A visual reference point is the A632 which runs in a straight line between the two bridges and it feels due E-W, even if it isn't strictly so. On earlier versions (which I can no longer see) both bridges were on the same level, which looked and felt right and would make sense to a modern viewer or someone in a car. On this morning's version the Western (left-hand) one has been moved South (downwards.) Mercifully, I hope the solution is easy, simply move the superb "module" of DSJ-DNJ-DEJ and left hand road bridge up a row, put an STR below DSJ, and tweak the top right hand corner to join up again. Otherwise - Wow! If those are the standard colours then go with that. If we changed to Eastern Region Blue, for example, they would all be blues so leave it be. Could the dinky little pointers be anything other than red or would that look daft? My eye roved down your other delicious works in progress. Your fabulent West Cumbrian (Northern) diagram has Oatlands and Moresby Parks missing. I would be delighted to comment on this superb WIP if you wish, but I don't want to butt in. By the way, to my eye the colour scheme on both W Cumb diagrams looks clearer than that proposed for Ducky. It's a pleasure exploring with you. Dave DavidAHull (talk) 08:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Alan. Now for some hat eating. In the course of looking for something quite different I have stumbled across a good scale old OS map of Arkwright Town and the Junctions. After a lifetime of travelling along the A632 by car and bus my flabber is gasted that the line of the road is not E-W, but as you have implied it with your "staggered" bridges. Your bridges are staggered and so am I. I can only hope you have not wasted time and effort "correcting" them. Gosh, this hat tastes crap. Yours apologetically. Dave DavidAHull (talk) 21:52, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I thought I was finished with User:Useddenim/Duckmanton, but now I will have to go back ans move the easterly bridge. (Not a biggie, though I do have to go to work now—I ended up on 2nd shift for the summer, but it's easy work driving for the University: see this item.) As far as checking a previous version, just click on the [View history] tab and select whichever version you want. Useddenim (talk) 19:04, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Alan, once again, my apologies. I'm even more impressed with what you do now I know you're several thousand miles away. I don't know how you select what to work on, but I have others cooking if you are interested. Kind regards, Dave DavidAHull (talk) 19:19, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for adding to the Pyewipe Junction article - some interesting material there. I have some material on the GNGEJR and the LDEC to review and hope to expand the articles on both in the forthcoming months.--Davidvaughanwells (talk) 18:31, 2 June 2013 (UTC) I really appreciate your kind note, thank you. I look forward to seeing your stuff in due course. I've worked my way along the LD from Chesterfield MP and now I'm going to do the Beighton Branch, after Tuxford Shed and Works and Langwith J Shed. Kind regards, DaveDavidAHull (talk) 19:38, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for June 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
built at road level at the end of a steep {{Convert|590|yd|m|0}} branch adjacent to Tinsley Road (later renamed {{rws|West Tinsley}} station. This connection also served [[Edgar Allen and Company]]'
run from Sheffield through {{rws|Spinkhill}}, {{rws|Clowne South}}, Creswell's old "Top Station" ({{rws|Creswell and Welbeck}}, {{rws|Shirebrook North}}, Shirebrook West, and {{rws|Mansfield
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).
So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.
What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.
The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Whitwell railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Creswell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
co.uk/2013.htm Passenger Services Over Unusual Lines 2013, corroborated by observation and the WTT}]</ref> The main aim of this exercise is to preserve staff route knowledge for times when
rolling stock. The crowds flocked as never before.{{sfn|Little|1995|p=15}}{{sfn|Kaye|1986|p=26}}{{sfn|Booth|2013|p=11} As a last hurrah special trains were run to the seaside shortly before the
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please see WP:Citing sources for ideas on how to improve the references and footnotes on the article.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beighton Junction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lincoln (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Clipstone railway station. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. --Redrose64 (talk) 09:10, 13 August 2013 (UTC): Will do, thanks, DaveDavidAHull (talk) 09:25, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A page you started (Duckmanton East Junction) has been reviewed!
Thank you for reviewing this short article. I assume by reviewing it you scanned it for lack of citations, pornography, spelling and the like, which is all good stuff. Could I suggest you also read it, specifically the section headed "Description" which places Duckmanton East Junction in the context of the four junctions which made up the collectively named "Duckmanton Junction", which is cited up to the hilt. Good luck, Dave DavidAHull (talk) 21:21, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know what your edit 'don't use obsolete or invalid params; don't stuff multiple values into years/events' refers to.
The parameters |owner= and |manager= are obsolete, you should use |original=|pregroup= and |postgroup=. The parameter |code= is invalid, since it is not recognised by {{Infobox UK disused station}}. The parameters |years= and |events= should each contain no more than one value; if you need more than one year/event pair, continue with |years1=|events1=|years2=|events2=|years3=|events3= etc. up to |years8=|events8=. This is for accessibility reasons. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:28, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Clock Face railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St Helens. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lower Ince railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ince railway station. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bamfurlong railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bamfurlong. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi, following up on your revert of my (and Jonesey95's) changes to Ainsdale Beach railway station. According to WorldCat, the ISBN of Portrait of the Cheshire Lines Committee is in fact 0-7110-2521-5 (or 978-0-7110-2521-9; they're equivalent). The ISBN "0 7110 2512 5" is invalid; the check digit "5" at the end doesn't match up with the rest of the number. I built a tool for working with ISBNs, and it also shows that this one is incorrect. Even if the incorrect version appears in the book, libraries are likely to be listing it under the corrected version—Wikipedia should too. {{Nihiltres |talk |edits}}22:50, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for this clear and helpful reply, I now accept the book has got it wrong. Luckily, the railway contents of the book are excellent. Does anyone actually use ISBNs in the real world? I have in the past quoted them to libraries and been met with blank stares. All the best. DavidAHull (talk) 18:03, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
ISBNs are most useful when you already know what book you're looking for, e.g. when following a citation. I think individual libraries tend to use the Dewey Decimal classification more, because that's more useful for searching for information by subject area, rather than seeking out a specific book. Of course, I'm not a librarian… {{Nihiltres |talk |edits}}19:32, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Dewey classifications are non-unique: two books can have the same classification, and this means that they should be about the same topic, but not necessarily exactly the same. They're great for organising libraries, because if the library shelves are arranged in Dewey order, you should find that all the books that are specifically about the Cheshire Lines Committee are placed fairly close together, perhaps intermixed with books specific to other railways, depending on how many digits that library uses for Dewey numbers. Since they cannot identify a specific book, we don't provide for them in our citation templates.
