User talk:ChattWiki423

Welcome

Hello, ChattWiki423, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 16:34, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert "Bob" Martino (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 16:34, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, ChattWiki423! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 16:34, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was:
This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Draft:United States Stove Company, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
– robertsky (talk) 13:16, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Information icon

Hello ChattWiki423. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:ChattWiki423. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=ChattWiki423|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Noah 💬 18:03, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Noah,

I added employer, client and affiliation information to my bio. Also, I attempted to re-create the article using Article for Creation. I am not sure it worked, however. When I submitted it there, it took me back to the original article, and I did not see any indication that the new article was submitted. Please let me know what else I can do to increase the chance of this article being accepted. Thank you. ChattWiki423 (talk) 17:50, 21 July 2021

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert "Bob" Martino (July 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by -noah- were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Noah 💬 18:03, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert "Bob" Martino (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
"decades of experience leading groundbreaking projects" is more suited to a glowing CV than an encyclopedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 19:39, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Robert "Bob" Martino has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Robert "Bob" Martino. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:54, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Robert "Bob" Martino

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Robert "Bob" Martino, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:28, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My advice to you is to practice NPOV editing by making minor edits to existing articles rather than jumping straight in with a complete new article. That way you are more likely to become familiar with the Wikipedia guidelines and how they work in practice. Deb (talk) 17:45, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How to sign your posts

Hello! I noticed you may not be familiar yet with how to properly sign your posts. Signing on talk pages is important, as it makes clear who said what and when. I'm leaving you the standard message below. Thanks. --- Possibly ☎ 21:04, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --- Possibly ☎ 21:01, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Deb (talk) 08:29, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: United States Stove Company (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Justlettersandnumbers was:
Blatant undisclosed paid editing in violation of our Terms of Use – see, e.g., Special:Diff/1004227974.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:08, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:United States Stove Company has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:United States Stove Company. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:48, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: United States Stove Company (July 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:
Where does the quote “mammoth stove foundry” come from? I could not find it in source #3.

"Just two years after opening, Perry chose to reorganize the company." What does this mean? Reorganize how?

Source #5 seems to be a press release. I can't access source #1 or #2, so I can't assess the notability of this company, but please address the content concerns I mentioned.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Cerebellum (talk) 09:28, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert "Bob" Martino for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert "Bob" Martino is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert "Bob" Martino until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

nearlyevil665 19:00, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask why this draft was nominated for deletion? ChattWiki423 (talk) 19:13, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That is in the deletion nomination. He does not seem particularly notable. --- Possibly ☎ 19:15, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! Thank you for letting me know! I will check back soon for updates. ChattWiki423 (talk) 19:17, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: United States Stove Company (August 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clearfrienda was:
Still lots of un-cited claims, possibly WP:CUCKOO editing.

It doesn't seem to pass WP:NCORP, the criteria being "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject", which, as far as I can tell, isn't in this article. Some sources are pay walled, though, so I can't see them.

And also, Does the author of this draft have any sort of financial or other connection with the subject of this draft? Please read the conflict of interest policy and the paid editing policy and make any required disclosures.

You may ask for advice about conflict of interest at the Teahouse.

If this draft is resubmitted without addressing the question about conflict of interest, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Clearfrienda 💬 11:41, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Information icon

Hello ChattWiki423. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:United States Stove Company, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:ChattWiki423. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=ChattWiki423|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure and [{WP:UPE]]. Clearfrienda 💬 11:51, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please disclose your paid editing on the talk page of the article. I did see the notice on your user page. You can use this template like this:
{{Connected contributor (paid)|User1=|U1-employer=}}
Clearfrienda 💬 12:04, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That info can already be found on the talk page. ChattWiki423 (talk) 16:59, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: United States Stove Company (August 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:
Please address the comments of reviewers than resubmitting with zero changes.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:14, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: United States Stove Company has been accepted

United States Stove Company, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Waddles 🗩 🖉 19:33, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:ChattWiki423/sandbox

Information icon Hello, ChattWiki423. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:ChattWiki423/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Volkswagen Chattanooga Assembly Plant, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 21:26, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]