User talk:Anoshirawan

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello Anoshirawan! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- Behnam 23:32, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I noticed you are known only as an IP address; that means you are not signed up. To sign up, you only need to click Create account and choose a username and password. You don't need to provide any personal information. If you sign up, you'll have a username that others can use to recognize you and leave you messages on the wiki. You'll be able to sign your name just by typing four tildes (~~~~) when you leave someone else a message. Plus, you (and others) will easily be able to see a list of all your contributions to Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, ask at the Village pump, or feel free to ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Behnam 23:34, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

f you are not proud of your heritage, thenHey I saw the Latif Pedram picture you uploaded but it is not GFDL license and the Admins check it and they deleted it. Here are a list of different types of licesenses you can use. Click on one type then it will show you all the different lisences for that type. Then copy and paste the tag { { ________ } } and paste it onto the image's page. Here they are http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags#List_of_image_copyright_tags--Behnam 06:25, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But I don't think there is any way we can use that picture. It is copyrighted with the BBC. But its ok, we already got a picture. --Behnam 06:27, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Khorasan TV

Hello. Please see if you can add anything to this new article I opened about Khorasan TV. --Behnam 17:40, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also please see the Hamid Qaderi article and see if you can add anything there. Thanks. --Behnam 06:22, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: Hamed Qaderi

Yeah sure, honestly I was actually just about to do that . --Behnam 07:37, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]




re: Articles

Sure. Simply click on the history tab, then find the version that you would like to undo to and then click on undo. And that is all. --Behnam 03:06, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

come on msn --Anoshirawan 03:07, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Greater Iran Template

Salam. I removed the Greater Iran Template from Afghanistan article. Several reasons: The template is designed for the history related articles, while the Afghanistan page is a general article about Afghanistan, only one of its sections is about the History. Secondly, the template should be added to those articles which are mentioned in the Template i.e. Ghaznavids, Timurids, and all other dynasties. So the template is strictly reserved to articles corresponding to the history of dynasties, rulers and governments in Greater Iran. It is far away to add it in the Afghanistan article. Thanks for not adding it again. Khuda Hafez -Ariana 12:14, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]




Hotaki dynasty

You wrote: "Persian Cromwell was a Book written in Hotaki's court, their is no reason for you to remove this info."

The Persian Cromwell is a work of fiction. It is not a reliable source. See talk page. --Bejnar 23:45, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • You asked for evidence that Hotaki was a Ghilzai. Read: Malleson, George Bruce (1879) "Chapter 7: The Ghilzai Rule" History of Afghanistan, from the Earliest Period to the Outbreak of the War of 1878 W.H. Allen & Co., London, OCLC 4219393, limited view at Google Books. --Bejnar 23:51, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

THis book was written in 1879 lol. Persian Cromwell is Historical Fiction and is the only english book writeen about him during his rule. I named couple of Persian also and you have no right to remove my info, I know for a fact you dont understand farsi so It would be better if you let ppl write articles who do know.

--Anoshirawan 00:02, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not fluent in Farsi (Persian language); however, I am a trained researcher. You may not understand that fiction, even historical fiction, is not a reliable source. Where did you list the Persian sources? I did not find them on the Hotaki dynasty talk page. --Bejnar 15:38, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Request for Comment: Hotaki dynasty origin and ethnicity

The RFC on the origin and ethnicity of the founder of the Hotaki dynasty are being conducted on the Hotaki dynasty talk page, as that is where a lot of the discussion of this issue has appeared. --Bejnar 16:45, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

University of Balkh

Sallam. I think the correct name for University of Balkh is actually Balkh University. What do you think? --Behnam 20:59, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its the same. But Balkh University is more common --Anoshirawan 21:58, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but would be the official name? --Behnam —The preceding signed but undated comment was added at 19:39, August 23, 2007 (UTC).
For the university in Herat, in English it seems to be Herat University according to the official website http://heratuniversity.org/index.php/home.1242.html. --Behnam 03:20, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just to let you know, I opened an article for Herat University. -- Behnam 14:47, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Afghanistani singers category merge

There is a discussion to move the Afghanistani singers category to Afghan singers. Please go there and vote oppose and join the discusion there. Here is the link click here. --Behnam 20:33, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Template:History of Afghanistan

Please read the talk page for Template:History of Afghanistan, and undo your edit deleting Hotaki Dynasty. Otherwise, let me know why you are reverting without talk. --Bejnar 21:52, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Politicians of Afghanistan

You have recently recreated or reposted material at Category:Politicians of Afghanistan which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. --After Midnight 0001 02:13, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