ISBNs are supposed to be unique to the extent that if a book is revised, or merely republished in a different form (such as paperback instead of hardback), a new ISBN should be allotted. The last digit of an ISBN is known as the check digit: there is a calculation that you can perform on the other digits, and if the result of that does not match the check digit, you know that there is an error. It's sensitive enough to detect transposition of two digits, which is what seems to have happened here: applying the calculation to ISBN0 7110 2512 5 Parameter error in {{ISBN}}: checksum we find that the check digit should be 6, i.e. ISBN0 7110 2512 6 - but if you click that, and follow some of the links such as Open Library or WorldCat, you'll find that the book allotted that ISBN is Peter Johnson's "The Festiniog Railway: a view from the past", clearly nothing to do with the Cheshire Lines Committee. Searching those sites for the actual book title (Portrait of the Cheshire Lines Committee), we find ISBN0 7110 2521 5 - all the digits are the same except that the third 1 has been exchanged with the 2. --Redrose64 (talk) 09:13, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Holland engine shed, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages New Holland and Ian Allan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brigham railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DMU. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hello again, thank you for asking. In a word, incompetence:-
1. I duplicated Template:Cockermouth and Workington Railway RDT because it seemed to be tied to the article about the railway. Specifically, I couldn't figure out how to make collapse work if I used the RDT template with individual stations, so I made a copy of the innards and adapted that to headings and footings I copied from your masterworks, notably Duckmanton Junction. I would love to know how to square the circle, as I've had to spend time this evening making changes to both versions, eg moving Workington Bridge railway station to its proper place west of Workington Bridge Junction.
2. The yellow header is incompetence pure and simple. In the context of previous/next boxes I know of some colours, such as LNWR or GCR, but don't know how to apply appropriate colours to route diagram headers. Once again, I'd welcome being shown how and shown where a list of established railway colours is kept.
4. I've embarked on a project to update Cumbrian railways. I've been surprised to find how few stations have any article at all. Well hey, that's what I'm getting my teeth into, but I'm flummoxed when someone has made a station redirect to something else, such as a railway. A concrete example, not in Cumbria, but a clear example, is Runcorn Gap railway station which redirects to St Helens and Runcorn Gap Railway. As I can't stop it redirecting I can't write an article. Can you please show me what to do?
I really appreciate you taking the trouble to follow this up.
Redrose: I can't stop it redirecting because I can't land on it. If I search for Runcorn Gap railway station it comes back with the railway, so I'm stuck outside a loop which I can't penetrate.
Go to Runcorn Gap railway station. At the top you will see the page title ("St Helens and Runcorn Gap Railway") and the standard message "From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" as usual. Below those it says "(Redirected from Runcorn Gap railway station)". What happens when you click that link? --Redrose64 (talk) 00:31, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
With regard to Marron Junction that you show on the line of the Cockermouth and Workington Railway, can you look at the Wikipedia line diagram of the Whitehaven, Cleator and Egremont Railway, where you will see the correct position for this station, above that of Bridgefoot but below the junction of that line with the Cockermouth and Workington Railway.
I have seen your reply on my talk page with regard to the previously discussed matter of Marron Junction and I need to draw your attention to the Wikipedia article on the Whitehaven, Cleator and Cockermouth Railway where the matter is shown on two sections of the main body of the article:-
...In the "overview" panel at the top right-hand corner, under the "terminal stations" section, Marron Junction is shown, together with two others.
... In the main text body of the article, under the heading of "northern section", you will find Marron Junction also mentioned there.
It is not up to me to cast aspersions on those who compliled the article on the Whitehaven, Cleator and Egremont Railway who chose to enter the Marron Junction information into the two sections that I have shown above.
the overview panel makes a red mention of Marron Junction because no such article exists. The route diagram in the overview box shows Marron Junction, but not Marron Junction railway station. I will edit the route diagram in my next session to show a triangular junction there. I may add Marron Junction railway station for completeness, but I'm mindful of clutter.
I've had another good look at the list of places of interest in the "Northern section" part of the main body. once again it mentions Marron Junction, but not the station.
I see that several of the places in that section are places, not stations. My current mission is to work my way round the old Cumberland filling such gaps, of which there are quite a lot.
I see Wikipedia as cumulative, others fill gaps in my contributions and I try to do likewise. Filling gaps implies no criticism and certainly no aspersions; not by me anyway.
More than you can imagine, I have to make a 20 mile round trip to see Butt in Crosby Library! Can you please give me the page number?
Cheers
Dave
DavidAHull (talk) 22:00, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Workington Central railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page River Derwent. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Aha! I wrote to you a few weeks ago about a fabulous RD of West Cumbria - this is it! Before owt else, this is a masterpiece, I congratulate you on it. As always with every RD, what is its scope? I have embarked on my own Cumbrian project to ensure that every station, public, private, workmen's or whatever has a Wikipedia article. That makes my job at once easy - every means every - and hard - every means a lot, but hey, I'm not going anywhere! Template:West Cumbrian Railways has some never public stations, such as Dovenby Lodge and St Thomas Cross Platform, does it aspire to all? On what is there already, a few gremlins catch my eye:
3) I've never come across Parkside can you please point me to evidence showing it. Whatever it is, it isn't the Parkside to which it is linked, which is a hundred miles away in Derbyshire.
