User talk:AmericanLemming

Jurassic World

I can't edit the Jurassic World page, but the Indominus Rex also has "Abelisaurus" DNA in her. Someone should really add actor links to the plot section as well.

A belated welcome!

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, AmericanLemming. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! //Gbern3 (talk) 19:17, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

IEM Review

Hi there! In case you hasn't already noticed, I have begun reviewing International emergency medicine. The review page is here. Cheers! --Cryptic C62 · Talk 16:33, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Villa Regina

Thanks for taking the time to copy-edit the article and the suggestions to improve it on the talk page. I'll try to assess some of those points you remarked. It is one (if not my first) attempt to edit an article about a city, and it proved to be a bit of a challenge! Since the town has an interesting history, I thought it would make a good read.--GDuwenTell me! 19:40, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AmericanLemming, I'm sorry you couldn't post on my talk page; I didn't know my edit notice would cause problems with your browser—it worked fine in mine. Re: your message, I removed the blue quotation box because lengthy quotations should use either template {{blockquote}} or {{quote}}, or <blockquote> quoted text </blockquote> per WP:MOSQUOTE. The template {{quotation}} produces a blue box which looks like a formatting mistake caused by an indentation at the edge of the edit window. Also the quotation is short and can be easily integrated into normal text; setting it apart gives it undue weight and looks incongruous. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 22:41, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

International Federation for Emergency Medicine

The talk page categories wouldn't be the appropriate ones for the main article, because they're all internal quality-assessment project categories that are meant exclusively for talk pages, while content categories are a different tree entirely.

Please don't interpret the categorization tag as a personal tweak to your nose as the creator of the article. It just puts the article into a maintenance queue that a lot of people work on, and there are typically about 100-200 articles that get left uncategorized for various reasons every single day — so if you don't already know the correct categories to file the article in, it's perfectly okay to just leave the tag there until somebody else resolves it. You're certainly free to fix it if you choose to explore the category system until you find the right ones, but it's not your responsibility to do so yourself. Bearcat (talk) 18:06, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Virudhunagar

Hi, I missed the talk of GOCE in the page - thanks a lot for copy-editing. I am nominating the article for GA. Ssriram mt (talk) 14:24, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for International Federation for Emergency Medicine

Alex ShihTalk 00:02, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Beginning to fix errors

Just to let you know, I am beginning to fix the errors you noted. Thanks for the comprehensive review. :) Toa Nidhiki05 00:49, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editing conflict

Hello, AmericanLemming. You have new messages at Talk:Treblinka extermination camp/GA1.
Message added 14:46, 14 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Reviewer Barnstar

The Reviewer Barnstar
Awarded to AmericanLemming for your exceptional work in bringing Treblinka extermination camp article to WP:Good Article status through a long but immensely insightful review process. Please accept this modest gift as a token of my gratitude. Thank you. Poeticbent talk 18:26, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FAC

Hey there... it's probably not really appropriate to pimp for reviews of other articles on FAC nomination pages. It makes the page longer and makes it more difficult for FAC coordinators to go through them since it's off-topic. You should probably remove those. It would be better to ping people directly on their talk pages if you want to ask for reviews. --Laser brain (talk) 11:30, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can do that. I wasn't sure about whether I should do it or not, so now I know not to do so. Thanks for letting me know! AmericanLemming (talk) 19:32, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, AmericanLemming. You have new messages at Talk:Treblinka extermination camp#Comments for PoeticBent to address.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wikilinking

Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:

  • dates
  • years
  • commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
  • common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

Thanks and my best wishes.

Tony (talk) 10:17, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, AmericanLemming. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Help desk.
Message added Dismas. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ralph Richardson

Thank you for your thoughtful comments on the talk page. I have replied there, suggesting a rewording for one of your two points, and I'd be glad of your thoughts on it if you have time and disposition to look in. Tim riley (talk) 11:01, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Very pleased you approve of the redraft. Thank you so much for your input. A definite improvement to the article, I think. Best wishes, Tim riley (talk) 00:26, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pokémon the Movie: Genesect and the Legend Awakened may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • That night, the Genesect begin taking over the center of[Pokémon Hills, driving out the other Pokémon and building a giant [[wikt:cocoon|cocoon]]. The

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:13, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SAS (software)

Do I need to re-nominate it to get a new reviewer?

I have a similar problem on Viralheat as well, where a reviewer started a review a month ago, then vanished. CorporateM (Talk) 17:18, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback on a new beta feature called Hovercards

Hello AmericanLemming. We are looking for feedback on a new beta features called Hovercards - https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Beta_Features/Hovercards Would be super useful if you could try the feature and give us your feedback. Also if you have used the navigation popups gadget, we are trying to understand which actions from that gadget are useful. Please comment here - https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Beta_Features/Hovercards&workflow=rt4khfuq1svh8sx3 Thank You, Vibhabamba (talk) 09:58, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Smith hatnote typo

Good Lord, that had been there for ages! I'm astonished neither I nor anybody else ever noticed it! Thank you very much for your sharp eyes. —Cliftonian (talk) 07:13, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation join the new Physiology Wikiproject!