During the discussion as to whether this category should be deleted I sided with preservation. But User:After Midnight is correct. Those of us who disagree with the decision have other options than recreation as if the deletion discussion had not concluded with delete.
IIRC many of the participants objected to the name being inconsiten with the names of most other categories. So, they would not have objected to Category:Afghanistani politicians, because it was consistent with the hundreds of other categories that were focussed around someone's nationality. Conforming with that convention would erode a lot of the criticisms against Category:Politicians of Afghanistan. Maybe I am overlooking something obvious? The other guy was saying that "Afghan" implied Pashtun. So, could politicians who were from the Pashtun ethnic group also be included in Category:Afghanistani politicians?
There is a forum for discussing categories, prior to creating them. Maybe User:After Midnight can give you advice about where that forum is? Maybe they can give you advice about how to phrase your proposal? I think you will find that if you can get the regular participants in that forum on your side your category will survive a nomination for deletion.
I based my support for Afghanistani over Afghan or Afghani because I trusted a guy who had personal knowledge of the naming conventions of the region. I don't have personal knowledge of the region. But if you or the other fellow initiate the discussion in the forum I would be happy to voice my support.
I am going to leave User:After Midnight a link to my comment.
Cheers! Geo Swan 02:49, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I dont know Why this category is getting deleted. Its a fact that Afghan is synonymous with Pashtun. There were alot of arguments over the term "Afghanistani" but Politicians of Afghanistan is much better than both of them. Politicians of Afghanistan not only includes ethnic Afghans but other ethnicities also so I hope you can change it back to Politicians of Afghanistan. --Anoshirawan 03:25, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

I can't change it back. I am not an administrator. And I would get the same admonishment you got if I tried. And I can't make the initial argument on the forum where people discuss the names of categories, prior to creating them, because, unlike you, I don't have personal knowledge that Afghan==Pashtun.
I think there are two main objections to Category:Politicians of Afghanistan -- IMO they are not really meaningful objections -- but we have to get along with the majority:
  1. Systemic bias -- English speakers who can't image that conventional usages in English could be wrong, or deceptive.
  2. A misplaced aesthetic sense. Almost all the other categories that focus on people from a particular nationality, or ethnic group, have the nationality first. In general, if the category is for people from nation Foo, who are all of occupation Bar are named, Category:'''Foo'''-istani '''Bar'''. You and the other guy wanted Category:'''Bar''' of '''Foo'''-istan. This offends their esthetic sense. This should be easy to address. If the Foo part should be Afghanistani not Afghan, just use Category:Afghanistani politicians -- and half the objections evaporate.
Cheers! Geo Swan 21:42, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly, if you feel that my decision was incorrect, please do start a deletion review. All of the instructions that you need should be located at this link: WP:DRV. I really do not mind my decision being questioned and encourage you to do so if you truly feel that you are right. --After Midnight 0001 02:35, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

please explain more fully...

Could you please consider using edit summaries when you make edits? You made dozens of edits to articles on my watchlist. If you use edit summaries then other wikipedians can trust they know what is going on with your edits, without checking them out, one at a time. Thanks in advance!

Cheers! Geo Swan 02:24, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for telling me. --Anoshirawan 03:21, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

82.83.137.200

Sallam. Please do not revert edits by that IP address. Thanks. -- Behnam 17:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:History of Iran

Do you believe that pre-Aryan history is appropriate for the History of Iran template and for the History of Greater Iran template? Should they include the Median Empire and the Achaemenid Empire? --Bejnar 19:10, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greater Iran is a Region and it was known as Iran even before the achaemanids but Afghanistan is a new concept which never existed efore the 19th century. the Hotakis had more impact on modern iran than modern day Afghanistan.--Anoshirawan 01:00, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

So, is this statement incorrect: "Notwithstanding this inscriptional use of ērān to refer to the Iranian peoples, the use of ērān to refer to the empire is also attested by the early Sassanid period." ? --Bejnar 16:07, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I study history of the region, there was no country called Iran before 1935. Today's nation of Iran was called Persia before 1935. Regarding Afghanistan, the name translates to "Land of the Afghans", which means the area was recognized as Afghanistan thru-out history. This is why we use Afghanistan for the entire history of that nation, not just from the 19th century but includes early history. "Land of the Afghans" is something you must always consider when looking at the word Afghanistan.--J.Hufza 11 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by J.Hufza (talk • contribs)

and i belive you are a lier since you don´t know nothing about Iran. Persia was the term europeans and the north-africans used it for the Aryan country. You are either NisarKand or Pashtun65 who also claimed to have studied history. The people self called themself Eironi, Erani. Ossets still call themself Ironis. --Aspandyar Agha 16:33, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I believe you have zero knowledge about Iran and Afghanistan. Iran is a historical name and it was introduced to the west in 1935. Before 1935 the western world used Persia while the natives always used Iran or Eran. Afghanistan was first used by Persians. They referred the Salaiman Mountains and the Peshawar valley as Afghanistan while modern day Afghanistan was known as "Khorasan". in the 19th century the British used this term for Khorasan while the Kings and Amirs still used Khorasan and not Afghanistan. The first time the government recognised this country as Afghanistan was in 1924.