I noticed your recent template update of the Carlisle and Silloth Bay Railway, which includes four stations that were not shown on the original line template, so as the master West Cumbrian Railways line template includes this line, I have asked useddenim if he will be so kind as to update that particular template when he has the time to do that task.
I hope you haven't jumped the gun, I'm still researching Port Carlisle Junction station where sources are very confusing. I suspect, but can't yet prove, that it was never a halt on the Silloth line at all, only on the Waverley route, in which case it will need moving again. This, despite Quick showing it as on my revised Route Diagram. I've found two photos of the Up (northbound) platform perhaps 150 yards north of the junction and none showing anything at the junction itself or just to the Silloth side, nor have I found any mention in the heaps of Silloth material I've studied, only in NBR material. The plot thickens!
It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
the material in this article was (wrongly, in my view) in the article Grimsby District Light Railway (GDLR). I put out notices to that effect in its talk page and got no response, so, after a period of waiting I created a self-contained article for the Great Grimsby material then cut and pasted the material over from the GDLR article. I had no problem with the material except that it was in an article for a quite separate concern - rather like an article about Manchester United containing material about Manchester City.
I have no idea if the contents were lifted from somewhere else, I didn't write them.
I assumed that at some point a human would look at the offending material and make a decision on whether to zap it. Have I written these comments in the wrong place for that to happen? DavidAHull (talk) 07:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Have a look at the instructions on the article, in the box beginning "The CorenSearchBot has performed a web search with the contents of this page". --Redrose64 (talk) 14:18, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've now had a look at the Grace's Guide material and I reckon the Bot's right, it is a straight lift, including the core error; Grace's entitles the text Grimsby District Light Railway so as far as I'm concerned it can be zapped. I don't have the time to create a proper Grimsby Tramways article, if and when I do so I'll create it in an OK manner.DavidAHull (talk) 17:51, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have restored the material that I removed on the 11th. Sorry for the mistake. The bot got the source wrong. I hunted for it on Wikipedia, but since you had already removed the material from the source page, I did not find it. Copying within Wikipedia is of course permitted, but attribution is required. At a minimum, you are supposed to do this by saying in the edit summary on the destination article which article we copied the material from. There's also templates available, which should have been used in this case. This problem would have been avoided if that would have been done. I have restored the material and added the required attribution, but note there's a problem with the citations. I have taken a guess at what they are supposed to be, but if you could check, that would be great. — Diannaa (talk) 21:52, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for this. I don't really understand the toings and froings to be honest, but it's a rare and pleasant thing in Wikiland to read statements like "Sorry for the mistake." You guessed correctly about the first Price reference, well done. I'm afraid I don't have the Tramway Review book, so I can't confirm or refute the second, but it sounds plausible. I suggest we now let it rest, as nobody seems overbothered and the content is and always has been pretty good, it was just wrongly associated with the Grimsby District Light Railway which was another business altogether. All the best, DaveDavidAHull (talk) 22:13, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Great Grimsby Street Tramways requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.gracesguide.co.uk/Grimsby_District_Light_Railway. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Qpalzmmzlapq | talk | contribs21:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A page you started (Micklam railway station) has been reviewed!
Wikipedia editor Ibadibam just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
The further reading list seems to be mostly copied from Lowca Light Railway, and it might be worth reducing it to only those sources that specifically pertain to this station.
To reply, leave a comment on Ibadibam's talk page.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kirkbride railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kirkbride. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carlisle Canal railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North Eastern Railway. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Regarding this edit - it has been pointed out before, some years ago (when you started doing it) - maybe not on your talk page, maybe not regarding Shirebrook North railway station specifically, but I have done it. Where a page title is ambiguous (see WP:SIMILAR) we put a hatnote at the very top; where the articles are related but not ambiguously named, we might create a WP:SEEALSO section near the bottom. What we do not do is place sections called "Ambiguity" early in the article. --Redrose64 (talk) 23:24, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for June 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Penrhyn Quarry Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ian Allan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Holy Island Waggonway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi, re this edit: please use the appropriate template (it should be {{cite magazine}})) and do not misuse the parameters. The author is not "and Wherefore The Why", that's a corruption of the title of the section in the magazine. I've fixed it up like this. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:06, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Two new maps have today been added to the article on Penrhyn Quarry Railway. I hope they are as accurate as they should. The cartographer wants to know, where the 'Llandegai flint mill' was. Have you already found any traces of it? --NearEMPTiness (talk) 18:01, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi DavidAHull, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Lord Roem ~ (talk) 22:34, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations. The next "level" in this "game", where initially nobody knows that some levels exist, would be changing the user name from red to blue by giving a little introduction about yourself and your Wikiwork on your User page. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 23:34, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for drawing this to my attention. I know precisely nothing about South American railways, so I can only contribute the same amount to the factual side of the article.
It reads as if it has been translated into English by a machine or someone with a good grasp of English, but who isn't a native speaker. It seems borderline insulting for me to go wading in to make the English more natural. Are you sure it would be an OK thing to do?
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carnarvon Castle railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sixpence. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. I am maintaining {{Track gauge}} aka {{Railgauge}}, mainly to build a tough base of well-defined track gauges. Today, it has 269 definitions.