Physiology gives us an understanding of how and why things in the field of medicine happen. Together, let us jumpstart the project and get it going. Our energy is all it needs.

Based on the long felt gap for categorization and improvization of WP:MED articles relating to the field of physiology, the new WikiProject Physiology has been created. WikiProject Physiology is still in its infancy and needs your help. On behalf of a group of editors striving to improve the quality of physiology articles here on Wikipedia, I would like to invite you to come on board and participate in the betterment of physiology related articles. Help us to jumpstart this WikiProject.

  • Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
  • You can tag the talk pages of relevant articles with {{WikiProject Physiology|class=|importance=}} with your assessment of the article class and importance alongwith. Please note that WP:Physiology, WP:Physio, WP:Phy can be used interchangeably.
  • You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing physiology articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
  • We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
  • Why not try and strive to create a good article! Physiology related articles are often small in scope, have available sources, and only a limited amount of research available that is readily presentable!
  • Your contributions to the WikiProject page, related categories and templates is also welcome.
  • To invite other editors to this WikiProject, copy and past this template (with the signature):
  • To welcome editors of physiology articles, copy and past this template (with the signature):
  • You can feel free to contact us on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. You can also put your suggestions there and discuss the scope of participation.

Hoping for your cooperation! DiptanshuTalk 12:47, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into the local language
The Cure Award
In 2013 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you so much for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date medical information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do!

We are wondering about the educational background of our top medical editors. Would you please complete a quick 5-question survey? (please only fill this out if you received the award)

Thanks again :) --Ocaasi, Doc James and the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation

Rodent

Thanks for taking a look. Could you please respond on the talk page again? LittleJerry (talk) 04:16, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Update at talk page. LittleJerry (talk) 18:14, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Dragon Warrior II#Requested move

Page move is proposed; you are invited to discuss it there. --George Ho (talk) 03:53, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 18 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA Cup

AL, Round 3 is almost over, Round 4 is about to begin, and we continue to have success with the GA Cup. We need to figure out some statistics for Round 3, so I thought that asking for your contribution would be a good idea. Your feedback last month was very valuable, and I think it motivated our contestants. Have you seen any results from our efforts? I've noticed, for example, that the articles in the pink backlog box at GAN seem to have been nominated more recently. IOW, the backlag times have seem to be shorter. Of course, that's just my observation; I don't have any real evidence for that. If you could substantiate my observation, or if you have any other effects from this Round, that would be very helpful, and something that I could put in the Round 4 newsletter that'll be published next week. Thanks, and happy New Year. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 18:37, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A cupcake for you!

Thank you for creating User:AmericanLemming/Noteworthy Wikipedians! I think this will be very useful to me as I've run into the same troubles of finding active folks among long member lists that contain mostly inactive folks. Bananasoldier (talk) 18:51, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject TAFI

Hello, AmericanLemming. You're invited to join WikiProject Today's articles for improvement. Feel free to nominate an article for improvement at the project's Nominated articles page. Also feel free to contribute to !voting for new weekly selections at the project's talk page. If interested in joining, please add your name to the list of members. --Bananasoldier (talk) 05:57, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Jurassic world

Thank you for edit. I'm just trying to be accurate without the plot being written too long. I'm assuming you've seen the movie and it's easy to see with the force the Mosasaurus came out of the water she was not what the animal was really going for, she didn't even get chewed smh.Mcelite (talk) 01:37, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Christmas!

Happy Christmas!
Have a happy holiday season. May the year ahead be productive and happy. John (talk) 18:54, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for supporting my RfA

Hawkeye7 RfA Appreciation award
Thank you for participating in and supporting my RfA. It was very much appreciated. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:23, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support

Peacemaker67 RfA Appreciation award
Thank you for participating and supporting at my RfA. It was very much appreciated, and I am humbled that the community saw fit to trust me with the tools. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:57, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings

I was just wondering. How active are you these days around here, AmericanLemming? Would you be interested in some more collaborative work on another GA proposal? I have an idea in mind, somewhat similar to our successful Treblinka nomination. Too bad User:Khazar2 is no longer active to complete our team, but I also know that you'd probably find a good match for a replacement, since you're the sole creator of User:AmericanLemming/Noteworthy Wikipedians. All best to you, Poeticbent talk 14:38, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for asking, Poeticbent. I log in to Wikipedia every day to look at my watchlist and do a little copy-editing (fixing typos, rewording awkward sentences), but that's about it. I would love to collaborate with you again, as I really enjoyed working with you on the Treblinka article, but I simply don't have the time to go through an entire article in a week because of my schoolwork. However, if you aren't in a hurry, I could slowly read and copy-edit an article in a month or two. Anyway, let me know what the article is, and I'll let you know whether or not I have enough time to work on it and how long it would take me to go through it. AmericanLemming (talk) 18:58, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, AmericanLemming. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, AmericanLemming. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:AmericanLemming/Noteworthy Wikipedians