Iran has been used althroughout History and you can find this term in Persian literature aswell.Anoshirawan 01:14, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Punctuation

Please put one space after each period and comma. Thanks. -- Behnam 02:00, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ok :)

--Anoshirawan 02:12, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Tajiks article

Please keep an eye on the Tajiks article as there has been a lot of bad edits on it. Thanks. -- Behnam 00:45, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Anoshirawan for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Raoulduke47 12:38, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template: History of Afghanistan

Please do not remove the Hotaki dynasty from the Template:History of Afghanistan without providing a good reason on its talk page. That Afghanistan was not a country until recently is not a good reason, see the talk page of that template as well as the History of Afghanistan article and its talk page. That there were other rulers of the area after the Hotaki dynasty is not a good reason, see same as above. A good reason would be that the Hotaki dynasty ruled only in southern India and not in the area we now know as Afghanistan; however that just is not true. --Bejnar 23:04, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zahir Shah

Please get some sources describing Zahir Shah's fascism and oppression of most of the people of Afghanistan. These guys think we are just making this up. Provide books, articles, etc. -- Behnam 21:31, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hon203

Ok, thanks. -- Behnam 21:14, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it. -- Behnam 21:55, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Dari (Afghanistan)

You provided a citation and a link to Prof. Daryush Ashori's article on Farsi and Dari in the Dari (Afghanistan) article, but the link doesn't work. Do you have information on where it was published? --Bejnar 23:19, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Behrooz requesting help

Hi! I saw you were a member of WikiProject Iran, so I thought you might be able to help. A merge between the articles on the Persian names "Behrooz" and "Behrouz" has been proposed, but so far the merge has not been discussed. As I'm not very familiar with Persian names, I thought I'd try to find someone who was, to comment on the proposed merge. Thanks!Lex Kitten 12:36, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Persian language

You wrote on 25 October 2007 in an edit summary: "Whats Eastern and Western Persian lol..... In Afghanistan we have numerous dialects and most dialects spoken in the western parts of the country arte closer to the iranian dialects." Eastern Farsi and Western Farsi are the terms that linguists, not necessarily native speakers, have determined analytically appropriately describe the major languages that cover the range of Persian dialects between Teheran and Kabul. See, for example, Decker, Kendall D. (1992) "Languages of Chitral" Sociolinguistic Survey of Northern Pakistan, 5 National Institute of Pakistan Studies, Quaid-i-Azam University and Summer Institute of Linguistics, Islamabad, xxii, 257 p. In addition there are eight (8) other Persian languages that are currently spoken, some only by isolated elements removed from the Tajikistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-Iran corridor. The Persian language sub-group is divided by linguists into the following languages:

  • Aimaq (sometimes called Barbari or Berberi)
  • Bukharic
  • Darwazi (also called Badakhshani)
  • Dehwari
  • Dzhidi
  • Farsi, Eastern
  • Farsi, Western
  • Hazaragi
  • Pahlavani
  • Tajiki

Each of these has in addition a number of dialects that have been recognized. Just for example, Aimaq has had the following dialects identified: Taimuri (Teimuri, Timuri or Taimouri), Taimani, Zohri (Zuri), Jamshidi (Jamshedi, Djamchidi, Yemchidi or Dzhemshid), Firozkohi, Maliki, Mizmast, Chinghizi, and Zainal. Please do your research before using terms like lol. --Bejnar 18:00, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnicity in the lead paragraph

I noticed that you inserted the ethnicity of Akram Assem into the lead paragraph of his article. The Manual of Style says: "Ethnicity should generally not be emphasized in the opening unless it is relevant to the subject's notability." This is especially true when the ethnicity of the biographee is in dispute. --Bejnar 04:01, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No edit wars, please (pasted from Dari (Afghanistan))

Reverted the article right now to Bejnar's better founded argumentation. During the last month, Anoshirawan and Bejnar had an edit war on the question wether Dari was just a dialect or a language. They had countless reverts from this here to that one (and maybe even earlier, but I didn't have the nerve to check). Apart from this question being linguistically problematic, please try to avoid edit wars - if not, admins may start to block you. Makes you appear less trustworthy as Wiki-contributors in the long run. Take a deep breath plus a look at WP:EDITWAR, WP:3R and dialect, and try to find a compromise formula. Thanks! -- Kavaiyan <°)))o>< 00:00, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There he goes: Anoshirawan continues his edit war. -- Kavaiyan <°)))o>< 05:00, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't you think you should rather get into discussing with Bejnar (who seems quite constructive about this), instead of risking your Wikipedia status by acting in this irresponsible manner? -- Kavaiyan <°)))o>< 05:00, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you really believe in this edit [1] then you should located a reliable source to use as a citation, then possibly explain that there is a controversy. Miesbu 16:16, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RFC History of Afghanistan template

There is an RFC on the Template:History of Afghanistan about whether the template should include the Hotaki dynasty. See template talk. --Bejnar 23:31, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Hotaki dynasty

In replacing the History of Afghanistan template on the Hotaki dynasty article with the History of Greater Iran template you said "we will let it stay this way for now". I have already indicated on the talk page why this change that you have just made is not appropriate. The History of Afghanistan template is the more specific template. Please change it back to the more specific History of Afghanistan template, and cease changing it. --Bejnar 23:48, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Atta Mohammad

Dorood. Please take a look at this article on Ustad Atta Mohammad. -- Behnam 10:38, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He's full name is actually Atta Mohammed Noor right? -- Behnam 00:35, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yes,Ustad Atta Muhammad Noor--Anoshirawan 01:11, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Turko/Mongol dynasties

