User talk:Bryan Derksen

Use this link to add a new topic. I will respond on this page to comments left here, unless you ask that I respond on your talk page.

Since you participated in the Sedna name discussion

Minor planet 90377 Sedna > Sedna (minor planet) discussion taking place at Talk:90377_Sedna#Odd_name. Please join in if it catches your fancy. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Freefall (webcomic)

Hello, Bryan Derksen. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Freefall".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 13:25, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Maximals for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Maximals is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Maximals until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 23:17, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Scientology/Links. Since you had some involvement with the Scientology/Links redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Traditionalist (talk) 01:25, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Scientology/Links) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Scientology/Links, Bryan Derksen!

Wikipedia editor Daniel kenneth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great work

To reply, leave a comment on Daniel kenneth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nomination of List of Predacons for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Predacons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Predacons until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 18:20, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Universe of the Metroid series listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Universe of the Metroid series. Since you had some involvement with the Universe of the Metroid series redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:03, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:2cf8a.tmp.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2cf8a.tmp.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bryan Derksen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bryan Derksen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Electric light bulb listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Electric light bulb. Since you had some involvement with the Electric light bulb redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 19:47, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request for openion

Article Legitimacy (criminal law) has been requested to be moved to Legitimacy (law) requesting your openion at Talk:Legitimacy_(criminal_law)

Thanks and regards

Mahitgar (talk) 07:55, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Service module

The article Service module has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is original research from 2004. The topic is notable; indeed, there are already articles about Apollo Command/Service Module well supported, and Soyuz. This article adds nothing to the encyclopedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rhadow (talk) 00:02, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Service module for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Service module is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Service module until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rhadow (talk) 17:17, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bryan Derksen. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mercury quadrangle category

Template:Mercury quadrangle category has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 17:00, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Universe of the Metroid series listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Universe of the Metroid series. Since you had some involvement with the Universe of the Metroid series redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 07:12, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The World of Balance listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The World of Balance. Since you had some involvement with the The World of Balance redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 11:39, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of quadrangles on Europa

The article List of quadrangles on Europa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject isn't notable. I could find only a couple mentions of Je3, and nothing about the others so there's no general notability about the subject of quadrangles on Europa. Unlike List of quadrangles on Mars, none of the quadrangles here have articles written about them so a list is unnecessary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:01, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of quadrangles on Enceladus

The article List of quadrangles on Enceladus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject isn't notable. I could find only this brief mention and other mentions that Enceladus is broken up into quadrangles so there's no general notability about the subject of quadrangles on Enceladus. Unlike List of quadrangles on Mars, none of the quadrangles here have articles written about them so a list is unnecessary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:06, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of quadrangles on Rhea

The article List of quadrangles on Rhea has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject isn't notable. I could find only the NASA material that says their images cover a 15-quadrangle span so there's no general notability about the subject of quadrangles on Enceladus. Unlike List of quadrangles on Mars, none of the quadrangles here have articles written about them so a list is unnecessary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:08, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of quadrangles on Tethys

The article List of quadrangles on Tethys has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject isn't notable. Some NASA material talks about their imagery as a 15-quadrangle series of maps but there's no general notability about the subject of quadrangles on Tethys. Unlike List of quadrangles on Mars, none of the quadrangles here have articles written about them so a list is unnecessary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:12, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of quadrangles on Io

The article List of quadrangles on Io has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject isn't notable. I found very little discussion of the quadrangles of Io, so there's no case for WP:GNG. Unlike List of quadrangles on Mars, none of the quadrangles here have articles written about them so a list is unnecessary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:13, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of quadrangles on Ganymede

The article List of quadrangles on Ganymede has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject isn't notable.NASA published maps described as a 15-quadrangle series but there's no general notability about the subject of quadrangles on Ganymede. Unlike List of quadrangles on Mars, none of the quadrangles here have articles written about them so a list is unnecessary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:16, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of quadrangles on Dione

The article List of quadrangles on Dione has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject isn't notable. Some NASA material talks about their imagery as a 15-quadrangle series of maps but there's no general notability about the subject of quadrangles on Dione. Unlike List of quadrangles on Mars, none of the quadrangles here have articles written about them so a list is unnecessary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shield (Stargate) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Shield (Stargate). Since you had some involvement with the Shield (Stargate) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 17:21, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Space fountain, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://www.baen.com/Chapters/0671876864/0671876864___4.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Space fountain saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! –dlthewave ☎ 02:51, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm nominating the merging of the template Template:Fusion power with two other templates Template:Fusion methods and Template:Fusion experiments that were split in 2008. The discussion is at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --AquaDTRS (talk) 20:46, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Size change in fiction has been nominated for discussion

Category:Size change in fiction, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 17:18, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bryan Derksen. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Space fountain for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Space fountain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space fountain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:02, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of LINCOS

Notice

The article LINCOS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This partnership not appear to be separately notable from the company and university that started it

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:19, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox Venus crater

Template:Infobox Venus crater has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox crater data. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:03, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lunar quadrangle

Template:Lunar quadrangle has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:29, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Venus quadrangle

Template:Venus quadrangle has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:30, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mars quadrangle

