User talk:Dannis243Hi, Sorry about the flag. I just wanted to get rid of MisterManhattan's tendentious edits, and I must have misunderstood your edit (which I now see had already reverted MrM). Bishonen | talk 12:21, 18 March 2016 (UTC). Unblock request 17 October 2016please look throught my contributions i have never edited ABOUT Eritrea, Eastern Africa or what some regional spelling of coffe so please unblock me i i never knew or heard of him (this so called user Hiyob346) till i was blocked without investigations
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Dannis243 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: please unblock me i do not know who this "Hiyob346" is and never heard of him! reading his sockpuppet investigations and if you see my contribution i have NEVER EDTITED ABOUT Eritrea, Eastern Africa or what he did "Occasionally using the regional spelling of "coffe". please look throught my contributions and this is a great mistake Decline reason: After discussing with blocking admin below, I'm not persuaded that this account is not a sockpuppet. I'm sorry @DeltaQuad and DoRD: didn't want to take a look. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:18, 28 November 2016 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Dannis243 (talk) 07:50, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
I should clarify: I'm convinced to certainty that this account is a sock of Chaosname (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), a community-banned user ([1]). While there may be doubt as to the technical connection to Richard0048, this account should not be unblocked. (Non-administrator comment) Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 11:43, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Next Qatari general election, 2013 listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Next Qatari general election, 2013. Since you had some involvement with the Next Qatari general election, 2013 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 02:13, 7 November 2016 (UTC) Cancelled Qatari general election, 2013 listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cancelled Qatari general election, 2013. Since you had some involvement with the Cancelled Qatari general election, 2013 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 02:14, 7 November 2016 (UTC) ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Hello, Dannis243. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) Nomination of Blue, White and Red Rally for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blue, White and Red Rally is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue, White and Red Rally until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:51, 20 June 2024 (UTC) |