Sallam sallam. Can you please keep an eye on the following articles? : Timur, Timurid dynasty, Great Seljuq Empire. Thanks. -- Behnam (talk) 02:54, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please also watch this one: Turko-Persian tradition. Much appreciated. -- Behnam (talk) 09:55, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please do not revert blindly. The second paragraph is not related with Turko-Persian tradition but is related with Arabic-Persian. If you check the cited references, you see that both are irrelevent either. You're harming the project, since you came to the page with the spam message above and reverted just beacuse Beh-nam invited you there. Please, try to be neutral and constructive. If you want to discuss, you're always welcome. Regards. E104421 (talk) 18:05, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Afghanistan provinces and cities

Dorood. Please keep a watch on all the provinces and their capital cities in Afghanistan. here's the list. There's a lot of vandalism on them. Thanks.

Also please districts. -- Behnam (talk) 14:48, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmad Shah Abdali's relationship with Nadir Shah

Please write about their relationship and use a reference to support it. I think Tarikh Ahmad Shahi might have some information on that, can you find the page number? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.93.211.223 (talk) 01:28, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning!

Please try not to keep reverting edits of others or you will be blocked. You have changed the correct number of ethnic make-up to a false one in many articles I came across. I will report you and you will be blocked for a long time if you continue with vandalising articles in that way.--Hurooz (talk) 12:34, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is another sockpuppet of user: NisarKand. Don't worry about him, it's quite funny that a user who has been banned with dozens of sockpuppets is now threating others. -- Behnam (talk) 14:42, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No consensus

You moved "Dari (Afghanistan)" to "Dari (Persian)" while the issue was under discussion on the talk page. You know better. Your action was disingenuous. --Bejnar (talk) 01:13, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Anoshirawan. Your name has been mentioned in a discussion at the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. You are welcome to join the discussion and add your own comment. EdJohnston (talk) 03:43, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warning

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Murghab District, you will be blocked from editing. At 08:28, 25 November 2007, you made this edit which switched the names of the two ethnic groups Pashtuns and Tajiks, with the result that what formerly read "approximately 85% Pashtuns" then read "approximately 85% Tajik". The original ethnic figures were taken from the United Nation's High Commissioner for Refugees' District Profile which had been cited as a reference. This edit of yours was blatant vandalism. Don't do it again. --Bejnar (talk) 23:00, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • In looking at some of the other Districts of Afghanistan ethnic figures, I see that you changed the figures on the Khaki Jabbar District article three times away from the cited UN HCR profile report. You changed them on 26 July 2007, again on 15 October 2007, and finally on 25 November 2007. First, when a source for figures is provided, please read it, especially when it is an electronic source readily available. Second, if you disagree with cited figures, find a reliable source to cite and present on the talk page your argument as to why your figures are better. Do not just change figures because you think they are wrong. How many of the ethnic figures in these Afghanistan districts have you changed? Do I need to look at all 327 of them, or will you clean up your own mess? --Bejnar (talk) 02:49, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
For example, I notice that the incorrect figures for Khaki Jabbar District have made their way into the Kabul Province#Demographics section. Will you clean that up, or shall I? --Bejnar (talk) 04:05, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 03:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NisarKand and Khampalak

NisarKand came back with several sockpuppets. I've learned how to use checkuser and reported them all and he has been banned again. Interestingly, other admins discovered the Khampalak also came back with a few sockpuppets and he has also been banned for good. see here. If you how see any new users suddenly show up with their same views, then now we can do a checkuser since I know how to do it now and it works very well. -- Behnam (talk) 01:25, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Derogatory term

In regard to your recent edit to Dari (Persian), it has come to my attention that Gabri is a derogatory, non-scholarly, term for the Zoroastrian languages in Iran. So it is better not to use it. Gabri is also an eastern Chadic language spoken in Chad. Obviously that is not the language that you were referring to when you edited the Dari article on 29 November 2007. --Bejnar (talk) 18:40, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

edit summaries

please use edit summaries sometimes. for example if you are reverting vandalism, just type in rvv. thanks.


Why?

I don't know why you are very much interested to add the tag sockpuppet|NisarKand on my user page? Who is this NasirKhan that you stamp everyone with? Kabulzamin 14:58, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Afghanistani

Hey, why are you changing the word "Afghan" to "Afghanistani" in the wikipedia articles? It is incorrect to say "Afghanistani" in english. A5678 (talk) 03:36, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Iranica

Dorood. I hope you're doing good. I don't think you're familiar with Encyclopedia Iranica. I've been reading it lately and it is very good. The online version though is not complete. They only have entered some articles. But what they have there is excellent. Here is the LINK. One very good article I was reading recently was the article on Hazaras. It's very detailed, you can read it here. It's divided into four sections so you'll have to click on the other sections. Check out the other articles too. They are good. They will add more gradually to the free online version. I'm looking forward to when they finish the free online version. Kabul-Shahan2020 (talk) 04:33, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Baghlan

Iranica's entry on Baghlan -- Kabul-Shahan2020 (talk) 04:43, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmad Zahir ethncity