Editor Peter Horn noticed that you added to Cleethorpes Coast Light Railway the gauge of 14+1⁄4 inch, sourced by Scott. This gauge is not yet in the {{Track gauge}} list, so it is a new and unique gauge (not mentioned elsewhere on this wiki). My question is: can you please check and confirm that the source mentions this gauge? If so, I'd be happy to add it to the list &tc. -DePiep (talk) 18:32, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for contacting me. Before anything else, congratulations on and thanks for {{Track gauge}} aka {{Railgauge}} which is a fine asset. There is no question that the railway ran bearing the self-inflicted wound of 14+1⁄4 inch gauge from 1972 to 1994. Scott refers to it several times and devotes an indented half page of text to the subject alone on page 59. I've scanned it for your info, but don't know how to send it to you! Scott's history of the railway is a serious work of scholarship. In essence, the likeliest explanation is that it was a cock-up, with the track suppliers interpreting the request for "quarter scale" literally (which would result in 14 and one eigth) and the loco suppliers understanding the order to be for 15", the two nitwits not talking until track was laid and the loco suppliers turned up and tried to run them! The owners were Cleethorpes Council, who neither had nor claimed technical know-how. Dave DavidAHull (talk) 20:25, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No need to send me a copy (you can upload it to wiki commons, would be nice). I am convinced about the seriousness of source&editor and so this unique gauge will be added. (It just happens that other weird gauges are less sure to be sourced). This is the first new gauge added in2+1⁄2 years! And you know there will be a dedicated category added to Category:Articles that mention a specific track gauge too?
Now this question. I'm not English-ish, so can you tell me how that "quarter scale" order ended up into 14+1⁄4? A language misunderstanding? A quarter of 57" = 4 ft 9 in (1,448 mm)? Stupid it was (especially by keeping the rolling stock, not adjust the rails...). In 1972! -DePiep (talk) 21:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again. An exact "quarter scale" model of anything - a locomotive, a plane, a building or whatever - would have all dimensions reduced to one quarter (25%). So a quarter scale of a building 100 metres high would be 25 metres tall, a quarter scale diagram of a sewer with a diameter of 8 metres would show its diameter as 2 metres. A "one tenth scale" model of the same building would be 10 metres high and the sewer would be 80 centimetres across.
Standard gauge tracks are set at 4ft 8.5in apart, which is the same as 56.5 inches apart, so a "quarter scale" version of that would set the tracks as 56.5/4 inches apart, which is 14.125 inches apart, ie 14 and 1/8th inches apart. That is not exactly 14 and 1/4inches apart, but its the nearest thing to some sort or explanation of how a railway could have got something so wrong. As I wrote in my parts of the CCLR article, the consequences for the railway were non-trivial.
Now that sounds like fun! I wonder what country the line was in? I've had a go at buying the book (isbn=0715340042 oclc=643482297, by the way) but it would set me back £45 which would incur domestic disciplinary action. I've found a phone number to ring.... I'll be back. Dave DavidAHull (talk) 22:08, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I might take you up on that. Liverpool University Library's website says they have a copy.I will phone them tomorrow and see if I can access it, otherwise its available from Amazon from the USA. I'll get back to you when I've phoned the university. DaveDavidAHull (talk) 23:31, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Wait wait. That was a joke. I'm not allowed to talk with English people any more or so. Again, more of your 'domestic issues' over there. Glad to hear the your phone with Liverpool still works. -DePiep (talk) 23:38, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I visited Liverpool University library today and studied Baxter's fine book. I have written my trip up in the Track Gauges talk page. To be honest I'm not very clear whether this is the correct way to reply to the two people who have been so kind as to contact me, who I believe to be DePiep and Peter Horn. Please acknowledge or put me right. Dave DavidAHull (talk) 17:09, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, DavidAHull. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
@Peter Horn: Get thee behind me, Satan. I will open these Pandora's boxes occasionally, they look far too tempting when I have no end of projects in progress (eg finishing off Padarn Railway, Cumbria and Cleethorpes Coast Light Railway), projects in preparation (NE Wales, Shetland, Orkney, Ryedale & Workmen's trains) projects at the dream stage (quarry lines at Arenig and dam builders' lines at Maentwrog/Trawsfynydd and LDECR & MR Joint Railway.) I really enjoyed St Michael's Mount tramway, which I'd never heard of and have learned a lot from you while doing it. I'll keep your list of delights for rainy days. Thank you for drawing them to my attention Old Bean. Kind regards, Dave DavidAHull (talk) 20:22, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
By me adding it to the Merionethshire Railway article. Until this conversation, I took the Historical Welsh... to be the same sort of animal as "Disused railway stations in Gwynedd", "Railway stations opened in 1875" and their ilk.DavidAHull (talk) 13:29, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You're mixing up templates with categories. If you add a category to a page (such as [[Category:Disused railway stations in Gwynedd]], the page is automatically listed at the category's page (such as Category:Disused railway stations in Gwynedd). This is not true of templates - or indeed, any other page - it is a characteristic of categories only. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:51, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Thanks for your edits to West Somerset Mineral Railway which have really helped to improve the article. I asked on the articles talk page a while ago what else people thought was needed to get the article to meet the Good article criteria, with a response that more was needed about the mining, but I would say the article is about the railway specifically. My only thought is that the lead may need to be expanded to summarise the article. Do you think anything else is needed/would you like to nominate the article for GA?