Template:Mars quadrangle has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:31, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gerardo Flores for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gerardo Flores is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerardo Flores (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 17:54, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear Bryan Derksen,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 16:41, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Nomination for deletion of Template:POTD-width

Template:POTD-width has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —⁠andrybak (talk) 18:58, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Decepticons for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Decepticons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Decepticons (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 17:15, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Star Trek planets (A–B) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Star Trek planets (A–B) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Star Trek planets (A–B) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:48, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Star Trek planets TOC

Template:Star Trek planets TOC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ミラP 23:07, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Spike Witwicky for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spike Witwicky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spike Witwicky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 12:15, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Star Trek planets has been nominated for discussion

Category:Star Trek planets, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TTN (talk) 14:22, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Finder's Stone

Notice

The article Finder's Stone has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fictional object, no evidence of passing WP:NFICTION/GNG, PRIMARY sources only, pure WP:PLOT, BEFORE does not show better sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:59, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Igor Dmitriyevich Novikov

Notice

The article Igor Dmitriyevich Novikov has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Anarchyte (talk | work) 08:11, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Stargate races has been nominated for discussion

Category:Stargate races, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TTN (talk) 17:48, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Middle-earth rivers has been nominated for discussion

Category:Middle-earth rivers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:08, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Middle-earth swords has been nominated for discussion

Category:Middle-earth swords, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Hog Farm (talk) 20:25, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Myconid

Notice

The article Myconid has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 15:32, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Autobots for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Autobots is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Autobots until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 12:56, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Decepticons for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Decepticons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Decepticons (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 21:36, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dungeons & Dragons planes of existence has been nominated for merging

Category:Dungeons & Dragons planes of existence, which you created, has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TTN (talk) 18:43, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Hiram (given name)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hiram (given name). Since you had some involvement with the Hiram (given name) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC678 20:34, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Wake Island/Military" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wake Island/Military. Since you had some involvement with the Wake Island/Military redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 12:52, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Wake Island/Economy" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wake Island/Economy. Since you had some involvement with the Wake Island/Economy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:27, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wererat for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wererat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wererat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 11:40, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Land of the Lost (1974) - Grumpy and a Pylon.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Land of the Lost (1974) - Grumpy and a Pylon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Hog Farm Bacon 04:05, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Land of the Lost (1974) - The Zarn's ship.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Land of the Lost (1974) - The Zarn's ship.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Castle Doom

Notice

The article Castle Doom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:48, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dune (franchise) planets has been nominated for merging

Category:Dune (franchise) planets has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TTN (talk) 15:18, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I sent you an email. Cheers. ExoEditor 16:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of names of European cities in different languages for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of names of European cities in different languages, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of names of European cities in different languages until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:05, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion discussion includes the articles listed in that article including the alphabetical subgroup list pages. Largoplazo (talk) 03:44, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"S42: In case of fire use ... (indicate in the space the precise type of fire-fighting equipment. If water increases the risk add - Never use water)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect S42: In case of fire use ... (indicate in the space the precise type of fire-fighting equipment. If water increases the risk add - Never use water). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 9#S42: In case of fire use ... (indicate in the space the precise type of fire-fighting equipment. If water increases the risk add - Never use water) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Talk 23:01, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merger of Template:R1

Template:R1 has been nominated for merging with Template:R-phrase. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 07:33, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Twenty Year Society

Dear Bryan Derksen,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Twenty Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for twenty years or more. ​

Best regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weaveravel (talk • contribs) 12:57, 1 November 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ketu (mythology) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ketu (mythology) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ketu (mythology) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Salimfadhley (talk) 22:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cite OCAM

Template:Cite OCAM has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:37, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Concluded webcomics has been nominated for deletion

Category:Concluded webcomics has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:28, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Earth's atmospheric gases.png

Notice

The file File:Earth's atmospheric gases.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low-res, no obvious use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:57, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Dyson sphere

Dyson sphere has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. TompaDompa (talk) 23:32, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Secret history

Notice

The article Secret history has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Multiple issues per maintenance tags. Unsourced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Isaac Newton (in depth, 2/3)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Isaac Newton (in depth, 2/3) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 31 § Isaac Newton (in depth, 2/3) until a consensus is reached. Artem.G (talk) 12:15, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Blinovitch Limitation Effect for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blinovitch Limitation Effect is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blinovitch Limitation Effect (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pokelego999 (talk) 01:39, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Blinovitch Limitation Effect for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blinovitch Limitation Effect is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blinovitch Limitation Effect (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pokelego999 (talk) 22:22, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Midget emoticon" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Midget emoticon has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 13 § Midget emoticon until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:45, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mind uploading in fiction for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mind uploading in fiction is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mind uploading in fiction until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Eater(Novel)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Eater(Novel) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 14 § Eater(Novel) until a consensus is reached. Nickps (talk) 22:54, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Lada Terra quadrangle

A tag has been placed on Category:Lada Terra quadrangle indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:51, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John Sheppard (Stargate)

Notice

The article John Sheppard (Stargate) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Consists of naught but plot summary, without a single reliable secondary source, for its entire 19.24-year history.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Phobias has been nominated for splitting

Category:Phobias has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. gnu57 20:16, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Geyser

Geyser has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:32, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Several virtual reality-related categories have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the categories' entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. 67.209.128.52 (talk) 22:59, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]