Prof Enayatullah Shahrani's Book " Bazmeh Ghazal" says Ahmad Zahir was half Pashaii and Half Tajik. Shahrani was the dean of the Fine arts faculty of Kabul University.--Anoshirawan 02:59, 26 November 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anoshirawan (talk • contribs)

Hello. Can you please provide the details of that book so that we can cite it and end the dispute? Maybe the publisher and date? CanadianAnthropologist (talk) 04:43, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sepas. But do you know the publisher or date or even year it was published? By the way, to sign your posts, you can just four of these ~ at the end and it will do it automatically like this: -- CanadianAnthropologist (talk) 06:47, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The book isn't with me right now but it was published in 1999.Anoshirawan 06:51, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Ok, that should be enough for now. Tashakor. By the way, just use the four ~ to sign. CanadianAnthropologist (talk) 06:59, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Also I'd like to bring this to your attention. CanadianAnthropologist (talk) 07:16, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Who are you to change someons identity with unknown source? The greatest source is me and his rest of his relatives in TORONTO, CANADA. Have you ever met him personaly? Go ahead contact his son to get a better idea instead of citing someone who isn't related to him at all. You are warned and if you continue action will be taken!--Shikab (talk) 08:46, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Your removed page protection from Afghan-Americans, also you reverted edits and placed false "Afghanistani" name after it was already concluded that the only correct name to be used is "Afghan" (Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 July 27#Afghan). If you continue your disruptive behaviour you will be blocked indef.--Ziblam (talk) 11:09, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Afghanistani

I am observing that you're changing the adjective "Afghan" to "Afghanistani" in almost each article. Let me know you that you are creating a new adjective in English which didn't exist, Nice work! By the way, by ignoring each little clues of Pashtuns, people who live right beside you in the same land, your Iranian fellows will never grant you the identity of sharing the same culture as them i.e. Irani. I, personally, am against the Pashtun fascism and their thoughts of *Pashtunisation* of Afghanistan, but I do not go so far to risk the unity in my country. We, both Tajiks and Pashtuns, must live beside each other for as long as it takes. I passed all my life in migration, everyone of us suffered from civil war and problems just because of these ethnic issues.The only way for living in peace would be ignoring some minor prejudices. As Hafiz (rah) says: آسایش دو گیتی تفسیر این دو حرفست با دوستان مروت و با دشمنان مدارا Even if you don't accept Pashtuns as your friends, you must learn how to do "mudaaraa". You must distinguish between two things: struggle against fascism and prejudice. What you're doing now is "Prejudice". Now please don't start giving a lecture about Afghan and Afghanistani. If you ask me my personal point of view, I am not happy as well with the word "Afghan" and even the name of "Afghanistan" for our land which was one Khurasan. I even sometimes try to explicit this issue for some people who are not aware of it, but here, it is wikipedia. Here you cannot force your own views. "Afghanistani" is not yet recognized as an adjective in English, instead it confuses the readers. I am asking you to once think on this matter as a rational person not as an emotional person. Khuda Hafez —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.79.213.205 (talk) 18:21, 17 December 2007 (UTC) And oh yeah, it works very well dear User:Beh-nam having two accounts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.79.213.205 (talk) 18:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

new article for Amir Jan Sabori

Dorood. I thought I'd start an article for him. I've spelled his name according to the cover his latest album. CanadianAnthropologist (talk) 21:22, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

interesting article

I knew they existed, but I never knew there was actually a name for them: Pashtun Mafia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.95.147.112 (talk) 23:44, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SSP

Pls go to your SSP submission and provide diffs. — Rlevse • Talk • 03:09, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You rm'd a protection tag when the protection was done by an admin, [2]. Please cease. — Rlevse • Talk • 02:41, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tajiks

What is the empty wikitable doing at the end of the article Tajiks? You have placed it there twice, today 28 December 2007, and previously on 27 December 2007. Please use the sandbox for experimentation, or create a user subpage. --Bejnar (talk) 21:08, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Why do you insist on adding "and Afghanistan" to the sentence: "The Tajiks trace their more immediate ancestry to the East Iranian-speaking Bactrians, Sogdians, and Parthians, which means that the historical ancestors of the Tajiks did not speak Persian - the south-western Iranian language, today known as 'Farsi' in Iran and Afghanistan." The name of the language in Afghanistan is officially "Dari", although it is true that it is often called "Farsi" as well, but the fact is that this is irrelevant to this article and to this sentence. In truth, the fact that today the language that they did not speak is called "Farsi" is irrelevant. I suggest that the sentence be edited to read: "The Tajiks trace their more immediate ancestry to the East Iranian-speaking Bactrians, Sogdians, and Parthians, which means that the historical ancestors of the Tajiks did not speak a southwestern Iranian language, such as Persian. What do you think? --Bejnar (talk) 16:23, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Afghan

Sallam. I'd like your input on the disambiguation page for Afghan. Please take a look at it. Thanks. Padmanii (talk) 18:16, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Improper page moving