— Rodtalk10:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Rodw: Dear Rod, thank you for your kind remarks. I fear seeking Good Article status is a hiding to nothing. All the Donowts have to do is keep saying "do this" and "do that" where "this" and "that" are unbounded vague thoughts and we as writers have to try to please the unpleasable. I settle for doing my best and let the Clever Dicks imagine they are scoring their own little points. I have worked collaboratively with positive people on Holy Island Waggonway and St Michael's Mount Tramway and templates such as Duckmanton Junction, I would be happy to do the same with you on the WSMR. If others come along with specific suggestions I'll be pleased to pursue them if possible. Best wishes. Dave DavidAHull (talk) 18:51, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I have not had the same experience from GA reviewers - generally I have found them constructive and wanting to improve the articles. I'll take another look at the article and see if I can see anything else which needs improving - would you then be happy if I nominate it (we could even make it a joint nomination as you have done the majority of recent work)? I will also put a note on the talk pages of User:Britmax & User:Geof Sheppard as they have also made significant & substantial contributions.— Rodtalk18:58, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again, good to hear from you. The Pheasant Express article is smashing, thank you. I'm up to my ears in the West Somerset Mineral Railway ay the moment, but I managed to get hod of a copy of the standard work on the potato railways last Saturday. I will turn my attention to it before to long. I really enjoyed working with you on Holy Island Waggonway and hope we will be able to collaborate once more. I especially value the way you come up with things I'd never thought of and sources I'd never heard of. Kind regards, Dave DavidAHull (talk) 19:08, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for keeping me in mind, if you find an English article about a querky railway line. By the way: Did you know that Tandy Center Subway was, during the period of its operation, the only privately owned subway in the United States? --NearEMPTiness (talk) 20:14, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
My favourite oddball railway is the Spurn Head Railway, but it has probably been done to death. All of Colonel Stephens' lines were definitely quirky, but are also pretty well covered. I have a copy of Jermy's book on Northumberland minor railways (he did pioneering work on Holy Island if you recall.) I haven't used his masterpiece for anything other than H I Waggonway. I suggest indexes of back copies of "Railway Bylines" could be fruitful, they specialise in the weird and wonderful. Kind regards, Dave. DavidAHull (talk) 20:23, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Does gunpowder count as unusual? Low Wood Gunpowder Works seems to have had a ng railway before a "proper" branch. I've never heard of this line..."odd branch 1". or this "odd branch 2". In my home town of Bolsover a ng line was built as an integral part of the 1890s "Model Village" of New Bolsover, it was part of the colliery's lines (probably 2ft gauge) and carried coal to the houses and night soil away. I'd love to work with you on that one! There were several ng railways on Orkney and Shetland, some were military, others to do with fishing and a few with minerals. I have small, specialist books on both island groups' railways. The Festiniog Railway had (still has, I think) a coffin van. A traffic now lost to railways was carrying racing (homing) pigeons; it was big enough to warrant special vehicles. A regular fish offal train ran for years in the Grimsby area, not ng though. Horses were common for haulage and shunting, but a mule-hauled line existed in Somerset 1918-1920, see West Somerset Mineral Railway. Before refrigeration the carriage of ice between Scandinavia and London (for example) was significant (I once had dealings with a company based in former ice house next to the Thames), did railways carry ice from glacier to port? Carriage of iron ore was and remains commonplace, but what about less well-known minerals? Many sewage works had ng or monorail internal lines, eg Esholt in Yorkshire. Just a few thoughts to keep you awake. Kind regards, Dave DavidAHull (talk) 22:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Re: British English
{{Use British English}} is useful for identifying/monitoring articles for spelling consistency, and for any editing tools or article searches that may support that - for example, the EngvarB script. {{EngvarB}} is also useful where a national variant is unclear. Hope this helps explain things. Dl2000 (talk) 01:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have recently noticed that lots of the dates for pits on the Brendon Hills give different dates to those in the Historic Environment Record. It is possible that they haven't been updated with new research but it might be worth us mentioning that different dates are used by different sources. This search should take you to some of the pages I'm looking at.— Rodtalk14:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Rodw:Dear Rod, I've come across this, which states that Jones's masterpiece is but a shortened version of his two volume life's work!! "Jones's life's work"(PDF).
Aldershot Narrow Gauge Suspension Railway
Military Narrow-Gauge Railway, South Camp, Aldershot, 1872
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Immingham Town electric railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Uffington. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
I don't see why this should be deleted, it accompanies and reflects a high quality article of the same name. I reject the proposal until I hear more of the logic.DavidAHull (talk) 06:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
About the Dyserth branch line. Since you have discovered and documented that unique track gauge (2 ft 7 in), I hope you will add that to the article. When that happens (in a section maybe?), I will add it to the template. Best way to write it: {{Track gauge|2 ft 7 in}}, will look good before & after me adding it. The glory should be yours. -DePiep (talk) 19:46, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm deflected by other interests at the moment. When I get back to Wikipedia I'll definitely take your kind advice. Best wishes, Dave DavidAHull (talk) 22:45, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination for deletion of Template:Beighton Junction detail2
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article West Somerset Mineral Railway you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. I just noticed the User:Rodw may be out of action, and this notice did not get copied to your user page automatically. Bob1960evens (talk) 13:40, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I note your recent developments on this line and it took me back to days long ago when as a child, I was always taken for a ride upon it every time the family visited Southport
Hello DavidAHull. The request for changing the name of the file was on Commons. Your revert of my edit just changed the file from a direct link to a redirect. Regards, --Gereon K. (talk) 21:13, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid I have no idea what you mean, but I'm sure you're right. As long as the reader doesn't suffer you can do as you please. It just seems a pity to replace the equivalent of "No 10 Downing Street, London, Mrs M Thatcher" with "Southern England".DavidAHull (talk) 21:37, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination for deletion of Template:Ellis' Railway Encyclopaedia3R