Greetings, seems like you may have misspelled my username there. JoJo Eumerus mobile (talk) 23:15, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. Now, instead of linking to the nonexistent page User:Jo-Jo Humerus, it links to your user page, User:Jo-Jo Eumerus. AmericanLemming (talk) 00:34, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Genetics of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages VCP, OPTN and TBK1 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
ALS is coming along nicely. Thanks for all your hard work. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:39, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
We want to keep the lead fairly concise and in easy to understand language. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:50, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lung cancer

I updated the reference (Harrison's Principles) to the 20th edition, but forgot to update the year. Axl ¤ [Talk] 16:08, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AmericanLemming. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AmericanLemming. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ANG (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ALS

Are you planning to bring to WP:GAN? Added a few links to the text you added and shorted a bit of it. Let me know if you disagree with any of this. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:08, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

The 2018 Cure Award
In 2018 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 17:41, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

The Invisible Barnstar
On behalf of the FAC coordinators, for your unheralded but very helpful regular updates of the FAC statistics page. Thanks/cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 09:35, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not true

This is not at all true or what the sources say. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2019_college_admissions_bribery_scandal&diff=889510374&oldid=889505357 --2604:2000:E010:1100:9CF:31B3:8490:DA3E (talk) 04:31, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thank you for your edits over 2018 to summer 2019 to Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. I appreciate you developing health information in the public benefit. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:02, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into your local language via meta
The 2019 Cure Award
In 2019 you were one of the top ~300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a thematic organization whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:35, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How do you update the GA stats?

Hi, I noticed you've been updating the GA stats. How do you get the numbers looking back? I went to add a row to the table for 1 June but it's now 3 June, so I didn't want to add the wrong values. Enwebb (talk) 19:22, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Enwebb: I've updated the table for 1 June. There is no way to get the numbers looking back as far as I know; that's why I take a screenshot of the Wikipedia:Good articles page at 0:00 UTC on the first day of the month. I usually update the GA stats and FA stats page right away, but I've been a little busy over the past few days and hadn't gone around to it yet. Thanks for the reminder! AmericanLemming (talk) 20:26, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for updating the stats! It's been exciting to see the results of the backlog drive. Enwebb (talk) 22:11, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lung cavitary lesion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aspiration. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Featured article review/archive/September 2015

Wikipedia:Featured article review/archive/September 2015, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Featured article review/archive/September 2015 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Featured article review/archive/September 2015 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Hog Farm Talk 17:14, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting some first level copyedit help

Greetings,

Requesting your visit to article draft Draft:2021 Minar-e-Pakistan mass sexual assault and provide first level help in copyedit if topic interests you.

Just for info: I do select users to be requested from recent changes to related pages from Women related article categories

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 09:52, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trans States Airlines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Compass Airlines.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar of thanks

The Teamwork Barnstar
To AmericanLemming for seeing the problem and the idea for a solution; to Hog Farm for grabbing the bull by the horns and running with it; and to GreenC for setting up fambot to create the report at Wikipedia:Featured articles/mismatches that will save all of us many hours of searching for that missing or extra star populating the Featured article categories. Thank you for the speedy solution to a problem spanning more than a decade. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:49, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Season's greetings and Merry Christmas

Season's greetings and Merry Christmas to you and your family. Have a wonderful holiday season. Cheers! RV (talk) 12:02, 24 December 2021 (UTC) [reply]

Words in Commons

Hi AmericanLemming, Merry Christmas! I was just checking "By the numbers" at The Signpost. One thing I can't figure out is 0.25 words per Commons article. Every Commons pic I look at has much more than that! My guess is that it has to do with the extensive use of templates there. I'll suggest finding an answer there and commenting on it - or just remove Commons from that table. BTW, I'm going to put back that sentence about the length of German words. Bri should love that! I'm off for my annual Christmas vacation, so @Bri: will take the editing from here. Smallbones(smalltalk) 03:27, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe Komposita mit Überlänge ☆ Bri (talk) 04:14, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thank you very much

The Signpost Barnstar
for a very nice job this issue. Smallbones(smalltalk) 02:19, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Silly Boy Blue

Hi. Regarding this, please see MOS:THEMUSIC; "The" in artist names are lowercase mid-sentence. Thanks. – zmbro (talk) (cont) 21:39, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External academic review and publication of Wikipedia pages

Hi Lemming. In case you'd not come across it before, I thought I'd message to ask whether there are any Wikipedia articles that you'd be interested in creating/updating/overhauling and submitting for external, academic peer review.

The WikiJournal of Science (www.wikijsci.org) couples the rigour of academic peer review with the extreme reach of the encyclopedia. For existing Wikipedia articles, it's a great way to get additional feedback from external experts. Peer-reviewed articles are dual-published both as standard academic PDFs, as well as having changes integrated back into Wikipedia. This improves the scientific accuracy of the encyclopedia, and rewards authors with citable, indexed publications. It also provides much greater reach than is normally achieved through traditional scholarly publishing.

Note that we do have to publish under real names, so if you don't want your real name associated to your username, you may have to choose atopic that your username has not previously edited.

Anyway, let me know whether you'd be interested in putting an article through academic peer review (either solo, or with a team of coauthors).

All the best - T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 02:13, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Featured Article subsection

Template:Featured Article subsection has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:25, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]