On 08:14, 9 December 2007, you, Anoshirawan, moved the Afghan American page to Afghanistani-American. It was moved back and the impropriety of the move was discussed. You, Anoshirawan, were specifically asked not to move the Afghan American page again. You have moved it several times more without comment on the talk page, on 05:15, 24 December 2007 and 03:43, 25 December 2007 and 02:31, 27 December 2007 and 08:17, 29 December 2007 and 21:32, 2 January 2008. The consensus except for you, Anoshirawan, and banned editors, is that Afghan American is the correct title. This is in accord with the CfD of July 2007 in which the categories for people of Afghanistan nationality were decided to be called Afghan people. This was reinforced by the poll on the proper demonym at Talk:Afghanistan#Poll?. This irresponsible behaviour by you, Anoshirawan, has been demonstrated before. You moved Shindand District to Sabzwar District on 06:00, 26 August 2007, without discussion. After some discussion it was moved back to "Shindand District", but you, Anoshirawan, moved it again on 02:50, 26 November 2007 and again on 02:36, 29 November 2007 and again on 08:02, 9 December 2007. Thankfully, you eventually stopped moving "Shinand District". Similarly, in the middle of a discussion about the proper name for the Dari (Afghanistan) language article, you moved it on 07:32, 24 November 2007 to the very ambigous Dari (Persian), a problem which has not been fixed since. Please is there some way to get you to understand that this is not proper behaviour? Please try to understand other editors arguments and read the sources. In the Shinand case you eventually asserted in the RFC only that "This district has been known as Sabzwar for thousands of years. everyone from this district use sabzwar not shindand. The Goverment today uses both Sabzwar and Shindand." without citation. No sources were introduced to support your statement, yet after the RFC was over, you again moved the page. If you cannot tell if a move is objectionable to others, please consider all moves to be objectionable and present your reasoned argument with citation to reliable sources on the talk page, and give others a reasonable amount of time to respond, two weeks is not excessive. If you think a move will be objectionable, please consider something like Wikipedia:Requested moves for controversial moves. --Bejnar (talk) 03:39, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History of Greater Iran

The Template:History of Greater Iran is not the proper template for the Hotaki dynasty. It is too broad. The Hotaki dynasty is important for the History of Afghanistan for the reasons disclosed on the talk page. Unless you can come up with a good reason why the more general template which does not mention the Hotaki, is appropriate, please don't keep placing it on the Hotaki dynasty article. Why is the Template:History of Greater Iran more appropriate? Please give a positive reason. --Bejnar (talk) 04:10, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 9 January 2008, for the article Hotaki dynasty you replaced the History of Afghanistan template with the History of Greater Iran template without edit summary. The reason that you gave on 3 January 2008 on the Hotaki dynasty talk page for that replacement was "The Hotaki dynasty had a bigger impact on Modern Iran than Afghanistan." That same day I asked "What was the impact that the Hotaki dynasty had on modern Iran?" Please could you respond before replacing the template again? --Bejnar (talk) 06:17, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Inserted figures don't match citation

On 3 January 2008, you made edits to the figures derived from the Encyclopedia Iranica that appeared in the Ethnic groups section of the Demography of Afghanistan article. You inserted incorrect figures for the "Aimak" and "Other", and deleted the "Turkmen". If you are going to cite to the Encyclopedia Iranica please make sure that the citation verifies your submission and is a correct derivation. Since these numbers were extensively discussed on the talk page and you are an experienced editor, I think that you ought to have known this. Don't insert unsupported ethnic data. See my warning of 25 and 26 November 2007 above. --Bejnar (talk) 22:01, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:History of Afghanistan - deletion of detail

What is your theory on deleting the detail from the History of Afghanistan template? You have done it twice without edit summary or comment on the talk page. What gives? --Bejnar (talk) 05:56, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 20 January you again deleted detail from the History of Afghanistan template, giving as a reason, "Durranis and hotakis werent local". This isn't much of a reason, as reading the Durrani Empire article: "The Durrani Empire was a large state that included territories within modern Afghanistan, Pakistan, the Khorasan province of Iran and a smaller section of western India." and the Hotaki dynasty article: "The Hotaki dynasty (1709-1738) was founded in 1709 by Mirwais Khan Hotak, an ethnic Pashtun from the Ghilzai clan[1] of Kandahar province in modern-day Afghanistan." clearly show that they are part of the history of this place. Please do not remove detail from the History of Afghanistan template without discussing it first and finding at least one other non-IP editor who agrees with you, not counting Beh-nam's sockpuppets. Is it clear that you are in a minority concerning changing this template, and that only by rational, polite discussion will you be able to do so? If not, tell me and we can take this to the administration. I have tried to elicit your underlying problem with the Hotaki, but have been unable to do so. --Bejnar (talk) 22:24, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnic data