Can I draw your attention to the guidance at WP:Further reading (particularly "A large part, if not all, of the work should be directly about the subject of the article" and "However, the section should be limited in size. Wikipedia is not a catalogue of all existing works") and WP:ELNO (particularly "one should generally avoid providing external links to...any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a featured article" and "Sites that are only indirectly related to the article's subject: the link should be directly related to the subject of the article."). Wikipedia is not a reading list or a directory of links. I lack the subject expertise to prune the lists myself but, although I commend your enthusiasm, in my opinion the appendices at Cromford and High Peak Railway are far too long. Dave.Dunford (talk) 10:36, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your advice, which I take kindly. The list is indeed too long, what I am doing is assembling resources before (re)writing the article instead of what I have done in the past, ie (re)write book by book. The last few articles I got stuck into (eg Cawood, Wistow and Selby Light Railway) had very little, but I find the C&HP has far more than I expected, so it has growed and growed. As I get stuck into writing the list will self prune as, for example, I move external links to photos to the individual item (most of which haven't got an article of their own at present, please see the route diagram.) If when I'm done and dusted there turn out to be any resources unused I'll chuck 'em away, but on prima facie evidence so far, most resources have something unique to evidence, even if it is just one 19th Century photo. There is a Cunning Plan, honest! Dave DavidAHull (talk) 17:10, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Dave.Dunford: Hello again. I've embarked on my first article on features on the CHPR - Gotham Curve - making use of the research work discussed above, which has proved invaluable. It has led so far to pruning a grand total of one item from the External links section in the main CHPR article. This isn't surprising really, as items would only be moved if they related only to Gotham, but most source material, such as books, refer to many places on the line. I would welcome your observations before I spend a zillion hours going along unwise routes. Dave DavidAHull (talk) 23:26, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Dave.Dunford: I've embarked on Hopton Incline. If you fear I'm heading in any wrong directions I'd appreciate it if you'd tell me sooner rather than later. Lots still to do to it, but the shape and borrowings between this and Gotham Curve should be clear to you, but are they ok and will they be ok for other features yet to start? Kind regards, Dave DavidAHull (talk) 22:10, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@NearEMPTiness: Hello! I'm sure I saw a message from you come up on my screen a day or two ago, but I managed to lose it unread except for the first couple of words and I can't find it anywhere. Please either a) tell me I'm completely crackers or b) send it to me here. I'm getting stuck into the Cromford and High Peak Railway. I've expanded the route diagram and done initial research into resources, which turn out to be amazing, I put them into the CHPR's article which just growed and growed and growed..... I remember fondly working with you on Holy Island Waggonway. Kind regards, Dave DavidAHull (talk) 22:57, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, DavidAHull. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Is it still planned to produce a fully detailed Wikipedia article on St Bees Golf Halt railway station? We discussed that matter quite a while ago when you were deeply involved in the railways of the Cumbria area on Wikipedia.
Happy New Year. Yes, I aim to return to Cumbria, but I'm up to my ears with other things on and off Wikipedia, so it is likely to be months rather than weeks before I can back to St Bees. Kind regards, Dave DavidAHull (talk) 17:44, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Routemaps
Hi David, I've an interest in the former local railways around Leigh, Lancashire. I've noticed that you've produced some excellent route diagrams for the area. I do a fair bit of my browsing using a tablet and most of the BS-map style diagrams get corrupted, would you mind if I tried to upgrade them to the newer Routemap style, which displays properly on them.
Regards
Colin Langdon 11:29, 12 January 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Colinlangdon (talk • contribs)
I am just returning from a virtual trip to Tasmania, where I found three very peculiar waggonways, which might be of interest to you:
The Marrawah Tramway was a forest railway near Marrawah in Tasmania with a gauge of 3 ft 6 in (1,067 mm).
Grubb's Tramway (Mowbray) was a partially completed, private logging tram line in Tasmania from the junction of the Launceston-George Town Road at the Tamar River near Mowbray to a saw mill at Pipers River.
@NearEMPTiness:Happy New Year! I've finally had the opportunity to sit down and enjoy these three interesting articles. Thank you for writing them and thank you for drawing them to my attention. If I may make an observation, the Marrawah Tramway article seems to stop in mid air in the 1920s, but it soldiered on for a long time after that. Do you intend to return to it to cover the later period? I hope so, because it's smashing stuff. Kind regards, Dave DavidAHull (talk) 10:53, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Template:Liverpool, St Helens and S Lancashire Railway requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Useddenim (talk) 01:13, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, DavidAHull. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, DavidAHull. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Dear TheDragonFire. Thank you for this and for restoring the article. As Promisemenopromises doesn't appear to have read past the first word of the article, in particular as far as the opening paragraph, and from the subtlety of his or her remark I can't be bothered replying to him or her, though I will if s/he addresses me direct. As I am sure you appreciate, whilst it is indeed arguable that the station SHOULD have been called Ffestiniog or Llan Ffestiniog, in fact it WAS called Festiniog to the very end. Season's greetings. DavidAHull (talk) 09:33, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Duckmanton Junction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stamford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello David I recently was looking at your Doe Lea and Clowne Branch line pages. I noticed you placed Bolsover castle and Clowne South among others in the Chesterfield Borough. Now I'm sure you didn't mean to but the actual borough is Bolsover Borough. The pages have and are being tweaked to correct the borough. Your not the only one to make the mistake someone even put Tenbury Wells as Shropshire despite it being in Worcestershire.