Do not insert or reinsert ethnic data into articles without proper citation to published source material which is reliable. Ethnic data is inherently controversial. (WikiProject Ethnic groups says: "Let's be clear: ethnicity is a minefield.") "All material that is challenged or likely to be challenged needs a source." and "Biographies of living persons should be sourced with particular care, for legal and ethical reasons. All contentious material about living persons must cite a reliable source." Wikipedia:Citing sources. That article goes on to say, "If you find unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about a living person—whether in an article or on a talk page—remove it immediately." (emphasis in original). Definitely, once ethnic data is removed or contested by another editor it must be properly sourced before reintroduction. Additionally, "Ethnicity should generally not be emphasized in the opening unless it is relevant to the subject's notability." Wikipedia:Manual of Style (biographies)#Opening paragraph --Bejnar (talk) 16:46, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

new articles for new singers

Three Reverts rules on Raziq Faani

Please stop removing the nationality in the lede on Raziq Faani. You have made three reverts (without comment or citation), two of these in the last 24 hours. Please cite your sources for this person NOT being Afghan on Talk:Raziq Faani, and please use edit summaries when making edits. Please see WP:3RR. Otherwise, these repeated reverts will be treated as vandalism, and I'll take this to moderation. I'm sure we can find some compromise before this happens. Thank you T L Miles (talk) 14:22, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning #2 - Ethnic data

Please do not restore contested ethnic data, or unsourced ethnic data, to articles. You were warned on 10 January 2008, see above, not to do this and you were provided information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. On 20 January 2008 you restored ethnic data in the Babrak Karmal article that was clearly contested on the talk page, and the ethnic data was mentioned as contested in the edit summaries. 12:38, 19 January 2008 Bejnar (see talk page about contested ethnicity). Because this is a problem that you seem to have, it is necessary that you check the talk page before adding or reinserting ethnic data into articles. You have been warned a second time. --Bejnar (talk) 22:06, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 10:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Hello Anoshirawan. You appear to be edit-warring across a few articles and templates (e.g. Zakia Kohzad, Template:History of Afghanistan‎). Please stop this, as there appears to be a consensus against your changes (Bejnar, Edward321, Kingturtle and Raoulduke47). If you continue to revert, you may end up being blocked - remember that WP:3RR applies even if editors have made three or fewer reverts in a 24 hour period, if their behavior is clearly disruptive. Thanks, пﮟოьεԻ 57 09:54, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. Unfortunately you have disregarded my statement above. Whilst this is a constuctive edit and a good idea, this is not and is a continuation of your edit-warring crusade. Please note that if you make another edit like the latter one, I will block you for disruptive behaviour. пﮟოьεԻ 57 11:42, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sassanid Empire

At 04:48 on 23 January 2008 in the Sassanid Empire article you changed "third Iranian dynasty and the second Persian Empire" to "third Iranian dynasty and the third Persian Empire". Obviously if it were the third of both it would be uninteresting in the lead, and only one would be included. However, in scholarly works the Sassanid Empire is considered the "second" Persian Empire. No less an authority than the Encyc. Iranica says: "Ardaæir succeeded in creating a "Second Persian empire" which was recognized for over four centuries as one of the two great powers in Western Asia and Europe." "Sasanian Dynasty" Encyclopedia Iranica So, please don't change the lead from "second" Persian Empire. See the discussion on the talk page under fourth imperial Iranian dynasty for why it is "third Iranian dynasty". --Bejnar (talk) 01:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning #3 - Ethnic data

You have twice been warned about using unsubstantiated ethnic data. You did it again. At 01:30 on 25 January 2008 in the Afghanistan article under "Demography - Ethnic groups", you changed the percentage of Pastuns reflected in the Encyc. Inranica from 39.4 to 36.4. These numbers were discussed extensively on the talk page for the main article Demography of Afghanistan at Ethnic Groups - Encyclopædia Iranica. The correct number is 39.4. Do not change ethnic numbers without a good citation. Please read all available information before changing ethnic percenatges, or ethnicity. Please do not use numbers for ethnic data that are not supported by the citation in the text. This is a recurring problem for you. Please be careful in your edits. --Bejnar (talk) 23:27, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]



Warning #4 - Ethnic data

At 03:41, 7 February 2008, to the article Kabul Province you removed cited data about the ethnic make-up of the province and substituted in unsourced data that contradicts the sourced data. Do not make unsubstantiated ethnic edits! In addition, you have failed to provide adequate information about the document cited by you as: "Professor Enayatullah Shahrani (Dean of the Fine Arts Faculty of Kabul University) (1999)" or "Bazmeh Ghazal", to substantiate your ethnic statements about Sarban and Ahmad Zahir. --Bejnar (talk) 05:23, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]



new articles

Please see if there is anything you can add to them or correct on them. Thanks.

welcome back

I welcome you back to Wikipedia. As you proceed as an editor in this community, please review the following pages. They could come in handy.

I look forward to working with you on articles. Cheers, Kingturtle (talk) 11:40, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammed Zahir Shah

Please show on the article talk page all these "pov's" that are supposedly in the article. - dwc lr (talk) 22:29, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Really why are you reverting to an old version again? - dwc lr (talk) 11:00, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please avoid edit wars

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mohammed Zahir Shah. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Kingturtle (talk) 02:58, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kabul University. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Kingturtle (talk) 21:31, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not start another edit war at Kabul University. You run the risk of being blocked again, and potentially banned. Kingturtle (talk) 12:55, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

I suspected you of being a sockpuppet. I was wrong. Please accept my apology. Sincerely, Kingturtle (talk) 18:55, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

user: Tajikam420

Is either NisarKand or Khampalak. Sounds more like Khampalak.