Oops, as I was born and brung up in Bozer these count as howlers. They are undoubtedly oversights, as I can't imagine I deliberately put Bolsover in Chesterfield, nul points for carelessness. Well spotted and thank you. Dave DavidAHull (talk) 01:54, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This entire article rests on a single source, which is Festipedia, which is not a published source. That in turn contains a single unsourced sentence claiming this station existed. So, there isn't a single [[WP:RS
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
David, thank you for the note on my talk page. I took a look at your changes. Unfortunately, as they stand they do not help the article. You have added one source, but it is to another Festipedia page. Since Festipedia is a site anyone can edit, it is not considered a reliable source. The section you cite is itself unsourced on Festipedia, so it doesn't lend any credence to the claim about Glynllifon Street station. The rest of what you added is speculation, which unfortunately violates Wikipedia's pillar of not allowing orioginal research. What is needed are independent, published sources that would allow readers to verify that the station existed. At the moment there is nothing but unsourced speculation, I'm afraid. Can you provide such sources? Otherwise, the article should go through an AFD|deletion discussion. Thanks, Laplorfill (talk) 16:38, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again, thank you for your civil and constructive approach. I'm afraid I have come to the end of evidence, solid or otherwise. Apart from deletion, is there anything which can be salvaged? We know (ie properly sourced) that the line was reguaged and that the northern terminus in Blaenau was closed in 1882, several months before the narrow hauge (ng) services ended. We know that ng services continued during reguaging right up to a few days before reopening as a standard gauge line. We know that the most southerly and the intermediate ng stations on the line remained open and that their footfall was miniscule compared with a northern terminus in Blaenau itself. We know that the company went to the trouble and expense of re-routing the line round the work on the viaduct north of the most northerly intermediate station (Tan y Manod), clearly implying that services continued north of Tan y Manod. All we don't know was where the services terminated during the reguaging period. I accept that the two websites don't conform to Wikipedia's provenance rules, but for the record I'd back them against some of the stuff published about railways in the region. I'm not a Ffestiniog Railway member, but if writings in any medium by society members are anything to go by some rivet counter will challenge inexactitudes within the hour. So, what, if anything, can be salvaged until the fabled postcard or timetable turns up? Kind regards, Dave
Hello David. Thinking more about this, here's a suggestion. I would merge the unique information from Glynllifon Street railway station into Diphwys railway station (Festiniog and Blaenau Railway), and make it clear that the existence of Glynllifion station is unsure. I'd have a separate section in the Diphwys article about Glynllifion. That way, you can refer to it, but not overstate the evidence. You can then redirect the Glynllifion article to the Diphwys one. If in the future, evidence is published, the standalone Glynllifion article can easily be revived. How does that sound? I'm happy to help with doing this. Best, Laplorfill (talk) 16:23, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Fine constructive thinking, thank you. I'll have a stab in the next few days and ask you to have a look. Out of interest, I have revisited Boyd, he gives the viaduct between Tan y Manod and Blaenau as being at 3 miles from Llan Ffestiniog, with the FBR Duffws terminus as 3m 32ch miles from Llan, so we have a maximum of 32 chains to play with to find the temporary terminus site. Looking closely at late 19th Century OS maps and rather rusty local knowledge my money is definitely on it being next to the Glynllifon St level crossing. I aim to try to contact Gwynedd Archives to see if they have copies of 1882/3 Blaenau area newspapers and/or FBR timetables or notices about arrangements. In the next few minutes I will copy the present Glynllifon St article to my Sandbox in case some zealot promptly zaps the public version. Best wishes, Dave.
I haven't done anything on the article as I was waiting for Gwynedd Archives to get back to me, which they have done today. They have told me what newspaper covered Blaenau in 1882-3 and that they don't have copies themselves, but that the Welsh Archives in Aberystwyth might, so that will be my next port of call, tomorrow or Wednesday. If not I'll approach the paper or its successor direct to see if they have archived copies. Fingers crossed. Dave
I've just risked divorce by spending a few hours poring over the newspaper archive. There are fascinating snippets, such as a Festiniog and Blaenau carriage blowing over in high wind and being righted by passengers (Cambrian News 11 Feb 1881) but nothing on our central pursuit. The F&BR timetables disappear after 3 Nov 1882, presumably because the company was wound up, I can see no TT for the ng service thereafter. I'll have a further think about avenues to pursue, then, if no progress, I will draft a change as you suggested. A minor complication is that the TTs show the Festiniog running to Duffws and the F&BR to Diphwys (contrary to Boyd) until 1883 when the Festiniog TT shows them running to Diphwys! It's all good fun. Dave
I haven't been able to resist more digging in the wonderful Welsh newspaper archives. I haven't found any direct corroboration of our central quest, but lots of flesh to put on bones. Most importantly I have found evidence that the new Bala & Festiniog (GWR) station in Blaenau was delayed by ownership issues, and that, as per Boyd, ng trains ran up to a few days before sg opening, so we have an additional line of argument that there is a period when ng trains continued, but to not to Diphwys/Duffws. Though technically outside the scope of this particual conundrum the junket to celebrate the sg opening to Blaenau sounds to have been an extremely wordy affair, much enlivened by drink, according to the account of the event and subsequent complaint by an abstainer. I'll draft a paragraph during this week. I wonder how to get sight of the Ffestiniog Magazine article referred to in the Festipedia piece. Best wishes, Dave
Lest you imagine I've gone to sleep I have busied myself constructing a timeline for the conversion period drawing on Boyd, Butt and the rich vein of newspaper reports. Most things are consistent, though Butt has a couple wrong. Alas, they are all silent on the temporary terminus. I hope to draft a paragraph or two in the next day or two. Best wishes, Dave
Here is my first stab at the timeline, I hope to revisit it and sources this evening to check items and ad any I have missed. Needless to say, it hasn't answered to core conundrum.
Festiniog and Blaenau Railway regauging
January 1882 Invitation To Tender for contract to widen and convert the F&BR[1]
February 1882 Widening contract let to Scott & Edwards, late contractors on Holyhead Docks[2]
23 May 1882 F&BR EGM resolved the company be wound up voluntarily[3][4] Boyd p67
July 1882 First through train from Bala to Llan Ffestiniog carrying VIPs, not the public[5]
1 September 1882 Tenders invited to construct "a small Engine Shed at Bala and one at Festiniog and also a timber carriage shed at Festiniog"[6]
October 1882 Discussion of half fares for schoolchildren from Festiniog and Tyddyngwyn to Diphwys [7]
1 November 1882 Bala to Llan Ffestiniog ("Festiniog") standard gauge line opened by Bala and Festiniog Railway (under GWR umbrella) with much junketing Boyd p67, Butt p96 [8][9][10]
7 December 1882 Accounts of a train snowed up between Festiniog and Bala[11][12]
7 May 1883 Invitation to Tender closed to build stations at Tyddyngwyn (future "Manod") and Blaenau and Goods shed at Blaenau[13]
April 1883 Sidings at new Blaenau station ready Boyd p67
July 1883 "Festiniog and Blaenau" Railway Timetable published, Festiniog to Diphwys (intermediate stations were never mentioned in any FBR imetable)[14]
31 July 1883 Col. Rich inspected regauged line and refused permission to open it Boyd p68 [15]
1 September 1883 Col. Rich re-inspected the line and gave permission to open Boyd p68 [16]
Wednesday 5 September 1883 narrow gauge services ended "for the purposes of rising the middle bar" Boyd p68 [17]
Monday 10 September 1883 standard gauge services Bala to Blaenau started Butt p36 although neither Manod nor Blaenau Festiniog station was fully ready Boyd p68. Much was written about the banquet to celebrate the opening, not all of it complementary.[18][19][20][21][22]
November 1883 Weighbridges ordered for several stations between Bala and Blaenau inclusive[23]
These are great. It would be a real enhancement to add some of them to the Festiniog and Blaenau Railway article. As you say, still nothing to confirm the temporary station, though. Best, Laplorfill
Glad you think they show potential, I am in the process of formalising the references and adding any others I may spot in the process.
I've finished that process and spent a couple of fruitless hours looking for anything addressing the core question, with no success. My Welsh isn't good enough to interrogate Welsh language papers thoroughly, but I've tried every variant of g/orsaf, tanymanod/tan-y-manod, tyddyngwyn, glynllifon, tren, rheilffordd I can think of, with nothing doing. I'll sleep on it then, if nothing dawns, I'll go back to the number you first thought of, so to speak. Dave
F&BR locos and rolling stock were stored at Llan Ffestiniog after the ng line closed Boyd p80 (letter from Wm Dean)
I've found another possible lead. British Railway Journal Vol7 contains an article published in 1985 entitled "Blaenau Ffestiniog 100 years ago". I've ordered a copy, you never know.... Fingers crossed, Dave
Nice idea, but the article is silent on our quest. I've run out of ideas, so at some point this week I'll have a stab at the approach you set out. I'm snowed under with family things at the moment, so it will be a case of grabbing a chance. Dave
OK, an unexpected opportunity has arisen, so here goes with a first stab. When we agree a text I will copy and paste it into the Duffws FBR article, with proper refs-
There is ample evidence that narrow gauge services between Llan Ffestiniog and Blaenau Ffestiniog continued during the rebuilding period, only finally ceasing five days before standard gauge services began.{refs: Boyd pp67-68, contemporary newspapers, contemporary timetable] The line's two intermediate stations, Tyddyngwyn and Tan-y-Manod remained open throughout the period.[Butt pp 236 and 227] Records are less clear as to where the services ended. Butt [p146] gives "Llan Festiniog GW" as closing on 1st November 1882 and "Festiniog GW" opening on the same date. The latter is uncontentious, but on that date it was opened as the temporary terminus from Bala. No other source concurs that the narrow gauge station at Llan closed on that date, nor was there any need for it to do so, as the two buildings were on the same campus but some distance apart on different levels. Such a move would have robbed the narrow gauge line of most of its passengers and found its way into contemporary newspaper columns. It appears that Butt is confused on the subject of the station(s) at Llan.
The situaton at the Blaenau end is confused. Butt states that "Duffws Ff&B ... Closed 1 November 1882. Reopened and renamed Blaenau Festiniog 10 September 1883" [Butt p84] Boyd is silent on Duffwys's closure, simply stating that standard gauge services started on 10 September, despite the new Manod and Blaenau Festiniog stations being unfinished. Boyd describes the narrow gauge diversion round the new viaduct, thereby supporting the contention that narrow gauge services continued north to within half a mile of Duffws at the very least. Timetables published in the conversion period simply gives times of trains leaving and arriving at the two termini - "Festiniog" and "Diphwys". Unlike at Llan, the rebuilding at Diphwys was considerable, with a wholly new layout and substantial sidings, buildings and signalling, it would have been difficult to continue to run loaded passenger trains into such a building sit and for pasengers to board and alight. [Festipedia] states, without citing a source, that temporary passenger facilities were provided at Dolgaregddu which was at the western end of the Duffws station site, meaning trains would have to pass through the worksite. A second enthusiast website states that narrow gauge services terminated at or near the Glynllifon Street level crossing. This claim is plausible as it would have kept passengers away from the station worksite and delivered them near to work, shops and other stations, but the site's only supporting evidence is to state that this arrangement is shown on a postcard. Such a postcard is keenly sought.
Please edit as you see fit. Thanks, Dave
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Teigl Halt railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ian Allan.
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited North Sunderland Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lingfield.
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Working timetable for Grimsby and Immingham electric railway?
Hi! I couldn't help notice from your contribution to Kiln Lane electric railway station that you seemed to have access to an old working timetable for the Grimsby and Immingham Electric Railway.
I'm currently working on a personal project that involves a lot of old timetables, but I have very little information about this line. If you get a chance, if you could please provide the usual booked time between each station for this railway, that would be very useful for me, and I would very much appreciate it. If you have the ability to scan/photograph the timetable (I don't imagine it's very long?) that would be even more helpful.
The era I'm working in is Summer 1955, so at that point the street running section was still open. I'm guessing it was shut by the time of your 1956 timetable? So any details you have from earlier timetables on the running time for that section would also be appreciated. I doubt it changed too much over the years? The only info I actually have for Summer 1955 is in the Eastern Region public timetable, page 368, in which only the departure times from Grimsby Corporation Bridge are listed, with no other useful information. Knowing how long trams were booked for between each stop, even if not precisely in the 1955 timetable, would be very useful for me.
Many thanks!, especially for all the work you've done on the railway pages on Wikipedia! And no problem if you don't have the time to help me, if you need something in return from a Summer 1955 working timetable I have quite a lot of them now. --Muzer (talk) 18:20, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