He has been confirmed as Khampalak by checkuser and will be banned soon.

Please vote in survey over whether to have article title Human rights in Iran or Human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran

  • 23 November 2007 Sinooher changed the article name from Human rights in Iran to Human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran
  • Koavf changed the article name back to Human rights in Iran 9 March 2008,
  • Crazy Suit changed it back to Human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran a couple weeks later, 23 March 2008.

We should decide this once and for all and not what the name is as it makes a difference to the wording of the text in the article.

Arguements

State of Afghanistan was founded in 1880

According to Anwar-ul-Haq Ahady (a Pashtun himself and the head of Afghan Mellat) the state of Afghanistan emerged in 1880, not during the Ahmad Shah Durrani era as this article claims. See Ahady's article:

The Decline of the Pashtuns in Afghanistan, Anwar-ul-Haq Ahady, Asian Survey, Vol. 35, No. 7. (Jul., 1995), pp. 621-634.

You are the shameless banned editor Tajik

You have no shame at all, you dirty rat. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.134.132.60 (talk) 12:21, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Bairam Khan

I have no idea which side is "right", but if you don't include a source for your claim, I will continue to assume the other guy is right. Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead) 06:03, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for acknowleding the poll of my wording as valid by acutally using it, and not blindly rejecting it as the anon has done. Carl.bunderson (talk) 06:06, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another warning

I see you are back to blindy removing any mention of the term Afghan [3][4][5]. Please stop immediately or you will be blocked again. Regards, пﮟოьεԻ 57 18:06, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Tajikam

A tag has been placed on Tajikam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Tom Harris (talk) 02:46, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thread at ANI

You are being notified of a thread regarding your actions at WP:ANI#Nonstop vandalism by Anoshirawan. seicer | talk | contribs 12:41, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling: Mosaddeq, Mossadeq, Mossadegh, or Mosaddegh?

Google search survey:

  • 40,700 for Mohammed Mosaddeq
  • 86,000 for Mohammed Mossadeq
  • 78,400 for Mohammed Mossadegh
  • 2,010 for Mohammed Mosaddegh

Proposed name change

I propose changing the title of the article to Mohammed Mossadeq --BoogaLouie (talk) 21:38, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Salam, did you have noticed what kind of sources they used in Afghanistan article? They have vandalized to much and brought mixing lies and facts. Ask an Admin to rewrite the article or he/she should reopen the article so i can rewrite it.--84.59.127.102 (talk) 16:50, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Toddst1 (talk) 04:46, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anoshirawan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What have I vandalized. Please provide more information why I got banned

Decline reason:

From looking at your recent edit history, it appears you have continuously and repeatedly attempted to change the ethnicity of numerous persons relating to Afghan history and culture, and that you have done so without consensus or support of any outside references. That you have been blocked for essentially the same issue seven times in the past, and have not changed your behavior, seems to be the reason you have been blocked. Your most recent block, for 1 month, did not seem to impress upon you the need to stop this behavior. Thus, it appears you have been indefiniately blocked. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 06:16, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anoshirawan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I edited Ahmad Zahir's article and the ethnicity that I put for him is backed with a source and this is not vandalism. Also the other edit I made was on Zahir Shah's article and I also provided a source for my claim. My other edits were simply reverts to articles that were vandalized by Sockpuppets of Nisarkand and he is the one who reported me to you.

Decline reason:

You were not blocked for vandalism - you were blocked for persistent disruption and edit warring. Your history shows you have consistently ignored previous warnings and numerous blocks for that very thing, and it is clear that this account has been used solely to push your POV, so an indefinite block is now appropriate. I would have done it myself if Toddst1 hadn't beaten me to it. Kafziel Complaint Department 06:36, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anoshirawan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What do you mean when you say I have only pushed my POV. first of all most of my blocks were because of the 3RR. I haven't claimed anything without a source or reference and banning me because I control articles that are constantly vandalized by sockpuppets. And since I got unblocked last time I haven't been that active on wikipedia. I am sure this has been a big misunderstanding and If I have done a mistake I am sorry for my part.

Decline reason:

The misunderstanding is all yours. You do not seem to understand that we are not a soapbox or battleground. Goodbye. —  Sandstein  21:03, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anoshirawan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Then what should editers do when wikipedia gets flooded by sockpuppets and as a lot of administrators know, the articles that have to do with Afghanistan get vandalized everyday by a banned user and this does not make sense to leave those articles alone and not change them. I would accept a one month block but banning me forever for something that I have not done does not make sense.

Decline reason:

My personal opinion is that pov-pushers who try to use Wikipedia to fight nationalistic battles are a much more serious problem than vandalism. But don't worry; other users who are better able to collaborate politely will probably make whatever improvements are necessary. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:14, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Due to abuse of the {{unblock}} template, this page is protected from editing. You may request another review of the block in six months, after the protection expires. Kafziel Complaint Department 06:45, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]